Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
_______________
Thomas G. Wolpert [ARGUED]
Wolpert Schreiber
527 Main Street
Royersford, PA 19468
Counsel for Appellants
Matthew J. Connell [ARGUED]
Lamb McErlane
24 E. Market Street
P.O. Box 565
West Chester, PA 19381
Counsel for Appellees
_______________
OPINION OF THE COURT
_______________
JORDAN, Circuit Judge.
Appellants Randy Mulholland and Christine Kurtz
appeal a decision of the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania rendered during trial,
granting judgment as a matter of law against them on the
claims they brought under 42 U.S.C. 1983 against Berks
County, Pennsylvania.1 For the following reasons, we will
affirm.
1
I.
Background2
A.
10
11
12
13
14
15
Discussion14
Mulholland and Kurtz reassert on appeal their claim
14
16
17
18
19
Inadequate Investigation
20
21
22
3.
23
24
19
25
B.
26
27
1.
28
29
30
31
24
32
2.
33
25
34
35
III.
Conclusion
36