Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
SPEED TRAP?
DOWN TO BUSINESS
P. 21
P. 24
Internet Evolution
Network policing
in an age of online
freedom P. 32
informationweek.com
Copyright 2008 United Business Media LLC. Important Note: This PDF is provided solely as a reader service. It is not intended for reproduction or public distribution.
For article reprints, e-prints and permissions please contact: PARS International Corp., 102 West 38th Street, Sixth Floor, New York, NY 10018; (212) 221-9595
www.magreprints.com/quickquote.asp
CONTENTS
>>
COVER STORY
24 Content Everywhere
A rising tide of unstructured
data is forcing businesses
to make a choice: Manage all
this contentor drown in it
20 Defending Cyberspace
A key commission on cybersecurity is urging President-elect
Obama to unite initiatives and
expand regulation of cyberspace
21
20
16
Charged up
informationweek.com
Yes, change
needed
CONTENTS
> SOURCES
8 Feedback
15 Editorial Contacts
47 Advertiser and Editorial Indexes
47 Sales Contacts
IN DEPTH
32 The New Traffic Cop Web filtering has
become a lot more than just blocking porn sites and
ESPN, as the threats and tools get more sophisticated
CIO VALUES
41
12 Finances On The
Road Delivery of financial
services via a mobile platform and real-time research
are the next big things for
his industry, says Scottrade
CIO Ian Patterson
> COLUMNS
TECHNOLOGY INDEX
Batteries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .16
MySQL
Blogging platforms
802.11n
Native Client
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .22
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .43
Femtocells
. . . . . . . . . . . .20
. . . . . . .24
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21
Software as a service
. . . . . . . . . . .48
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .22
Storage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18
OpenCL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18
Open source
Web applications
. . . . . . . . . . . .20,
21, 22
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .22
Packet analysis
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .43
Cybersecurity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20, 32
Green IT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .41
Database software
Internet
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .32
Security
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .32
Web filtering
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20
Servers
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18
Data centers
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .21
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .41
Desktop virtualizers
. . . . . . . . . . . . .45
Linux
MIMO antennas
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .43
Smartphone processors
. . . . . . . .18
WiMax
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .32
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20
Wireless . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .43
informationweek.com
R A
esearch
eports
54%
Are concentrating on
core capabilities by
outsourcing noncore
processes
27%
26%
Engage in BPO in
order to reduce risk
nalytics
Analytics
InformationWeek Analytics
delivers comprehensive,
real-world assessments
of critical technologies at
informationweekanalytics.com
>>
Managing
Virtual Servers
Even as virtualization succeeds
in limiting the number of physical servers in the data center,
rampant VM growth is threatening to turn back our hardwon gains. The answer is
strong management, but
where to find it?
>>
Insecurity Of Green
Computing As more organizations establish green computing initiatives and governments enact legislation, the
topic grabs more attention in
the collective consciousness
of CEOs everywhere. But
before you jump into green
tech, there are security risks
to consider.
informationweek.com
Jupiterimages
To find out more about BPO, download the full Analytics Report,
free for a limited time: bpo.informationweek.com
FEEDBACK
Now that bailout is the new black
in tony economic circles, is there
any limit to the governments role
in propping up companies and
markets? Rob Preston
informationweek.com/1213/preston.htm
I think the United States uses an economic model other than capitalist or interventionist. If one were to coin a de-
informationweek.com
Jupiterimages
Googles Schmidt: An
Economic Solution Is
Within Our Grasp
STARTUP CITY
As cloud computing moves from early adopters to the mainstream, its becoming clear that
IT pros need full-featured management tools to get it right. RightScales platform can be
used to deploy and manage virtual servers in Amazons EC2 and other cloud services.
Founded in 2006, RightScale just closed $13 million in second-round funding. John Foley
RIGHTSCALE
HEADQUARTERS Santa Barbara, Calif.
PRODUCT RightScale Platform, a management system and dashboard
for cloud computing services
PRINCIPALS Michael Crandell, co-founder, CEO; Thorsten von Eicken,
co-founder, CTO; Rafael Saavedra, co-founder, VP of engineering
RightScale
is Crandells
third startup
MULTIPLE CLOUDS
THE PLATFORM
OUR TAKE
BACKGROUND
>
TIMELINE
RightScale is
founded
2007
Partners with
FlexiScale, GoGrid
2008
Receives $4.5
million in funding
$13 million in
new funding
informationweek.com
CIO VALUES
On The Job
Size of IT team: More
than 300
IAN PATTERSON
Career Track
CIO
Scottrade
Career accomplishment
Im most proud of: In
2006, Scottrade built a
state-of-the-art data center. I was so proud of my
team for the amount and
quality of work we accomplished in a short period of
time. That project drove
home the value of coming
together and focusing on
the end goal.
>> Banking: Were implementing core banking systems to enhance our product offerings.
>
Vision
The next big thing for my business will be ...
Full delivery of all financial services products via a
mobile platformbeyond account transfers and
streaming quotes. Research will be available in a
fast, real-time capability.
Advice for future CIOs: Learn the business, not
just the technology. An IT professionals key differentiator is understanding the business and converting business needs into technical solutions. If you
dont understand the business, you often try to fit a
round peg into a square hole.
Personal
Colleges/degrees:
University of Arizona,
BS in business administration with a focus on
management information
systems
SEE WHAT OTHER TOP TECH EXECS HAVE TO SAY AT: informationweek.com/topexecs
informationweek.com
P R I N T
O N L I N E
N E W S L E T T E R S
E V E N T S
INFORMATIONWEEK.COM
Mitch Wagner
Executive Editor, Community
mwagner@techweb.com 213-514-5597
Michael Singer
West Coast News Editor
msinger@techweb.com 415-947-6346
Cora Nucci
Managing Editor, Features and Reviews
cnucci@techweb.com 508-416-1130
Roma Nowak
Director, Online Operations and Production
rnowak@techweb.com 516-562-5274
REPORTERS
Charles Babcock
Editor At Large
Open source, middleware, development
tools, databases, virtualization
cbabcock@techweb.com 415-947-6133
Thomas Claburn
Editor At Large
Security, search, Web applications
tclaburn@techweb.com 415-947-6820
Paul McDougall
Editor At Large
Software, IT services, outsourcing
paulmcd@techweb.com 212-600-3187
Mary Hayes Weier
Editor At Large
Enterprise software, business intelligence,
software as a service, RFID
mhayes@techweb.com 734-761-9396
Marianne Kolbasuk McGee
Senior Writer
IT management and careers
mmcgee@techweb.com 508-697-0083
J. Nicholas Hoover
Senior Editor
Desktop software,
Enterprise 2.0 collaboration
nhoover@techweb.com 516-562-5032
Tom LaSusa
Managing Editor, Newsletters
tlasusa@techweb.com
Antone Gonsalves
News Writer
Processors, PCs, servers
antoneg@pacbell.net
Jeanette Hafke
Senior Web Producer
jhafke@techweb.com
Eric Zeman
Mobile and Wireless
eric@zemanmedia.com
Joy Culbertson
Producer jculbertson@techweb.com
EDITORS
INFORMATIONWEEK VIDEO
Mike Fratto
Managing Editor/Labs
Networking and security
mfratto@techweb.com 315-567-9866
informationweek.com/tv
Fritz Nelson
Executive Producer
fnelson@techweb.com
Mary Stevens
Managing Editor/Tech Tracker
mstevens@techweb.com 978-468-2709
Matt Conner
Associate Producer/Editor
mconner@techweb.com
Heather Stanic
Production Assistant
hstanic@techweb.com
CONTRIBUTORS
Michael Biddick mbiddick@nwc.com
Frank Bulk fbulk@nwc.com
Randy George rgeorge@nwc.com
Joe Hernick jhernick@nwc.com
Serdar Yegulalp
Senior Editor
Linux, open source
syegulalp@techweb.com 516-562-5029
Andrew Conry-Murray
New Products and Business Editor
Information and content management
acmurray@techweb.com, 724-266-1310
K.C. Jones
Associate Editor
E-commerce, Web portals, Internet policy
kirconley@techweb.com 212-600-3189
Marin Perez
Associate Editor
Mobile, wireless, smartphones
mperez@techweb.com 415-947-6734
W. David Gardner
News Writer
Networking, telecom
wdavidg@earthlink.net
ADVISORY BOARD
Dave Bent Senior VP and CIO, United
Stationers Inc.
Robert Carter Executive VP and CIO,
FedEx Corp.
Michael Cuddy VP and CIO, Toromont
Industries
Dan Drawbaugh CIO, University of
Pittsburgh Medical Center
Kent Kushar VP and CIO, E.&J. Gallo Winery
Jason Maynard Software Analyst, Credit
Suisse Worldwide
Randall Mott Sr. Executive VP and CIO,
Hewlett-Packard
Jeffrey Neville CIO, Eastern Mountain Sports
Denis OLeary Former Executive VP,
Chase.com
C.K. Prahalad Professor of Business
Administration, University of Michigan
Mykolas Rambus Head of Technology and
Special Projects, Forbes Media
Douglas Rammel Former VP of IS,
Technology, and Integration Operations, the
Sports Licensed Division of the Adidas Group
M.R. Rangaswami Founder, Sand Hill Group
Ralph J. Szygenda Group VP and CIO,
GM Corp.
Craig Watson CEO, Opti-Pay
Technologies LLC
Laurie Zeitlin Senior CIO, Publix Super
Markets Inc.
READER SERVICES
InformationWeek.com The destination
for breaking IT news, career guidance,
interactive tools, and more
COPY DESK
Jim Donahue
Chief Copy Editor jdonahue@techweb.com
Elizabeth A. Chodak
Deputy Copy Chief
echodak@techweb.com
TECHWEB
Tony L. Uphoff, CEO
Bob Evans, Sr. VP and Content Director
Roger Smith
Senior Editor
SOA, Web services,
application infrastructure
rsmith@techweb.com 415-947-6376
R E S E A R C H
Kay Blough
Copy Editor kblough@techweb.com
ART/DESIGN
Mary Ellen Forte
Senior Art Director mforte@techweb.com
Sek Leung
Senior Designer
sleung@techweb.com
Katherine Lechler
Associate Art Director
klechler@techweb.com
INFORMATIONWEEK
ANALYTICS
Subscriptions
Web: informationweek.com/magazine
E-mail: customerservice@informationweek.com
Phone: 888-664-3332 (U.S.)
847-763-9588 (Outside U.S.)
Lorna Garey
Executive Editor, Analytics
lgarey@techweb.com 978-694-1681
Heather Vallis
Managing Editor, Research
hvallis@techweb.com 508-416-1101
informationweekanalytics.com
Art Wittmann
Managing Director
awittmann@techweb.com 408-416-3227
NEWSFILTER
informationweek.com
Content, Content
L
By
Every
where
ernance systems. In addition to being the big bucket for
companies unstructured content, theyre trying to provide a management layer that applies policies to content even if it doesnt sit in the vendors repositories.
Compliance and record retention will move from
something that a few regulated companies do with a subset of documents to something that lots of companies will
do with lots of data, says Mark Lewis, president of EMCs
content management and archiving division.
At the same time, collaboration applicationsfirst and
foremost Microsofts SharePointare getting into the
act. SharePoints organic integration with Office makes it
a strong contender as a content management system.
On top of all this, new initiatives aim to ensure that
ECM platforms balance availability, interoperability,
and management in this sea of information. A push for
interoperability standards is one such initiative (see
story, p. 28).
It makes good sense to have a software layer that
lets companies apply retention and records rules to
business content regardless of where that content resides. Of course, implementing an enterprise-wide
system to manage business content requires significant integration and policy decisions, but the alternativesfailing an e-discovery test, missing a regulatory
requirement, and locking out people and applications
that need to use contentare worse.
The best place to start understanding how to ride
the surge of business content is with collaboration
apps. Theyre responsible for generating a significant
portion of business information, which makes them an
increasingly viable option to control it.
ECM Evolution
Latest products focus on collaboration and
third-party content management
Alfrescos Enterprise 3.0 platform adds Share collaboration
capabilities
EMCs Documentum 6.5 gets new components:
>>>>
>>
>>>>
Risk
IT
organization
As ECM products evolve to manage unstructured info along with content-centric apps, they
provide more tools to help IT address data retention and compliance. Managed content is
easier to find in a discovery exercise.
Business
organization
Bottom Line
As the volume of unstructured business content continues to grow, companies must get it under control.
While meeting compliance and e-discovery requirements are necessary, the evolving ECM market also has
the potential to help companies get more value out of content, not just manage the risk it represents.
informationweek.com
Standard Interface
Will Open New Options
Documentums back-end infrastructure with its compliance and retention capabilities. CenterStage Essentials, now in beta, should be available early next year.
CenterStage, EMC insists, isnt a SharePoint competitor. SharePoint is better positioned as a content services
tool for the masses, says Whitney Tidmarsh, EMCs VP of
worldwide marketing for content management and
archiving. CenterStage is aimed at content-driven applications that pull in users from several companies, she
says.A car manufacturer with a new product design might
want its own design team as well as suppliers using the
app.Employees get full access, and suppliers only get the
portion of the car theyre working on,Tidmarsh says.
But other ECM vendors, particularly IBM and Alfresco,
are going head to head with SharePoint. IBM in October
revealed plans to integrate Lotus Quickr, its collaboration and social networking platform, with its ECM products, including FileNet P8 and IBM Content Manager 8.
Lotus Quickr provides portals and team workspaces for
employees and business partners to share documents
and create blogs and wikis. IBM says the integration will
be available in December with Lotus Quickr 8.1.1.
IBM recently said it would put key content management functions from FileNet Content Manager 4.5 directly into Office 2007s user interface. This would include the ability to search for content across multiple
FileNet repositories, check documents in and out of
FileNet, tap into business process workflows, and integrate with FileNet Records Manager 4.5 to declare Office documents as official records. Both integration efforts are intended to blunt SharePoints advantage
from its close tie with Office.
informationweek.com
OLLABORATION AND
interoperability are shaking
up enterprise content management from the outside,
but forces are also emerging from within
that have the potential to reshape the
market. Two companies in particular, Alfresco and SpringCM, challenge the
dominant deployment model of proprietary, premises-based software.
Alfresco and SpringCM attack the two
major weaknesses of ECM vendors:
cost and time. Its not unusual for a company to drop $1 million on ECM software and services, and Gartner says it
can take six to 18 months to deploy.
With its open source ECM platform,
Alfresco offers key ECM functions, including document management, Web
content management, and collaboration.
It borrows from the Red Hat model by
distributing its software free under a GPL
license and selling a subscription for support, service-level agreements, and access to a community knowledge base.
That usually means a much lower cost
assuming the company has sufficient inhouse knowledge, so the savings arent
MOVING FORWARD
ECM products like Documentum have come a long
way from their origins moving certain content
through specific business processes, such as loan
origination or check processing. This is still their primary role, but ECM vendors are broadening their
informationweek.com
Seagate CIO Mark Brewer has become a true believer in the possibilities.
He started blogging on the wiki system
this spring, and hes evangelizing among
other executivesfor example, suggesting to one manager to file status reports
on the wiki rather than sending a PDF file
around. My eyes have really been
opened to the possibilities, Brewer says.
Seagates wiki is predominately used
by the IT group. It includes a data
warehouse FAQ application, a green IT
site of best practices, and an IT scorecard where people can enter the latest
benchmarks instead of editing a PowerPoint presentation. Some of the content on Seagates Clarity project management software also links from wikis.
A small group collaborates on wiki policies, and another IT group manages
the software, though nobody has it as a
full-time job. Do I have an overhead of
editors? Absolutely not, Brewer says.
Content largely stays on topic because because theres no anonymous
posting, Brewer says. Some parts of
the wiki are built on templates to keep
them from getting confusing.
Among the next steps for Seagate is
setting up a sort of Wikipedia for IT
help where, for example, BlackBerry
users with problems could go for troubleshooting rather than calling IT. Engi-
The
Webs New
By Richard Martin
IN THE EARLY YEARS OF THE INTERNET, protecting your company from unsuitable or unseemly Internet content was simple: Block network access to the
sites people shouldnt visit on company time or equipment. Now, with the number of URLs on the Web hitting 1 trillion, according to Google, thats obviously
not feasible, even as the potential downsides of workers spending time in cyberspaces less-respectable neighborhoods have increased dramatically. Plus,
the dangers arent just limited to those shady sites.
Bottom line: Web filtering has gotten a lot more complicated for companies
than just blocking porn sites and ESPN.
The good news is that an array of companies, from Internet service providers
to third-party applications providers to major security outfits, now supply a
range of tools to monitor and regulate how employees use the company network. At the same time, HR and IT departments have become more sophisticated about how they limit employees Web activities.
Its a rare company that doesnt include some form of acceptable Internet
use policy in its employee handbooks. Theres been an attitudinal shift where
many businesses now view a certain level of personal Web surfing as a natural
Part of an ongoing series assessing the future of the Internet. For more, check out internetevolution.com. Contributors to its ThinkerNet blog
include Jart Armin, editor of RBNexploit.com (about the infamous Russian Business Network) and HostExploit.com, and Michael Mascioni, a
market research consultant in digital media. Internet Evolution also features industry-specific content in its IT Clan and Security Clan sections.
informationweek.com
>
GET GRANULAR
Companies are glad to take advice from their carriers on best-in-class providers, but that doesnt mean
business technology leaders are better off just relying
on a carrier-certified security suite, rather than going
directly to the experts.
The problem with such Internet service providers
playing that Web security role is they arent set up to
provide very granular policy to customers, says Dean
Coza, director of product management for Web security solutions at Websense. The ISPs struggle with the
fact that not everyone is the same, he says.
Founded in 1994, Websense has gone from providing
companies with lists of off-limits URLs and filters that
block them to helping companies protect their essential information and manage information risk, says
Coza. Released in September, the 7.0 version of Web-
informationweek.com
Computing, which sells companies Web filtering, esenses flagship product is at root a Web security gatemail security, intrusion prevention, and firewall softway that goes beyond DPI to dynamic, real-time inspecware. Standalone Web-security companies arent dotion and approval (or blocking) of every Web page and
ing badly, either: Websense, which acquired competitor
every morsel of data traversing a corporate network.
SurfControl a year ago, has reported record revenue
The result: a complete decompile and reassembly
the last few quarters.
of the content, Coza says. Less-specialized DPI sysUnfortunately, theres an arms race at work here:
tems dont do 10% of the content inspection we do,
Even as the tools for protecting corporate networks
he contends. The tool runs scripts in a browser in orgrow more sophisticated and powerful, the threats
der to detect malware that might be hashed or enfrom employees careless or malicious Web surfing
coded within them. The scripts gets executed against
have grown more multifarious. Despite the string of
Websenses heuristics and signatures to determine if
high-profile malware infestations, data leaks, and nonthey carry hidden threats. Then theyre recompiled
compliance disasters, many companies still dont get
and, if they pass muster, delivered to the employee.
it. Every supplier and ISP
Websense calls the process
interviewed for this story
de-obfuscation.
What employee activities
agreed that the level of enSimilarly, Blue Coat,
do you monitor?
terprise IT understanding
which began life as an Inof Web security risks is far
ternet accelerator speeding
49%
behind the reality. Many
delivery of content over
Web browsing behavior
security-industry execubalky networks and then
40%
tives estimate the portion
moved into URL filtering,
Inbound e-mail
of companies using the
has broadened its business
37%
most up-to-date Web proto include a tool that runs
Outbound e-mail
tection and filtering tools at
executable scripts from the
less than 20%.
Web through 10 different
33%
The responsibility is up
scanning engines. Blue
Use of networks, servers, applications
to the user or the company,
Coats ProxySG appliances
31%
not the ISP, says Terrence
let operators like BT and
Attempts to access sensitive
Brewton, research analyst
Sprint monitor Web surfing
applications or data
at consulting firm Frost &
activity and issue alerts and
12%
Sullivan. Ultimately, the
block content based on preEmployee activity in blogs,
ISPs say, We provide backdefined company policies
social networking sites
bone, we can offer you
as well as monitoring for
some tools, but thats all we
viruses and other mali33%
can do, Brewton says.
cious code. Running traffic
We dont monitor our employees
At this point, IT executhrough scanning engines
Data: InformationWeek Analytics 2008 Strategic Security Study
tives
have four options:They
and antivirus software from
of 1,097 business technology professionals
can choose among the secumultiple vendors, including
rity and Web-monitoring
major security companies
tools and assemble a multivendor solution that works for
like Symantec and rivals such as Websense, the comtheir company. They can work through their ISP, assumpany claims record revenue for the last two years.
ing it offers consulting and services for such tools. They
We sell a lot of infrastructure to service providers,
can rely on built-in software from their network equipsays Carrie Oakes, VP of product marketing. They in
ment vendor, such as Cisco or Nortel, or network security
turn offer on-premises services to large companies and
provider, like Symantec. Or they can do nothing.
managed services to small and midsize businesses
Option four isnt the way to go, no matter what comlooking for the same type of filtering capability.
pany it is. Fortunately, the range of choices that the other
Major network vendors and security companies,
options provide is broad enough to offer help to just
meanwhile, have been on an acquisition spree to add
about every company trying to strike a balance between
similar technologies for deep-packet inspection and
giving employees the online freedom they need to be
secure Web gateways. In early 2007, Cisco spent $830
productive and keeping the network healthy and safe.
million to buy IronPort, a provider of mail-filtering appliances and data-loss prevention systems. Just last
month, McAfee paid $465 million to acquire Secure
Write to us at iweekletters@techweb.com.
informationweek.com
INFORMATIONWEEK ANALYTICS
HILE DATA CENTER ARCHITECTS have weathered much change over the past decades,
theres a transformation on the way bigger than anything weve yet seen as data centers decisively move from business necessity to strategic advantage. Meanwhile, IT is working to
understand how trendsincluding virtualization, cloud computing, escalating power densi-
>
35%
Less than
last year
25%
More than
last year
36%
Same as
last year
Data: InformationWeek survey of 279 business
technology professionals
Get the full Analytics Report, free for a limited time: datacenter.informationweek.com
informationweek.com
INFORMATIONWEEK ANALYTICS
data center expansion was stopped cold because the
building couldnt structurally support the new infrastructure and projected data center weight loads.
For some, the answer has been to outsource. In our
recent InformationWeek Analytics report on cloud computing, we found that virtualization has enabled service
providers to offer shared platforms at a fraction of the
cost of physical facilities, significant because 68% in that
poll indicated that cost was the most important factor
in moving toward this model. This is driving the apparently supercharged growth of behemoth data centers,
with Google, IBM, Microsoft and co-location providers
spending billions on new sites. All have placed great
emphasis on energy-efficient construction methods.
3%
Not sure
10%
Less than
last year
36%
Same as
last year
Data: InformationWeek survey of 279 business
technology professionals
most of us to meet growing demand will be to incrementally increase the efficiency of older facilities that
likely werent built to handle modern loads.
Efficiency is not just about energy. In the data center, its also about squeezing the last dollar out of what
has been invested and extending a resources life for
as long as possible. Much of the disproportionate
growth in data center investment is
being driven by inefficient mechanical and electrical infrastructure design, and thats where a facilities
partnership comes in.
Efficient designs also mean giving
up entrenched data center stereotypes. Who wants to design a mission-critical facility that breaks with
the tradition of a raised floor, or runs
at 80 degrees? Yet, as we discuss in
our full report, thats just what leaders like Google are doing, at great
economic advantage. Their lessons
can be used in our legacy data centers. In addition, in our practice
weve found that its considered cutting edge for a facility to monitor itself as a total system and dynamically respond based on sensing
resource demands, rather than on
preprogrammed schedules. This, too,
is changing as centralized monitoring, control, and intelligent software
become more affordable.
Kenneth Miller has more than 15 years of
experience implementing complex IT systems and is currently a data center architect with Midwest ISO. Contact him at
kmiller@nwc.com.
informationweek.com
TECH
TRACKER
For IT By IT
THE LOWDOWN
THE PROMISE 802.11n, with theoretical data rates to 600 Mbps, can
deliver faster cells with better signal quality and has the potential to decrease
overall infrastructure costs and enable new applications.
>>
THE PLAYERS Many spectrum analysis tools developed for 802.11a/g will
work with 802.11n. Bigger vendors, including AirMagnet, Berkeley Varitronics,
Cisco, and Fluke Networksalong with smaller players like AirSleuth and
MetaGeekprovide tools that characterize the spectrum in which 11n operates. However, packet analysis will require a new breed of tools. AirMagnet,
WildPackets, and Cace Technologies (AirPcap) are players in the 802.11n
packet analysis market.
>>
THE PROSPECT Those blistering data rates dont come easy. And 802.11n
shares spectrum with legacy protocols. To squeeze the most out of 802.11n
wireless environments, a well-thought-out game plan and a decent toolkit are
required. Understanding 802.11ns nuances will be half the support battle, and
knowing what tool to use for a specific problem will be the other half.
>>
TECHTRACKER
TECHTRACKER
urations can drastically
802.11n will come much
DIG DEEPER
alter a given cell shape
cheaper than for organizaTHE FAST CROWD 802.11n is becoming a viable platform
and size. Again, survey
tions that need an infrafor mission-critical networks. Really. Find out whos offering
what. Download this free InformationWeek Report at:
and modeling tools must
structure upgrade to get
informationweek.com/alert/802.11n.htm
address all 802.11n variready for it. But even if
ables to be as effective as
companies face substantial
See all our Reports at informationweekreports.com
possible.
up-front costs to revamp
In addition, because one goal of
Survey to virtually plan WLANs,
their infrastructure, the advanthe survey process is to predict
followed by feet-on-the-ground
tages of high-speed wireless
and ensure (as much as possible)
verification.
greater mobility and portability
minimum data rates, 11n-oriented
Post-installation support means
among themwill make its adopsurvey products must deliver
monitoring the airspace to find
tion an imperative.
graphical what-if reporting abilcompeting or offending signals
Along with an overall better raities that reflect hundreds of poand packet analysis with commerdio environment, 802.11n is good
tential scenarios for each access
cial or open source tools to reveal
news for the applications that run
point thats being considered.
connectivity or application issues.
o n i t . Fo r ex a m p l e, w i r e l e s s
Wireless packet analysis is alThese basic premises dont
streaming video and voice over a
ready complex in 11a/g networks,
change with 802.11n, but the unwireless LAN should perform
and it gets even more so with 11n.
derlying mechanics can take on a
more reliably and predictably with
Because of MIMO, the location of
whole new feel, depending on
802.11n. And although ratification
the client becomes critical in atwhich of the many options and opof the final standard is still possitempting to get an accurate read
erational modes are invoked.
bly a year away, vendors such as
on the traffic. Ideally, the capture
happens at one or both endpoints.
Evolution Of 802.11n
Although the wireless payload
will remain the same in 11a/g and
2007
2009/2010
2004
2008
802.11n networks, traffic headers
Draft 2 of 802.11n
Additional options
Work begins
Finalization
and
how traffic is fragmented may
completed; Wi-Fi
for 802.11n to be
on 802.11n
of Draft 7 of
Alliance starts
finalized next year;
standard
802.11n base
differ, which may be a concern to
interoperability
ratification expected
standard and
those who like to go deep on
testing
in early 2010
some features
packet analysis.
802.11ns channel bonding, different guard intervals that ma802.11a/g spectrum analyzer
AirMagnet, Berkeley Varitronics
tools from AirMagnet, Cisco, Fluke
nipulate interframe spacing, frame
Systems, and Ekahau already are
Networks, MetaGeek, and others
aggregation options, and the numoffering 802.11n-capable support
will still find noise and interferber of antennas, will redefine what
tools to ease implementation as
ence. Its logical to expect that anwireless traffic looks like. Analysis
well as transition.
alyzers will eventually detect
tools must support the full suite of
802.11n
devices
along
with
everyoptions in the draft standard in orSURVEY SAYS
thing
they
can
classify
today.
der to be effective when the final
Before 11n networks can be inFor
survey
products,
802.11n
reversion is approved.
stalled (or current 11a/g networks
ally
raises
the
bar.
Cells
tend
to
For WLAN administrators whove
can be upgraded to 11n), organhave
increased
data
rates
at
farbeen
in the game for a while,
izations will need to survey the
ther
distances,
so
youll
need
to
re802.11n
brings a whole new bag of
spaces to be covered or resurvey
learn
the
fundamentals
of
survey
intricacies
to be reconciled, both
areas where current WLANs live.
procedures.
The
new
standard
can
before
and
after
installation. Some
This is because 802.11n works in
use multiple channel bonding that
existing toolsmainly spectrum
the same frequency slices (2.4 and
doubles spectrum width to achieve
analyzersare still relevant in their
5 GHz) as 802.11a/g networks.
higher data rates, so survey tool
current incarnations. But for packet
For most of us, the site survey
providers need to accommodate
analysis and survey work, make
has become an exercise in mergthe new options in their various alsure your tools are tuned to
ing the virtual with the physical,
lowed combinations for 11n cells.
802.11n, or youll be missing a lot.
using a modeling tool like AirMIMO antennas in various configMagnet Surveyor or Ekahau Site
LEE BADMAN (lbadman@nwc.com)
>
>
>
>
informationweek.com
Rolling Review
BUSINESS CONTACTS
INDEXES
FOR ADVERTISING AND SALES CONTACTS
go to createyournextcustomer.com/contact-us
or call John Siefert (949) 223-3642.
EDITORIAL INDEX
AirMagnet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
AirSleuth. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
Alfresco . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24, 28, 29
Angel.com . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
Appirio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
AT&T . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Berkeley Varitronics Systems. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
Blue Coat Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
Boston Power . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
BT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
Cisco. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32, 43
Commission on Cyber Security for the 44th Presidency . . . . . 20
Cox Communications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
Dell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Ekahau . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
EMC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24. 28
First Energy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
Fluke Networks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
Google . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16, 22, 41
Harrahs Entertainment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Hewlett-Packard. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
IBM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24, 28, 41
IT Mill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
LG Electronics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
MessageLabs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
MetaGeek . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
Microsoft. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22, 24, 41, 48
MindTouch . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
OpenText . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24, 28
Pfizer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
Publicis Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
RightScale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Red Mountain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
Salesforce.com . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16, 48
ScanSafe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
Scottrade . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Seagate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
SpringCM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
Sprint . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20, 32
Sun Microsystems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18, 21
Symantec . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
Twitter. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Verizon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20, 33
Verizon Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
Verizon Wireless . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
VMware. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
Websense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
ADVERTISER INDEX
American Power Conversion www.apc.com . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Autonomy www.autonomy.com. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C2, 1
dtSearch Corp. www.dtsearch.com . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
Eaton www.powerware.com . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
Hewlett-Packard www.hp.com. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C4
Hypoint www.hypoint.com . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
IBM www.ibm.com. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21, 23, 34, 35, 38, 39
SALES CONTACTSEVENTS
District Manager, Maryanne Russo
(516) 562-5096, mrusso@techweb.com
Director, Event Operations, Jennifer Russo
(516) 562-5094, jrusso@techweb.com
MARKETING AND RESEARCH
Associate Publisher, Marketing, Winnie Ng-Schuchman
(516) 562-5982, wng@techweb.com
Director of Marketing, Sherbrooke Balser
(949) 223-3605, sbalser@techweb.com
Research Director, Amy Doherty
(508) 416-1168, adoherty@techweb.com
Director of Online Research, Donna Fabyonic
(516) 562-5016, dfabyonic@techweb.com
Senior Marketing Manager, Ellen Asuncion
(949) 223-3622, easuncion@techweb.com
Field Marketing/Sales Ops Manager,
Monique Luttrell (415) 947-6304, mluttrell@techweb.com
AUDIENCE DEVELOPMENT
Sr. Group Director, Scott Popowitz
(516) 562-7919, spopowitz@techweb.com
Director, Karen McAleer
(516) 562-7833, kmcaleer@techweb.com
Subscriptions (800) 453-7221
ADVERTISING AND PRODUCTION
Publishing Services Manager, Lynn Choisez
(516) 562-5581 Fax: (516) 562-7307
Publishing Manager, Ruth Duggan (516) 562-5111
MAILING LISTS
MeritDirect LLC (914) 368-1024
REPRINTS AND RIGHTS
For article reprints, e-prints, and permissions, please contact:
PARS International Corp.
Phone: (212-221-9595 x426
Fax: (212) 221-9195
E-mail: TechWebReprints@parsintl.com
Back Issues, Chandra Wallis (800) 444-4881
BUSINESS OFFICE
Senior Business Manager, Marian Dujmovits
EDITORIAL OFFICE
(Fax) 516-562-5036
United Business Media LLC, 600 Community Drive,
Manhasset, N.Y. 11030 (516) 562-5000
Copyright 2008. All rights reserved.
TECHWEB
Tony L. Uphoff, CEO
Bob Evans, Sr. VP and Content Director
Eric Faurot, Sr. VP, Live Events Group
Joseph Braue, Sr. VP, Light Reading Comm. Group
John Siefert, VP and Publisher, InformationWeek Business
Technology Network
Scott Vaughan, VP, Marketing Services
John Ecke, VP, Financial Technology Group
Greg Kerwin, VP, Global Development
John Dennehy, VP, Finance
Beth Rivera, VP, Human Resources
Jill Thiry, Publisher, Microsoft Technology Group
Fritz Nelson, Executive Producer, TechWeb TV
Scott Popowitz, Sr. Group Dir., Audience Development
informationweek.com
INFORMATIONWEEK (ISSN 8750-6874) is published weekly, with a combined issue in December, by United Business Media LLC,
600 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY 11030. INFORMATIONWEEK is free to qualified management and professional personnel involved
in the management of information systems. One-year subscription rate for U.S. is $199.00; for Canada is $219.00. Registered for GST as
United Business Media LLC. GST No. R13288078, Customer No. 2116057, Agreement No. 40011901. Return undeliverable Canadian
addresses to Bleuchip International, P.O. Box 25542, London, ON, N6C 6B2. Overseas air mail rates are: Africa, Central/South America,
Europe, and Mexico, $459.00 for one year. Asia, Australia, and the Pacific, $489.00 for one year. Mail subscriptions with check or money
order in U.S. dollars payable to INFORMATIONWEEK. For subscription renewals or change of address, please include the mailing label
and direct to Circulation Dept., INFORMATIONWEEK, P.O. Box 1093, Skokie, IL 60076-8093. Periodicals postage paid at Manhasset,
NY, and additional mailing offices. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to INFORMATIONWEEK, United Business Media LLC, P.O.
Box 1093, Skokie, IL 60076-8093. Address all inquiries, editorial copy, and advertising to INFORMATIONWEEK, 600 Community Drive,
Manhasset, NY 11030. PRINTED IN THE USA
DOWNTOBUSINESS
ROB PRESTON
informationweek.com