Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
ABSTRACT
Constraint means some drawbacks or in efficiency in any type of Research Constraints are the only substitute
of creating innovations in coming future for coming generations. But suggestions are the research proposals found in
miniature form may yield the noble of success. Here the researchers want to submit both constraints and suggestions in
communication system among farmers and farm women community in Keonjhar Dist.of Odisha. This is a quality
Refinement through technology transfer and hi-tech communication system pattern. The Following Constraints and
Suggestions were illustrated with live discussion mode which was carried out in 2016 under the Sponsorship of Dept. Of
Extension Education, College of Agriculture, OUAT, Bhubaneswar.
KEYWORDS: Constraint, Communication, Suggestion
Original Article
intellect of Researchers for reflection of truths before Agriculture Scientists for Technology Advancement and
Received: May 23, 2016; Accepted: Jun 08, 2016; Published: Jun 15, 2016; Paper Id.: IJEEFUSJUN201612
INTRODUCTION
Keonjhar District is a Tribal dominated District and it undergoes 5th schedule area as per PESA act being
implemented by Govt. Still OBC, General and SC families were established since the rules of British and past
kingdoms. Constraints in communication system play an important role in the realm of development of a human
civilisation. Though there are many communication sources, systems, channels still the people are lagging behind
the development. The reason behind it may be due to incompatibility, in efficiency and unable to transfer the
appropriate communication to people in right time, proper place with suitable system befitted with peoples dialect,
culture and their norms. Due to constraints the communication system may fail to transcribe the message, the
latest technology so communication gap may occur. The involvement of people and interaction with source,
channel with regular manner and with effective mode may bridge the gap between communication system and
communication clients. Here the researchers have emphasized the communication system constraints being faced
by farmers and farmwomen of Keonjhar Dist. and submitting the poor farmers demand via their valuable, needy
and heartfelt suggestions for coming researchers and policymakers in order to upgrade the farming community
with best communication systems being facilitated by Govt-University-NGO-COMPANY as a role model of
Research-Academia-Extension-Farmer-Communication model being thought by them.
The objective of research is to list out the communication constraints with the farmers and farmwomen in
www.tjprc.org
editor@tjprc.org
104
105
Frequency
Percentage
Rank
Order
Frequency
79
65.83
III
87
72.5
67
55.83
IV
89
84
70
II
91
75.83
POOLED DATA
Frequency
Percentage
Rank
Order
IV
166
69.16
III
74.16
III
156
65.00
IV
91
75.83
II
175
72.91
II
101
84.16
192
80.00
It was clear from the Table 4.6.1. that majority of farmers(75.83 percent) were admitting that Lack of Empathy
ranked one followed by Improper communication skill (70 percent) placed second rank,In effective environment
(65.83 percent) third rank and inadequate knowledge(55.83 percent) 4th rank.
Similarly, in case of Farm women the constraints were Lack of empathy(84.16 percent) ranked one followed by
Improper communication skill (75.83 percent) placed second rank,In effective environment (74.16 percent) third rank
and inadequate knowledge(72.5) 4th rank.
The findings leads to concluded that source related constraints were same for Farmers and farm women..So it was
therefore suggested that for execution of smoother communication systems among farmers and farm women the trainers
should have empathy on them, the communication skill must be fitted with the local culture and dialect which should be
very simple and generalization must be in proper manner. Effective environment and climate setting should be given
priority during imparting training. Adequate knowledge regarding topic to be delivered was very important. In this way we
could overcome the draw backs of source related constraints. The graphical presentation of source related constraints was
as below.
Figure 1
www.tjprc.org
editor@tjprc.org
106
Table 4.6.2
2. Message Related
Constraints
No need based message
Un time message
Inadequate message
content
In applicable message
Ambiguous message
Less understood message
87
96
72.5
80.00
V
III
103
99
85.84
82.5
I
II
190
195
79.16
81.25
IV
II
89
74.16
IV
85
70.84
IV
174
72.50
84
98
101
70
81.67
84.16
VI
II
I
78
94
103
65
78.34
85.84
V
III
I
162
192
204
67.50
80.00
85.00
VI
III
I
The Table 4.6.2 depicted that the majority of farmer respondents (84.16 percent) were giving first rank to
Less understood message. The second and third major constraints were Ambiguous message (81.67 percent) and Un
time message (80 percent).The other topmost constrains in order of importance were Inadequate message content
(74.16 percent), No need based message (72.5 percent), and In applicable message (70 percent) ranked fourth,fifth and
sixth respectively.
Simillarly incase of farmwomen the message related constraints were Less understood message(85 percent)
ranked one followed by Un time message (81.25 percent) placed second rank, Ambiguous message (80 percent) third
rank, No need based message (74.16 percent) fourth rank.,In adequate message content(72.50 percent) fifthrank and
In applicable message(67.50 percent) sixth rank resp[ectively.
The study therefore concluded that all the parameters contained in the table may be considered as important
constraint and all possible remedial measures including convey of appropreate message to farmers and farm women is
desirable along with proper treatment and transmission of messages for achieving communication by effective
message.The graphical presentation was presented as below.
Figure 2
Table 4.6.3
3. Channel related
constraints
In appropriate channel of
message delivery
Unreached channel
No information on channel
In ability to use the channel
Impact Factor (JCC): 3.0965
98
81.66
105
87.5
203
84.58
88
78
84
73.33
65
70
II
IV
III
91
68
89
75.83
56.66
74.16
II
IV
III
179
146
173
74.58
60.83
72.03
II
IV
III
NAAS Rating: 3.63
107
From the above table 4.6.3 we might be concluded that majority of the farmer were facing In appropriate channel
of message delivery (81.66 percent) constraint which was ranked first followed by the other constraints in order of
importance were Unreached channel(73.33 percent) ranked second,Inability to use the channel(70 percent) ranked
third and No information on channel(65 percent) ranked fourth and perceived as last constraint among all. According to
the findings obtained from the farmers who were facing much problem in channel related constraints by above means
which should be considered with possible remedial majors by appropreate channelization and treatment of channel in a
sustainable way.
Simillarly in case of farm women the following channel related constraints were described as below
In appropriate channel of message delivery(87.5 percent) ranked one followed by Unreached channel(75.83 percent)
ranked second, In ability to use the channel(74.16 percent) placed third rank and the last ranked constraint was No
information on channel(56.66 percent).
Henceforth the study concluded that the channel related constraints faced by farmers and farm women were same
and this constraints can be minimized by using best and appropreate channels.The graphical presentation was given below.
Figure 3
Table 4.6.4
4.System constraints
Systematic distoration
of message
Fog distoration
Mirage distoration
Over lapping of
message
EntropyDisorganization of
message
Problem in treatement
of message
37
30.83
VI
39
32.5
76
31.66
VI
43
50
35.83
41.66
V
IV
34
53
28.33
44.16
VI
IV
77
103
32.08
42.91
V
IV
101
84.16
98
81.66
II
199
82.91
84
70.00
III
88
73.33
III
172
71.66
III
89
74.16
II
102
85
191
79.58
II
The above Table 4.6.4 reflected the expression of respondents in terms of System constraints, amongst which rank
one goes to Over lapping of message(84.16 percent) because from many study we found that overlapping of message
creates problems during communication and another expressions submitted by respondents were Problem in treatement of
www.tjprc.org
editor@tjprc.org
108
message(74.16 percent) placed second rank followed by Entropy-Disorganization of message(70 percent) placed third
rank, Mirage distoration(41.66 percent) placed fourth rank,Fog distoration(35.83 percent) placed fifth rank Last and
most important constraints found in every where was Systematic distoration of message (30.83 percent) placed sixth rank.
Simillarly incase of farmwomen the system related constraints were overlapping of message(85 percent) ranked
one followed by Problem in treatement of message(81.66 percent) placed second rank, Entropy-Disorganization of
message(73.33 percent) third rank, mirage distoration(44.16 percent) fourth rank., Systematic distoration of message
(32.5 percent) fifthrank and fog distoration(28.33 percent) sixth rank respectively.
Therefore from the above findings,we might be suggested that the suitable measures should be taken for avoiding
the system related constraints.The graphical presentation of system related constraints were as below.
Figure 4
Table 4.6.5
5. Miscellaneous
constraints
Technical jargons
Confusion to encode and
decode message
Humiscical attitude for
cope up with
understanding the message
Low profile mental ability
for clarifying message
100
83.33
II
110
91.66
210
87.5
102
85
108
90
II
192
80.00
II
74
61.66
IV
81
67.5
IV
155
64.58
IV
84
70
III
93
77.5
III
177
73.75
III
The above Table 4.6.5 reflected the expression of farmer respondents in terms of Miscellaneous constraints,
amongst which rank one goes to Confusion to encode and decode message(85 percent).Similarly another expressions
submitted by respondents were Technical jargons(83.33 percent) ranked second followed by Low profile mental ability
for clarifying message(70 percent) ranked third.The Last and most important constraints found in every where was
Humiscical attitude for cope up with understanding the message(61.66 percent).
Simillarly incase of farmwomen the miscellaneous constraints were Technical Jargons(91.66 percent)ranked one
followed by Confusion to encode and decode message (90 percent) placed second rank, Low profile mental ability for
Impact Factor (JCC): 3.0965
109
clarifying message (77.5 percent) third rank, and Humiscical attitude for cope up with understanding the message (67.5
percent) placed fourth and least perceived miscellaneous constraint among all.
From the study we might be concluded that farmers and farm women perceived most important constraints were
technical jargons and confusion to encode and decode the message as the respondents were less prompt and educated
regarding this cumbersome work.So here the suggestion was made for creating natural and general form of messages
which would befitted to them.The graphical presentations of the miscellaneous constraints were as below.
Figure 5
Table 4.6.6: Nature of constraints :- (Communication of Message to Respondent)
A. Physical
Constraints
FARMERS N=120
POOLED DATA
Frequency
Percentage
Rank
Order
Frequency
Percentage
Rank
Order
Frequency
Percentage
Rank Order
81
67.5
III
100
83.33
II
181
75.41
II
67
55.83
IV
89
74.16
IV
156
65
IV
83
69.16
II
97
80.83
III
180
75
III
88
73.33
103
85.83
191
79.58
Training place
is not suitable
Inaudible voice
of
communicator
Improper
timing of
communication
Improper
arrangement
The Table 4.6.6. depicted about various physical constraints with respect to communication being opined by
farmers and farmwomen.
Farmers were giving Rank one constraints to Improper arrangements(73.33 percent) during imparting training
and related activities followed by other important. constraints were Improper timing of communication(69.16 percent)
ranked second, training place is not suitable(67.5 percent) placed third rank and the last ranked constraint was
Inaudible voice of communication(55.83 percent).
Simillarly
incase
of
farmwomen
the
constraints
in
order
of
importance
were
described
as
Improperarrangement(85.83 percent) ranked one followed by training place is not suitable(83.33 percent) ranked
two.Simillarly another important constraints were Improper timing of communication(80.83 percent) ranked third and
the last constraints was Inaudible voice of communicator(74.16 percent)
www.tjprc.org
editor@tjprc.org
110
Therefore from the above study we might be concluded that physical facilities should be provided as per the
requirement of farmer and farmwomen.The graphical presentation of constraints were as below.
Figure 6
Table 4.6.7
B. Psychological
Constraints
Language not
understood
Lack of empathy
by the sender
Lack of
communication
between sender
and receiver
Lack of need
based message
FARMERS N=120
POOLED DATA
Frequency
Percentage
Rank
Order
Frequency
Percentage
Rank Order
Frequency
Percentage
Rank
Order
86
71.66
IV
89
74.16
IV
175
72.91
IV
87
72.5
III
98
81.66
II
185
77.08
III
91
75.83
II
97
80.83
III
188
78.33
II
95
79.16
104
86.66
199
82.91
The Table 4.6.7 reflected the expression of farmer respondents in terms of Psychological constraints, amongst
which rank one goes to Lack of need based message(79.16 percent) Similarly another expressions submitted by
respondents were Lack of communication between sender and receiver(75.83 percent) ranked second followed by Lack
of empathy by the sender(72.5 percent) ranked third and the last perceived constraint was Language not understood(71.66
percent).
Simillarly incase of farmwomen the topmost constraints were described as Lack of need based message(86.66
percent) ranked one followed by Lack of empathy by sender(81.66 percent) placed second rank, Lack of communication
between sender and receiver(80.83 percent) ranked third and the last perceived rank was Language not understood
(74.16 percent) ranked fourth among all constraints.
The above findings leads to concluded that whenever conducting communication between farmers and
farmwomen psychological entities should be taken as priority and accordingly the easier communication might be
conducted by considering Intelligent quotient,mind mapping and emotional quotient.
The graphical presentation of psychological constraints was as below.
111
Figure 7
Table 4.6.8
C. Cultural
constraints
FARMERS N=120
POOLED DATA
Frequency
Percentage
Rank
Order
41
34.16
III
103
85.83
144
60
III
67
55.83
II
89
74.16
III
156
65
II
81
67.5
102
85
II
183
76.25
Restricted family
values
Lack of
cosmopoliteness
Lack of family
support
Frequency
Percentage
Rank
Order
Frequency
Percentage
Rank
order
The Table 4.6.8 depicted about various cultural constraints with respect to communication being opined by
farmers and farmwomen.
Farmers opined about their cultural constraints inorder of importance were Lack of family support(67.5 percent)
ranked one followed by Lack of cosmopoliteness (55.83 percent) and the last perceived constraint was Restricted family
values(34.16 percent) placed third rank.
Simillarly the cultural constraints were expressed by farmwomen were Restricted family values(85.83 percent)
ranked one followed by Lack of family support(85 percent) and Lack of cosmopoliteness ranked third as per their
opinion.
Therefore from the above study it might be concluded that for maintaining proper communication we should
follow acculturazitation policy and providing flexibility in order to achieve Happy Index in humanbeings.The graphical
presentation of cultural constraints were presented as below.
www.tjprc.org
editor@tjprc.org
112
Figure 8
State Suggestion for Growth and Development of Communication System among Farmers and Farm Women
Table 4.6.9
Suggestions From
Respondents
Information regarding
input, latest technology
and market should be
given in time
Regular visit of
Scientists/Govt.official
s for helping them
A trustworthy
information and
communication system
is desirable
Village level
information kiosks and
common service centre
is needed
More exposure visits,
exhibition and
demonstration is
needed
Local languages should
be given priority and
local resource persons
needed for imparting
training
Quality support service
should be provided
during training and out
station visit
Need based and timely
training and
demonstrations, trials
should be given
priority
Zero discrimination
and avoid of ego
should be followed by
resource person
Resource materials
should be simple with
local language and
more pictures with
illustrations will be
added
FARMERS N=120
POOLED DATA
Frequency
Percentage
Rank
Order
100
83.33
VI
102
85
VII
202
84.16
IX
110
91.66
II
113
94.16
223
92.91
II
100
83.33
VI
106
88.33
VI
206
85.83
VIII
101
84.16
108
90
209
87.08
VII
103
85.83
IV
97
80.83
IX
200
83.33
113
94.16
111
92.5
III
224
93.33
110
91.66
II
100
83.33
VIII
240
87.5
VI
105
87.5
III
109
90.83
IV
214
89.16
IV
99
82.5
VII
112
93.33
II
211
87.91
110
91.66
II
112
93.33
II
222
92.5
III
Frequency
Percentage
Rank
Order
Frequency
Percentage
Rank
order
The table 4.6.9. presented the opinions,views and suggestions of Farmers and Farmwomen being collected by
Impact Factor (JCC): 3.0965
113
www.tjprc.org
editor@tjprc.org
114
Figure 9
CONCLUSIONS
Constraints in communication system in peoples strata (Here farming community) can be minimized by accepting
best communication models, communication channels and communication networks which should be economically viable,
culturally compatible, socially acceptable and for people it must be suitable and feasible. So, the message for all
communication researcher and clients please follow the citation of Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Man needs his difficulties
because they are necessary to enjoy success it resembles with Constraints are the Mother of Invention.
Invented Model of Communication System
Figure 10
115
by integrating Research stratum from Communication sources, communication channels being refined by Research
organizations and effectively interpreted by academia means university/organization and for practically useful extension
stratum may help the clients to reach effective communication by being influenced by communication system with a
sustainable way.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We are thankful to almighty for his Oceanic blessings and feel enthusiastic by contributing this article to the
Society for Devt. of Farmers and Farm women in general and Research scientist in particular.
REFERENCES
1.
Angell, I.O. & Smithson S. (1991). Information systems management: opportunities and risks. London: Macmillan.
2.
Brokensha, D., Warren, D.M. & Werner, O. (1980). Indigenous knowledge and development. Washington, DC: The University
Press of America.
3.
Cavallo, R.E. (1982). Systems methodology in social science research: recent developments. Boston, MA: Kluwer Publishing.
4.
Checkland, P.B. (1981). Systems thinking, systems practice. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons.
5.
Checkland, P. & Holwell. S. (1998). Information, systems and information systems: making sense of the field.Chichester, UK:
John Wiley and Sons.
6.
7.
Cramer, D. (1998). Fundamental statistics for social research: step-by-step calculations and computer techniques using SPSS
for Windows.London: Routledge.
8.
Cronbach, L.J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychsometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
9.
Demiryurek, K. (2006). Distance education for rural people in developing countries: Turkish experience. Journal of Extension
Systems, 22(2), 83-94.
10. Demiryurek, K. (2000). The analysis of information systems for organic and conventional hazelnut producers in three villages
of the Black Sea Region, Turkey. Unpublished doctoral dissertation,University of Reading, Reading, UK.
11. Garforth, C. (2001). Agricultural knowledge and information systems in Hagaz, Eritrea. SD Dimensions. Retrieved 16 May,
2008 from http://www.fao.org/sd/2001/KN1001a_en.htm (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/5XrUS2mZh)
12. Garforth, C. & Usher, R. (1996). Methodologies for analysing and improving the effectiveness of promotion and uptake
pathways for renewable natural resources information and technology: a review paper.Reading: AERDD, The University of
Reading. (Working Paper 96/8.)
INSTITUTIONAL SOURCES
www.tjprc.org
editor@tjprc.org
116
Panchayat Raj Institutes of Respective area, Block office & Collectorate, Keonjhar
ICAR-CIWA Bhubaneswar
Behera under the guidance of Dr. Bibhuti Prasad Mohapatra of Dept. of Extension Education, College of Agriculture,
OUAT, Bhubaneswar as Chairman and Chief guide of Research Committee. Dr. B. Parasar,Prof and HOD, Dr.R.K. Mishra
and Dr.A.K. Parida are the Members of the Research Committee for guidance and help in every aspects.
Endnotes:-This is a Students research work for partialfullfillment of Doctoral degree as per UGC/ICAR and
SAU rules.