Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Department of Education
Region IV-A CALABARZON
Calamba East District
Cluster I
TO BE FILLED DURING
EVALUATION
TIMELI
NE
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
(5)
Outstandin
g
(4)
Very
Satisfactor
y
Had all parts
of DLP with
very
appropriate
1 | CANHS-IPCRF SY2015-2016
(3)
Satisfactor
y
(2)
Unsatisfact
ory
Had
incomplete
parts of DLP
with
inappropriat
e and
inadequate
instructional
materials.
With
instructional
Utilized 1-2
instructional
WEIGHT
PER
OBJECTI
VE
(1)
Poor
Had
incomplete
parts of DLP
with no
instructional
materials.
No
instructional
JUNE
2015
MARC
H
2016
ACTUAL
RESULT
RATIN
G
SCO
RE
Q E
AV
E
3.85
3.85
.10 x
3
.30
10%
materials.
Learnin
g
Outcom
es
I. Teachinglearning
Process (40%)
2. Facilitates the
learning of
learners through
functional daily
lesson logs and
innovative
teaching
strategies and
cooperative is
evident.
instructional
materials
instructional
materials
materials
Exhibited
promptness
in the
submission
of DLP daily.
Exhibited
promptness
in the
submission
of DLP 4
times a
week.
Delivered
updated
content and
knowledge
using
appropriate
approaches
and
strategies
and
cooperative
learning is
satisfactory
evident.
The teacher
developed
measurable
goals for
learners
learning that
is aligned
with the
competenci
es.
Exhibited
promptness
in the
submission
of DLP 3
times a
week.
Delivered
updated
content
knowledge
using
appropriate
approaches
and
strategies
and
cooperative
learning is
fairly
evident.
The teacher
clearly
communicat
ed a focus
and learning
is
appropriate
for learners
and is
aligned with
the
competenci
es.
Facilitated
functional
DLP/DLL 4
Facilitated
functional
DLP/DLL 3
Delivered
accurate
and updated
content
knowledge
using
Q appropriate
approaches
and
cooperative
learning is
highly
evident.
The teacher
established
challenging
and
measurable
goals for
learners
learning that
is aligned
with the
competenci
es.
T Facilitated
functional
DLP/DLL
2 | CANHS-IPCRF SY2015-2016
materials
but were not
utilized
Exhibited
promptness
in the
submission
of DLP twice
a week.
materials
was used
Delivered
updated
content
knowledge
using
appropriate
approaches
and
strategies
and
cooperative
learning is
less evident.
Delivered
updated
content
knowledge
using
appropriate
approaches
and
strategies
and
cooperative
learning is
not evident.
The teacher
did not have
a clear focus
for learners
learning.
The teacher
did not have
a clear focus
for learners
learning and
the
objectives
are too
general to
guide lesson
planning or
the
objectives
are
inappropriat
e for
learners.
Facilitated
functional
DLP/DLL
Facilitated
functional
DLP/DLL
Exhibited
promptness
in the
submission
of DLP once
a week.
JUNE
2015
MARC
H
2016
10%
3.6
7
.10 x
3.67
.37
daily.
Child
Protecti
on
Policy
and
Student
s
Anecdot
al
Records
I. Teachinglearning
Process (40%)
3. Maintains
discipline of
learners inside
the classroom
guided by the
rules and
regulations.
Discipline in
the
classroom
Q was highly
evident.
Best
Class
Home
Checklis
t
I. Teachinglearning
Process (40%)
4. Monitors daily
attendance and
maintained a safe
and orderly
environment with
respect to all
learners.
100% of the
learners
maintained
discipline
guided by
the
classrooms
rules
regulations
and
guidelines.
Maintained
discipline of
learners
daily.
Monitored
daily
attendance
and
maintained
a safe and
orderly
Q environment
with respect
to all
learners all
the time.
E 100% of the
learners
attendance
3 | CANHS-IPCRF SY2015-2016
times a
week.
times a
week.
twice a
week.
twice a
week.
Discipline in
the
classroom
was
satisfactorily
evident.
75-99% of
the learners
maintained
discipline
guided by
the
classrooms
rules
regulations
and
guidelines.
Discipline in
the
classroom
was fairly
evident.
Discipline in
the
classroom
was less
evident.
Discipline in
the
classroom
was not
evident.
50-74% of
the learners
maintained
discipline
guided by
the
classrooms
rules
regulations
and
guidelines.
25-49% of
the learners
maintained
discipline
guided by
the
classrooms
rules
regulations
and
guidelines.
Maintained
discipline of
learners 4
out of 5
days.
Maintained
discipline of
learners 3
out of 5
days.
Maintained
discipline of
learners 2
out of 5
days.
24% and
below of the
learners
maintained
discipline
guided by
the
classrooms
rules
regulations
and
guidelines.
Maintained
discipline of
learners 1
out of 5
days.
Frequently
monitored
and
maintained
daily
attendance
and
maintained
a safe and
orderly
environment
with respect
to all
learners.
75-99% of
the learners
attendance
Fairly
monitored
and
maintained
daily
attendance
and
maintained
a safe and
orderly
environment
with respect
to all
learners.
50-74% of
the learners
attendance
Seldom
monitored
and
maintained
daily
attendance
and
maintained
a safe and
orderly
environment
with respect
to all
learners.
25-49% of
the learners
attendance
Did not
monitor and
maintain.
24% and
below of the
learners
JUNE
2015
MARC
H
2016
10%
JUNE
2015
MARC
H
2016
10%
4.6
7
.10 x
4.67
.47
.10 x
4
.4
Student
s
Records
of
Perform
ance
was
monitored;
safely
orderliness
and
cleanliness
were
maintained
in all areas
of the
classroom
including its
surrounding
s.
was
monitored;
safety
orderliness
and
cleanliness
were
maintained
in all areas
of the
classroom
including
surrounding
s.
was
monitored;
safety
orderliness
and
cleanliness
were
maintained
in all areas
of the
classroom
including its
surrounding
s.
was
monitored;
safety
orderliness
and
cleanliness
were
maintained
in all areas
of the
classroom
including its
surrounding
s.
Monitored
records of
students
two days
earlier than
the target
date.
Monitored
records of
students a
day earlier
than the
target date.
Monitored
records of
students 1-2
days after
the target
date.
Monitored
records of
students 3-4
days after
the target
date.
Keep
records of
grades and
students
performance
neatly and
in order.
Keep
records of
grades and
students
performance
.
Keep
records of
grades only
or
performance
only
Complied
II. Students
the
Outcome (30%)
complete
1. Keeps accurate
and
records of
accurate
grade/performanc
records of
grades and
e in every grading
students
period:
Q performance
Class Record
in a
School Forms
portfolio,
Form 137
neatly, in
order with
Form 138
data and
documentati
on
All records
and school
forms
indicated
were
4 | CANHS-IPCRF SY2015-2016
attendance
was
monitored;
safety
orderliness
and
cleanliness
were
maintained
in all areas
of the
classroom
including its
surrounding
s.
Monitored
records of
students 5
days after
the target
date.
Keeps no
record at all.
JUNE
2015
MARC
H
2016
10%
Only 4 of
the records
and school
forms
indicated
Only 3 of
the records
and school
forms
indicated
Only 2 of
the records
and school
forms
indicated
Only 1 of
the records
and school
forms
indicated
4.3
5
.10 x
4.33
.43
submitted.
Remedi
a tion
Progra
ms
Dropo
ut
II. Students
Outcome (30%)
2. Conduct
Remediation
Programs
II. Students
Outcome (30%)
3. Maintain zero
dropout rate in
class
were
submitted.
were
submitted.
were
submitted.
were
submitted.
Submitted
records of
students
T two days
earlier than
the target
date.
Was offered
to 10 lowperforming
pupils and
Q above with
every
appropriate
instructional
materials
6 pupils and
above got
75% rating
and above
E in the
summative
and
quarterly
tests
Conducted
remediation
T daily
Submitted
records of
students a
day earlier
than the
target date.
Submitted
records of
students 1-2
days after
the target
date.
Submitted
records of
students 3-4
days after
the target
date.
Submitted
records of
students 5
days after
the target
date.
Was offered
to 8 lowperforming
pupils with
minimal
instructional
materials
Was offered
6 low
performing
pupils with
appropriate
traditional
instructional
materials
Was offered
4 low
performing
less
traditional
instructional
materials
Was offered
2 lowperforming
pupils and
below
5 pupils got
70-74%
rating in the
summative
and
quarterly
tests
4 to 5 pupils
got 65-69%
rating in the
summative
and
quarterly
tests
3 pupils got
60-64%
rating in the
summative
and
quarterly
tests
1 to 2 pupils
got 59%
rating and
below in the
summative
and
quarterly
tests
Conducted
remediation
4 times a
week
Conducted
remediation
3 times a
week
Conducted
remediation
two times a
week
Conducted
remediation
once
Employed
all means to
maintain
Q 100% yearly
enrollment
Employed
all means to
maintain
95% to 99%
yearly
enrollment
Had 2
dropouts
Employed
all means to
maintain
90% to 94%
yearly
enrollment
Had 4
dropouts
Employed
all means to
maintain
85% to 89%
yearly
enrollment
Had 6
dropouts
Employed
all means to
maintain
80& to 84%
yearly
enrollment
Had 8
dropouts
Submitted
pertinent
records and
Submitted
pertinent
records and
Submitted
pertinent
records and
Submitted
pertinent
records and
Maintained
E zero dropout
T Submitted
pertinent
records and
5 | CANHS-IPCRF SY2015-2016
JUNE
2015
MARC
H
2016
10%
JUNE
2015
MARC
H
2016
10%
3.6
7
.10 x
3.67
.37
4.0
0
.10 x
4
.4
forms two
days earlier
than the
target date
Certifi
cates
III. Professional
Growth and
Development
(20%)
1. Attends
seminars,
workshops and
trainings for
teacher during the
rating period
III. Professional
Growth and
Development
(20%)
2. Earn MA units
forms on the
target date
forms a day
after the
target date
forms two
days and
beyond the
target date
Participated
in division
level
seminars,
workshops,
GAD, or
training
Participated
in
district/clust
er level
seminar,
workshop,
GAD, or
training
Participated
in school
level
seminar,
workshop,
GAD or
training
No
participation
Participated
in 3 or more
seminars/
workshops/
GAD, with
documented
results
Participated
actively in 2
seminars/
workshops/
GAD, with
documented
results
Participated
in one
seminar/
workshops/
GAD, with
documented
results
Participated
but did not
finish the
seminar/
workshops/
GAD
Did not
participate
in any
seminar/
workshop/
GAD
Submitted
pertinent
papers two
days earlier
than the
target date
Submitted
pertinent
papers a
day earlier
than the
date
Submitted
pertinent
papers on
the target
date
Submitted
pertinent
papers a
day after
the target
date
Earned 30
MA units
Earned 27
MA units
Earned 18
MA units
Submitted
pertinent
papers two
days and
beyond after
the target
date
Earned 9 MA
units
Achieved 80
to 99%
target MA
units
Completed
MA units
within the
set time
frame
Achieved 70
to 89%
target MA
units
Completed
MA units a
semester
late than the
set time
frame
Achieved 50
to 69%
target MA
units
Completed
MA units
two
semester
late than the
set time
frame
Participated
in regional/
national/
international
Q seminars,
workshops,
GAD
MA
TOR/
Grade
s
forms a day
earlier than
the target
date
Completed
academic
Q requirement
s
Achieved
100% target
E MA units
Completed
MA units
earlier than
the set time
frame
6 | CANHS-IPCRF SY2015-2016
Achieved 40
to 49%
target MA
units
Had
incomplete
MA units
within the
set time
frame
JUNE
2015
MARC
H
2016
5%
JUNE
2015
MARC
H
2018
5%
.05 x
4
.2
1.6
7
.05 x
1.67
.08
Certifi
cate
III. Professional
Growth and
Development
(10%)
3. Serve as
Lecturer in SLAC
sessions
Served five
times as
Q lecturer in
SLAC
sessions
Use 100%
very
appropriate
E and up-todate lecture
materials
Docum
entati
on,
certifi
cates
III. Professional
Growth and
Development
(10%)
4. Participates cocurricular English
related activity
within the year
Submitted
pertinent
papers two
days earlier
than the
target date
Participated
in cocurricular
English
Q related
activity with
full
documentati
on
Participated
in 3 or more
co-curricular
English
E related
activities
with
documented
results
Submitted
pertinent
papers two
T days earlier
than the
target date
7 | CANHS-IPCRF SY2015-2016
Served four
times as
lecturer in
SLAC
sessions
Used 80 to
99%
appropriate
and up-todate lecture
materials
Served
thrice as
lecturer in
SLAC
sessions
Used 70 to
79% up to
date lecture
materials
Served
twice as
lecturer in
SLAC
sessions
Used
appropriate
traditional
lecture
materials
Served once
as lecturer
in a SLAC
sessions
Submitted
pertinent
papers a
day earlier
than the
target date
Submitted
pertinent
papers on
the target
date
Submitted
papers a
day after
the target
date
Participated
in cocurricular
English
related
activity with
incomplete
documentati
on
Participated
actively in 2
co-curricular
English
related
activities
with
documented
results
Submitted
pertinent
papers a
day earlier
than the
date
Participated
a cocurricular
English
related
activity
Initiated a
co-curricular
English
related
activity
Submitted
pertinent
papers two
days and
beyond after
the target
date
Proposed a
co-curricular
English
related
activity
Participated
in one cocurricular
English
related
activity with
documented
results
Participated
but did not
finish the
co-curricular
English
related
activities
Did not
participate
in any cocurricular
English
related
activities
Submitted
pertinent
papers on
the target
date
Submitted
pertinent
papers a
day after
the target
date
Submitted
pertinent
papers two
days and
beyond after
the target
date
Used
traditional
lecture
materials
JUNE
2015
MARC
H
2016
5%
JUNE
2015
MARC
H
2016
5%
.05 x
4
.2
4.3
3
.05 x
4.33
.22
PTA
meeti
ngs/co
nferen
ces
Acade
mic
monit
o ring/
followup
100%
accomplish
ment with
set
agreements
5 or more
PTA
meetings/
conferences
were
conducted
Conducted
PTA
meetings
two days
earlier than
the
scheduled
date
More than
100%
accomplish
ment with
set visits
E 3 or more
outreach
programs
were
accomplishe
d
8 | CANHS-IPCRF SY2015-2016
100% of
planned
meetings
conducted
producing
only set
agreements
and partial
accomplish
ments of
these
4 PTA
meetings/
conferences
were
conducted
75% of
planned
meetings
conducted
producing
only set
agreements
50% of
planned
meetings
conducted
with
minimal
results
25% and
below of
planned
meetings
conducted
with no
results
3 PTA
meetings/
conferences
were
conducted
2 PTA
meetings/
conferences
were
conducted
1 PTA
meetings/
conferences
were
conducted
Conducted
PTA
meetings a
day earlier
than the
scheduled
date
Conducted
PTA
meetings on
the
scheduled
date
Conducted
PTA
meetings a
day after
the
scheduled
date
76%-99%
accomplish
ment of
visits with
partial
success in
implementa
tion of
intervention
s
2 outreach
programs
were
accomplishe
d
51-75%
accomplish
ment of
visits with
suggested
planned
intervention
s
25-50%
accomplish
ment of
visits with
planned
intervention
s
Conducted
PTA
meetings
two days
and beyond
the
scheduled
date
below 25%
accomplish
ment of
visits with
no
intervention
s
1 outreach
program
were
partially
accomplishe
d
Outreach
program
was planned
and
conceptualiz
ed but did
not push
through
No outreach
program
was
accomplishe
d
JUNE
2015
MARC
H
2016
3%
JUNE
2015
MARC
H
2016
3%
3.3
3
.03 x
3.33
.10
3.6
7
.03 x
3.67
.11
Teache
rs
Portfoli
o
Conducted
home
visitations
two days
earlier than
the target
date
documents
were filled
neatly,
properly,
systematical
ly and
accurately
on its
designated
dimensions.
Prepared/
updated all
the
necessary
documents
in the RPMS
Portfolio 5
days before
the date of
visitation
and
verification
Conducted
home
visitations a
day earlier
than the
target date
Conducted
home
visitations
on the
target date
Conducted
home
visitations a
day after
the target
date
Conducted
home
visitations
two days
and beyond
the target
date
Updated 50
to 69%
RPMS
documents
and
evidences
85% of the
RPMS
documents
were filled
neatly,
properly,
systematical
ly and
accurately
on its
designated
dimensions
Prepared/
updated all
the
necessary
documents
in the RPMS
Portfolio 3
days before
the date of
visitation
and
verification
75% of the
RPMS
documents
were filled
neatly,
properly,
systematical
ly and
accurately
on its
designated
dimensions
Prepared/
updated all
the
necessary
documents
in the RPMS
Portfolio on
the date of
visitation
and
verification
65% of the
RPMS
documents
were filled
neatly,
properly,
systematical
ly and
accurately
on its
designated
dimensions
Incompletel
y
prepared/up
dated all the
necessary
documents
in the RPMS
Portfolio on
the date of
visitation
and
verification
50% of the
RPMS
documents
were filled
neatly,
properly,
systematical
ly and
accurately
on its
designated
dimensions
Did not
prepared/up
dated all the
necessary
documents
in the RPMS
Portfolio on
the date of
visitation
and
verification
Plus Factor
9 | CANHS-IPCRF SY2015-2016
JUNE
2015
MARC
H
2016
2%
5
10%
.04 x
5
.2
100
%
OVERALL RATING
Name of Ratee:
3.85
Name of Rater:
JMAR I. ALMAZAN
10 | C A N H S - I P C R F S Y 2 0 1 5 - 2 0 1 6
11 | C A N H S - I P C R F S Y 2 0 1 5 - 2 0 1 6