Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Abstract-- In this paper, the meander line antenna (MLA) have been designed to operate at 2.4-GHz for WLAN application.
Two different designs of meander line antenna are investigated, without conductor line and with conductor line. Microwave
Office software is used for simulation designed process. The antenna is fabricated on a double-sided FR-4 printed circuit
board using an etching technique. Then the design has been tested with the Advantest Network Analyzer. The comparison
between simulation and measurement results for the return loss and radiation patterns were presented. A bandwidth of 80
MHz and return loss of -37.7 dB were obtained at frequency 2.4 GHz. The gain is comparable to microstrip yagi antenna.
Index Terms antenna, meander line, meander line antenna, WLAN
Design I
Design II
E-Plane
Design I
H-Plane
Design II
H-Plane
Design I
2.4GHz.
E-Plane
Design IV
at 5.8 GHz
E-Plane
Design IV
at 2.4GHz
TABLE 1
SIMULATION RESULTS FOR MICROSTRIP ANTENNA
Simulation
Design I
Design II
Design IV
Frequency
2.4
2.4
2.4
Response (GHz)
Return Loss (dB)
-19.57
-37.7
-20.53
Bandwidth
(MHz)
HPBW -H-field
(degree)
HPBW -E-field
(degree)
57MHz
(2.38%)
84
80MHz
(3.33 %)
88
40 0
110MHz
(4.58%).
92
52 0
480
0
-2 0
-4
-6
-8
TABLE 3
Return
Loss
Design I
(dB)
Simulation
Frequency response (GHz)
Return Loss (dB)
Bandwidth (GHz)
Return
Loss
Design II
(dB)
-10
-12
-14
Fre que ncy (GHz)
V. MEASUREMENT RESULT
0
0
10
-10
-20
Return
Loss
Design III
(dB)
Return
Loss
Design IV
(dB)
-30
-40
Design I
2.4
-20.08
4.5 (1.89%)
Frequency Response
(GHz)
TABLE 2
COMPARISON BETWEEN FOUR DESIGNS
h
Freque
Lower n
RL
BW
(mm
ncy
upper
(dB)
(GHz)
(GHz)
freq.(GHz)
Design I
11
2.4
1.26-4.66
-12
3.4
Design II
11
2.4
1.12-4.4
-12.45
3.28
Design III
2.4
0.14-6.09
-34.93
5.95
Design IV
2.4
0.01-6.25
-29.97
6.24
Simulation
Results
0
-5 0. 5
-10
-15
1. 5
2. 5
3. 5
Design I
-20
Design II
-25
-30
-35
-40
Fr e que n c y ( GH z )
TABLE 4
MEASUREMENT RESULTS FOR PLANAR
ANTENNA DESIGNED
0
-5
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
3.2
3.4
Measurement
Design
I
Design
II
Design
III
Design
IV
Frequency
response
(GHz)
2.39
2.52
2.52
2.4
Return Loss
(dB)
-16.5
-13.45
-22.5
-15.3
Bandwidth
(MHz)
71MHz
(2.98%)
38MHz
(1.33%)
43MHz
(1.79%)
70MHz
(2.92%)
-10
-15
-20
-25
-30
Frequency (GHz)
0
-5
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
-10
-15
-20
-25
-30
Frequency (GHz)
TABLE 5
MEASUREMENT RESULTS (IMPEDANCE 75 OHM)
TABLE 3
MEASUREMENT RESULTS FOR MICROSTRIP
ANTENNA DESIGNED
Measurement
Design I
Design II
Design IV
Frequency
Response (GHz)
2.35
2.375
2.43
-16.32
-35.42
-24.68
Bandwidth (MHz)
64MHz
(2.7%)
56MHz
(2.36%)
68MHz
(2.8%)
36 0
480
440
20 0
320
560
HPBW -H-field
(degree)
HPBW -E-field
(degree)
Measurement
Design I
2.4
-19.66
Bandwidth (MHz)
57MHz (2.38%)
Gain (dB)
4dB
VI. CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
[1] A. Khaleghi. A. Azooulay. J. C. Bolomey,
A Dual Band Back Couple Meandering
Antenna For Wireless LAN Applications,
Gof Suryvette, France, 2005.
[2] H. Nakono. H. Tagami. A. Yoshizawa. and
J.Yamauchi, Shortening ratios of modified
dipole antennas, IEEE Trans. Antennas
Propagat., Vol. AP-32, pp. 385-386, Apr.
1984.
[3] S. Best, On the resonant properties of the
Koch fractal and other wire monopole
antennas, IEEE Antennas and Propagation
Soc. Int. Symp, June 22-27, 2003, pp. 856859.
[4] Constine A. Balanis, Antenna Theory: A
review,New York, Wiley, 1992.
[5] V. K. Palukuru, M. Komulainen, M. Berg,
H. Jantunen and E. Salonen, FrequencyTunable Planar Monopole Antenna for
Mobile Terminals EuCAP 2007,
Edinburgh, UK, November 2007.