Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
D E C E M B E R 2 015
M&A 2015:
New highs, and a new tone
Deal activity surged again this yearespecially big deals and those in the United States.
MoF 2016
M&A 2015
Exhibit 1 of 2
Exhibit 1
4,894
4,499
670
3,154
236
1,943
1,220
1,699
1,885
1999
2007
1,130
Asia-Pacific
1,147
3,560
2,504
2,669
806
507
569
970
761
804
1,236
1,296
2012
2013
2,617 Americas
1,784
20152
2014
MoF 2016
M&A 2015
Exhibit 2 of 2
1 Includes deals with value of more than $25 million only. Figures may not sum, because of rounding.
2 Data extrapolated to show expected results for entire year based on announced activity (not withdrawn) through Nov 30, 2015.
Exhibit 2
10
5
Total DVA
0
5
Acquirer DVA
10
15
20
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
YTD
20152
1 For M&A involving publicly traded companies; dened as combined (acquirer and target) change in market capitalization,
adjusted for market movements, from 2 days prior to 2 days after announcement, as % of transaction value.
and a companys excess total return to shareholders two years after a deal, when most synergies
are captured.
Why do many investors continue to applaud big
deals? It could be a change in the types of deals. In
the past, big deals were often seen as tactics to
address cost reduction and industry consolidation
and many still are. But today we also see deals
where managers and boards are talking about diversification and, for the first time in a long time,
about revenueabout cross-selling and creating
new customer opportunities, and about transformation. Some of that has always been part of the
rationale for big deals, but given continuing strong
announcement effects, it may be that investors