Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
#:2385
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
11
1900 Avenue of the Stars, 21st Floor
Los Angeles, California 90067-4590
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Plaintiffs,
v.
ALAN HAYMON, ALAN HAYMON
DEVELOPMENT, INC., HAYMON
HOLDINGS, LLC, HAYMON
SPORTS, LLC, HAYMON BOXING
MANAGEMENT, and HAYMON
BOXING LLC,
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
17896-00617/2644157.1
1.
Boy Promotions, Inc. and Bernard Hopkins (Plaintiffs) in the above entitled
action. I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this declaration and if
2.
the Air Force, I began the practice of law in Los Angeles, with an emphasis on civil
litigation. I have been doing that ever since, trying cases in various federal and
state courts.
10
1900 Avenue of the Stars, 21st Floor
Los Angeles, California 90067-4590
3.
For the past six years, I have also taught a course one quarter a year at
11
12
am committed to teach the course there in the academic year 2016-17. The Law
13
School has set my course for the Winter quarter 2017, i.e., from January 13 to
14
March 10, 2017. The course is three hours every Friday morning. I believe
15
16
4.
17
issues. Plaintiffs originally estimated that the trial would require at least 10 trial
18
days. Defendants stated that it would be premature even to estimate the length of
19
the trial.
20
5.
21
22
The Court estimated the length of the trial as only 4 days and set
If this were only a four day trial starting on January 31, 2017, a guest
23
24
February 3, 2017. But, having tried numerous cases for over 50 years, I can
25
represent to the Court with confidence that, even with exceptional diligence by
26
counsel, this case cannot be tried in four days or anything close to that very limited
27
period. Now that we can see the many and complex issues to be tried, even our
28
7.
others, the proper definition of the market for managing elite boxers, the proper
definition of the market for promoting such boxers, the extent of interchangeability
boxers, whether, at the same time, defendants have functioned as a boxing promoter
for such boxers or had a financial interest in such a boxing promoter (an anti-
defendants have used exclusivity provisions in their agreements with elite boxers
10
and others to exclude plaintiffs from competing to promote such boxers and from
11
12
defendants have paid hundreds of millions of dollars to buy up television air time
13
14
15
16
boxing venues on favorable dates, and whether defendants have engaged in the
17
18
19
present share of the market for managing elite boxers, the extent of defendants
20
present share of the market for promoting elite boxers, the barriers to entry in the
21
market for managing elite boxers, the barriers to entry in the market for promoting
22
elite boxers, the likelihood of defendants using their dominance in the market for
23
managing elite boxers and their anti-competitive conduct to obtain monopoly power
24
in the market for promoting such boxers, and the damages incurred by plaintiffs as
25
26
27
Each of these issues is contested, and many break down into multiple subissues. Many will require a detailed factual analysis of multiple transactions. The
28
17896-00617/2644157.1
trial will require a substantial number of percipient witnesses for each side, as well
8.
this Court and that the Court undoubtedly has a busy calendar and many things to
however, I respectfully request a brief continuance of the trial date from January 31,
10
2017 to March 13, 2017, the first court date after my final class at Stanford Law
11
12
13
14
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of
America that the foregoing is true and correct.
15
16
17
/s/ Bertram Fields
BERTRAM FIELDS
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
17896-00617/2644157.1