0 Voti positivi0 Voti negativi

11 visualizzazioni10 pagineContinuous functions

Jul 28, 2016

© © All Rights Reserved

PDF, TXT o leggi online da Scribd

Continuous functions

© All Rights Reserved

11 visualizzazioni

Continuous functions

© All Rights Reserved

- Vector Calculus Supplement
- WK7--MunkresHW4
- Lecture Notes 0913
- Free eBooks Download
- calculus on manifolds notes.pdf
- Sequences
- Homology Lecture Notes
- utility_iitb.pdf
- Fixed Point Theorems for Four Mappings in Fuzzy Metric Space Using Implicit Relation
- WK_9_S1
- HW1
- LMTF SQNC
- euclid.jmsj.1197320621.pdf
- Sequence Textbook Sequences and Series
- [Lahiri] Lecture Notes on Differential Geometry.pdf
- Topological Groups
- (Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems) Igor v. Konnov, Dinh the Luc, Alexander M. Rubinov - Generalized Convexity and Related Topics-Springer (2007)
- On Semi-T1/2 Spaces
- ON STABILITY OF ZERO SOLUTION OF SOME TYPES OF FIFTH ORDER
- Samina Batul

Sei sulla pagina 1di 10

1. Continuous functions

Definition 1.1. Let (X, TX ) and (Y, TY ) be two topological spaces and let f :

X Y be a function.

(a) We say that f is continuous at x X if for every neighborhood V of f (x) there

exists a neighborhood U of x such that f (U ) V .

(b) We say that f is continuous if f 1 (V ) TX for every V TY .

We shall use the term map as synonymous with continuous function.

This definition of continuity, both locally at a point x as well as globally on the

entire space X, is motivated by our work on continuity of functions on Euclidean spaces

from chapter ??. Specifically, the reader will recognize that this definition mirrors the

results of theorem ?? which considered the case of X = Rn and Y = Rm .

In the Euclidean case, a function f : Rn Rm is defined to be continuous globally

if it is continuous at every point x Rn . Definition 1.1 is set up slightly differently

in that global continuity (part (b) of definition 1.1) is not defined as local continuity

(part (a) of definition 1.1) at every point x X. Nevertheless, the relation of global

to local continuity of functions between topological spaces remains the same as in the

Euclidean space, as explained by the next theorem.

Theorem 1.2. A function f : X Y between two topological spaces is continuous

if and only if it is continuous at every point x X.

Proof. = Suppose that f : X Y is continuous globally and let x be a

point in X. Pick an arbitrary neighborhood V of f (x) in Y , then U = f 1 (V ) is a

neighborhood of x in X with f (U ) V .

= Suppose that f : X Y is continuous at every point x X, let V be an

open subset of Y and set U = f 1 (V ). Wed like to show that U is open. For that

purpose, let x U be an arbitrary point (if U is the empty set then it is automatically

open) and note that V is a neighborhood of f (x). By continuity of f at x, there must

exist a neighborhood Ux of x with f (Ux ) V . This latter relation shows that Ux U

and consequently we obtain U = xU Ux . Since U is a union of open sets, it must be

an open set.

Before exploring the concept of continuity into greater depth, we consider some

examples.

1

Example 1.3. Let (X, TX ) = (R, Tcc ), let (Y, TY ) = (R, Tf c ) with p = 0 and let

f : X Y be the function f (x) = x2 . Let U = R {x1 , ..., xk } Tf c be any open set

so that f 1 (U ) = R {x1 , x1 , ..., xk , xk } Tcc . Thus f is continuous.

Example 1.4. Let (X, TX ) = (R, Tf c ), let (Y, TY ) = (R, Tp ) with p = 0 and let

f : X Y be again the function f (x) = x2 . Then {0, 1} Tp but f 1 ({0, 1}) =

{1, 0, 1}

/ Tf c so that f is not continuous.

Example 1.5. Let X be a non-empty set and let P1 and P2 be two partitions on

X and let T1 and T2 be the two associated partition topologies on X. Let f : X X

be the identity function f (x) = x whose domain is equipped with T1 and codomain

with T2 . Then f is continuous if and only if every element in P2 is a union of elements

from P1 .

Example 1.6. The constant function f : X Y , given by f (x) = p Y for all

x X, is always continuous since f 1 (U ) is either the empty set if p

/ U or all of X

if p U .

Example 1.7. Let X be equipped with the discrete topology, then any function

f : X Y is continuous. Conversely, if X is given the indiscrete topology, then a

function f : X Y to a Hausdorff space Y is continuous if and only if it is constant.

For if f were not constant then we could find two points a, b X with f (a) 6= (b).

The Hausdorff property would guarantee the existence of two open and disjoint sets

U, V Y with f (a) U and f (b) V . But then f 1 (U ) wouldnt be the empty set

(since itd contain a) nor all of X (since it couldnt contain b).

Example 1.8. Let (X, dX ) and (Y, dY ) be two metric spaces and let TX and TY be

the associated metric topologies. Then a function f : X Y is continuous at x X

if and only if for every > 0 there exists a > 0 such that

x0 X and dX (x, x0 ) <

Thus continuous functions between metric spaces satisfy the familiar rule for continuity

at a point from analysis. We leave the verification of this as an exercise (exercise ??),

it follows along the lines of the proof of theorem ??.

The next theorem provides a number of alternative definitions of continuity of

functions. Part (a) is a generalization of theorem ?? from the Euclidean case to general

topological spaces.

Theorem 1.9. Let f : (X, TX ) (Y, TY ) be a function between two topological

spaces. Then f is continuous if and only if any of the mutually equivalent conditions

below is met:

(a) f 1 (B) is a closed subset of X for any closed subset B of Y .

f (A).

(c) For all subsets A X one gets f (A)

1

(d) For all subsets B Y one gets f (Int(B)) Int(f 1 (B)).

1. CONTINUOUS FUNCTIONS

Proof. We will show that properties (a) and (e) are each equivalent to f being

continuous. We will then prove the implications (a)=(b)=(c)=(a). Showing that

(d) is equivalent to the continuity of f is left as an exercise (exercise 3.1).

(a) Suppose that f is continuous and let B Y be a closed set. Then f 1 (B) =

X f 1 (Y B) is also closed since Y B is open and continuity of f forces f 1 (Y B)

to be open also.

Conversely, suppose that f has property (a) and let V Y be any open set. Then

1

f (V ) = X f 1 (Y V ) is open since Y V and f 1 (Y V ) are both closed, the

latter by property (a).

we obtain f 1 (B) f 1 (B).

By

(a)=(b) Let B be any subset of Y . Since B B,

1

property (a) of f , the set f (B) is closed but since the set f 1 (B) is the smallest closed

is immediate.

set containing f 1 (B) (see lemma ??), the inclusion f 1 (B) f 1 (B)

(b)=(c) Take A X to be any subset of X and apply property (b) of f to

B = f (A) to obtain f 1 (f (A)) f 1 (f (A)). Since A f 1 (f (A)) we also get

A f 1 (f (A)). Applying f to the inclusion A f 1 (f (A)) yields the desired result.

= B showing

Then, according to property (b) of f , we must have f (x) f (A) = B

(d) The necessity of property (d) for a continuous function is obvious. Suppose

then that f possesses property (d) and let V Y be an open set. Let J I be such

that V = jJ Vj . Then f 1 (V ) = f 1 (jJ Vj ) = jJ f 1 (Vj ) showing that f 1 (V )

is a union of open sets and therefore open.

The reader may have noticed that of the various characterizations of continuity in

theorem 1.9, there are two conditions (conditions (b) and (c)) involving the closure

of sets but only one condition (condition (d)) involving the interior. Condition (b)

involves taking preimages under f and condition (c) requires one to take images under

f . Given that condition (d) also involves preimages, one may suspect that perhaps

there is also a characterization of continuity of f in terms of taking images of f and

interiors of sets. That this is not so is shown by the next two examples.

Example 1.10. Consider the function f : R2 R given by f (x, y) = x and with

each of R2 and R equipped with the Euclidean topology. Then f is clearly continuous,

but, taking A = {(x, 0) R2 | x R}, we find that

Int(f (A) = Int(R) = R

while

f (Int(A)) = f () =

Thus the inclusion Int(f (A) f (Int(A)) fails in general for continuous functions.

Example 1.11. Consider the function f : R R given by f (x) = 0 and assume

again that both copies of R come with the Euclidean topology. Pick A = R, then

f (Int(A)) = f (R) = {0}

while

Thus the inclusion f (Int(A)) Int(f (A)) also fails in general for continuous functions

(see however part (a) of proposition 1.17 below).

We next single out some simple functions that are always continuous. The reader

will no doubt recognize familiar properties of continuous functions from the Euclidean

case.

Proposition 1.12. Let f : X Y and g : Y Z be continuous functions between

topological spaces and let A X be any subspace of X. Then

(a) The inclusion function : A X is continuous. In particular, the identity

function id: X X is always continuous.

(b) The composition function g f : X Z is continuous.

(c) The restriction function f |A : A Y is continuous.

(d) Let Ui X, i I, be a collection of open subsets of X such that X = iI Ui

and let h : X Y be a function with h|Ui : Ui Y continuous for each i I.

Then h is continuous.

Proof. (a) For an open subset U X, the preimage 1 (U ) equals U A and is

therefore open on A with respect to its relative topology.

(b) Let W be an open subset of Z. Then V = g 1 (W ) is an open subset of Y and

thus U = f 1 (V ) must be open in X. Since U = f 1 (g 1 (W ) = (g f )1 (W ), were

done.

(c) This follows from parts (a) and (b) since f |A = f where : A X is the

inclusion map.

(d) Set hi = h|Ui and let V Y be an open set. Then h1 (V ) = iI h1

i (V ) and,

since each h1

(V

)

must

be

open

in

U

(in

its

relative

topology),

there

must

be open

i

i

1

subsets Wi X with hi (V ) = Ui Wi . As both Ui and Wi are open in X then so is

Ui Wi showing that h1 (V ) is a union of open sets and therefore open.

Definition 1.13. A function f : X Y between topological spaces is called

a homeomorphism if f is a continuous bijection with a continuous inverse function

f 1 : Y X. We say that two topological spaces X and Y are homeomorphic, and

write X

= Y , if there exists at least one homeomorphism f : X Y .

A function f : X Y is called a local homeomorphism if every point x X has a

neighborhood U such that f |U : U f (U ) is a homeomorphism, where U and f (U )

come equipped with their relative topologies inherited from X and Y respectively. Two

spaces are called locally homeomorphic if there exists at least one local homeomorphism

between them.

Talk about how homeomorphic spaces are really one and the same from an abstract

point of view.

Remark 1.14. The relation of being homeomorphic tobetween topological spaces

is an equivalence relation. By this we mean that it satisfies the following three properties:

1. Reflexivity: X

= X.

1. CONTINUOUS FUNCTIONS

2. Symmetry: If X

= Y then also Y

= X.

= Z.

Part 1 is facilitated by the identity map id: X X (see proposition 1.12, part 3). For

part two, if f : X Y is a homeomorphism, then f 1 : Y X is also a homeomorphism. Finally, for part 3, if f : X Y and g : Y Z are homeomorphisms, then

g f : X Z is also a homeomorphism (see proposition 1.12 part 2).

In a similar vein one can also prove that the relation of being locally homeomorphicis an equivalence relations among topological spaces (see exercise ??).

Example 1.15.

Definition 1.16. Let f : X Y be a map between topological spaces. We say

that f is open if f (U ) is an open subset of Y whenever U is an open subset of X.

Similarly, we say that f is closed if f (A) is closed in Y for every choice of a closed

subset A X.

Note that, by definition, every homeomorphism is an open map. Indeed the condition for a bijection f to be open is the same as the condition as for f 1 to be continuous.

Similarly, using theorem 1.9, one finds that a homeomorphism is also a closed map.

Perhaps more surprisingly, local homeomorphisms are also open maps:

Proposition 1.17. Let f : X Y be a map between topological spaces.

(a) f is an open map if and only if f (Int(A)) Int(f (A)).

for every subset A X.

b) f is a closed map if and only if f (A) = f (A)

(c) If f is a local homeomorphism then f is an open map.

Proof. (a) Suppose first that f is open and let A be any subset of X. Since

Int(A) A we find that f (Int(A)) f (A). Since f is open, the set f (Int(A)) is

an open subset of f (A). But Int(f (A)) is the largest open subset of f (A) forcing the

inclusion f (Int(A)) Int(f (A)).

Conversely, suppose that f (Int(A)) Int(f (A)) holds for all A X. Pick an open

subset U X, then f (Int(U )) = f (U ) Int(f (U )). On the other hand, the inclusion

Int(f (U )) f (U ) is trivially true showing that f (U ) = Int(f (U )), thus f (U ) is open.

(b) Assume that f is closed and that A X is any set. Then A A implies

Since f (A)

is closed and contains f (A), the inclusion f (A) f (A)

follows since the closure of f (A) is the smallest closed set containing f (A). The converse

f (A) follows from theorem 1.9, part (c).

inclusion f (A)

for all subsets A of X, wed like to

On the other hand, suppose that f (A) = f (A)

= f (B),

show that f is closed. Thus, let B X be any closed set, then f (B) = f (B)

the latter set is of course closed.

(c) Assume that f is a local homeomorphism. To show that f is an open map, let

U X and set V = f (U ). Wed like to show that V is an open subset of Y . Towards

this goal, pick a point x U . Then there exists a neighborhood Ux of x such that

f |Ux : Ux Vx , with Vx = f (Ux ), is a homeomorphism. Without loss of generality we

can assume that Ux U for if not, we could simply replace Ux by Ux U . But then

itself.

The next example shows that a local homeomorphism does not have to be a closed

map.

Example 1.18. Let X = h0, 1i R and Y = {(x, y) R2 | x2 + y 2 = 1} R2 , each

equipped with the relative Euclidean topology. Consider the map f : X Y defined

by f (t) = (cos(2t), sin(2t)). This is a local homeomorphism but f (X) = Y {(1, 0)}

and X is closed while Y {(1, 0)} is not.

We will encounter open and closed maps again in subsequent chapters. Open maps

will play an important role in the study of quotient spaces (chapter ??). Chapter ??

will give a nice criterion for a map to be closed in terms of compactness of the domain

of the map (theorem ??).

2. Convergent sequences

In this section we examine convergent sequences in topological spaces, first in the

their own right and then with regards to their relation to continuous function. Familiar

properties of sequences from Euclidean spaces no longer hold in this more general

setting, perhaps most striking being the non-uniqueness phenomena for the limit of a

convergent sequence. A characterization of continuity in terms of sequences is given in

theorem 2.12.

Definition 2.1. Let (X, T ) be a topological space and xk X a sequence. We say

that the sequence xk converges to x X, and write limk xk = x or just lim xk = x,

if for every neighborhood U of x there exists a k0 N such that for all k k0 we

obtain xk U .

Note that if one takes (X, TX ) = (Rn , TEu ) then this definition agrees with the

familiar definition of continuity in Euclidean spaces, compare to theorem ??.

Example 2.2. Let X = R be equipped with the partition topology TP associated

to the partition

P = {[4a 2, 4a + 2i | a Z}

Then the sequence xn = (1)n converges to any point x [2, 2i since this is the

smallest non-empty open set containing both 1 and 1.

Example 2.3. If X is equipped with the indiscrete topology, then any sequence in

X is convergent and its limit is any point in X. Conversely, if X is given the discrete

topology, then a sequence xk is convergent to x X if and only if xk = x for all

sufficiently large k.

Example 2.4. Let X = R be given the finite complement topology Tf c and consider

the sequence xk = k. Then limxk = x for any x R since every neighborhood of x

contains all but finitely many elements of {x1 , x2 , x3 , ...}. If we give R the countable

2. CONVERGENT SEQUENCES

complement topology Tcc instead, then lim xk = x if and only if xk = x for all k

sufficiently large (exercise ??).

Example 2.5. 5. On X = R consider the particular point topology Tp with p = 0.

Then the only sequences converging to p = 0 are the sequences which are eventually

constant (and equal to zero) since {0} is a neighborhood of 0. The sequences converging

to 6= 1 R are those that lie in the set {0, x} for all sufficiently large indices. to x0 = 1!

As the examples above show, in general topological spaces limits of sequences may

not be unique. They are unique tough if X happens to have the Hausdorff property.

Definition 2.6. A topological space X is called Hausdorff if every two points

have disjoint neighborhoods. Said differently, we require that for each pair of points

a, b X, a 6= b, there exist open sets Ua , Ub X with a Ua , b Ub and Ua Ub = .

Theorem 2.7. Let X be a topological space.

(a) If X Hausdorff space and xk X is a convergent sequence, then the limit lim xk

is unique.

(b) If X is fist countable and has the property that every convergent sequence xk X

has a unique limit, then X is Hausdorff.

Proof. (a) Suppose that there are two (or more) limits for xk , say a and b. Since

X is Hausdorff, we can find disjoint neighborhoods Ua and Ub of a and b respectively.

Let ka N be such that xk Ua for all k ka and kb N have the property that

xk Ub for all k kb . Then for all k max{ka , kb } we have that xk Ua Ub , a

contradiction since Ua Ub = .

(b) Given two arbitrary points a, b X with a 6= b, we need to find two disjoint

open sets of which one contains a and the other contains b. Let Ba = {Uia X | i N}

and Bb = {Uib X | i N} be countable neighborhood bases at a and b respectively.

We define new open sets Via and Vib as

Vka = U1a U2a ... Uka

and

These sets are open since they are finite intersections of open sets. Furthermore, notice

that Vja Uia and Vjb Uib for every j i. Clearly, each Via is a neighborhood of a

and each Vib is a neighborhood of b.

If Vka Vkb = for some k, we are done. So suppose instead that Vka Vkb 6= for all

k N. Let xk Vka Vkb be an arbitrary point. This yields a sequence in X which we

claim converges to a. To see this, let U be any neighborhood of a and find an Ukaa Ba ,

ka N, such that Ukaa U . Then Vka U for every k ka , in particular xk U for

every k ka , showing that lim xk = a. Repeating this same argument for b shows also

that lim xk = b. This is a contradiction since by assumption all convergent sequences

in X have a unique limit. We are thus forced to conclude that there is some k N for

which Vka Vkb = , giving us disjoint neighborhoods of a and b, as needed.

The first countability condition from part (b) of theorem 2.7 is necessary and cannot

be weakened as the next example shows.

We claim that every convergent sequence xk X has a unique limit. Suppose not,

that is suppose that lim xk = a and lim xk = b with a 6= b. Let Ua be the open set

Ua = R {xi | xi 6= a}

Clearly a Ua and so there must be some na N such that xn Ua for all n na .

But then xn = a for all n na since xn Ua {xi | i N} = {a}. A similar argument

shows that for some nb N all xn = b for n nb . But then xn = a and xn = b

for n max{na , nb } which is impossible since a 6= b. On the other hand, X is not

Hausdorff since every two non-empty open sets have nontrivial intersection.

Recall that we saw that a subset A Rn (with the Euclidean topology) is closed if

and only if it contains the limits of all its convergent sequences (this was our original

definition of a closed subset of Rn , see definition ??). This characterization of closed

sets is only partly true in general topological spaces.

Theorem 2.9. Let X be a topological space and A a subset of X.

(a) If A is a closed then it contains the limits of all its convergent sequences.

(b) If X is first countable and A contains the limits of all of its convergent sequences, then A is closed.

Proof. (a) Let xk A be a sequence with limit x. If x

/ A then x X A which

is an open set. By convergence of xk there must be some k0 N such that xk X A

for all k k0 . This is impossible since xk A and A (X A) = .

Suppose this were not

(b) We will show that A is closed by exhibiting that A = A.

1, 2, 3, ...} be a countable basis at x and define Vi as

Vj = U1 U2 ... Uj

Note that the sets Vi are open, that the inclusion Vj Ui holds for all j i and that

each Vj contains x. We claim next that each set Vi A must be non-empty. For if not

then A Vj would be a closed set smaller than A and containing A, a contradiction.

Thus we can pick an element xk Vk A. But now xk must converge to x since if V

is any neighborhood of x then there must be an index k0 such that x Uk0 V and

thus xk V for all k k0 . Since xk A and lim xk = x we conclude that x A.

Therefor A = A.

That the first countability condition from part (b) of the preceding theorem cannot

be dropped, is illustrated by the next example.

Example 2.10. Let X = R be equipped with the countable complement topology

and let A X be the set A = X {0}. Notice that A is not closed (since X A = {0}

is not open). But A contains the limits of all of its convergent subsequences. To see

this we only need to show that no sequence xk A can converge to 0. This is easy to

see since the set U = X {x1 , x2 , ...} is an open set which contains zero but no element

of the sequence xn . Thus A contains the limits of all of its convergent sequences. Note

2. CONVERGENT SEQUENCES

that this, in conjunction with theorem 2.9, show that (R, Tcc ) cannot be first countable

and hence neither second countable.

Parts (b) from both theorem 2.7 and theorem 2.9 show that if we assume the

topological space X in question to be first countable, then sequences in X behave in

close analogy with their Euclidean counterparts. The next theorem shows that this

kinship extends even further.

Theorem 2.11. Let X be a topological space and let x X be a given point.

Suppose the {x} is not an open set and that x has a countable neighborhood basis.

Then there exists a sequence xk X {x} converging to x.

Proof. Suppose that Bx = {U1 , U2 , U3 , ...} is a countable neighborhood basis at

x X. As in the proofs of theorems 2.7 and 2.9, we define new set Vj as

Vk = U1 U2 ... Uk

Since {x} is not an open set by assumption, we cannot have Vk = {x} for any value of

k N. Thus, we can always pick an element xk Vk {x} and thus form a sequence.

It is easy to prove that lim xk = x (this was already shown in the both the proof of

theorem 2.7 and in the proof of theorem 2.9).

We conclude this section by examining the relation between continuous functions

and convergent sequences. As the reader may guess by now, with the assumption

of first countability, the relation between the two is just as in Euclidean space (see

theorem ??).

Theorem 2.12. Let f : X Y be a function between two topological spaces.

(a) If f is continuous at x X and if xk X is a convergent sequence with

lim xk = x, then f (xk ) Y is also a convergent sequence with lim f (xk ) = f (x).

(b) If X is first countable and f has the property that limf (xk ) = f (x) for all

sequences xk X converging to x, then f is continuous at x.

Proof. (a) We will first show that property (a) of the theorem is equivalence to

continuity of f . Let V Y be a neighborhood of f (x). Since f is continuous, the

set U = f 1 (V ) X is a neighborhood of x. Since lim xk = x there is some k0 N

such that xk U for all k k0 . But then f (xk ) V for all k k0 also, showing that

lim f (xk ) = f (x).

(b) Let V be a neighborhood of f (x) and set U = f 1 (V ). We seek to show that

U contains a neighborhood of x. Suppose that this were not so. In that case, let

Bx = {V1 , V2 , V3 , ...} be a neighborhood basis around x and pick xk (X U ) Vk

arbitrarily. Then xk converges to x and thus by assumption f (xk ) must converge to

f (x). This however is impossible since V is open and f (x) V while f (xk )

/ V.

Consequently, U must contain a neighborhood of x and hence f is continuous at x.

10

3. Exercises

3.1. Show that a function f : X Y is continuous if and only if f 1 (Int(B))

Int(f 1 (B)) for every subset B Y .

3.2. For R let f : R R be the function f (x) = x + . If both the domain

and codomain of f are equipped with the finite complement topology, for which R

is f continuous?

- Vector Calculus SupplementCaricato datrashcanxtx
- WK7--MunkresHW4Caricato daFabrício Mello
- Lecture Notes 0913Caricato daAqua Nail Spa
- Free eBooks DownloadCaricato daAmanda Tate
- calculus on manifolds notes.pdfCaricato da"señor de las bestias"
- SequencesCaricato daSiva Kumar Gani
- Homology Lecture NotesCaricato dajjwfish
- utility_iitb.pdfCaricato daPrakash Singh
- Fixed Point Theorems for Four Mappings in Fuzzy Metric Space Using Implicit RelationCaricato daAlexander Decker
- WK_9_S1Caricato daKyle Broflovski
- HW1Caricato daFabian Molina
- LMTF SQNCCaricato dahello
- euclid.jmsj.1197320621.pdfCaricato daSon Hoang
- Sequence Textbook Sequences and SeriesCaricato daekkexxe
- [Lahiri] Lecture Notes on Differential Geometry.pdfCaricato daJulian Rey
- Topological GroupsCaricato dagmyspin
- (Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems) Igor v. Konnov, Dinh the Luc, Alexander M. Rubinov - Generalized Convexity and Related Topics-Springer (2007)Caricato daAtanu
- On Semi-T1/2 SpacesCaricato daIJRASETPublications
- ON STABILITY OF ZERO SOLUTION OF SOME TYPES OF FIFTH ORDERCaricato daIJAR Journal
- Samina BatulCaricato daกมลวรรณ สงเรืองศรี
- 11_MATH_28_Manual_UNIT_1.pdf;filename_= UTF-8''11%20MATH%2028%20Manual%20UNIT%201Caricato daCherry Jane Perez
- MidtermCaricato da173_4804
- 1-s2.0-S0166864107001320-mainCaricato daEdgar Castañeda
- Application DmsCaricato daSanny Katiyar
- Louis H. Kauffman- Assignments. Math 215. Fall 2009Caricato daOkomm
- GraphletsCaricato daropasci
- 18th PMO National Stage Written Phase Q and ACaricato daRichster Lofranco

- outlineCaricato daScreaming Silence
- christoffel.pdfCaricato dahammoudeh13
- ASP + AC + SO and Non- Tech - Syllabus_2Caricato daAli Sikander
- Chapter No.1 (Lecture No.1)Caricato daScreaming Silence
- Presentations TipsCaricato damansanas22
- Review 11Caricato daErmin Katardzic
- NT-Assignment1 soln.pdfCaricato daScreaming Silence
- math-induction.pdfCaricato daScreaming Silence
- Mathematical Induction-Concept.pdfCaricato daScreaming Silence
- Tangent and Normal Vectors.pdfCaricato daScreaming Silence
- 02 - Complex NumbersCaricato daMuzafar Ali Channa
- CirclesCaricato daScreaming Silence
- IIT JEE Study MaterialCaricato dacpawan_699508

- Test1 HL Integral Calculus v1 (1)Caricato daJUNIOR
- lecture07b_matrixstackCaricato dasushma_shetty_17
- (Lecture Notes) Daniel Bump-Hecke Algebras (2010)Caricato daMarcelo Hernández Caro
- New Efficient Fourth Order Method for Solving Nonlinear EquationsCaricato daAsia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research
- Lesson 9-NCCaricato dajemakl1568
- MultPlannerAC EACaricato daapi-3723109
- ch05.pdfCaricato daTom
- Revision Roots of Quadratics and Cubics (1)Caricato daSayar 'Eames' Banerjee
- weebly limits page 1Caricato daapi-321919618
- Introduction To Probability Solutions to the Odd Numbered Exercises (Charles M. Grinstead & J. Laurie Snell - 0821807498).pdfCaricato daManuel Guilherme
- matlab presentationCaricato daشافقه محمد نور
- Math Jan 2008 Exam C3Caricato dadylandon
- EXAM1 - MATH311Caricato daMar Lou Galinato
- HW LogCaricato daKhairi Ismail
- LIBEM2_xls 1.3Caricato daPimsree Mecute
- Circle Maps, Arnold ThmCaricato daMiroljub Brzakovic
- Chapter 1 - Conic Sections.pdfCaricato daceca.mizu
- A Polys and NT Holden Lee Lecture 13 ECaricato daLiu Yi Jia
- Algoritmo para el cálculo de equilibrio en flujo multifásicoCaricato daAnonymous aoNBPi2f1v
- The Placidus House Division Formulas for AstrologyCaricato daAnonymous WeDXoM1Q
- [202]Bastos Torres Combined Delta-Nabla Sum Operator Discrete FractionalCaricato daNuno Bastos
- Tricky Word ProblemsCaricato daPremananda
- final demo slesCaricato daapi-313517608
- 11 Maths Exemplar Chapter 2Caricato davaibhav
- Number System - Quantitative Aptitude Problems and SolutionsCaricato daRohan Mondal
- ProblemCaricato daxyza304gmailcom
- cse213WfdInductionCaricato daRuiPaiva
- CAT 18 Solutions - Afternoon Slot - QACaricato dagofodu
- Function HLCaricato daAmol Agarwal
- MATH2420-problems1Caricato daleopard9987

## Molto più che documenti.

Scopri tutto ciò che Scribd ha da offrire, inclusi libri e audiolibri dei maggiori editori.

Annulla in qualsiasi momento.