Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Synopsis
Open pit slope design has conventionally been effected as a bottomup function utilizing available geotechnical information. This results
in a decision criterion based on probability of failure and factor of
Safety with a risk assessment being carried out on the proposed
design slopes. The design approach recommended reverses the
process using fault event tree decision methodology. The
consequences of this approach are that acceptable risk criteria have
to be determined by mine owners. Slopes are then designed by the
technical staff to achieve these corporate goals. Benefits that arise
from the process are that the owners take a proactive decision on
the risk-benefit relationship allowing the technical staff to optimize
the geotechnical exploration programme and design.
VOLUME 106
JULY 2006
503
Introduction
T
r
a
n
s
a
c
t
i
o
n
P
a
p
e
r
18. Implementation
504
JULY 2006
VOLUME 106
REFEREED PAPER
REFEREED PAPER
JULY 2006
505
P
a
p
e
r
Overall assessment of
slope design reliability
Reliability
POF
Failure under
normal operating
conditions
POF
POO
18%
90%
Over mining
POF
POO
50%
2%
Unforseen
geological
conditions
POF
POO
70%
2%
78%
22%
Unexpectedly
high water table
POF
POO
30%
2%
Failure due to
poor blasting
Failure due to
extraordinary
events
POF
POO
POF
POO
15%
2%
50%
2%
Unexpected
rock mass
strength/behaviour
POF
POO
50%
2%
506
JULY 2006
VOLUME 106
REFEREED PAPER
Failure under
normal
conditions
Injury to
personnel
Failure due to
geology
deviation
Failure due to
change in water
level
Expected
fatalities
Evaluate
against
accepted level
of risk
Expected
economics
loss
Evaluate
against
expected
change in
revenue due to
change in angle
Damage to
equipment
Failure due to
mining
disturbance
T
r
a
n
s
a
c
t
i
o
n
Loss of
production
POF
Failure due to
seismic loading
Contracts
Probability
of force
majeure
Accepted level
in line with
corporate risk
profile
Failure due to
high stress
Human
resources
Industrial
action
Accepted level
of risk
Unforseen rock
mass
strength/behaviour
Public
relations
Stakeholder
resistance
Accepted level
of risk
P
a
p
e
r
Incident
Fatalities
Yes 0.05
No
0.95
Yes
0.9
Evacuation
effective?
Yes
No
0.8
No
0.1
Injuries?
Fatalities?
Yes
0.2
Exposure
0.8
Monitoring
effective?
No
0.2
POF = 10%
REFEREED PAPER
JULY 2006
507
Normal operating
conditions
Force Majeur
Loss of Profit
Yes
Cost
prohibitive?
Yes
No
Yes
Can
contracts
be met?
Production
replaced by
Spot?
No
Cost
prohibitive?
No
No
Yes
Production
affected?
Yes
Yes
No
Additional
cost?
No
Slope failure
508
JULY 2006
VOLUME 106
REFEREED PAPER
0.6
0.2
P
a
p
e
r
0
NPV
220
3.0E-04
200
2.5E-04
180
2.0E-04
Reduction in risk
due to increase in
slope monitoring
160
1.5E-04
140
1.0E-04
120
5.0E-05
Probability (Dimensionless)
NPV ($ millions)
Figure 7Comparison of a conservative and optimistic mine plan on the bases of the probability of achieving the expected NPV
0.0E+00
100
45
50
55
60
55
70
Figure 8The comparison between different designs based on NPV profit and risk of fatalities for a mine in South Africa
REFEREED PAPER
JULY 2006
509
10-6
10-5
Risk
10-4 10-3
10-2
10-1
TRAVEL
Motor accident (total) (US)1,4
Motor accident (pedestrian) (US)1
Frequent flyer profession1
Air travel4
DANGEROUS EMPLOYMENT
Space Shuttle programme2
Police killed in line of duty (USA)1
DANGEROUS SPORTS
Skydiving (US) (1998)2
Mountaineering1
Avg individual voluntary risk2
LIFESTYLE
US tap-water1
Alcohol (light drinking)1
Cigarette smoking (1 pack/day)1
4 table spoons of butter/day1
DREAD DISEASE
Cancer1
GENERAL ACCIDENTS
Drowning4
Electrocution4
Falling objects4
Falls4
Firearms4
Fires and hot substances4
Home acciden1
All accidents4
NATURAL HAZARDS
Hurricanes4
Lightning4
Tornadoes4
GENERAL
Acceptable risk for involuntary activities2
Acceptable risk for voluntary activities2
Tolerable limit at work3
involuntary
voluntary
1. Wilson and Couch (1987), 2. Philley (1992), 3. Hambly andHambly (1994), 4. Baecher and Christian (2004)
510
JULY 2006
VOLUME 106
REFEREED PAPER
Conclusion
The outcome from the risk methodology process ensures that
risks to personnel, and of equipment damage, economic
impact, force majeure, industrial action and negative public
relations are within the required criteria set by the owners. It
envelops the concept that stability is not the end objective,
but that safety is not compromized and that the economic
impact of selected slope angles has been optimized. A
The Journal of The South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy
Mine Pit
Slopes
T
r
a
n
s
a
c
t
i
o
n
1
Merchant
shipping
Mobile drill
rigs
s
pe
lo
ts
pi ria
d ite
de cr
en n
m ig
m es
co d
Re
Geisers
Foundations 2
7
3
Super
Canvey
Tankers
LNG Storage
Canvey
Refineries
Fixed drill
rigs
8 4
P
a
p
e
r
9
Dams
5
Canvey
Recommended
6
10
Estimated
US Dams
Other LNG
Studies
Commercial
aviation
consensus
ALARP
region
11
-1:10 000
-1:1000
*region defined by the upper most and lower most ALARP boundaries from: Hong Kong planning department, ANCOLD, U.S. Bureau of reclamation and U.K.
HS executive guidelines.
Individual Fatality statistics U.S.A - Voluntary
1. Space Shuttle program (per flight)
7. Cancer
8. Motor vehicle
9. Home accidents
References
BAECHER, G.B. and CHRISTIAN, J.T. Reliability and statistics in Geotechnical
Engineering, John Wiley and Sons. West Sussex. England. 2003.
BAECHER, G.B. Statistical methods in characterization. Updating subsurface
sampling of soil and rocks and their in situ testing, Engineering
Foundation, Santa Barbara, California, 1982. p. 463492
HAMBLY, E.C. and HAMBLY, E.A. Risk Evaluation and Realism. Proceedings of
the Institution of Civil Engineers and Civil Engineering, vol. 102. 1994.
pp. 6471.
PHILLEY, J.O. Acceptable RiskAn Overview. Plant/Operations Progress.
vol. 11, no. 4. 1992.
STEFFEN, O.K.H. Planning of open pit mines on a risk basis. Jl S. Afr. Inst. Min.
Metall. vol. 97, 1997. pp. 4756
VICK, S.G. Degrees of Belief. ASCE Press. Virginia. 2002.
WILSON, R. and CROUCH, E.A.C. Risk Assessment and Comparisons: An
Introduction. Science, vol. 236. 1987.
VOLUME 106
REFEREED PAPER
JULY 2006
511
T
r
a
n
s
a
c
t
i
o
n
VOLUME 106
REFEREED PAPER
JULY 2006
513
P
a
p
e
r
Background
Mintek
Atomaer
ConRoast Process
Mintek developed, piloted and patented a process for the
treatment of sulphide concentrates containing platinum
group metals, nickel, copper, cobalt and other base metals
(ConRoast Process).
The ConRoast Process operates to remove sulphur from
the metal sulphide concentrates by roasting, followed by
smelting of dead-roasted concentrate in a DC arc furnace
using an iron based alloy as a collector of platinum group
metals, nickel, copper, cobalt and other base metals.
The ConRoast Process offers significant advantages in
terms of environmental impact, health and safety.
Sulphur emissions are captured and removed from the
enclosed roasting equipment in a continuous stream of
sulphur dioxide gas of an appropriate strength as feed to a
plant to produce sulphuric acid for use in downstream base
metal leaching operations.
The ConRoast Process provides great flexibility for
treatment of a range ore types and concentrate compositions
without imposing limits on the minimum quantities of
contained base metals or sulphur. It can tolerate high
contents of chromite in concentrates characteristic of UG2
ores. UG2 ores are becoming increasingly important in the
production of platinum group metals.
514
JULY 2006
VOLUME 106
REFEREED PAPER