Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Department of Justice
Executive Office for Immigration Review
A 097-318-914
Enclosed is a copy of the Board's decision and order in the above-referenced case.
Sincerely,
DorutL C!
t1AA)
Donna Carr
Chief Clerk
Enclosure
Panel Members:
Adkins-Blanch, Charles K.
Grant, Edward R.
O'Leary, Brian M.
Userteam: Docket
Cortez, Jocelyn A.
De Castroverde Law Group
1149 S. Maryland Pkwy.
Las Vegas, NV 89104
Date:
JUL 1 2 2016
APPEAL
ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT: Jocelyn Cortez, Esquire
APPLICATION: Reopening
The respondent, a native and citizen of El Salvador, has appealed the Immigration Judge's
February 3, 2016, decision denying the respondent's motion to reopen proceedings in which she
was ordered removed in absentia on May 18, 2004. The Department of Homeland Security
(DHS) has not filed a reply to the appeal. The appeal will be sustained.
We have considered the totality of the circumstances presented in this case, including the fact
that the respondent has been granted deferred action as a childhood arrival ("DACA"), and find
that reopening is warranted. We also find that administrative closure is warranted in light of the
respondent's grant of DACA. If either party to this case wishes to reinstate the proceedings, a
written request to reinstate the proceedings may be made to the Board. The Board will take no
further action in this case unless a request is received from one of the parties. The request must
be submitted directly to the Clerk's Office, without fee, but with certification of service on the
opposing party.
Accordingly, the following orders will be entered.
ORDER: The appeal is sustained, the Immigration Judge's decision dated February 3, 2016,
is vacated and proceedings are reopened.
FURTHER ORDER: The proceedings before the Board of Immigration Appeals in this case
are administratively closed.
Cite as: Jessica Lisseth Lara-Merino, A097 318 914 (BIA July 12, 2016)
IN REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS
'
,i',
IN THE MATTER OF
LARA-MERINO, JESSICA LISSETH
FILE A 097-318-914
COLERK
IMMIGRATION COURT
FF
IN THE MATTER OF
APPLICATIONS:
Feb
, 2016
Motion to Reopen
)
)
LARA-MERINO, JESSICA LISSETH )
)
)
)
RESPONDENT
'.
David Ayala
United States Immigration Judge
respondent was thirteen at the time she was apprehended, personal service of the charging
document upon her parent, guardian, or conservator was mandatory. Contrary to the motion's
contention, the Notice to Appear does not have to be served upon the minor respondent and his
or her parent, guardian or conservator; it need only be served upon an individual in the latter
group. 8 C.F.R. 103.8(C)(2)(ii). The record indicates that the Notice to Appear was properly
served on the respondent's aunt. Exh. #1. Because the Notice to Appear also contained the
hearing notice for the respondent's May 18, 2004, hearing, service of the Notice to Appear upon
the respondent's aunt satisfied the requirements of section 239(a)(l) of the Act with respect to
the charging document and hearing notice. Based on all of the above, the Court concludes that
the respondent has not demonstrated that her removal proceedings should be reopened under
section 240(b)(5)(C)(ii) of the Act.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
THIS DOCUMENT WAS SERVED BY: MAIL) PERSONAL SERVI
TO: ( ) ALIEN ( )ALIEN C/0 CUSTODIAN LI
TY/REP HS
:
DATE:
'-<,/b BY: COURT STAFF_
"--------
-----Q
ATTACHMENTS: () EOIR-33 () EOIR-28 () LEGAL SERVICES LIST WtOTHER
2.- <-J-