Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
I. Course Description
This is a three-hour per week course which studies the various forms of reasoningthe deductive and the inductive. The subject also includes
the study of informal fallacies. It also allows the students to develop critical thinking by understanding and applying the basic rules, laws and
principles of correct reasoning. Moreover, it gives students the ability to produce and identity good arguments.
Exhibit knowledge and understanding of the basic rules, laws, and principles of logic that facilitates correct reasoning.
Construct correct, valid and logical statements
Demonstrate a critical mind applicable in dealing with issues in the society
Distinguish good arguments from bad arguments
Produce formal and informal arguments
Course Plan
Note: Prior to the first lesson, the first week of the semester will be dedicated to orientation and discussion of the mission-vision of Mabalacat City College.
Week
3-4
Content
Standard
Demonstrate an I.
understanding of
what logic is and
appreciate its use
as an aide in the
attainment of truth.
Demonstrate the II.
understanding of
judgment,
categorical
proposition, and
Venn diagram
Construct
hypothetical
propositions
Essential Learning
Declarative Knowledge
The What and Why of
Logic
A.
Nature of logic
B.
Logic: An Aid
Towards the
Attainment of Truth
Judgment
A. Categorical Proposition
1. A,E,I,and O
2. Venn Diagram
B. Hypothetical Propositions
1. Conditional
2. Disjunctive
3. Conjunctive
Functional
Knowledge
Writing the
importance of logic
in life
Intended
Learning
Outcome
Explain the
importance of
logic in life
Teaching
Learning
Activities
Values Integration
Assessment Tasks
Interactive
Lecturing
Discussions
Prudence
Board work
Assignment
Project
Responsibility
Assignment
Classifying and
illustrating
categorical
propositions
Diagram and
classify
categorical
propositions
Interactive
Lecturing
Constructing five
hypothetical
propositions
Construct
hypothetical
propositions
Interactive
Lecturing
Discussions
Essay
Discussions
6-7
8-9
10-12
Content
Standard
Essential Learning
Declarative Knowledge
Functional
Knowledge
Intended
Learning
Outcome
Teaching
Learning
Activities
Immediate Inference
A. Logical Equivalence
1. Obversion
2. Conversion
3. Contraposition
4. Inversion
B. Logical Opposition
1. Contradiction
2. Contrary
3. Sub-contrary
4. Alternation
Inferring equivalent
proposition via
obversion,
conversion,
contraposition, and
inversion
Inferring the truthvalue of an
immediate inference
Construct an
immediate
inference via
logical
equivalence
Interactive
Lecturing
Interactive
Lecturing
Mediate Inference
A. Categorical Syllogism
1. Form (Mood and
Figure)
2. Validity (Rules and
Venn diagram)
Examining the
validity of
categorical
syllogisms
Test whether a
categorical
syllogism is
valid.
Interactive
Lecturing
Constructing valid
categorical
syllogisms
Construct valid
categorical
syllogism.
Discussions
Values Integration
Assessment Tasks
Accurate
discrimination of
propositions
Board work
Assignment
Critical thinking
Board work
Critical thinking
Board work
Seatwork
Project
Discussions
Discussions
Content
Standard
Distinguish
V.
whether an
argument is good
or a fallacy.
Produce a good
argument
Essential Learning
Declarative Knowledge
Informal Fallacies
A. Fallacies of Ambiguity
B. Fallacies of Presumption
C. Fallacies of Relevance
D. Fallacies of Weak
Induction
Functional
Knowledge
Inspecting whether
an argument is good
or a fallacy.
Constructing a good
argument.
Intended
Learning
Outcome
Examine
whether an
argument is
good or a
fallacy.
Teaching
Learning
Activities
Interactive
Lecturing
Group
discussions
Values Integration
Critical thinking
Assessment Tasks
Project
Group activity
Construct a
good argument.
Major Exams
Class Standings
40%
60%
100%
IV. References:
4
Prepared by:
Noted by:
Approved by