Case 2:16-mc-00049-EGS Document 13 Filed 07/16/16 Page 1 of 2

Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Freedom From Covert Harassment &

Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania

1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
July 16, 2016
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE, LANCASTER, PA Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group
have given a NOTICE of COMPLAINT to the United States of America, et.al., regarding Civil
Rights Lawsuit which will be filed in Federal Courts, the Eastern District Court for Pennsylvania in the
near future.
On May 11, 2016 the article Court rejects man's claim that Lancaster County's residents
are torturing him with mind controlBy Matt Miller of Pennlive.com, reported the following:
Rest easy, residents of Lancaster County. The state Superior Court says Stanley
Caterbone can't sue you for stalking him and messing with his mind. A panel of that court
deep-sixed Carterbone's case in an opinion Judge Paula Francisco Ott issued Tuesday. Quite frankly, Ott
wrote, Caterbone gave the state judges no firm explanation of what he was claiming or what sort of
remedy he was after. Her court's ruling upholds an August 2015 decision by county Judge Jeffery D.
Wright to dismiss Caterbone's lawsuit as frivolous. According to Ott, Caterbone, acting as his own
lawyer, filed the case in county court against the "residents of the county of Lancaster, Pennsylvania,"
seeking an order to halt abuse he claims he was suffering at their hands. The Lancaster man accused
countians of participating in "organized stalking and/or electronic and mind manipulation torture being
committed against him," Ott noted. Also, she wrote, Caterbone asked the county judge to enlist the
local news media in a campaign to inform countians (Lancaster) to stop mistreating him.
Since that article the "organized stalking and/or electronic and mind manipulation torture being
committed against him (Stan J. Caterbone)," has escalated in a fevered pitch that can only elicit one
outcome if left without countermeasures murder, suicide, and or a prolonged deep psychosis.
After the collection of authentic transcripts from other Targeted Individuals, including NSA
Whistleblower Karen Stewart, U.S. Army Intelligence Officer Julianne McKinney, and expert, advocate,
and world renowned lecturer Dr. Nick Begich, Stan J. Caterbone is now ready to file the complaint. In
2009 President Barach Obama, Robert Gates, former Secretary of Defense and former Director of the
CIA, and the National Security Agency, or NSA were all named in a similar complaint in the Lancaster
County Court of Common Pleas, case no. CI-08-13373, CATERBONE v. the Duke Street Business
Center, et.al.,. That case is still listed as OPEN in the Lancaster County Prothonotary Office.
The complaint will be filed under 42 U.S. Code 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights.
In summary the statute reads Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or

usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the
United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or
immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in
equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an

act or omission taken in such officers judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a
declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section,
any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a

Page 2 of 2

Case 2:16-mc-00049-EGS Document 13 Filed 07/16/16 Page 2 of 2

statute of the District of Columbia.
Case law involving the following will be cited:

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

6.

Federal Sovereign Immunity Harvard Law School Federal Budget Policy Seminar
The Pennsylvania Castle Doctrine
U.S. Intellectual Property Law
RICO - Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act
United States Bill of Rights
The Legal Prohibition Against Torture

The prohibition against torture is firmly embedded in customary international law, international
treaties signed by the United States, and in U.S. law. As the U.S. Department of State has noted, the
"United States has long been a vigorous supporter of the international fight against tortureEvery unit
of government at every level within the United States is committed, by law as well as by policy, to the
protection of the individual's life, liberty and physical integrity" [U.S. Department of State, "Initial
Report of the United States of America to the UN Committee Against Torture." Oct 15, 1999. (15 Nov.
2001)]. That commitment should not be abandoned. Indeed, it must be deepened as the world
watches how the U.S. responds to the challenges before it. If the U.S. were to condone torture by
government officials or foreign governments in its fight against terrorism, it would betray its own
principles, laws, and international treaty obligations. It would irreparably weaken its standing to oppose
torture elsewhere in the world. And it would provide a handy excuse to other governments to use
torture to pursue their own national security objectives.1
A SUMMARY OF THE COMPLAINT CAN BE VIEWED AND DOWNLOADED AT:
https://www.scribd.com/document/318471926/STAN-J-CATERBONE-and-ADVANCEDMEDIA-GROUP-v-United-States-of-America-et-al-Executive-Summary-July-16-2016-Ver-2-0
___________/S/____________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania

1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com
717-669-2163
ACTIVE COURT CASES
J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court of
Appeals - COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-1149;15-3400; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 15-03984; 14-02559; 05-2288; 06-4650
Superior Court of Pennsylvania AMICUS for Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA 2016; Case No.
1561 MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349, CI-06-03401
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 16-10157

The Legal Prohibition Against Torture https://www.hrw.org/news/2003/03/11/legalprohibition-against-torture

Page 2 of 2