Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
4, December 2015
175
I.
INTRODUCTION
Bonfring International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management Science, Vol. 5, No. 4, December 2015
176
Units
Amps
g/lt
g/lt
Level1
10
4
4.5
Level2
15
6
9
Level3
20
8
13.5
Description
PH17-4 stainless steel(80mm30mm6mm)
Electrolyte copper 14mm and length 70 mm
Side flushing with pressure 0.5MPa
Commercial EDM Oil grade SAE 450+Gr.powder+surfactant SPAN20
20-30m
Normal
110 V
70 V
45 s
48 s
3 minutes
Bonfring International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management Science, Vol. 5, No. 4, December 2015
177
Discharge Current
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
Surfactant concentration
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
(3)
= 10 1
2 (4)
= . (1)
3
Where n is the number of replications for each experiment
=
. (2)
and is the response values. Table6 shows obtained average
where W is the weight difference of work piece before values of each response from each experiment and their
and after machining (g), is density of work material corresponding S/N ratios.
(g/mm),T is the weight difference of electrode before and
Table 6: Average Values of MRR, SR and TWR and Corresponding S/N ratios
Bonfring International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management Science, Vol. 5, No. 4, December 2015
178
1
(8)
III.
Exp.No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Process parameters
I(A)
SC(g/lt)
10
4
10
6
10
8
15
4
15
6
15
8
20
4
20
6
20
8
PC(g/lt)
4.5
9
13.5
9
13.5
4.5
13.5
4.5
9
SR
0
0.1917
0.1620
0.8513
0.9718
0.7850
0.8255
1
0.9574
Deviation sequences
MRR
TWR
1
0.6328
0.6544
1
0.9068
0.6724
0.4693
0.2167
0.1808
0.1986
0.4496
0.0451
0.2086
0.1898
0
0
0.1596
0.036
SR
1
0.8083
0.838
0.1487
0.0282
0.2144
0.1745
0
0.0426
Process parameters
I(A) SC(g/lt) PC(g/lt)
10
4
4.5
10
6
9
10
8
13.5
15
4
9
15
6
13.5
15
8
4.5
20
4
13.5
20
6
4.5
20
8
9
Grey relational
grade
0.3693
0.3828
0.3851
0.6613
0.7989
0.7145
0.7238
1
0.8707
Rank
9
8
7
6
3
5
4
1
2
Bonfring International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management Science, Vol. 5, No. 4, December 2015
179
Level 1
0.3790
0.5848
0.7861*
Level 2
0.7249
0.7762*
0.6545
Level 3
0.8648*
0.6649
0.6223
0.4858
0.1914
0.1638
Rank
1
2
3
= 3 + 2 + 1 2 ( )
Further, confirmation experiment was performed at
optimum process parametric setting (I3-SC2-PC1) to validate
the predicted values. The experimental, predicted values of
[5]
[6]
IV.
CONCLUSION
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
REFERENCE
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
Bonfring International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management Science, Vol. 5, No. 4, December 2015
180