Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233726394
CITATIONS
READS
46
2,670
2 authors, including:
Jos L. Louzada
Universidade de Trs-os-Montes e Alto Douro
146 PUBLICATIONS 669 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
b i o m a s s a n d b i o e n e r g y 3 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 2 6 3 4 e2 6 3 9
Available at www.sciencedirect.com
http://www.elsevier.com/locate/biombioe
article info
abstract
Article history:
The calorific values of wood pellets from different wood species were determined using
a Parr 6300 bomb calorimeter, following the CEN/TS 14918:2005. The aim of this study was
the thermo characterization of the wood pellets. Softwoods had a high calorific value
15 February 2011
between 19660.02 and 20360.45 kJ/kg, and the hardwoods had a ranging interval between
17631.66 and 20809.47 kJ/kg, in accordance to Phyllis distribution of HHV. The highest HHV
(Higher Heating Value) and LHV (Low Heating Value) were obtained by Bowdichia nitida
Keywords:
(20360.45 kJ/kg). Pinus pinaster was the softwood with the highest LHV (16935.72 kJ/kg).
Fagus sylvatica was the National hardwood with the highest HHV (19132.47 kJ/kg). Fraxinus
angustifolia was the National hardwood with the highest LHV (16450.82 kJ/kg). Eucalyptus
Moisture
(20809.47e17907.85 kJ/kg). Cedrus atlantica was the softwood with the highest HHV
Wood pellets
Linear regression
1.
Introduction
b i o m a s s a n d b i o e n e r g y 3 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 2 6 3 4 e2 6 3 9
2.
2635
3.
m2 & m3
( 100
m2 & m1
2636
b i o m a s s a n d b i o e n e r g y 3 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 2 6 3 4 e2 6 3 9
Table 3 e Mean SD (CV %) of Higher and Low Heating values, moisture content (Mar) of the samples.
Species
HHV (kJ/kg)
LHV (kJ/kg)
Mar (%)
Pinus pinaster
Pseudotsuga menziesii
Cedrus atlantica
Castanea sativa
Eucalyptus globulus
Fagus sylvatica
Quercus robur
Fraxinus angustifolia
Prunus avium
Salix babilonica
Populus euro-americana.
Acer pseudoplatanus
Chlorophora excelsa
Entandrophragma cyli.
Gossweilerodendron b.
Bowdichia nitida
Hymenaea courbaril
10.3
8.8
17.8
11.1
11.5
11.0
11.4
7.3
8.0
9.2
7.5
9.7
8.8
11.4
10.3
8.0
9.8
Sample
P4
P8
P12
P1
P2
P3
P5
P6
P7
P9
P10
P11
P13
P14
P15
P16
P17
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
100
100 & Mad
Mean (kJ/kg)
A
A
A
A
A
B
B
B
B
C
C
C
C
C
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
E
E
E
E
E
E
F
F
F
F
F
F
G
G
G
20809.47
20499.80
20360.45
20314.74
20237.89
19660.02
19296.38
19132.47
19090.90
19053.87
18791.20
18754.86
18696.82
18637.91
18279.41
18256.48
17631.66
2637
b i o m a s s a n d b i o e n e r g y 3 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 2 6 3 4 e2 6 3 9
Mean (kJ/kg)
Bowdichia nitida
A
Chlorophora excelsa
A B
Gossweilerodendron b.
B
Pinus pinaster
B C
Pseudotsuga menziesii
B C D
Fraxinus angustifolia
C D E
Hymenaea courbaril
D E F
Populus euro-americana.
D E F G
Fagus sylvatica
E F G H
Entandrophragma cyli.
F G H
Cedrus atlantica
F G H
Acer pseudoplatanus
F G H
Prunus avium
F G H
Castanea sativa
G H
Salix babilonica
H
Quercus robur
H
Eucalyptus globulus
I
17907.85
17287.67
17170.12
16935.72
16704.30
16450.82
16183.69
16130.08
15818.67
15691.61
15629.71
15615.05
15552.33
15468.56
15372.32
15361.13
14411.54
18000
17500
NCV ( K j/ k g) w. b.
4.
r=0.386 (n.s.)
17000
16500
16000
15500
15000
14500
14000
10
12
14
16
18
Mar(%)
Fig. 2 e Linear fit of Low Heating Value (LHV) by moisture
(Mar).
2638
b i o m a s s a n d b i o e n e r g y 3 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 2 6 3 4 e2 6 3 9
a
a
a
b
a
b
16030.1 a
(919.6)
16423.2 a
(696.9)
15575.6 a
(568.8)
16423.2 a
(696.9)
15575.6 a
(568.8)
16848.2 b
(894.3)
9.6 a
(1.5)
12.3 a
(4.8)
9.6 a
(1.7)
12.3 a
(4.8)
9.6 a
(1.7)
9.7 a
(1.3)
5.
Conclusions
references
b i o m a s s a n d b i o e n e r g y 3 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 2 6 3 4 e2 6 3 9
2639