Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221817492
CITATIONS
READS
19
340
3 authors, including:
Dellal A
University of Vigo
SEE PROFILE
SEE PROFILE
Authors
Aliations
Key words
fitness training
physical profile
heart rate
technical actions
time-motion characteristics
inter-periods
Abstract
Introduction
Dellal A et al. Variation of Activity Demands Int J Sports Med 2012; 33: 370375
sion [4, 5], the pitch size [18, 21], the number of
players [24], the duration of the exercise [16], the
presence of goalkeepers [23] and/or the balance
of the opposition [13] are all important mediators of the physical and technical demands
within a SSG. It has been previously demonstrated that a reduction in the number of ball
touches authorized per individual possession (1
or 2 touches) results in simultaneously greater
total distances covered in sprinting and placed
the players in a technical situation more dicult
than SSGs with a free play rule [4, 5].
However, there is still a lack of studies that
attempt to analyze the influence of the number
of ball touches in each individual possession on
both the physical and technical performance of
soccer players during SSGs. This is especially the
case for SSG training sessions that are divided
into a number of discrete exercise bouts in an
attempt to maintain the physiological load across
the entire session. In this context, Kelly and Drust
[18] revealed that the number of technical
actions decreased from the initial period to the
third and the fourth bouts within a training ses-
sion. These changes were not, however, observed for the physiological responses associated with the exercise as heart rate
increased across a similar time-scale.
Therefore, the aim of this investigation was to examine the physiological responses (heart rate and blood lactate concentration),
the physical activity profile and the technical requirements
associated with dierent periods of exercise across a range of
SSGs commonly used in elite soccer (i. e. 2 vs. 2, 3 vs. 3 and 4
vs. 4). It was hypothesized that the very high-intensity running
(VHIR) including sprinting, the high-intensity running (HIR), and
the technical performance of players would decrease from the
first to the last bout of the SSGs whereas the physiological
responses would significantly increase across a similar timescale. It was also hypothesized that these dierences between
the first and the last bout of the SSGs would be greater for SSGs
with a smaller number of players (i. e. 2 vs. 2 compared to 3 vs. 3
and 4 vs. 4; and 3 vs. 3 compared to 4 vs. 4). This information will
be of value in developing eective prescriptions within SSG for
soccer specific training.
Participants
20 international soccer players from a national team who qualified for the World Cup in 2010 took part in the study (age 27 2
years, height 180.6 2.3 cm, weight 79.2 4.2 kg, maximal heart
rate 200 4 beat.min 1, body fat 12.7 1.2 % [9]). The study was
conducted according to the ethical standards in sport and exercise science research [12] and the protocol was fully approved by
the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the local Federation
before the commencement of the assessments. Written informed
consent was received from all players after a detailed explanation about the aims of the study.
Procedures
Maximal heart rate and resting heart rate were determined for
each player using Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test [19] and
according to Dellal et al. [8]. From 7 to 10 days after the midseason break of the dierent domestic league, all players of the
national team had been gathered in order to prepare for the
Nations African Cup 2010 in Angola (from January to February).
During the preparation of this competition and during this competition, all the players performed the 3 dierent SSGs formats:
2 vs. 2, 3 vs. 3 and 4 vs. 4. All players were fully familiarised with
the SSGs formats and regimes during the first period of in-season training. Prior to each dierent SSG, a 20-min standardized
warm-up was carried out. Each specific game format restricted
the number of ball touches to maximal 2 touches. This frequency
of ball touches was selected on the basis of data determined in
match-play [7]. The duration and the pitch size of each SSG were
strictly controlled (2 vs. 2: 2 min and 20 15 m; 3 vs. 3: 3 min and
25 18 m; 4 vs. 4: 4 min and 30 20 m). Each exercise period was
separated by 3 min of passive recovery. The relative pitch size
per player stayed constant for all SSGs at 1:75 m2. 4 bouts of
exercise were completed for each SSG (P1, P2, P3, P4). All the
SSGs were performed with 4 supporting players stationed
around the playing area. The instructions to all players during all
SSGs were to keep possession of the ball. Several balls were
placed around the playing area and consequently, they were
immediately available to return into play. This enabled the game
Statistical analysis
Data are presented as means and standard deviations
(means S.D.). Before using parametric statistical test procedures, the normality of data was verified. A two-way analysis of
variance (ANOVA) with repeated measures was used to test for
dierences in performance measures (dependent variable)
between the dierent periods within each SSG (2 vs. 2, 3 vs. 3 or
4 vs. 4, independent variable). Follow-up univariate analyses
using Bonferroni-corrected pairwise comparisons were used
where appropriate. All statistical analyses were performed using
SPSS for Windows, version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA). The
level of significance was set at P < 0.05. Confidence intervals (CI)
for significant dierences in means were also determined. Eect
size (ES) values of 00.19, 0.200.49, 0.500.79, and 0.8 were
considered to represent trivial, small, medium, and large dierences, respectively [2].
Results
Discussion
313.7 16.2*
53.4 5.1***
71.8 12.7**
8.1 1.4***
62.5 4.6**
3.0 0.8***
10.5 0.3
3.2 0.0***
7.2 0.2***
88.7 0.7
85.6 2.9**
332.3 22.1***
58.9 5.3***
78.5 9.1***
8.7 1.4***
64.2 4.9***
2.4 0.6***
10.7 0.3
2.6 0.0***
6.7 0.2***
86.6 0.6
80.0 3.2**
(P2)
(P1)
91.3 2.6
7.8 0.2
91.1 0.5
3.8 0.1
10.4 0.3
3.5 0.7
60.0 4.3
7.4 0.9
66.0 10.3
46.1 6.4
297.8 18.6
(P3)
Period 3
2 vs. 2 SSG
Period 2
Period 1
95.1 3.3
8.9 0.1
93.4 0.4
4.6 0.1
10.5 0.3
5.1 1.2
55.5 4.1
4.2 1.2
54.9 11.6
36.7 6.5
273.0 30.8
(P4)
Period 4
79.8 3.9***
6.8 0.7***
86.9 2.6
2.8 0.2**
10.7 1.4
2.5 0.7***
72.4 2.2**
8.4 1.0***
144.9 20.9***
100.2 12.3***
584.4 56.2**
(P1)
Period 1
VHIR : Very high-intensity running ; HIR : High-intensity running ; RPE : Rating of perceived exertion
*Significantly dierent between periods 1 and 2, and periods 3 and 4; with *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001
total distance
covered (m)
total distance covered in VHIR (m)
total distance covered in HIR (m)
total number of
duels
successful passes
( %)
total number of lost
balls
total number of ball
possessions
blood lactate
concentration
(mmol.l 1)
RPE (CR-10)
% of maximal heart
rate
% of reserve heart
rate
Variables
84.7 3.6**
7.5 0.9**
88.6 2.7
3.2 0.2*
10.6 1.4
3.3 0.6**
71.6 2.7*
7.8 1.2*
120.5 13.8***
92.6 12.6**
557.3 53.1**
(P2)
Period 2
91.9 3.3
7.9 0.7
90.1 2.7
3.5 0.2
11.1 1.6
3.8 0.7
69.6 2.1
7.2 1.2
108.6 11.2
85.4 12.7
521.6 43.9
(P3)
Period 3
3 vs. 3 SSG
Table 1 Physical demands, technical actions and physiological responses during small-sided games according to the dierent SSG bouts.
92.5 3.8
8.9 0.7
91.9 3.0
3.9 0.2
11.2 1.2
5.4 1.5
65.8 2.2
4.7 1.1
99.7 6.9
72.6 12.9
461.8 30.3
(P4)
Period 4
77.6 4.3**
6.9 0.7***
83.4 2.8
2.5 0.2*
8.3 1.2
2.6 0.9***
70.8 5.1***
5.7 1.1***
169.8 20.5***
103.6 14.6***
711.9 65.5***
(P1)
Period 1
78.7 3.9*
7.7 1.0**
84.7 2.9
2.7 0.1*
8.4 1.3
3.7 1.1**
69.3 4.9**
4.6 1.0**
144.8 17.1**
95.5 12.4***
689.2 71.1**
(P2)
82.4 3.8
8.1 0.7
86.1 3.1
2.9 0.3
8.7 1.6
4.2 1.2
67.0 5.1
4.1 0.9
130.5 16.6
89.3 12.7
667.8 74.0
(P3)
Period 3
4 vs. 4 SSG
Period 2
88.5 4.4
8.9 0.8
87.9 3.2
3.2 0.2
8.7 1.2
6.0 1.7
63.5 5.6
3.1 0.8
107.7 13.2
76.5 13.4
604.9 55.2
(P4)
Period 4
Dellal A et al. Variation of Activity Demands Int J Sports Med 2012; 33: 370375
Fig. 1 Variation of the proportion of the total distance covered in VHIR and in HIR within all bouts
of each small-sided game tested.
30
25
20
**
**
**
***
**
**
15
10
05
00
P1
P2
P3
P4
P1
2 vs. 2
P2
P3
P4
P1
P2
3 vs. 3
P3
P4
4 vs. 4
% total distance covered in HIR
**Significantly different between periods 1 and period 4; with **p< 0.01; ***p < 0.001
VHIR : Very high-intensity running ; HIR : High-intensity running
P1: Period 1; P2: Period 2; P3: Period 3; P4: Period 4.
14
12
10
***
***
08
***
06
04
00
2 vs. 2
3 vs. 3
4 vs. 4
***
***
***
02
2 vs. 2
Number of
duels
3 vs. 3
4 vs. 4
Number of
balls lost
P1
P2
P3
2 vs. 2
3 vs. 3
4 vs. 4
Number of
ball possessions
P4
***Significantly different between periods 1 and 2, and periods 3 and 4; with ***p < 0.001
P1: Period 1; P2: Period 2; P3: Period 3; P4: Period 4.
Dellal A et al. Variation of Activity Demands Int J Sports Med 2012; 33: 370375
of players because a modification of only 1 rule aects the technical demand of a SSG as Kelly and Drust [18] and the present
study have observed. To illustrate this, Mallo and Navarro [23]
compared 3 dierent 3 vs. 3 with 3 dierent game rules in the
same pitch area. The result was that the number of ball contacts
and the number of short passes were greater when the rule was
to keep the ball as compared to the 3 vs. 3 with goalkeepers and
the 3 vs. 3 with 2 out-players. The 3 vs. 3 played with the aim
to keep the ball under the same conditions as those found in the
present study, indicating that the number of unsuccessful short
passes reached 15.4 4.7 % and this value was greater than in the
other game rules (9.1 5.1 % with presence of goalkeepers, and
5.3 2.9 % with out-players). Consequently, the coach could
increase the technical diculty of the SSGs by giving instructions to the players to keep the ball (without goalkeepers and
out-players) and in varying the game rules such as the number
of ball touches per individual possessions and the number of
players.
The main findings of the present study indicate that the total
distance covered in high-intensity activities and the technical
performance of elite soccer players decreased as a result of the
number of exercise periods in 2 vs. 2, 3 vs. 3 and 4 vs. 4 SSGs.
These changes were associated with increases in physiological
responses to the exercise. Technical actions also changed as a
result of the exercise period. Specifically, although the total
number of individual possession stayed constant, the number of
balls lost and the number of duels increased from P1 to P4 while
the percentage of successful passes decreased from P1 to P4.
The changes associated with the exercise period seem to be
related to the number of players. It is suggested that a reduction
of the number of players in a SSG induce a decrease of the
number and duration of the recovery periods between the
eorts. This data would seem to indicate that the number of
exercise periods included in any training session is also an
important factor for the planning and organisation of soccerspecific training sessions. Thus, according to the objectives of
the training and the time of the season, coaches could modify
simultaneously the technical diculty, the physical demands
and the physiological responses within the SSGs.
Acknowledgements
References
1 Barbero-lvarez JC, Coutts A, Granda J, Barbero-lvarez V, Castagna C.
The validity and reliability of a global positioning satellite system
device to assess speed and repeated sprint ability (RSA) in athletes. J
Sci Med Sport 2010; 13: 232235
2 Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hillsdale: NJ: Erlbaul Associates, 1988; 567
3 Coutts AJ, Duffield R. Validity and reliability of GPS units for measuring movement demands of team sports. J Sci Med Sport 2010; 13:
133135
4 Dellal A, Chamari K, Owen AL, Wong DP, Lago-Penas C, Hill-Haas S.
Influence of the technical instructions on the physiological and physical demands within small-sided soccer games. Eur J Sport Sci 2011;
11: 353358
5 Dellal A, Lago-Penas C, Wong DP, Chamari K. Eect of the number
of ball touch within bouts of 4 vs. 4 small-sided soccer games. Int J
Sports Physiol Perform 2011; 6: 322333
6 Dellal A, Hill-Haas S, Lago-Penas C, Chamari K. Small sided-games
in soccer: amateur vs. professional players physiological responses,
physical and technical activities. J Strength Cond Research 2011; 25:
23712381
Dellal A et al. Variation of Activity Demands Int J Sports Med 2012; 33: 370375