Micro Teaching Report

Scoring Rubric for Natasha Mortley and Jean Leslies

Micro-Teaching
January 15, 2016
Category
Organization
(10 points)

Scoring Criteria
The type of presentation is appropriate for the topic
and
audience.
Information is presented in a logical sequence.

Total
Points
5

Score
5

5
5

5
4

5
5

5
5

presentation.
Use of multimedia learnt this week
Length of presentation is within the assigned time

5
5

5
3.5

limits.
Information was well communicated.
Total Points

5
55

5
47.5

ADDIE is clearly identified and seen throughout the

presentation
Content
(30 points)

Presentation
(15 points)
Score

Technical terms are well-defined in language

appropriate for the target audience.
Material included is relevant to the overall lesson.
Appropriate amount of material is prepared, and
points made reflect well their relative importance.
There is an obvious conclusion summarizing the

Further comments below:

........
Thank you!
Doreen

Scoring Rubric for Natasha Mortley and Jean Leslies

Micro-Teaching
January 15, 2016
Category
Organization

Scoring Criteria
The type of presentation is appropriate for the topic
and audience.
Information is presented in a logical sequence.

Total
Points
5

Score
4

5
5

5
4

presentation.
Use of multimedia learnt this week
Length of presentation is within the assigned time

5
5

4
4

limits.
Information was well communicated.
Total Points

5
55

5
43

(10 points)
ADDIE is clearly identified and seen throughout the
presentation
Content
(30 points)

Presentation
(15 points)
Score

Technical terms are well-defined in language

appropriate for the target audience.
Material included is relevant to the overall lesson.
Appropriate amount of material is prepared, and
points made reflect well their relative importance.
There is an obvious conclusion summarizing the

Further comments below: A good presentation and very informative.

........
Thank you!
Kimberley Taylor

Table 2. Characteristics of a good quality presentation. (Tick Yes or No when assessing)

Is the presentation
comprehensible?
The presenters had very good
diction who used
comprehensible terminology.
Where special terms were
used, they were clear defined
and applied to the lesson.
The lesson was wellstructured with use of
purposeful, true to life
examples.
Is the presentation
stimulating?
This presentation was
stimulating with sufficient
engaging gestures,
participation from the class,
confidence and knowledge of
content with very clear
explanation
Is the visualization helpful?
The youtube video superbly
complimented the
presentation and so did the
video/voxbox. The lesson
was well received and stirred
our thoughts even for those
not belonging to that field.

- speaks freely

yes

no

- short sentences

yes

no

- terminology is
comprehensible

yes

no

- presentation is wellstructured

yes

no

- conciseness

yes

no

- use of examples

yes

no

- eye contact

yes

no

- speaker varies his position

yes

no

- participants are encouraged yes

to contribute

no

- use of humor to create a

relaxed atmosphere

yes

no

- presented with commitment yes

no

- friendly/respectful behavior yes

no

- visualization is clear and

well-structured

yes

no

- includes graphic elements

and optical stimuli

yes

no

- easily legible writing

yes

no

- colors help to focus on the

important aspects

yes

no

- comprehensible
visualization

yes

no

- affectionate layout

yes

no

Elaine
Bolton