Innovation in nursing is not a new concept to the nursing profession (Kaya,
Turan and Aydin, 2015). All over the world many nurses utilizes the used of new technology in order to improve the results of the care of health people and patients and reduce expenses. Innovation in nursing applications is extremely important for improving health, preventing diseases, describing and avoiding risk factors, developing healthy life standard attitudes, and qualifying the care treatment methods; beacuse innovation helps updated knowledge, methods and services be invented and discovered by the institutions (ICN, 2009). In the developing country like Philippines, the used of nursing innovation in the government hospital is still far behind from the ideal. Most improvements like telehealth are being observed in the private hospitals and institution where health service is expensive. The goverment is still in the phase of upgrading in order to achieve the goal of modernization in health services. According to the press released issued by the House of the Senate. Senator Recto said, P7.7 billion of HFEP's P27 billion outlay is earmarked for the acquisition of new hospital equipment, called the Health Facilities Enhancement Program (HFEP). Despite the fact, that we are living in the modern world of technology, the use of mobile phones and any other electronic devices in our daily social life. Most elderly people are being afraid to utilize the modern devices. Particularly, in the hospitals, elderly nurses are being stucked to the traditional method of charting. Most elderly thinks that the use of computer are for youngsters only. Computer are for all ages and our elderly can be equally competent in using technologies (Dino, 2013). This led to the researcher to make a study about the behavior of elderly nurses in the government hospital towards the use of advance technology in the nursing service.
2.0 Review of Related Literature
2.1 Theoretical Framework This study will employ the use of Unified Theory of Acceptance Use of technology (UTAUT) developed by Venkatesh, Morris, Davis and Davis in 2003 and Rosentocks (1996) Helath Behavioral Model. The UTAUT proposed an acceptance model which helps to understand likelihood of success of new technologies and determine drives of acceptance (Sezgin and Yildirim, 2014). 2.2 Literature review
2.3 Research Simulacrum
3.0 Research Methods 3.1 Research Design The researchers have decided to conduct this study in a naturalist approach. This research approach, which is more commonly termed as quantitative studies, generally involves the collecting and converting of data into numerical form so that statistical calculations can be made and conclusions be drawn. Accordingly, in order to provide causation among variables discussed in the previous section, the research method applied was experimental more specifically, quasi experimental, in which the element of randomization was removed. The quasi experimental method is an evolution of the experimental method which is a systematic and scientific approach to research in which the researcher manipulates one or more variables and controls and measures any other change in other variables. While experimental research is a word with a wide range of definitions, in the strictest sense it may be what is called a true experiment. Experimental research is often used [1] in studies where time is a priority in causal relationships, [2] there is a consistency in a causal relationship, [3] the magnitude of correlation is great (Experimental Research, 2011). Evolving from the experimental method while in most aspects still much the same the quasi experimental method characteristically lacks randomization. The use of control groups is absent. Quasi experiments are conducted when true experiments are impracticable of impossible (Tilley, 2006). Quasi experimental was deemed the best method to be used in this study due to time and financial constraints, as well as a limited subject pool from which to choose. Issues with practicality and convenience were also taken into consideration when deciding on which method would best suit the needs of the researchers study. 3.2 Research Locale The researchers shall conduct the study at Valenzuela Medical Center, Valenzuela City, Metropolitan Manila. This location was chosen in part due to its convenience and proximity to the researchers center of operations. 3.3 Population and sampling In accordance with the researchers quasi experimental method, at least eight participants will be chosen through purposive sampling with the following criteria: [1] Senior nurse, 35 years of age and above [2] not been diagnosed with chronic illness [3] staff in the institution that the researcher chose [4] willing to participate.
Virtually synonymous with qualitative research, purposive sampling is a type
of non-probability sampling that uses a particular subset of people and rejects people who do not fit a particular role (Purposive Sampling , 2013). Because of the lack of randomization, it can be argued that purposive sampling may not accurately represent the population. However, often in research there are instances in which probabilistic methods are simply not feasible, practical, or theoretically sensible (Trochim, 2006). 3.4 Research Ethics 3.5 Research Instrument 3.6 Data Collection 3.7 Data Analysis 4.0 Results 4.1 4.2 Significance difference of pre-test and post-test 4.3 Comparison of post-test scores of experimental and control 5.0 Discussion 6.0 Conclusion 7.0 Recommendation