Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Copyright 2007, The Johns Hopkins University and Hugh Waters. All rights reserved. Use of these materials
permitted only in accordance with license rights granted. Materials provided AS IS; no representations or
warranties provided. User assumes all responsibility for use, and all liability related thereto, and must independently
review all materials for accuracy and efficacy. May contain materials owned by others. User is responsible for
obtaining permissions for use from third parties as needed.
PrivateInsurance
andManagedCare
AnInternationalView
HughWaters
February22,2007
OutlineofTalk
(1) ComparisonofHealthExpenditures
Internationally
(2) OverviewofTypesofHealthInsurance
Internationally
(3) ExperienceofU.S.HealthInsurance
CompaniesinLatinAmerica
(4) ExampleofChile
HealthCareExpenditures
Internationally
HealthSpendingandIncome,byCountry,2004
HealthExpendituresperCapita
$6,000
$5,000
$4,000
$3,000
$2,000
$1,000
$0
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
PercapitaGrossNationalIncome(PPP)
$40,000
HealthSpendingandIncome,byCountry,2004
HealthExpendituresperCapita
$6,000
$5,000
$4,000
$3,000
$2,000
$1,000
$0
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
PercapitaGrossNationalIncome(PPP)
$40,000
UnderFiveMortalityandIncome,byCountry,2004
350
UnderFiveMortalityRate
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
PercapitaGrossNationalIncome(PPP)
$40,000
UnderFiveMortalityandIncome,byCountry,2004
350
UnderFiveMortalityRate
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
PercapitaGrossNationalIncome(PPP)
$40,000
HealthSpendingas%ofGDP,byCountry,2004
HealthExpendituresas%ofGDP
16%
14%
12%
10%
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
PercapitaGrossNationalIncome(PPP)
$40,000
HealthSpendingas%ofGDP,byCountry,2004
HealthExpendituresas%ofGDP
16%
14%
12%
10%
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
PercapitaGrossNationalIncome(PPP)
$40,000
TypesofHealthInsurance
Internationally
Health
Insurance
Systems
National
Health
Insurance
(MOH)
Social
Insurance
Single
Multiple
CommunityRisk
Sharing
PrivateInsurance
withCompetition
Feefor
Service
Managed
Care
Source:AkikoMaedaandCristianBaeza,theWorldBank
Insurance
Provision
Individual Private
Insurance
Population-based
Social Insurance
Private Provider
Public Provider
Demand side provider Supply Side provider
financing mechanism Financing Mechanisms
Insurance
Provision
Individual Private
Insurance
Population-based
Social Insurance
Private Provider
Public Provider
Demand side provider Supply Side provider
financing mechanism Financing Mechanisms
PrivateInsuranceas%ofHealthSpending,
byCountry,2004
PrivateIns.as%ofHealthSpending
60%
Uraguay
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
PercapitaGrossNationalIncome(PPP)
$40,000
PrivateInsuranceas%ofHealthSpending,
byCountry,2004
PrivateIns.as%ofHealthSpending
60%
Uraguay
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
PercapitaGrossNationalIncome(PPP)
$40,000
PrivateInsuranceas%ofHealthSpending,
byCountry,2004
PrivateIns.as%ofHealthSpending
60%
SouthAfrica
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
PercapitaGrossNationalIncome(PPP)
$40,000
PrivateInsuranceas%ofHealthSpending,
byCountry,2004
PrivateIns.as%ofHealthSpending
60%
50%
40%
Bahamas
30%
20%
10%
0%
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
PercapitaGrossNationalIncome(PPP)
$40,000
PrivateInsuranceas%ofHealthSpending,
byCountry,2004
PrivateIns.as%ofHealthSpending
60%
50%
40%
UnitedStates
30%
20%
10%
0%
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
PercapitaGrossNationalIncome(PPP)
$40,000
ExperienceofU.S.Companies
inLatinAmerica
CharacteristicsofManagedCareReadiness
OverallSystemStructure
Country
Centralized
Government
Control
Consumers
Providers
ClinicalService
Financial
UR/EBM
U.S.
+/++
++/++
++/+
+/++
+/++
/++
+/++
U.K.
++
++
Chile
Canada
++
Sweden
++
Germany
++
France
ManagedCareCompaniesinLatinAmerica
MultinationalinsurersareactiveinArgentina
andChile,andhavebeguninBrazil.
Threewaysthatmultinationalcorporations
investfinancecapitalinLatinAmerican:
(1) Purchasingcompaniesthatsellindemnity
insuranceorprepaidhealthplans;
(2) Jointventureswithothercompanies;
(3) Agreementstomanagesocialsecurity
andpublicsectorinstitutions.
ManagedCareCompaniesinLatinAmerica
Themainmultinationalcompaniesoperating
areAetna,CIGNA,theEXXELGroup,the
AmericanInternationalGroup(AIG),
InternationalMedicalGroup(IMG),and
Prudential.
InChile,Aetnacontrolsasubsidiary,Aetna
ChileSegurosGenerales,andcreatedanISAPRE
AetnaSaludin1993,whichhas60,000insured
subscribers(5thamongtheISAPREs).
ManagedCareCompaniesinLatinAmerica
InArgentina,Aetnaoperatesthrough
investmentsintheEXXELGroupandbought
thelargestandoldestprepaidinsuranceplanin
Argentina,AsistenciaMdicaSocialArgentina
(AMSA).
CIGNAoperatesinChile,BrazilandEcuador.
PrivateInsuranceInternationally
Onlyafewcountriesintheworldhavea
nationalhealthsystembasedprimarilyor
heavilyonmultipleprivateinsurers.
Amonghighincomecountries,anational
systembasedonmultipleprivateinsurers
existsonlyintheUnitedStates
EvenintheU.S.,publicsourcesaccountfor
45%ofhealthexpendituresnationwide.
RolesforPrivateInsuranceInternationally
Supplementarybenefitsforhigherincome
populationgroups.
Administratingpublicinsurance.
Managedcareindevelopedhealthsystems.
Increaseinvestmentinhealth;allow
governmenttofocusonlowerincome
groups.
Othernationswithasubstantialprivate
insurancemarketincludeChile,South
Africa,andthePhilippines.
PrivateInsurersandPublicInsurance
Currently,themostcommonadministratorsof
healthbenefitsinclude:
Nationalgovernment
Regionalgovernment
Socialinsurancefunds
PrivateinsurersorManagedCare
Organizations(MCOs)
Quasiautonomousnongovernmental
managementunits(forexamplelocally
controlledPrimaryCareTrustsintheUK)
ExportingManagedCare
Incountrieswithagrowingmiddleclass,
MCOscanplayacomplementaryroletothe
publicsystemalthoughothersbelievethat
suchprivateplanscanpotentially
underminethepublicsystem.
Thesecomplementaryplanscanbe
purchasedeitherbyemployersorthe
individualsthemselves.
ExamplethePhilippines
Spendsjust3.2percentofitsGDPonhealth.
Has35privateinsurancecompanies.
Theprimarydrivingforcebehindthis
processistheneedforaccesstoqualityheath
servicesintheprivatesector.
Inprinciple,thegovernmentisableto
reallocateitslimitedresourcesand
strengthenitsprogramsforthepoor.
ManagedCareinDevelopedHealthSystems
Inhighincomecountries,policymakershave
suggestedthatcompetinghealthplanscould
offerbenefitstosocializedmodelsofcare.
Learnfromthemethodsappliedbyprivate
healthinsuranceandMCOs.
Canefficiencybeimprovedthrough
competitionandintroductionofinternal
markets?
Issues
CreamskimmingexperienceinIsraelshow
thatinsteadoffocusingonimproving
clinicalqualityandefficiency,competing
sicknessfundsemphasizeincustomer
amenitiesandmarketing.
Sincegovernmentfundingisbasedon
averagecost,withoutriskadjustmentfunds
willtrytoselectmemberswiththelowest
risk,threateningtheintegrityofthesystem.
U.S.CompaniesAbroadAdvantages
Processing
Utilizationmanagement
Caremanagement
Qualityimprovement
Designandimplementationofprovider
paymentschemes.
U.S.CompaniesAbroad
Inthe1990smanagedcarecompanies
includingAetna,CIGNA,United,andBlue
CrossBlueShieldplansformedjoint
venturesinLatinAmerica,Asia,andAfrica.
NowmostU.S.MCOshaveabandonedtheir
riskbearinginsuranceoperationsoverseas.
Why?Complexityofadaptingtolocal
conditions,providerresistance,andanti
Americanorantimanagedcaresentiment.
CaseStudyUnitedHealthinSouthAfrica
Inthe1990s,Unitedformedajointventure
withSouthernLife,aSouthAfrican
insurancecompany,andAngloAmerican
Corporation,alargeminingconglomerate.
Facedseveralchallengesincludingnegative
physicianresponseandbadpress.
WhentheAngloAmericanCompanymade
anindependentbusinessdecisiontodivest
ofitsnonminingbusinesses,thejoint
venturewaseffectivelyabandoned.
CaseStudyUnitedHealth(cont.)
Severalfactorscontributedtothefailure:
(1)Overcommitmentofresources;
(2)Failuretorecognizetheimportanceof
directpatientpaypharmaceuticalsasa
sourceofrevenueforphysicians;
(3)Failuretogainthesupportofemployers;
and
(4)Lackoffullunderstandingofthecomplex
racialsituationinSouthAfrica.
CurrentSituation
UnitedandafewotherU.S.MCOs
includingKaiserPermanenteandCIGNA
maintaininternationaloperations.
Consultingandadministrativeservicesand
partnershipsforhealthcareprovision.
Insuranceproductsarelimitedmainlyto
U.S.expatriatesandthoseworkingforU.S.
companiesabroad.
Chile
CaseStudy
Chile
Population16.1million.
GDPpercapita(PPP)$10,874.
Healthexpenditures$489percapita.
TotalFertilityRate(TFR)2.0.
Lifeexpectancyatbirth78.0.
OOPas%oftotalhealthspending23.7%.
Source:2006WorldDevelopmentIndicators
Chile DecliningTotalFertilityRate
Chile DecliningPovertyRate
Chile HealthSectorOrganization
Health Sector
Public subsector
Private subsector
18 private health insurance plans
(ISAPRES): 2.8 million beneficiaries
(18.5 % of population)
Curative and
preventive health
insurance
Public health
interventions
National programs funded and managed by the Ministry of Health (i.e. free
vaccination, TBC treatment, Hanta virus control, PNAC, etc.)
Insurance must finance annual preventive physical examination for each beneficiary.
Providers
Stewardship and
Regulation
Health Financing
Health expenditures $581 per capita.
Health care system financed through the public
National Health Fund (Fondo Nacional de Salud
FONASA), and a group of private insurers
(Instituciones de Salud Previsional ISAPREs).
Employed individuals not otherwise covered are
required to contribute 7% of their income to
FONASA (up to a maximum of approximately
US$135). or to purchase health insurance from an
ISAPRE.
Coverage
From 1981, possible to opt out FONASA and
into ISAPREs.
ISAPREs cover 20% of the population (from
2% in 1983) and FONASA 67%.
There are currently 17 ISAPREs, covering 20%
of the population (from 2% in 1983), vs. 67% for
FONASA.
Coverage (cont.)
The ISAPREs, by law, set premiums at
community rates by age, sex and family size.
Other private insurance companies offer
differentiated plans that vary according to the
premium paid and the health risk of the insured
family.
FONASAs rates are tied only to income. People
can buy health insurance simply by paying 7% of
their income, independent of their age, number
of beneficiaries, or health status.
ChileSourceofHealthInsurance,2000
100%
90%
% in FONASA
80%
% in ISAPREs
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
1 (poorest)
3
Income Quintile
5 (richest)
Coverage (cont.)
Wealthier Chileans went to ISAPREs example of
adverse selection.
9.0% of FONASA's risk pool is over 65 years of age,
compared to only 2.2% of the ISAPREs' beneficiaries.
The ISAPREs' beneficiaries have a mean monthly
income of $554 (1998 estimate) while the majority of
FONASA beneficiaries have a mean monthly income
of less than $154.
ISAPREs RiskRatingTable
Insured
Dependants
Age
Months
Years
Male
Female
Spouse
Male
Female
00 - 11
2,40
2,40
2,40
3,00
3,00
12 - 23
2,40
2,40
2,40
2,40
2,40
02 - 17
1,10
2,30
2,50
1,10
1,10
18 - 24
1,00
3,00
2,50
1,00
1,30
25 - 39
1,00
4,20
3,30
1,00
3,30
40 - 49
1,60
3,80
2,70
1,40
2,70
50 - 59
2,10
3,90
2,80
2,00
2,80
60 - 64
4,00
4,50
3,60
3,60
3,60
65 - 69
5,10
5,10
4,30
5,50
4,30
70 - ms
5,70
5,50
5,20
6,70
5,20
Source:MinistryofHealth(www.minsal.cl)andFONASA(www.fonasa.cl).
Criticisms
This mixed system of insurance has been criticized
principally because of an alleged negative effect on
equity.
One specific criticism is that permitting the rich to
opt out of the public health system diminishes what
some call the systems solidarity.
Public opinion surveys show that a majority think that
access to good health services is not available to all
Chileans.