Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
colonial. And how patriarchy maintains its power amongst families and
communities. Additionally it will look at how patriarchy manifests itself in the
book Palace Walk and the effects of its culture on two characters and the
impact that power relations have in the characters ability to self-actualise. It will
look at secular and religious challenges to patriarchy by Islamic intellectuals,
activists and reformers.
Patriarchy is something which exists but differs between all societies. By looking
at patriarchy in a political light it can be seen how the oppression of women is
upheld by power of government. Ideological conditioning is one way of how this
power is upheld. Socialization of male and females which is suited to favour
males is how the conditioning is gained to keep patriarchy running smoothly.
The family is the unit in which its members are ruled by power of government, by
the socialization of sexes from birth the family actually helps to patriarchy keep
its position by helping its young to conform to what is expected of them. The
family, the larger society and the state are all connected and are the main three
patriarchal institutions and where patriarchy through the state keeps control of
its people through the head of the family so the family becomes a replica of the
larger society, Millet (1971).
Naguib Mahfouzs novel Palace Walk shows the ways in which patriarchy
manifests itself following the lives of an Egyptian family beginning in the year
1917. Al sayyid Ahmed Abd al-Jawad is the husband and father of the
patriarchal household who use rules and fear to hold power over the entire
family, whilst also contradicting himself by breaking his own rules for his own
benefit. Amina is the wife and would have to obey her husband on every matter.
Living most of her life in isolation Amina had been forbidden to leave the house
for a full twenty five years. Waking early each morning to help her husband
dress, she would then go about preparing breakfast to be served on the top floor
of the house; this floor was to be used predominantly by the males in the
household. Amina would stand on duty awaiting instruction by her husband. This
experience for the male children was always a tense and nerve wracking and the
only part of the day in which the sons were together with their father. Their
father would strictly examine each of them looking for some fault, where they
would then be seriously reprimanded. Once the father left the house for work the
atmosphere would dramatically change, this would be met with relief, leaving
each of them to be able to talk, laugh, sing or play free from fear. This would be
the start of a typical day in the household, the male sons would then head out to
work or school leaving Amina and her daughters doing daily chores.
The daughters would then become ruled by the mother, who would divide the
chores that needed to be completed for the day, although the mother would
show love and kindness more than anything else. Aminas day would finally end
when she would greet and serve her husband after his nightly trips out
socialising and drinking with friends unaware of his involvement with other
women.Amina had showed an objection to these nites out early on in the
marriage with al sayyidsresponse being to grab her by the ears and say Im a
man. I am the one who commands and forbids. I will not accept any criticism of
my behaviour. All I ask of you is to obey me. Dont force me to discipline you.
Patriarchy would also show its form in much other stronger ways. The father
would have control over any marriage for his children. Both daughters unable to
show themselves to any other male would have their choice of partner made for
them. A marriage proposal would come from the family of any future husband
and the decision of whether to accept or decline would be made by the father.
Once the daughters were married they then escaped the control of their father
but would then become under the control of their husband and their new in-laws.
Ibrahim (2007) a leading spokesman for democracy and human rights in the Arab
world says to understand Islamic thinking today an historical approach must be
used by understanding three main things. By understanding Islam as something
that came to very old societies it became mixed with other cultures over the
course of a century which then in turn changed again which has lasted right up
until now. The second thing is that understanding that every child from every
generation learns through history books that this first century of Islam was the
most glorious time and a revival of that era of civilisation to return are how the
Muslim Brothers, Hezbollah, Hamas and Al Quada have come about. The third
thing is the question that Muslims have struggled to agree an answer on is the
question of why the West has progressed so much whilst they havent. They
have been presented with three answers. One answer is that they must go right
back to pure religion, a second answer is that they didnt keep up with the West
and were then conquered so they must try to be like the West. The third answer
is that they dont need to do either but they could combine the best of both as in
using both modernity and the best of their early heritage, culture and tradition.
The Islam Reformation project is something that was started by Ibraham after
9/11. One thesis that has been put across is the theory that although the Koran is
based upon freedom, democracy, gender equality and human rights Islamic
thought has not been updated or changed for one thousand years. The reason
for this being that religious authoritys shutdown Ijtihad which is the
reinterpretation of the text and said it was the foreign pressure upon Islam was
the reason. It is thought that by reinterpreting the text it would then be felt as
being controlled by the West. The Islamic reformation project has asked Islamic
thinkers from across the world to think about this statement Please, as you read
the Koran and the basic heritage of Islam, develop 21 st century Islamic answers
that will help keep our youngsters to be faithful to their religion and their
heritage but also help them to live in the 21 st century as full partners, not as
enemies and not as warriors.
Bibliography
N,Mahfouz (1956). The Cairo Trilogy, Germany, Everymans Library.
G, Lerner (1986), The Creation of Patriarchy, New York, Oxford University Press.
K, Millett (1977), Sexual Politics, Great Britain, Virago Press.
M, Badran, (2009), Feminism in Islam, Oxford, AOneworld Book.
S, Mahmood, (1962), Politics of Piety, New Jersey, Princeton University Press.
T,Ramadan, (2010), What I believe, New York, Oxford University Press.
A, Millen, (2009), For your own good : Hidden cruelty in child-rearing and the
roots of violence, London, Urago.
M, Isday, (2008), The history of Human Rights, Los Angeles, University of
California Press.
Wider Reading.
A politics of inclusion: An interview with SaadEddin Ibrahim.