Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
2
3
adel_hdm@yahoo.com
boulahiamalek@yahoo.fr
b.houssam19@hotmail.fr
4
benalladz@yahoo.fr
I. INTRODUCTION
uring the last years the low and medium voltage networks
have been connected with new active systems such as
wind turbines, photovoltaic systems, storage devices, units of
improvement the quality of power and other. Almost all of
these new systems are connected to the grid by VSC (VSC
Voltage Source Converter) with a filter. The rectifier at two
levels based on a PWM control was typically used as robust
and highly effective solution. Power electronics is becoming
increasingly used by various systems related to power
generation, and industrial equipment. Among the generating
systems are cited, the wind power is growing rapidly around
the world. This expansion is due to research efforts in this
domain. So, wind turbines are widely developed as an
alternative energy source in providing a cost-effective option
in the energy market. Therefore, the wind sector shows great
interest for direct connection of these units for medium
voltage networks for future developments [3].
Furthermore, liberalization of the electricity market
stimulates new ideas as in the case of power quality [3]. The
distribution and transport are usually based on the airlines and
II.
1038
0.5
B. Wind velocity
0.4
X: 8.147B=0
Y: 0.48
Cpmax
B=5
Cp
0.3
0.2
B=10
0.1
B=220
B=15
0
lamdanoom
0
10
15
lamda
Figure 3. Wind tuurbine characteristics
With
i this study, as
The wind speed will be modelled in
determined by a sum of several harmonics in the form
C. Wind Turbine
D. Asynchronous Machine
Where
1039
Electrical System
Figure 5. Speed Controller
Mechanical System
Where
III.
Machine current(A)
Simulations results
50
-50
4
4.02
4.04 4.06
600
400
200
0
6
Time (s)
4.16 4.18
1040
10
Simulations results
200
-200
-400
0
1000
Voltage Vdc(v)
10
Time (s)
800
600
400
200
0
B.
10
Time (s)
-50
4
4.02
4.04 4.06
4.16 4.18
Mag (% of Fundamental)
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
15
20
1041
10
Harmonic order
Table I
Switching Table
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
1
Active power(w)
x 10
8
6
4
2
0
10
Time (s)
1000
800
600
400
200
0
10
Time (s)
Grid current(A)
0
-50
4
4.02
4.04 4.06
4.16 4.18
Mag (% of Fundamental)
10
Harmonic order
15
20
Power
37 kW
Grid voltage
250V
DC link voltage
900V
Current
35A
Switching frequency(voc) 2.5kHz
Grid frequency
50 Hz
1042
IV.
REFERENCES
DPC
Advantages
*Fixed switching Freq. (easier design input filter)
*Advanced PWM strategies can be used
*Cheap A/D converters
*Good steady state performance
*No separate PWM block
*No current regulation loop
*No coordinate transformation
*Good dynamics performances
*Simple algorithm
*Decoupled active and reactive power control
*Instantaneous variables with all harmonics components
estimated (improve power factor and efficiency)
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
VOC
DPC
Disadvantages
*Coordinate transformation and decoupling between
active and reactive components is required
*Complex algorithm
*Input power factor lower than for DPC
*Dynamic response is slower than that of DPC control
*High inductance and sample frequency needed
*Power and voltage estimation should be avoid at the
moment of switching
*Variable switching frequency
*Fast microprocessor and A/D converters required
V.
CONCLUSION
1043