Are rational thoughts the weapons of irrational minds?

The science behind climate change is compelling, but climate change activists, wielding their edgy
street posters and credible Himalayan Glacier reports, should dare not pollute the integrity of political
and economic debates on the practicalities of climate governance.

The exertion of their influence has became so terribly obvious. Not all that long ago I heard a speech
by Ban-ki-moon on a BBC radio broadcast. The Secretary-General of the UN, identify the
organizations priorities for 2010 in an address to the UN General Assembly.

After pressure from nations under the influence of delusional environmentalism, the UN chose to
dishonor their annual pledge to combat global poverty. They prioritized, instead, climate change.

So does this matter?

YES!

It will mean the difference between hundreds of billions of dollars,

trillions into the future

and far more valuable lives , squandered in accordance to convoluted funding algorithms which will
direct our limited resources into the atmosphere…

….But… UN processes are not inflexible…they are only a rubber band in the hands of member
nations.

Therefore WE can ensure that rational thoughts are NOT permitted to be the political weapons of
irrational minds.

but neither acquiesce nor apathy are acceptable!

The United Nations needs to prioritize the imminent crisis of global poverty over the nuisance of
climate change.

You may be aware that the real deal-breaker at Copenhagen was the conflict between the rich and
poor countries over funding. Finance provided to help developing nations deal with potentially
disastrous impacts of climate change ‘solutions’ are not entirely on top of the aid sums which they
receive to help with their development -with agriculture, poverty relief, health and education.
Oxfam's Robert Bailey said that: “poor countries fear that, without a guarantee of ‘additionality’,
when the rich states have to start providing huge sums of compensation money, they will simply divert
their aid flows, and that money that once went to schools and hospitals will be switched, for example,
to wind farms”

The ‘green’ fabrication that environmental activists are on the same side as the worlds poor lies in
tatters.

They clearly are not.

The failure at Copenhagen was not the result of greater influence of developing countries. It was a
failure, yet again, in the rationality of voting citizens. Those citizens, corrupted the nauseating green
movement, who are now morally apprehensible for the political activism that lead to the failure of the
climate Summit. They were the voting citizens who were part of the western representative
democracies that have the greatest influence in the UN. Just like the Australian voters who you will
soon be.

But you will be very different. Because you will not fail to understand the position of developing
countries in regards to climate governance.

Educators like our teacher Ms. Carroll have the responsibility to form the developing minds of her
students to the epitome of humane rationality. Irrational climate activists took the fight to our country.
Will she have the audacity to fight back!

For developing countries, climate change reduction strategies and other environmental tactics that
impede economic development are unacceptable

They scored this into UN orthodoxy at the Rio Earth summit in 1992. They emasculated the Kyoto
Protocol by insisting only rich countries cut emissions. And they will continue to do this again and
again and again.

Clearly, there are times when environmental aims have economic costs, and where the UN must
prioritize poverty reduction or climate change.

The UN Prioritizing climate change over poverty was a case classic alarmism. The futility and
depravity of this path already has been proved.

Therefore, the United Nations needs re-orient itself as the compassionate agents of humanity that it
was...and we can and will compel it to be.
Because if Copenhagen was not a climate change epiphany for Western leaders then only through the
moral integrity of this generation and the sagacity of our teachers will we ever be able to envisage a
practical global strategy to both mitigate climate change and alleviate extreme poverty.

And no longer, on an international scale, will we permit rational thoughts to be the weapons of
irrational minds.