University of Malaya

Assignment

HRK/2014

KEEE 2142
Assignment I
Name:

___________________________

Matric No.: ___________________________

Marks: _____________

Titles
Image Suppression Analysis in Superheterodyne Receiver Architecture
Instructions
1. This assignment is to be carried out individually.
2. Utilizing, simulink (Communication Toolbox) in Matlab, construct a superheterodyne
receiver chain as illustrated in Figure 1.
3. Analyze the visual characteristic of image signal being injected at the input of the
superheterodyne receiver.
4. Apply an input signal of x ( t ) = ARF cos RF t + Aim cos im t at the architecture of Figure 1
5. Explain quantitatively the image rejection and image flow in the architecture of Figure 1.

Figure 1. Superheterodyne Architecture

6. The analysis of the image rejection should be proved qualitatively and simulated.

University of Malaya

Assignment

HRK/2014

Learning Outcomes
ON

COMPLETION

OF

THE

MODULE

THE

STUDENT

SHOULD

BE

ABLE

TO

DEMONSTRATE THE FOLLOWING LEARNING OUTCOMES:

ABLE TO EXPLAIN THE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM QUALITATIVELY
ABLE TO EXPLAIN THE WORKING OF INDIVIDUAL BLOCK IN THE SYSTEM
MATHEMATICALLY
SIMULATE THE SYSTEM USING MATLAB.

Marking Scheme
a) Clear Technical Theory details related to the Assignment.
b) Mathematically justification of the constructed frequency planning
c) Proper explanation for the working of individual components in the system
d) Corresponding simulated output.

A: 80% +
Clear and well presented theory details related to the Assignment.
Able to explain the correct system operation.
Able to explain the working principal system.
Able to perform in depth analysis of the Assignment

B: 70-79%
Clear and well presented theory details related to the Assignment.
Able to explain the correct system operation.
Able to explain the working principal system.
Not able to perform in depth analysis of the Assignment

C: 60-69%

[10 % ]

[10 % ]

Grading Criteria

[30 % ]

[30 % ]

e) Discussion and conclusion

[20 % ]

Clear and well presented theory details related to the Assignment.

Able to explain the correct system operation.
Not able to explain the working principal system.
2

University of Malaya

Assignment

Not able to perform in depth analysis of the Assignment

D: 50-59%
Clear and well presented theory details related to the Assignment.
Partially able to explain the correct system operation.
Not able to explain the working principal system.
Not able to perform in depth analysis of the Assignment
E: 40-49%

Clear and well presented theory details related to the Assignment.

Not able to explain the correct system operation.
Not able to explain the working principal system.
Not able to perform in depth analysis of the Assignment

F: 0-39%

Not clear and well presented theory details related to the Assignment.
Not able to explain the correct system operation.
Not able to explain the working principal system.
Not able to perform in depth analysis of the Assignment

HRK/2014