Date:_________

COURTESY NOTICE TO INFORM YOU OF SERIOUS LIABILTY

RE: A Valid complaint pressed by ____________________ that clearly encroaches on Sec 279 (1) CC
1. Hello my name is Marc Boyer, and i'm a CFA for most Electoral District Associations [EDA] in the
Lower Mainland, for the Marijuana Party [of Canada]. Think of my role as being a Fiduciary for our
membership. I get duly involved when my members complain about being denied rights that are
protected by all kinds of BC Supreme Court [BCSC] Supreme Court of Canada [SCC] rulings, and
this new in-default provision in Bill-C-46 called: Sec 279 (1) CC Trafficking in Person. We accept
that most people have no idea that this law exists, yet Sec 19 CC says: ignorance of the law is no
excuse in law. But, frankly with this Courtesy Notice, you are hereby informed, and notified.
2. Please read Sec 279 (1) CC Trafficking in Person - 1 Section 279.01 of the Criminal Code is
amended by adding the following after subsection (2): Presumption /Prsomption
1. (3) For the purposes of subsections (1) and 279.011(1), evidence that a person who is not
exploited lives with or is habitually in the company of a person who is exploited is, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, proof that the person exercises control, direction or
influence over the movements of that person for the purpose of exploiting them or facilitating their
exploitation, [as to 279,011(1)] is guilty of an indictable offence and liable
1. (b) to imprisonment for a term of not more than fourteen years and to a minimum punishment
of imprisonment for a term of five years, in any other case.[like this]
2. Civilly, damages per victim are up to $1,000,000. [who wants to set case precedent?]
3. Take note that this new law is very threatening to anyone who tramples on our member's right to our
medicine of choice [in this case cannabis]. Take note that we're not threatening, we actually are now
just offering good legal advice in order to avoid further conflict and liability by informing anyone, who
wants to believe that they have a right to hold a personal prejudice over anyone that prohibits this
individual, or restricts /encroaches on, this member's right to relieve their genuine pain and suffering
by peacefully smoking cannabis [in this case - in their own home] is now violating Sec 279 CC
1. What's occurring here, is a pattern of behaviour, where lots pf arbitrary rules set by Maritime
Authority are ignoring our BCSC /SCC common law rights to benefit from this herbal medicine.
2. This law is new to Canada, but its historic roots are found in Feudal English Law, where its main
application was to bar Maritime Authority from trespassing on our common law rights to basic
essentials [like] food /medicine /water, with arbitrary rules and regulations. Historically, Maritime
Authority have always called any common law activity 'criminal', because they can't be taxed or
regulate [for what in this case] is a common law agricultural commodity, under this R v Smith
/SCC ruling, where it upholds that no CDSA /Maritime Authority holds jurisdiction to control,
restrict and /or regulate any legitimate access to anyone with genuine medical marijuana rights.
4. In this case, the culprits are any officer acting under a formal or ad-hock policy that's being set and
enforced in this case by Fraser Health Authority, and this new law is there to charge any officer in
this Institution, and the Institution itself is subject to face class action suits, if any body [like yours]
insists that it holds some kind of Authority to arbitrarily restrict the movement of this member.
1. ON THIS: We accept that this institution actually does have some tenants, where smoking
cannabis can be restricted, in order to protect this patient from going psychotic [for example].
2. BUT in this case, there is simply no good excuse for trespassing on this member's right to
peacefully medicate, in the safety of their own home. In this case, our member agrees to not
smoke joints, they only medicate with a vape pen, and frankly this device creates very little odour.
5. No one in any Institution is exempt from this law, in fact the reason this law resurfaced was the
rampant abuse created by mainly Police Officers, but it clearly applies to your Institution as well,
1. Please be on notice that: Any future violations of our members medical marijuana rights
may lead to serious consequences, so act accordingly and be on your best behaviour.
Under Fiduciary trust,
Marc Boyer

IMPORTANT GENERAL NOTES ON APPLYING THIS COURTESY NOTICE.

#1

rule: BE COURTEOUS, whenever delivering this notice [in this case] by anyone
who is living in any apartment or strata complex, with no smoking rules. The reason
for promoting a vape pen is that it offers a civil solution, by pointing to the fact that
vaping is probably the most courteous way to medicate. Vaping actually holds case
law precedent that it is not smoking in the conventional application of the word]
2. THEREFORE: arbitrarily applying new interpretations of regulations that encroach or restrict
medical access rights of any one who need to medicate can be called: Trafficking in Person.
3. With this law - our medical access rights over-ride their arbitrary Maritime regulations.
We refer to this example, where the complaint is for smoking joints or bongs, where neighbours
can say they are offended by the large volumes of smoke. - BUT, by providing a reasonable
alternative [like vaping] offers a reasonable compromise to keep the peace, and be civil.
1. AND frankly this law is there to enforce that Canadians really are proud that we really do
promote a multi cultural society that [by and large] respects gay rights, abortion rights,
Islamic rights, etc; AND this new law actually bars religious zealots to enforce that they hold
any right to regulate medical marijuana under Maritime Rule, like it's actually a crime to be
unregulated. This zealot prohibition behaviour of forcing their values over a real need to
medicate with this herb is unjustifiably, and now also a serious crime under Sec 279CC.
4. This Sec 279 CC provision, also makes it possible to grow small quantities of cannabis, in any
apartment or strata, especially if it's one of these small self-contained energy efficient, units that
are designed and approved as having safety standards set by Fire Departments, and.
1. AGAIN under this new law, no one can complain, because these residential units really do
contain what some call offensive odours, and again we accept that it's reasonable that a
commercial enterprise should not be called acceptable in an apartment or strata,
5. IN THEORY: All of these medical marijuana rights can be protected anywhere in Canada, by
anyone [with the where with all to defend these rights], with just a medical need for cannabis,
because these rights are all base on this all encompassing SCC /R v Smith ruling, where we
have a good chance of winning a court ruling, without affiliating with our Marijuana Party.
6.

But frankly, protecting our guarantees thru the Marijuana Party results where
our political rights raise this chance of winning to being a higher probability
and far more likely to prevail as a valid defence, because it's not just a case
of - 'I have this right' because: under our Marijuana Party, 'we hold a just
cause' to protect our beliefs that the majority in power cannot trample on.
If you really don't see the difference, then don't join our Party, because your
prejudice may become a liability to the general respect our Party deserves.

7. If Authority refuses to accept this notion that there is a big difference between
recreational marihuana that's under Federal control, and our medical marijuana
rights that are under The SCC and the provinces to control, then these Officers are
most likely violating Sec 279 (1) CC, and frankly deserve to be handled as criminals.
This Notice can be easily altered, to apply in all kinds of individual circumstances,
Service is only available to registered members, so subscribe in order to be protected.

This kind of positive law applications on this new law can be undertaken anywhere in Canada.
[quote from Margaret Mead] Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can
change the world; indeed, it's the only thing that ever has. [form a local Party Office to fix your world]
FOR MORE INFOMATION: call 778-707-7461 [or] email at increationwetrust@gmail.com [or] go
to our Facebook page called - VOTE Marijuana Party in Canada - to contact us, and participate.