Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, PR China
Department of Chemistry, Dezhou University, Shandong 253023, PR China
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 18 June 2012
Received in revised form 2 December 2012
Accepted 6 December 2012
Available online 17 December 2012
Keywords:
Methanol
Acetonitrile
Vaporliquid equilibrium
a b s t r a c t
Isobaric vaporliquid equilibrium (VLE) data for methanol and acetonitrile system was measured at
101.3 kPa by using equilibrium still. The results show that methanol and acetonitrile system can form a
minimum temperature azeotrope. Thermodynamic consistency of the experimental data was conrmed
by means of Herington semi-empirical method. The experimental values obtained were correlated by
using the Margules, Van Laar, Wilson and NRTL activity-coefcient models, respectively. The binary interaction parameters of the activity-coefcient models were determined. The average absolute deviation in
boiling point and vapor-phase composition were determined by comparing the experimental values with
those calculated by the activity-coefcient models. The calculated maximum average absolute deviations
were 0.25 K and 0.0056 for the boiling point and vapor-phase composition, respectively. Therefore, it was
shown that the four activity-coefcient models used satisfactorily correlate the experimental results of
methanol and acetonitrile system.
2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
2. Experimental
2.1. Chemicals
Chemicals used: All the reagents were analytical purity grade.
Methanol and acetonitrile were purchased from Tianjin University
Ke Wei Company. The purities of all the chemicals were checked
by a gas chromatograph (GC) equipped with a ame ionization
detector. The water content in chemicals was determined using
a Karl Fischer moisture titrator. The purity and water content are
listed in Table 1. The chemicals were degassed and subsequently
dried over molecular sieves (Nankai University 3A) for 24 h prior
to use. The purity of chemicals was further conrmed by comparing the experimental densities, the refractive indexes and the
normal boiling points with those reported in [11,12], as they are
listed in Table 2. The densities of the pure components were measured at 293.15 K using an DA-510 densimeter, and the refractive
indexes were measured at 293.15 K using an ATAGO RX-5000.
The accuracy in density, and refractive index measurements are
2.0 105 g/cm3 and 0.00001, respectively. Temperature was
controlled to 0.01 K with a thermostated bath.
2.2. Apparatus and procedure
1.0
Table 1
Purity and water content of pure components.
Methanol
Acetonitrile
Purity (mass%)
Suppliers
GC
>99.7
>99.5
99.75
99.61
Water (mass%)
0.8
0.03
0.03
0.6
y1
Component
0.4
360
T/ K
43
355
0.2
350
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
345
340
0.6
0.8
1.0
335
330
0.0
x1
Table 3
Experimental VLE data for the methanolacetonitrile binary system at 101.3 kPa.
0.2
0.4
x1
0.6
0.8
1.0
y1
Fig. 1. Vaporliquid equilibrium phase diagram for the methanolacetonitrile system at 101.3 kPa.
T (K)
x1
y1
1
338.41
338.04
336.96
337.02
337.09
337.71
338.09
339.38
340.55
344.6
350.19
355.66
1.000
0.962
0.866
0.805
0.766
0.646
0.602
0.437
0.310
0.171
0.054
0.000
1.000
0.945
0.860
0.814
0.785
0.706
0.687
0.600
0.529
0.380
0.189
0.000
1.000
0.998
1.030
1.051
1.064
1.119
1.158
1.324
1.535
1.750
2.225
2
2.535
1.863
1.705
1.640
1.464
1.376
1.188
1.074
1.047
0.994
1.000
I
D = 100, J = 150
Tmin
1
1
where
I = 0 ln(1 /2 ) dx1 ,
= 0 ln(1 /2 ) dx1 , =
Tmax Tmin , Tmax and Tmin were the highest and the lowest
boiling point in the system, respectively (K).
The results of thermodynamic consistency test are demonstrated in Fig. 3 and Table 4. The calculation result was that
Table 2
Density , normal boiling point Tb , and refractive index nD of pure components.
Component
Methanol
Acetonitrile
a
b
(293.15 K) (g cm3 )
Tb (101.3 KPa) ( C)
a
nD (293.15 K)
b
Experimental
Literature
Experimental
Literature
Experimental
Literaturea
0.79182
0.78338
0.7913
0.7822
65.26
82.51
64.70
81.6
1.32835
1.34358
1.3286
1.34411
44
1.0
Table 5
The Antoine constants of pure substances.
ln( 1/ 2)
0.5
Component
Methanol
Acetonitrile
7.4182
6.34522
1710.2
1388.446
22.25
34.856
0.0
355
-0.5
350
-1.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0
345
x1
340
335
0.0
Table 4
Thermodynamic consistency test of VLE data.
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
x1 y1
Tmax
Tmin
(K)
355.66
338.5
17.16
0.0086
0.4432
1.9404
7.6393
Fig. 4. Tyx diagram for the methanolacetonitrile system at 101.3 kPa: (, )
experimental data and () Wilson equation.
V p = xi i s ps exp
yi
i
i i
Vil (p psi )
(1)
RT
(2)
where P and T are the total pressure and the temperature in the
equilibrium system. xi and yi are the liquid and vapor phase mole
V is the fugacity coefcients
fractions in equilibrium, respectively.
i
s is the fugacity coefcient
of component i in the vapor mixture,
i
B
T (K) + C
(3)
k
exp 2
)k
(ln ical ln i
(4)
where k is the number of data points and i the number of components in the mixture. The experimental and calculated values are
exp
denoted by the superscripts exp and cal, respectively. i is cal-
culated with Eq. (2) and ical is calculated with Margules, Van Laar,
Wilson and NRTL models. The correlated interaction parameters,
together with the average deviations of temperature and the vaporphase composition for the methanol and acetonitrile binary system
at 101.3 kPa between the experimental and the calculated values
obtained from Margules, Van Laar, Wilson and NRTL models, were
shown in Table 6. The correlated interaction parameters obtained
through simplex search were, then, used to calculate y1cal , T cal , 1cal
and 2cal under corresponding liquid compositions and pressure
(101.3 kPa) and the results calculated were given in Table 7. The
Table 6
Margules, Van Laar, Wilson and NRTL parameters and mean absolute deviations of the binary system.
Model
Methanol (1) + acetonitrile (2) at 101.3 KPa
A12 = 0.884
Margules
A12 = 0.834
Van Laar
12 = 0.688
Wilson
g12 g22 = 1993.75
NRTL
c
k: number
of data
points.
a
T = Texp Tcal /kc .
y = yexp ycal /kc .
Parameters
A21 = 0.889
A12 = 0.940
21 = 0.525
g12 g11 = 1755.63
12 = 1.09
|T|a
|y|b
0.25
0.21
0.22
0.22
0.0048
0.0056
0.0054
0.0044
45
Table 7
Correlation results for methanol + acetonitrile system at 101.3 kPa.
x1
1.000
0.962
0.866
0.805
0.766
0.646
0.602
0.437
0.310
0.171
0.054
0.000
Margules
Van Laar
Wilson
NRTL
y1cal
Tcal (K)
1cal
2cal
y1cal
Tcal (K)
1cal
2cal
y1cal
Tcal (K)
1cal
2cal
y1cal
Tcal (K)
1cal
2cal
1.000
0.950
0.853
0.805
0.778
0.708
0.685
0.601
0.524
0.396
0.186
0.000
338.22
337.88
337.42
337.35
337.38
337.70
337.91
339.14
340.82
344.19
349.97
354.80
1.000
1.001
1.016
1.035
1.050
1.118
1.151
1.325
1.526
1.838
2.207
2.421
2.433
2.277
1.950
1.781
1.687
1.451
1.382
1.186
1.090
1.027
1.003
1.000
1.000
0.949
0.851
0.805
0.779
0.712
0.690
0.607
0.527
0.394
0.181
0.000
338.22
337.82
337.32
337.25
337.27
337.62
337.83
339.12
340.89
344.39
350.18
354.80
1.000
1.002
1.019
1.039
1.056
1.129
1.164
1.340
1.532
1.815
2.129
2.302
2.560
2.367
1.977
1.786
1.682
1.432
1.362
1.169
1.079
1.023
1.002
1.000
1.000
0.948
0.852
0.806
0.780
0.713
0.691
0.606
0.526
0.394
0.182
0.000
338.22
337.81
337.30
337.23
337.26
337.62
337.84
339.15
340.92
344.38
350.13
354.80
1.000
1.002
1.020
1.041
1.058
1.131
1.165
1.336
1.526
1.813
2.146
2.337
2.602
2.389
1.975
1.780
1.675
1.428
1.359
1.171
1.082
1.024
1.002
1.000
1.000
0.946
0.853
0.810
0.785
0.717
0.693
0.601
0.517
0.389
0.187
0.000
338.22
337.75
337.24
337.20
337.24
337.66
337.91
339.33
341.11
344.39
349.91
354.80
1.000
1.002
1.024
1.047
1.065
1.134
1.165
1.316
1.489
1.791
2.220
2.506
2.788
2.475
1.956
1.745
1.640
1.408
1.346
1.179
1.094
1.032
1.004
1.000