Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
things that give off light, things that glow. Do you get the point? Japanese isn't that
difficult to read, but it is our predisposition to believe that it is so that is why we fail
before we even try. We look at the mess of Kanji or the Hieroglyphs and cower in
self stupidity. If someone could just show others as I had learned on my own. The
in someway a connection with the light, bright etc. These words too have also have
do letters that represent sounds that together represent meaning. Here is one
example of a kanji that looks fairly difficult. This kanji is made in 9 strokes of the pen
and after learning that 日means the sun, or signifies words related to the sun then
we could make a fairly good estimate at what this next kanji means . 星 has the sun
kanji in it as well as the kanji for the word birth, or to give life to. 生 is the kanji sei
which means depending on tense of the word, life. In its future use tense this it
contains one other syllable mu む、Put 生and mu or む together and you have Umu
spawn.(49) Now before reading the answer on pg 8 take an educated guess at what
the meaning is. Think or ponder for a second how these two kanji put together make
a different yet totally logical word out of two other words. Just like Englishes prefixes
and suffixes in words like lithograph, literally stone write, or engraving . The words
birth of something and the word hi fused together make the word star. Now next time
you see a couple of kanji just take a guess, your chances of being right are better
than 50%.
Better than 50% chance is usually all that linguists worry about when tring to
find the similiarities of language. if you can guess more than 50% of the words given
some system like the above then the language is said to be related to your own
family.
There are 6 main language families from whence all other languages stem.
These are the Indo-Eurasiatic, the Urallic, the Anuit eskimo, the and the ..
Since it has never been proven that there was one all powerful might mother tongue,
which by the way is called nostratic tongue, it is fair to assume that there was one.
The languages of the world although apparently can seem so different, and it is true
that we are confounded by them, one culture are confounded by the words of
another. The problem is, is that there is no proof because there is no evidence of the
writings or digital recordings of ancient peoples to tell us that there really was only
one language. One thing we can say for fact is that there were less people.
That is fairly obvious. Therefore on that assumption, we can assume that there were
less languages than there are now. Can't we further say then that the further back
we go there were still less and less people.Therefore as x ( the number of people on
communication without two person. There isn't much need for a language if there is