Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Till Reek1
TRIMET ALUMINUM AG, Niederlassung Hamburg, Dradenauer Hauptdeich 15, 21129 Hamburg, Germany
Keywords: Dry Start, Cathode Performance, Cathode Restart, Cathode Quality
All equipment on site had been idle for about one year. As the
most likely future of the plant had been a relocation of all assets,
dismantling work had started. Of the 270 cells, 121 linings had
already been broken out. Fortunately, the directive had been to
start with the oldest cells first, instead of clearing the potlines
sequentially.
As the lining materials including cathodes for seven pots was
still on site, the decision was made to use these sets to construct
the first pots to be taken into operation, before a restart of old
linings was to be done.
The work necessary and the method developed to dry-start the
smelter was detailed in last years paper Successful dry-start of
the Hamburg smelter.
Abstract
In December 2005 the Hamburg aluminum smelter was shut
down. At the end of 2006, TRIMET ALUMINUM AG was able
to purchase the assets and successfully restarted the potlines in
2007. In December 2007 the plant was operating at full capacity
again, after facing serious supply limitation of pot lining materials
throughout the year. To be able to reach full production at record
time, unproven Eastern European and Chinese cathodes had to be
acquired. Until August 2008 45 pots with Eastern European
cathodes and 46 pots with Chinese cathodes were started. In
addition to these, 149 old linings that had been idle for more than
one year were restarted. This paper highlights operational
experience with these different groups of pots and describes the
success story of the first year of operation after the restart without
losing a single pot.
Introduction
The plant formerly kown as Hamburger Aluminium Werke
HAW consists of two potlines with Reynolds P19 side-by-side
pots with 270 pots in total. The pots were refitted to poor-mans
point feeder technology and magnetically compensated with two
side risers during the 90s.
In 2005 the then-time owners agreed mutually that it was not
feasible to produce primary aluminium in Germany and the plant
was shut down in December 2005. The future of the facilities was
highly contested in the following year. Several parties expressed
their interest in acquiring the assets to either relocate them or
restart them on site.
In November 2006, TRIMET ALUMINIUM AG, owner and
operator of the aluminum plant in Essen, Germany, finally
reached agreements with the former owners of the plant as well as
the city of Hamburg who holds rights over the land the plant is
built on. On December 1st the keys were handed over and
TRIMET started preparations immediate for the restart of the
smelter.
347
Potholes vs potage
No of potholes
25
number of pots
20
15
10
5
0
0
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
500
1000
1500
Days in operation
< 200 < 400 < 600 < 800 < 1000 < 1200 < 1400 < 1600
Pot age [days]
X [m]
To estimate the impact of the restart, the cathode voltage drop was
measured and the 6-month average before shut down was
compared to the 6-month average after the restart. The results are
shown in Figure 3. For most pots, no negative impact was
recorded. On the contrary, 55% of the pots show a decrease in
CVD up to as much as 116 mV. Only 15 % of the pots were
measured with an increased CVD.
Percentage of pots
Picture 2: Metal flow pattern within the pot. The area with
maximum number of potholes it marked.
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
25
50
75 100
348
Devolpment of CVD
480
30 %
before
shutdown
30 %
restart
460
CVD [mV]
440
420
400
100 %
before
shutdown
100 %
restart
380
360
340
300
< 100
< 200
< 300
< 400
< 500
< 600
< 700
< 800
< 900
< 1000
< 1100
< 1200
< 1300
< 1400
< 1500
< 1600
< 1700
< 1800
< 1900
< 2000
320
To track the long term development of the CVD, the CVD of all
pots within a certain range of age was averaged. The qualities
listed are again from one supplier per quality only.
The resulting curves are shown in Figure 4 and compared to data
collected before the shut-down.
Whereas the 100 % graphite cathodes run on a comparable level
before shut-down and after restart, a significant improvement was
recorded for the 30% graphite cathode blocks. Especially older
pots show a decrease in CVD, which remains stable on a
significantly lower level than before the shut-down.
The decrease in CVD is attributed to a complete removal of
bottom freeze and sludge.
Cathode performance
For both cathode types, no special measures were taken during
construction. The standard Hamburg relining procedure was
followed, using an alumina insulation layer and a barrier brick
layer beneath the cathode. For all pots the bricks were supplied by
the same supplier. The ramming paste for all pots was from our
standard supplier.
All selected pots were preheated to 850C to 900C prior to
adding bath. Both electrical as well as gas preheat were used.
During electrical preheat the 30% graphite cathode showed a
much faster heat-up rate resulting in two days preheating time,
instead of three days.
Measurement pots were selected and measurements of the
cathodic current distribution were done weekly as well as
measurements of the cathodic voltage drop.
To evaluate the cathode performance during operation, the
development of these figures was investigated.
Development of the cathodic current distribution (CCD)
Figure 5 and Figure 6 show the development of the standard
deviation of the cathodic current distribution for Chinese and
Eastern European cathodes respectively. Each graph shows the
individual development of three pots.
349
Chinese Cathodes
800
600
400
200
0
0
100
200
300
400
500
potage
For the Chinese 100% graphite cathodes, the measured CVD is on
a similar low level compared to the 100% graphite reference
quality. It is also showing a peak in the recent measurements.
Again, the visibility of this peak is due to a very narrow age
distribution. However, this peak can only partly be traced to
sludge formation. One main concern is that the period of sludge
formation has already passed, but the CVD has not returned to
previous levels yet.
Due to other measurements, such as the cathodic current
distribution, the average CVD is expected to return to levels
above the reference only.
Development of CVD
CVD [mV]
460
440
420
400
380
360
340
320
300
< 50 < 200< 350 < 500 < 650 < 800 < 950< 1100< 1250< 1400< 1550< 1700
< 1850
Pot age
100%; Supplier A
30%; Supplier B
Figure 7: development of CVD over pot age for proven 100% and
30% Graphite blocks as well as new suppliers
800
600
Conclusions
400
200
0
0
100
200
300
400
500
potage
Figure 6: Development of the standard deviation of the cathodic
current distribution over potage for 3 pots with 30% graphite
Eastern European cathodes
350
351