Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
ABSTRACT. International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs), formerly known as International Accounting Standards, are becoming increasingly important in the global economy. Over the last 35 years there has been
a strong push towards the adoption of a uniform set of financial accounting standards to replace the myriad number of country-specific standards
now in use. A major milestone towards the goal of global accounting standards occurred recently. Starting in 2005 most public companies domiciled
in the European Union are required to use the IFRS system when preparing their financial statements. This paper presents the International Financial Reporting Standards framework, including the roles of the rulemaking
bodies and where to access the primary IFRS publications. An annotated
KEYWORDS. Bibliographies, International Financial Reporting Standards, International Accounting Standards, Financial Accounting Standards
INTRODUCTION
Historically, individual countries have developed their own sets of financial accounting standards. International Financial Reporting Standards
(IFRSs) were created with the goal of providing a single internationally
recognized set of accounting standards. This article provides an introduction to the framework used for IFRSs, as well as useful primary and
secondary sources.
WHY HAVE INTERNATIONAL
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS?
In an increasingly interconnected world, the operations of international corporations are transnational. In addition, more and more investing takes place on a global level. Historically, different countries have
developed their own national accounting standards. Neighbors Canada
and the United States are similar in many respects but use different financial reporting standards. Numerous worldwide accounting standards can lead to confusion and large complications for preparers and
users of financial statements.
Financial statements prepared under different countries financial accounting rules are often not comparable. For example, if one company
reported under Chinese accounting standards and another under United
States GAAP (generally accepted accounting principles), an investor
would not be able to make apples-to-apples comparisons without making a number of adjusting accounting entries. Otherwise it would be tantamount to comparing two distances, one in miles and the other in
kilometers. Without adjustments the comparison is meaningless.
Todd M. Hines
For a number of years, the SEC has publicly supported the idea
of converging U.S. GAAP and International GAAP into a single globally recognized set of accounting standards. In 2005, the SECs then
Chief Accountant, Donald T. Nicolaisen, stated that he supported convergence and that a common accounting language usable around the
globe would be a dream come true (In the Public Interest, 2005,
p. 70). In another sign of convergence, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), promulgator of United States GAAP, has entered
into a joint project with the IASB to develop a common conceptual
framework, which, if successful, would bring the underlying principles
of U.S. GAAP into line with IFRS (Harrington, 2005). As discussed in a
following section, Principles-Based versus Rules-Based Standards,
the two frameworks are currently very different.
ROAD BLOCKS TO CONVERGENCE
A recent book on this topic identifies several main obstacles to a
worldwide harmonization of accounting standards. The most fundamental obstacles are the large differences between the accounting practices of different countries (Nobes & Parker, 2004). Explaining some of
these major differences is beyond the scope of this introductory article;
the important point is that many countries have accounting standards
vastly different from the International Standards. For example, the entire framework of U.S. GAAP is radically different from that of IFRS.
Another significant obstacle is nationalism. In the foreign policy
arena, the United States has recently been wary of multilateral solutions, preferring to go its own way on a number of international issues.
It has favored solutions that give it unilateral power to make binding decisions. There has been a similar trend in accounting. The United States
has been so cautious about joining a binding global accounting scheme
that it does not have unilateral power to influence or set its own accounting rules. Under the current U.S. GAAP system, all accounting
standards are promulgated by U.S. organizations, with the ultimate
authority residing in a U.S. government agency. A private U.S. organization, FASB, issues standards but the Securities and Exchange Commission retains ultimate authority. If the United States started following
IFRSs, it would not retain this kind of control over the accounting
standards to which its capital markets would adhere.
The new Form 20-F rules discussed earlier illustrate the SECs willingness to take small steps towards harmonization without wholly committing
Todd M. Hines
to adoption of IFRSs. Even though the SEC is attempting to make it easier for cross-listed firms to reconcile their financial statements to U.S.
GAAP on the Form 20-F, there are no current plans to accept financial
statements produced under IFRS without also requiring a reconciliation
to U.S. standards (Lo, 2004).
Although there have been movements towards a global set of accounting standards, many individual countries have retained their own
national standards. In 2001 the global accounting firms Deloitte &
Touche, Ernst & Young, KPMG, Arthur Andersen, PricewaterhouseCoopers, BDO Seidman, and Grant Thornton conducted a survey of the
accounting standards in over 60 countries. They found that only around
20 are, [r]esponding to the challenge of convergence with an active
agenda and proposed changes to national requirements (Nobes, 2001).
Momentum has picked up a bit since then. Information collected by
PricewaterhouseCoopers in July 2005 indicates that IFRSs are now
mandatory for listed companies in 70 of the 110 countries examined
(Bolton, 2006). However, 27 countries, including some of the largest
capital markets in the world, such as the United States and Japan, still
prohibit IFRS use by their publicly traded companies (Bolton, 2006).2
The IASB lacks the power to mandate that any country follow its
Standards. However, as discussed earlier, a number of nations have now
adopted IFRS, mainly due to the perceived benefits of operating under a
single worldwide set of financial accounting rules. The Boards main
responsibilities are
to develop, in the public interest, a single set of high quality,
understandable and enforceable global financial accounting standards that require high quality, transparent and comparable information in financial statements and other financial reporting to help
participants in the worlds capital markets and other users make
economic decisions;
to promote the use and rigorous application of those standards; and
to bring about convergence of national accounting standards and
International Accounting Standards to high quality solutions
(Hussey & Ong, 2005).
The IASCF oversees the Board. It raises the funds necessary to run
the IASB and, as mentioned earlier, appoints the IASB members. The
IASCF comprises twenty-two Trustees. They are required to be representatives of the worlds capital markets and to be from diverse geographical and professional backgrounds. The IASCF and IASB are
relatively new organizations. They replaced the previous rulemaking
body, the IASC, and came into operation officially in April 2001.
The primary accounting rules prepared and issued by the IASB are
the IFRS, previously known as International Accounting Standards. Before a final Standard is issued, an Exposure Draft is released in order to
obtain input from the public. Further details on IFRSs and Exposure
Drafts are provided later.
Another organization related to the IASB is the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (IFRIC). It primarily develops and solicits comments on how to interpret and apply the Standards
promulgated by the IASB. The IASB approves the Interpretations that
are developed by IFRIC. The important IFRIC pronouncements will be
discussed in more detail later.
International Accounting Standards Committee
Prior to the establishment of the IASB, international accounting standards were set by the IASC. This body existed from 1973 to 2001, and
Todd M. Hines
IFRS FRAMEWORK
In 1989 the IASC issued their Framework for the Preparation and
Presentation of Financial Statements. This framework describes the
basic concepts and parameters to follow when preparing financial statements under International GAAP. It serves as a guide for promulgating
standards, as well as a guide for resolving an issue that has not been specifically addressed in a previous standard. However, the framework itself is not a standard. It cannot override any issued standard. If there is
not a Standard or an Interpretation that specifically applies to a transaction, then IAS 8 requires that judgment be used to develop and apply an
10
accounting treatment that produces both relevant and reliable information. In making this judgment, IAS 8 also requires the consideration
of the definitions, recognition criteria and measurement concepts for assets, liabilities, income, and expenses used in the Framework.
PRINCIPLES-BASED VERSUS RULES-BASED STANDARDS
International GAAP is principles based. This means that the standards concentrate on general principles derived from a conceptual framework. The standards tend to provide limited guidance on applying the
principles to specific transactions. Accountants are not given a specific
road map to use when applying the principles to real world situations.
Instead they are encouraged to use professional judgment to apply the
general rules to their particular circumstances.
U.S. GAAP, while having some components of a principles-based
structure such as a conceptual framework, is far more rules based.
Rather than relying upon more general principles, U.S. GAAP often
provides a list of specific rules to apply in given accounting situations.
The goal is to deal with possible contingent scenarios and to plug up any
possible holes. U.S. standards tend to have more specific implementation guidance and bright-line tests of the correct and incorrect accounting treatments than does International GAAP. A 2004 article in the CPA
Journal illustrates this point:
Principles-based accounting for leases is addressed in six IASB
pronouncements and one Interpretation. In contrast, U.S. GAAP
related to lease accounting is addressed in 20 Statements,
nine FASB Interpretations, 10 Technical Bulletins, and 39 EITF
Abstracts. The depth of GAAP coverage of leases is characteristic
of the rules-based accounting system in the U.S. (Shortridge &
Myring, 2004, p. 35).
IMPORTANT IFRS PUBLICATIONS
International Accounting Standards Board: (2001- )
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). These are the
highest-level pronouncements issued by the IASB. Under the previous
Todd M. Hines
11
standards issuer, the IASC, the highest level standards were the International Accounting Standards (IAS). Note that since the establishment
of the IASB, this board has amended some IASs, proposed making
amendments to other IASs, suggested replacing some IASs with new
IFRSs, and adopted or proposed certain new IFRSs on topics for which
no previous IAS was issued. As of early 2006, seven International
Financial Reporting Standards have been issued. These are numbered
IFRS 1, IFRS 2, and so on.
IFRS Exposure Drafts. Before a final IFRS is issued, the IASB publishes an Exposure Draft to obtain public comments. These are produced to assure that important issues are not missed when a new
Standard is being considered. It also helps to ensure the consideration of
a wide range of viewpoints, not just those of the board members.
IFRIC Draft Interpretations. These are prepared by the IFRIC can be
issued to clarify previously issued Standards, as well to provide guidance on financial reporting issues not specifically addressed by IFRSs
or IASs. Interpretations tend to be necessary when unsatisfactory practices have arisen, or where the Standards lack guidance for particular
business circumstances. A Draft is issued to allow for public comments
and the consideration of these comments before the issuance of the final
IFRIC Interpretation.
IFRIC Interpretations. After a Draft Interpretation has a public comment period, a final Interpretation is considered and approved by the
IFRIC. It must then be approved by IASB before it is issued. As of
2005, seven IFRIC Interpretations have been issued. They are numbered IFRIC 1, IFRIC 2, and so on.
International Accounting Standards Committee: (1973-2001)
International Accounting Standards. During its existence the IASC
developed 41 standards. Many of these have been revised one or more
times over the years. A number of them have been superseded or have
been merged with other Standards. Those that have not been superseded
or merged remain in effect and still retain the IAS number. They are
numbered IAS 1, IAS 2, and so on.
SIC Draft Interpretations. The Standing Interpretations Committee
had a purpose similar to the current IFRIC. The SIC considered accounting issues within the context of the existing IASs and the IASC
Framework and offered guidance on the correct treatment. Unlike the
current IFRIC, the SIC had no authority to provide guidance on financial reporting issues not specifically addressed by existing Standards.
12
Todd M. Hines
13
14
Todd M. Hines
15
they (minus the non-mandatory guidance and all bases for conclusions)
are published in the Official Journal of the European Union in all the
EU languages. This can be accessed online at the above-listed URL
Starting in 2005, public companies from EU countries are required to
prepare their financial statements under IFRS, thus the availability of
much of the IFRS material through the EU Website. Because the EU
Webpage is cluttered and difficult to navigate, this method of access is
recommended only for very advanced users. Moreover, it is very difficult to discern what IFRS information is available from this source and
what is omitted.
Miller International Accounting Library Online (Subscription database)
http://tax.cchgroup.com/TaxResearch/ResearchResources/
AccountingAndAudit/
The Miller GAAP Guides are well-known sources for obtaining easier-to-understand explanations of accounting standards. They generally
contain practice pointers, illustrations, and examples. The Miller International Accounting Library Online includes the Miller explanatory
material for IFRSs. This entry is listed in this section because, for an additional fee, the full-text IFRS material can be added to a subscription.
16
Todd M. Hines
17
18
Todd M. Hines
19
standing of IFRSs and needs to see some examples. Not as useful for
someone with no background in the area.
Hallstrom, Kristina Tamm. Organizing International Standardization: ISO and the IASC in Quest of Authority. Northampton,
MA: Edward Elgar, 2004.
This book provides information on the establishment, negotiation
and maintenance of international standards. Specifically, the author examines the functions of two international standardizations bodies: the
International Standards Organization (ISO) and IASC. The ISO works
to pass international standards in numerous areas such as math, sciences, information technology, telecommunications, etc. It does not
deal with accounting standards. As discussed throughout this paper the
IASC, the predecessor organization to the IASB, was primarily concerned with setting international financial reporting standards. The
book discusses the reasons why there is a push for international standards in many different areas and illustrates the many difficulties that
must be overcome in order to institute them.
Hussey, Roger and Audra Ong. International Financial Reporting
Standards Desk Reference: Overview, Guide, and Dictionary.
Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2005.
This volume aims to provide a wide range of information on IFRSs in
one volume. As the title states, the first several chapters give a history of
international standards. Summaries and overviews of the IFRS Interpretations and Standards are also provided. The final section has a useful dictionary of many of the specialized terms used in this area. It can
be a helpful quick reference source, though many of the other sources
discussed in this section do a better job of explaining the actual International GAAP rules. The main problem here is that only a summary, albeit easy to read, is provided for each Standard issued. In general the
other explanatory sources listed in this section provide explanations by
topic. For example, intangible assets are addressed in IAS 36, IAS 38,
and IFRS 3. Someone using this source for an overview of intangible assets would have to read summaries for all three Standards in order to
learn the correct GAAP treatment, as opposed to reading one entry giving a collective overview of intangible assets under IFRS.
Holt, Paul. International Accounting. 6th ed. Mason, OH: Thompson Custom Publishing, 2003.
20
This title is several years old but has been included because it clearly
explains many of the most important issues for international companies,
such as worldwide differences in financial reporting, auditing and taxes.
It discusses the historical trends behind the strong push for uniform
global financial reporting standards, which have occurred over the last
few decades.
Keuleneer, Luc, Dirk Swagerman, and Willem Verhoog, eds. Is
Fair Value Fair?: Financial Reporting from an International Perspective. Chichester, UK: Wiley, 2003.
Most of the books covered in this paper provide an overview of international accounting standards. This book is a bit more specialized. A
fair value accounting system values assets at their current worth as opposed to their historical cost. The IFRS system is predicated on fair
value while other systems, notably U.S. GAAP, use historical cost. This
work presents a number of essays discussing the advantages and disadvantages of fair value.
Kirk, Robert. International Financial Reporting Standards in Depth.
Oxford, UK: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, 2005.
The International Standards are examined in this reference work. As
the title suggests, it is done with some depth but the book itself is less
than 300 pages. It would be most useful to someone who is already familiar with IFRSs and wants a focused reference source to consult.
Leuz, Christian, Dieter Pfaff, and Anthony Hopwood, eds. The
Economics and Politics of Accounting: International Perspectives
on Research Trends, Policy, and Practice. Oxford, UK: Oxford
University Press, 2004.
While its main concentration is on the economic and political factors
that determine what types of accounting rules are implemented, this
book is included here because of the issues importance in the drive for
international accounting standards. This title also shows some of the large
hurdles that must be overcome in order to implement any accounting
standards, and examines the important roles accounting plays in society.
Nobes, Christopher W., ed. Developments in International Accounting: General Issues and Classification. The New Library of
International Accounting. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2004.
A more advanced source, this monograph contains recent journal articles on current international accounting issues. There are a total of 22
Todd M. Hines
21
22
Though now several years old this book is included because of its
concentration on international accounting issues from the perspective of
future and current managers of multinational enterprises. It focuses more
on how these issues can affect organizations and which are most important, rather than providing a recitation of the IFRS pronouncements.
Tiffin, Ralph C. The Complete Guide to International Financial
Reporting Standards. London, UK: Thorogood, 2004.
This book is aimed at executives who need to get up to speed on
IFRS. It explains the principles of IFRS, explains many of the rules in
place, as well as the disclosure requirements and possible compliance
problems.
Walton, Peter, Axel Haller, and Bernard Raffournier, eds. International Accounting. London, UK: Thomson Learning, 2003.
The strength of this book is its wide scope. There are separate chapters on the accounting rules of most of the important industrialized nations, such as the United States, Australia, Japan, and many European
Union states. It describes the national accounting rules of emerging nations such as Russia and several of the Eastern European countries. The
establishment of the IASB and the increasingly rapid moves toward
global standards during the last decade are also discussed. It is a useful
one-volume overview of many of the accounting rules and issues throughout the world.
Explanatory Material: Free Websites
A number of the sources discussed in this paper are accessible over
the Internet, but this section will concentrate on free Websites that have
useful IFRS material. While many sites have a bit of information about
the IFRS, the ones listed here are more in-depth. Although none of the
sites have full-text access to the IFRS Standards and Interpretations,
they all provide useful explanatory material. The Big Four accounting
firms all have useful, free Websites related to the IFRS.
Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA)
http://www.accaglobal.com/ifrs/
The ACCA is a global professional association for accountants. It is
included here because of its section on IFRS. The ACCA issues a
Todd M. Hines
23
24
provides updates on the current activities of the IASB and its related
entities.
KPMG InternationalInternational Financial Reporting Standards
http://www.kpmgifrg.com
KPMG, a Big Four accounting firm, does a good job of posting current developments on IFRS to this Website. There is usually at least one
update posted a week. Some very advanced material is available at no
cost. For example, a free guide to the IFRS rules on financial securities
is over 230 pages long. Most of the available material is advanced and is
not written for IFRS neophytes.
PricewaterhouseCoopersCorporateReporting:
International Finanal Accounting Standards
http://www.pwcglobal.com/ifrs/
This Website, produced by a Big Four accounting firm, contains no
unique material that distinguishes it from those of its Big Four colleagues. But overall it does a good job of providing access to advanced
IFRS explanatory material. Someone unfamiliar with IFRS would be
better served using Deloittes IAS Plus Website because its material is
more targeted towards beginners.
CONCLUSION
The enormous growth of global capital markets, especially in the last
twenty-five years, has precipitated the drive for one set of globally recognized accounting standards. Creditors and investors have become increasingly frustrated that the financial statements of companies in
different countries cannot be compared. This has led to a campaign to
harmonize the worlds different accounting standards. The International Accounting Standards Committee was established in 1973 and
thereafter developed a set of accounting standards with the intent of
having them used around the world. Despite this push the developed
countries of the world continued to use their own national accounting
standards.
Todd M. Hines
25
NOTES
1. In this paper the use of the term IFRS may refer to the specific numbered standards passed by the IASB (e.g., IFRS 1, IFRS 2), but usually it will be referring to the
entire body of literature that comprises the International Financial Reporting Standards. This body of literature is also commonly referred to as International GAAP.
2. Deloitte & Touche maintains a regularly updated Webpage showing IFRS implementation status by country at: http://www.iasplus.com/country/useias.htm.
REFERENCES
Bolton, L. (2006, January). IFRS Use By CountryThe Big Picture. Accountancy, 137,
88.
Harrington, C. (2005). The Accounting Profession: Looking Ahead. Journal of Accountancy, 200(4), 43-48.
Hussey, R. & Ong, A. (2005). International Financial Reporting Standards Desk Reference: Overview, Guide, and Dictionary. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
In the Public Interest: A Conversation with the Chief Accountant of the SEC. (2005).
Journal of Accountancy, 199(1), 63-70.
Lo, K. (2004, September 29). A Slow and Steady Convergence Project. Financial
Times, 1.
Nobes, C. W., ed. (2001). Introducing GAAP 2001. Retrieved December 14, 2004,
from http://www.iasplus.com/resource/g2001sum.pdf/
Nobes, C. W. & Parker, R. (2004). Comparative International Accounting. Essex, UK:
Pearson Education.
Prather-Kinsey, J. J. & Rueschhoff, N. G. (2004). An Analysis of International Accounting Research in U.S.- and Non-U.S.-Based Academic Accounting Journals.
Journal of International Accounting Research, 3(1), 63-81.
26
Shortridge, R. T. & Myring, M. (2004). Defining Principles-Based Accounting Standards. The CPA Journal, 74(8), 34-37.
Tweedie, D. & Seidenstein, T. R. (2005). Setting a Global Standard: The Case for Accounting Convergence. Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business,
25(3), 589-608.
SUBMITTED: 12/16/2005
REVISION SUBMITTED: 04/28/2006
ACCEPTED: 06/28/2006
doi:10.1300/J109v12n03_02