Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
IEEE MICROWAVE AND WIRELESS COMPONENTS LETTERS, VOL. 20, NO. 1, JANUARY 2010
Abstractthis letter proposes a novel building block for developing tunable wideband bandpass filters. The proposed circuit
block mainly consists of short circuit coupled lines and short
circuit stubs with pin diodes as tuning elements. This work aims to
demonstrate reconfigurable bandwidth of this type of filter. Two
filters are designed and fabricated; one can be switched between
a fractional bandwidth (FBW) of 16.3% and 35% at a center
frequency of 1.9 GHz, and the other can be switched from a FBW
of 27.8% to 37.4% at a center frequency of 1.9 GHz. The insertion
loss and return loss in the first filter range from 4.17 dB to 0.4 dB
and 27.54 dB to 19.04 dB. The second filter exhibits an insertion
loss ranging from 0.73 dB to 0.43 dB and a return loss range from
31.1 dB to 27.7 dB. The tested filters show good agreement with
EM simulations.
Index TermsBandpass filter, microstrip filter, tunable filter.
I. INTRODUCTION
DVANCES in many microwave systems and applications
with multifunction capabilities means that there is an increasing demand to develop reconfigurable filters. Thus reconfigurable filters are essential for future wireless communication systems across commercial, defense and civil sectors. In all
these systems reconfigurable filter technologies hold the key to
controlling the spectrum of RF signals, eliminating interference
and preserving the dynamic range under any signal receiving
condition. Reconfigurable filters can be realised in a variety of
ways, but no matter what method of tuning is used they must
conserve their transmission and reflection coefficient over the
tuning range specified. They offer many advantages over traditional filter banks, the main being size and flexibility.
Many tunable filters have been investigated that control the
center frequency [1][6]. The tunability of the center frequency
is accomplished by varying the electrical lengths of filter resonators; tunability is either continuous or in discrete steps with
the use of varactors or pin diodes. Varactors were initially utilized and as the most popular choices being: Semiconducting
[1], BST [2] and piezoelectric [3]. Conversely, in order to tune
the center frequency in discrete steps pin diodes are employed
[5]; however with the introduction of microelectromechanical
systems switches, tuning the center frequency in discrete steps
Manuscript received August 03, 2009; revised October 09, 2009. First published December 09, 2009; current version published January 08, 2010. This
work was supported by in part by a UK EPSRC Industrial CASE Award.
Alexander Miller and Jia-Sheng Hong are with Department of Electrical,
Electronic and Computer Engineering, School of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, U.K. Email:
am541@hw.ac.uk, J.Hong@hw.ac.uk.
Color versions of one or more of the figures in this paper are available online
at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org.
Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/LMWC.2009.2035958
has been gaining more popularity due to their low RF losses and
dc consumption [6].
In comparison to tunability of center frequency, there has
been very little effort made in tunability of bandwidth. A
reason for this is the lack of methods to vary the inter-resonator
coupling electronically that is essential for bandwidth control.
There have been some papers that tackle this subject in a variety
of ways, some concentrating on the tunability of bandwidth at
a fixed center frequency [7], [8] and others dealing with simultaneous control of both bandwidth and center frequency [9],
[10]. On inspection of the literature it is clear that most reported
filter topologies and methods used only apply to narrowband
applications. However, there is increasing demand for tunable
wideband filters. Typical applications would be receiver modules and RF converters where filter banks can be replaced by
such a filter in order to save board space. This letter investigates
a new topology to realise such a filter with a reconfigurable
bandwidth. The tuning elements used are pin diodes, as they
are much less lossy than the varactor diodes, thus limiting the
degradation in passband width and filter operation.
II. FILTER BUILDING BLOCK
Shown in Fig. 1 is the proposed filter building block, which
mainly consists of short-circuited coupled lines and stubs that
have an electrical length of 90 at the center frequency of the
passband. The tunability of the proposed filter is based on the
concept that, for a given pair of coupled lines with fixed evenand odd-mode impedance, altering the impedance of the stubs
alters the coupling and in turn alters the bandwidth, hence, by
switching the stubs in and out of the circuit alters the passband
width. It can be shown that the return loss in the passband only
depends on the pair of even- and odd- mode impedances and is
independent of the characteristic impedance of the other stubs
(see Fig. 2). This makes bandwidth tuning easy. In addition to
this advantage, by simply cascading several same filter blocks
of this type, a higher order filter that increases the selectivity
while theoretically maintaining the same return loss over the
same bandwidth can be built. This trait is very desirable whilst
designing wideband filters with a reconfigurable bandwidth (see
Fig. 3).
III. EXPERIMENTAL DEMONSTRATION
To validate the circuit concept described in the above section,
two reconfigurable filter building blocks were designed, simulated and tested.
A. EM Simulation
Fig. 4 shows an implemented reconfigurable microstrip filter
and
mm. The pin
on a substrate with
diodes were modeled by using a capacitor of value 0.025 pF for
isolation and a resistor of value of 4 for connection (both these
29
100
;
=
= 90 ,
impedance of stub (Z
Z = 110:4
; Z = 18:8
).
0 70
= 4:5
0 85
Z = 110:4
; Z = 18:8
).
values are extracted from the data sheet for the PIN diode used).
For practical implementation, depending on a set of even- and
odd- mode impedances implemented, impedance transformers
may or may not be needed at the terminals for a matching purpose. The initial dimensions of the circuits were obtained using
Microwave Office [11] and finalized using EM software, Sonnet
[12]. The dimensions of the stubs are
mm
and
mm (narrowband stubs) while the coumm,
mm and
pled lines have a gap
mm. In this case, the impedance transformer
has a width and length of 0.6 mm and 24.8 mm, respectively.
In Fig. 4, just replacing the narrowband stubs with two wideband stubs
mm and
mm),
we obtain the second reconfigurable filter block. The simulated
performances of these two filters are summarized in Table I,
with the simulated and measured performance being illustrated
in Figs. 5 and 6.
There are some shifts in the center frequencies, which are accounted for by unequal even and odd mode electrical lengths and
some effect from the bias circuit. Furthermore, these unequal
Authorized licensd use limted to: IE Xplore. Downlade on May 13,20 at 1:495 UTC from IE Xplore. Restricon aply.
even and odd mode phase velocities also cause the spurious response at 4 GHz; the next spurious response should be at 6 GHz,
i.e., 3 . This is due to the fact that microstrip are not pure TEM
transmission lines. There is also a very slight degradation in the
bandwidth performance due to the bias lines being connected
in the middle of the coupled lines. The bias lines slightly decrease the coupling and, hence, decrease the bandwidth of the
response.
In the on state of the narrowband stub configuration there
is more losses associated with the response; this is due to the
isolation scheme used in order to suppress any unwanted spikes
in the passband due to fringing. By placing the diode half way
up the stub means there is a bigger current at this point, hence,
more losses are involved. By simply using one diode for isolation a spike was seen near the passband which would be detrimental to filter operation. Many cases were tried the first being
that a diode at the bottom of the stub and one at the top. This
30
IEEE MICROWAVE AND WIRELESS COMPONENTS LETTERS, VOL. 20, NO. 1, JANUARY 2010
TABLE I
PERFORMANCE OF THE FILTERS
V. ACKOWLEGEMENTS
The authors would like to thank A. Burdis and C. Bird at
SELEX Sensors & Airborne Systems Ltd. for their support and
encouragement.
REFERENCES
[1] Y.-H. Chun and J.-S. Hong, Electronically reconfigurable dual-mode
microstrip open-loop resonator filter, IEEE Microw. Wireless Compon.
Lett., vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 449451, Jul. 2008.
[2] J. Nath, D. Ghosh, J. - P. Maria, A. I. Kingon, W. Fathelbab, P. D.
Franzon, and M. B. Steer, An electronically tunable microstrip bandpass using thin-film barium-strontium-titanate (BST) varactors, IEEE
Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 27072712, Sep. 2005.
[3] M. A. Ahmad, R. Matz, and P. Russer, 0.8 GHz to 2.4 GHz tunable
ceramic microwave bandpass filters, in IEEE MTT-S Int. Micro. Symp.
Dig., Jul. 2007, pp. 16151618.
[4] E. Pistono, M. Robert, L. Duvillaret, J.-M. Duchamp, A. Vilcot, and P.
Ferrari, Compact fixed and tune-all bandpass filters based on coupled
slow-wave resonators, IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 54, no.
6, pp. 27902799, Jun. 2006.
[5] C. Lugo and J. Papapolymerou, Dual mode reconfigurable filter with
asymmetrical transmission zeros and center frequency control, IEEE
Microw. Wireless Compon. Lett., vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 499501, Sep. 2006.
[6] A. Abbaspour-Tamijani, L. Dussopt, and G. M. Rebeiz, Miniature and
tunable filters using MEMS capacitors, IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory
Tech., vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 18781885, Jul. 2003.
[7] C. Rauscher, Reconfigurable bandpass filter with a three-to-one
switchable passband width, IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol.
51, no. 2, pp. 573577, Feb. 2003.
[8] L. Zhu, V. Devabhaktuni, C. Wang, and M. Yu, Adjustable bandwidth
filter design based on interdigital capacitors, IEEE Microw. Wireless
Copon. Lett., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1618, Jan. 2008.
[9] M. S. Renedo, R. G. Garca, J. I. Alonso, and C. B. Rodrguez, Tunable
combline filter with continuous control of center frequency and bandwidth, IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 191199,
Jan. 2003.
[10] C.-K. Liao, C.-Y. Chang, and J. Lin, A reconfigurable filter based
on doublet configuration, in IEEE MTT-S Int. Micro. Symp. Dig., Jul.
2007, pp. 16071610.
[11] Applied Wave Research Inc, Users Manual, Version 7.5 Jun. 2007.
[12] Sonnet Software Inc., EM Users Manual, Version 12 NY, 2009.