Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
A. L. BENHAM
JUNIOR MEMBER AIME
W. E. DOWDEN'
W. J. KUNZMAN
ABSTRACT
SPE 1484-G
z
<
:z:
I-
:::Ii!
40
..i
0
:::Ii!
30
20
10
O~
__
o
FIG.
__L-__
10
20
L-~
__
40
MOL %
30
__
50
__
60
__
70
__
80
__
90
100
PROPANE
:~ :"'-
100
.
ro
-;
~ c;: CRITICAL
.~
.0
y
'0
""I""
.0
ro
__~~~~~~~~
m _
00
00
00
~ 60 -<t
~-~
"o
Z
I""
""I""I I~
ro
m
m
_
ro
_
INTERMEDIATES COMPOSITION. MOL %
~
50
10
OL-~-L-J
POINT
:l:
I-
20
10
100
10
30
20
RES 1't'lOl
FLUID
10 ---- ...
~L-~'O~2~O~~~'~0~'0~'~O~~~~.0~~~~'00
COMPOSITION INTERMEDIATES
MOL. %
FIC. 2-CALCULATED PHASE DIAGRAMS FOR THRlE RESERVOIR FLUIDS. (A) FOR FLUID B AT 3,000 PSIA AND 182, MW', = 38.8 AND
FOR FLUID C AT 2,200 PSIA AND 250F, MW,=39.4 AND MW H =220; AND (C) FOR FLUID E AT 1,500
PSIA AND 173F, MW, = 49.4 AND MW H = 241.
MII'.-202.6; (B)
230
PETROLEUM TRANSACTIONS,
AIME
100
It
I
I
I
,I
,I
I
<t
X
l-
A METHOD OF PREDICTION
An examination of Fig. 2 reveals that the limiting
tie line has a negative slope for each of the cases shown.
The sign of the slope of this tie line is determined by
the value of the equilibrium constants for the intermediates as the system approaches its critical composition. If the equilibrium constants are less than one, the
slope is negative; if they are greater than one, the slope
is positive. For most typical reservoir-fluid and displacing-fluid compositions, the equilibrium constants for the
combined intermediates will be less than one in this
region for typical reservoir temperatures and pressures.
This results in negative tie-line slopes. Individually, this
is true for pr<'pane and butane in the range of temperatures to 250F and pressures from 1,000 to 3,000 psi;
however, it is not always true for ethane. At 1,000 psi,
ethane will give a negative slope for the tie line for all
temperatures below lOOF, while the tie-line slopes are
negative at all temperatures below 250 P at 3,000 psi.
However, most typical injection fluids will contain less
than 75 per cent ethane so that this is not a serious
limitation.
These observations on the slope of the ~ie line serve
as the basis for a relatively simple method for caJcuhting the conditions f<'r miscibi1ity. Assuming a tie line
of infinite slope, the limiting injection-fluid composition
for a miscible displacement may be determined at a
certain reservoir temperature and ~ressure, knowing the
mixture of methane, injection-fluid intermediates and
reservoir fluid C.+ which gives a critical point at the
reservoir temperatures and pressure. All fluids having
an intermediates concentration equal to or greater than
that of the critical composition are either immediately
miscible or capable of becoming miscible with the reservoir fluid. Those containing fewer intermediates will
be assumed incapable of achieving miscibility. It was
explained in the previous section that, if the intermediates fraction is assumed to have a character close to
0
l&J
I
I
l&J
:E
::e
0
...J
:E
B
MOL
INTERMEDIATES
By
RICH GAS.
231
,-
70
.-
\\
-\I.
~.~"j. ~'!1
S0
7507 PSIA
0
\{164
F
2837PSIA
0
{90 F
.?\-1! 1440PSIA
..J
1\
.~
'-- {335"F
. ~~19 PSIA
255" F
{2700 PSIA
50
/
~
.J
3D
20
/V
1/
L<
VI1
1
-l
---
1
1
--....
RESERVOIR
FLUID
:1/
::I!
i ~\ ~e90F
~20PSIA
: \
I
I
I
.~~e66"F
2323 PSIA
~"..'
~
f--------
930 PSIA
---
1\-\l
0
{39S F
IS38 PSIA
SOF
S5 PSIA
~ ----...
I
10
>'1
~I
--....--....
o
o
0
{28S F
1711 PSI A
----...--....
on l
l
3D
ro
~-\l\P:
ffi
----...
00
00
20S O F
SI7PSIA
MOL % INTERMEDIATES
FIG. 4--CRITICAL POINTS FOR MIXTURES OF RESERVOIR FLUID
E, PROPANE AND METHANE.
232
CORRELAnON
Five reservoir fluids of different compositions were
chosen for a study of the possibility of correlating the
conditions for a miscible displacement as a function of
reservoir-fluid properties, injection-fluid properties, reservoir temperature and pressure. Table 1 contains a
complete analysis of each of these reservoir fluids. Perhaps the best measure of the differences in character of
these fluids is the molecular weight of the C 5 + fraction.
This ranges from 182.6 for Reservoir Fluid A to 241
for Reservoir Fluid E.
The LPG's or intermediates used in this study are
listed in Table 2. The mixtures designated as 1, 2 and
3 were used for the calculations with Reservoir Fluids
A, B, D and E, while Mixtures 4, 5 and 6 were used
for the calculations with Reservoir Fluid C.
The procedure previously set forward was used for
each series of calculations. The critical temperatures
and pressures were calculated using the Kurata and
Katz method" as modified by Davis, Bertuzzi, Gore and
Kurata. 12 The results were cross-plotted to obtain the
conditions for miscibility at even pressures for a given
reservoir fluid and displacing fluid. The results for the
different reservoir fluids and LPG's were compared, and
it became evident that the controlling variables in determining the miscibility conditions were temperature,
pressure, reservoir-fluid C, + character and displacingfluid C,+ character.
The next problem considered was that of characterizing the C, + fraction of reservoir fluids and the C, +
fraction of methane-LPG mixtures. Due to the limited
results available as compared to the many variables required for a rigorous characterization, the average molecular weight of these fractions was used for the correlation. Using this interpretation, the maximum permissible methane concentration in the displacing fluid for a
miscible displacement of reservoir fluids has been correlated as a function of (1) temperature, (2) pressure,
(3 r C,+ molecular weight of the reservoir fluid and
(4) c, + molecular weight of the displacing fluid.
The final correlation of results is given in Figs. 5
through 16. These figures cover the range from 1,000
to 3,000 psi, 70 to 260F, reservoir fluids having C 5 +
molecular weights from 180 to 240 and displacing fluid
having C,+ molecular weights from 34 to 58.1. Due
to the characterization of the C,+ fraction by molecular
weight and to the use of mixtures of ethane with propane and propane with butane for the calculations, the
correlation may be applied only when the C,+ intermediates in the displacing fluid are composed principally of ethane and propane or propane and butane;
however, small amounts of butane can be tolerated with
ethane and propane, small amounts of ethane can be
tolerated with the propane and butane, and small
amounts of other hydrocarbon substances such as would
exist in a natural gas may be tolerated without sacrificing accuracy. The correlation should not be expected to
apply for large amounts of non-hydrocarbon components in the displacing fluid.
The dashed line in Fig. 5 represents the critical locus
at 1,000 psi for various displacing-fluid C,+ components mixed with methane. Miscibility at temperatures
below this dashed line is assured if the displacing fluid
is a saturated liquid.
In general, the preferred method for using these
charts to predict miscibility involves the following.
1. Calculation of the reservoir-fluid or saturated resPETROLEUM TRANSACTIONS,
AIME
12.93
3.74
7.04
8.68
7.01
6.72
53.88
209
0.8400
144
682
48.96
4.18
1.98
1.36
1.40
1.36
40.76
211
0.848
182
3,206
59.12
9.19
4.55
3.42
C5+ 23.72
CH,
C,H.
C,Ho
c..H'0
CSH12
C.H14
C'lH16 +
MWC1+
Density C1+
Reservoir Temperature, 0 F
Reservoir Pressure, psia
Pseudo-Ternary Components Composition
CH.4, mol per cent
C2-C4, mol per cent
C5
+,
MWC,-,
MWC5+
12.93
19.46
67.61
47.6
182.6
48.96
7.52
43.52
38.8
202.6
6*
100
C.+220
C5+ 0.825
250
4,000
59.12
17.16
23.72
39.4
220
46.59
9.72
6.46
3.92
2.21
4.77
26.33
258.7
0.854
148
3,440
15.77
1.54
2.20
4.79
4.36
4.73
66.61
263
0.8511
173
1,128
46.59
20.10
33.31
40.0
221.6
15.77
8.53
75.70
49.4
241
paper by Stone and Crump" contains enough information about displacing fluids, displaced oil and displacement efficiency to be able to make a test of the reliability of the correlation. Table 3 contains pertinent compositions and properties along with the per cent recovery
obtained in a core displacement. The correlation indicates miscibility with composite gas, propane-rich gas,
and ethane-rich gas and indicates something less than
miscibility with separator gas and condensate gas. This
correlates with recoveries of 91, 90 and 96 per cent
obtained with the miscible systems, and 57 and 63 with
the immiscible systems.
A paper recently presented by Wilson" also contains
enough information concerning the conditions of the displacement so that the correlation may be tested. Table
4 contains these comparisons. The correspondence between high recovery and a prediction of miscibility is
good except for Run No.6 where the recovery was 72
per cent, although the correlation indicated that miscibility should have been obtained.
The second method for determining miscibility which
involves the use of a PVT method has been carried out
using Reservoir Fluid E to check the accuracy of the
prediction method and the generalized correlation. This
test was carried out in the following manner so that the
mechanism of displacement in a porcus medium which
produces miscibility was approximately duplicated in a
PVT cell. Recombined reservoir fluid was placed in a
visual PVT cell. If an initial gas phase existed at the
test conditions, this was displaced from the cell at constant pressure. The system then was returned to its origi?al volume, rel?r~ssured with the potential displacing
mIxture to the ongmal test pressure, while being brought
to equilibrium. If a gas phase existed after this step, the
previous displacement, injection and equilibration steps
were repeated until either the percentage gas stopped
decreasing after injection or the liquid swelled to 100
per cent. If the liquid swelled to 100 per cent, the system volume was increased before carrying out another
step. This procedure was followed until either the liquid
quit swelling after injection or the further injection of
fluid at constant pressure did not result in formation of
a ~as phase to indicate the achievement of miscibility.
ThIS procedure forced the system in the cell to follow
TABLE 3-MISCIBILITY CORRELATION APPLIED TO DISPLACEMENT DATA
OF STONE AND CRUMp13
Mol Per
Cent CH,
Displacing Displacement Mol Wt.
Allowed for
Mol Per
Fluid (Gas)
Recovery
C, +
Cent CH,
Miscibility
Miscible
Separator
57
~
~ ~~ ~
63.8
Condensate
63
48.9
67.4
No
64.0
Coonposite
91
49.9
55.0
Yes
60.0
Yes
Propane-Rich
90
42.7
55.9
45.0
Yes
Ethane-Rich
96
30.8
27.7
Crude Oil. 47.5API, MWC5+' 167
Pressure: 2,000 psia
Temperature: 128F
233
60
f-
'-'
<t
l.I... 550
00..
'-'
f-
'"ffi
58.1
(i)9
~
80f---~k-,"f-----r---r---r---t-
z....!
~ ~_ 40
f30 - - - -
54
49
-T-
441
:::;"-
LL
<5
Z
~:2
_
f-
o~ 20
o<t
70
00..
6o>l----t----t---I""F~r::::f~~~~~b:::=~
I
39
iij ~ 50~--~---'1_---'1_--1_--f__""""1c----P'_-=::1c---=r__-=i
34
8~
o......!
:::;"-
10
(f)
~~0--~8~0--~10~0~~1~20~~1+'40~-160~-'80~~2~00~~2~2~0~2~4~0--2~6~0~2~80
RESERVOIR TEMPERATURE, T, OF
FIG. 6--PREDICTED PHASE CONDITIONS AT 1,500 PSIA FOR A
MISCIBLE DISPLACEMENT OF A RESERVOIR FLUID CHARACTERIZED BY A C,+ MOLECuLAR WEIGHT OF 180, 200, 220 AND 240.
40~--~-~~--I_--I---I_--I---I---==t'--=_I---H
<.)
<t
~ 3%~0--~--"10~0--"12~0--"14~0,-"16bo,--"'8~0---?<20~0,-?:22~0,-?MtrO'-~~
is
RESERVOIR TEMPERATURE, T, OF
fZ
~ 70r-----1-"...~~~~~~
"-w
0l1.
z <5 i
~ ::i!:_ 50r[
f(j)9
o =>
u;
40r
~ 30
'"<t
fu
Cl
20'~0--~--~--~--~~,z,~~I~~~c+.~c+.~o~~
6
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
RESERVOIR TEMPERATURE, T, OF
-r--T-
80
~~
'" 301_--I1_--I---j---j---j-~-j--__t--__t--__t~~34
S
0..
<f)
RESERVOIR TEMPERATURE, T, OF
t--t---+-r--
50
Ui~
58.1
o 2~~O--~OO~--l100~~12~0--~14=0--~16~0--~,8~0~2~0~0~2~2~0~2~4~0~260~~280
f-
60r---!----l----"!~.:__.;~"-<I=-~~"""''!'.
54
e 501_--I----I---j---j--~_=c_____.:r"'""":::-t-='"'"""===t-=i:-49
6: 3
44.1
:::;"8 ~ 401_--I---j---j---j---j-----f--""+=-__t----f=-+39
'
0'-"
....!
~::2:
I-
=:l
o......!
40
:::;"-
u ~
'"~
30f--.--'e-----!--+-
<t
20>r---t---t-
<f)
o
80
00
34
RESERVOIR TEMPERATURE, T, OF
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
RESERVOIR TEMPERATURE, T, OF
240
260
280
Run
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
TABLE 4-COMPARlsON OF MISCIBILITY CORRELATION PREDICTION WITH "WILSON'S"" CORE FLOODING RESULTS
MWC, + in
Per C.o' CWo in
Displacing
Reservoir Fluid
Displacing
Per Cent
Per Cent CH,
Fluid
C.+MW
Fluid
Recovery
Allowed
--2-3-39
60
27
228
39
60
28
27
228
39
60
32
27
228
7
39
98
27
216
43
42
45
36
216
33
43
72
36
21
216
44
100
36
---m-
Miscibility
Predicted?
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Pressure, psia
Temperature, OF
Mol Per Cent Methane
with Propane in
Iniected Fluid
Miscibility?
1,500
173
1,500
173
30
Yes
35
Yes
3
~
173
4
1,500
173
41.5
Not Quite
46
No
80~=~--~-~
'-'
71----'~~~~~~~-~+--+--+---+--+--+-'-'
c::
6~
60,1---+--+-"-..c+-~+-"'~~~-R;.::.y
...J
~ ~_ 50,1---+--+--+--.p...~-+-':::"'J-....::o,k-=hc-'p_____5B.l
M
e
49
~
u;
;r::;;"-~
40,i---i--i--i---+_-+_--'"k--+_--'"1-=-+_---'f-44 .1
39
u<!>
30f--+--+--+--+--+--+--+-...cch:--+--+-----1
34
...J
~ Z~~0-"8~0-~IOO~~12~0~~14~0~~16~0~~18~0~~20~0~~22S0~o24~0~'26~0~~200
o
RESERVOIR
TEMPERATURE, T, OF
~ 80'f---..S::~~~~
"-W
00.
2
<5
t--i'"",,-r~'t-2:::f2::::-F:::::::t::===:f ~~' !
70,i---i--+_'::""f"'-~-R~~~
~::;;
49
~ e- 6o'f--+--+--+--+-~h"""":::p..-='f=____~~~~ %~.1
1~.1
O::J
~~
u<!>
'_-+-_+~-+-~-+-=--+-_-=j'
39
50,f--f--+--+--+--+--+--+-~?-~~-+-~
34
44 I_
39
34
j4~~0~o8~0-'lk,OO,-'1~20,-'14~0,-'16~0.-"~OO.-020~0.-~22bo~o24~0'-~26~0'-~280
~
RESERVOIR TEMPERATURE, T, OF
280
90r---,---,---,---,---,---,---~--,---,----,--,
I
U
G 90~-_-~
!zw
....z
80t-~~~~
<>:
~ 80,1---""'~~k-
LLW
o a.. 70
66
i=
1-.-+--+--+---+-.:::,..d--':-,....-!O-::::"..j...;;:?--k2-~==-+~~.I
49
44.1
50f-----~--+_--+_--+_--+---+---'"~~+_--+_~~39
34
~ 4~~0--~---~-~-~--160~-,80~~2~OO~-~2~2~O~2~~~~2~OO~~280
e,
TEMPERATURE, T, OF
~~
;n~
o~
60
56.1
~;;: 50f--+---+---I~-f_-~;:--t__=~~---=-:p-""""":!---'='f49
ao<!>
44.1
~ 40f---t---+_--+_--+_--+---+---~~+_--4_=~39
...J
34
6a. 306'';;0-'8;,;0~'1*00~'1*'20~'1-:!c40~-I;60;;-~,80;;-~2o:!:OO:;;-~2o:!:2;;-0~2~4-;;-0-::!26"'0~~200
RESERVOIR TEMPERATURE, T:F
235
70
pMETHANE IN
DISPLACED GAS
-------~Q
RUN 4
f----.,~-t---+---..---2-
+-
METHANE
- j----1------j---~+_-_1
_ Y8.0PANl'-. -C
3
RUN 3
!-
u;
o
20
o=-
70
0..
~ 60
<f)
<!
C>
~SO
RUN 2
0..
QPA~~ ___MEIH!,NE..
-' 40
0
=-
30
20
-C
70
~METHANE
~ 60
w
~ 50
w
'-.
RUN
0..
-,40
0
'" 30
stant-pressure and temperature ternary diagrams to illustrate the complete process rigorously. However, in
determining the limiting conditions for miscibility, the
conditions close to the critical point are the important
ones; nearly exact representation will be achieved by
using a C,_, intermediate fraction having a character of
that in the injection mixture and a C.+ fraction of
character equal to that in the reservoir fluid.
The limiting tie line is defined as a straight line drawn
tangent to the phase envelope in a ternary-composition
diagram at the critical point. Miscibility will be achieved
between a reservoir fluid and an injection fluid if the
point representing the latter lies to the intermediatecomponent side of the limiting tie line.
Typical reservoir fluids and injection mixtures give
negative slopes for the limiting tie line. Knowing the
critical composition for the reservoir pressure and temperature, a conservative figure for the maximum
methane concentration allowed in the displacing injection fluid is usually obtained by assuming that the minimum C,-4 intermediates allowed are equal to that existing in the critical composition. This is equivalent to
assuming a vertical, limiting tie line.
The approximate conditions for miscibility for five
different reservoir fluids were correlated using the reservoir temperature and pressure, reservoir-fluid C,-+
molecular weight, injection-fluid C,-C molecular weight
and the mentane concentration in the injection fluid.
This correlation may be used to predict the approximate conditions for a miscible displacement of reservoir
fluid by rich gas for temperature between 70 and
260 o P, pressures between 500 and 3,000 psia, reservoirfluid C, + molecular weights between 180 and 240
and displacing-fluid C, + molecular weight between
34 and 58. The correlation was partially checked using
published data. It also was checked using a stepwise
determination of miscibility using a PVT cell. The
correlation should be used with caution when the injection fluid contains ethane.
One general conclusion derived from the correlation is that miscibility between reservoir fluids and
rich-gas injection fluids is favored by high pressures,
low temperatures, light reservoir fluids and light hydrocarbon-displacing fluids rich in the heavier components.
The calculation method and correlation should be
extremely useful for the preliminary evaluation of field
rich-gas miscible-displacement projects and shOUld serve
as a starting point for laboratory studies if desired.
4
20
0
10
12
INJECTED
14
FLUID /
NOMENCLATURE
MW ll = average molecular weight of C,+ portion of
reservoir fluid
MW, = average molecular weight of C,-1 portion of injection fluid.
REFERENCES
1. Hutchinson, C. A., Jr. and Braun, Philip H.: "Phase
Relations of Miscihle Displacement in Oil Recovery",
Paper presented at AIChE-SPE Joint Symposium in San
Francisco (Dec., 1959).
2. Slohod, R. L. and Koch, H. A., Jr.: "Which to Use-'I'
Type or 'M' Type-in High Pressure Gas Injection ?".
Oil and Gas Jour_ (April 6, 1953) 51, 84, ll5.
3. Slohod, R. L. and Koch, H. A., Jr.: "High-Pressure Gas
Injection-Mechanism of Recovery Increase", Drill. and
Prod. Pmc., API (1953), 82.
4_ Whorton, Leonidas P. and Brownscomhe, Eugene R.:
U. S. Patents 2,724,437 and 2,724,438 (Nov. 22, 1955).
PETROLEUM TRANSACTIONS, AIME
901---~
80\-----l--~
EQUILIBRIUM
VAPOR
70~----~----+----+~
/' INJECTION
FLUID
EQUILIBRIUM
30 8~-........
..... LIQUID
.....
--
'RESERVOIR
FLUID
10~---l~~~----~----4-----+---~~---+---~----~
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
INTERMEDIATES, MOL %
FIG. 18-ExPERIMENTAL PHASE DIAGRAM FOR RESERVOIR FLUID E OBTAINED DURING STEP-WISE DISPLACEMENT TEST IN PVT CELL
-MISCIBLE DISPLACEMENT BY RICH GAS; RESERVOIR PRESSURE, 1,500; RESERVOIR TEMPERATURE, 173F.
5. Koch, H. A., Jr. and Hutchinson, C. A., Jr.: "Miscible
Displacements of Reservoir Oil Using Flue Gas", Trans.,
AIME (1958) 213, 7.
6. Clark, N. J., Schultz, W. P. and Shearin, H. M.: "Con
densing Gas Drive, Critical Displacement Process-New
Injection Method Affords Total Oil Recovery", Pet. Engr.
(Oct., 1956) 28, BAS.
7. Clark, N. J., Garms, K. M., Moore, J. L. and Shearin,
H. M.: "Miscible Drive-Its Theory and Application",
Jour. Pet. Tech. (June, 1958) X, No.6, 11.
8. Crump, James S.: U. S. Patent 2,880,801 (April 7, 1959).
9. Carter, R. T., Sage, B. H. and Lacey, W. N.: "Phase Be
havior in the MethaneProponenPentane System", Trans.,
AIME (1941) 142. 170.
***
237