Sei sulla pagina 1di 67

SIGNIFICANCE OF FRESNEL ZONES IN

SEISMIC REFLECTION PROSPECTING


C. H. Mehta, Consultant - Seismic Imaging &
Inversion

SEG_HL @ SHELL Technology Center,


Bangalore, India
4th Sept 2009

4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Acknowledgements

Society of Exploration Geophysicists for


inviting me to serve in the HL program

Shell for Sponsoring the HL

program

Mr. Gautum Kumar for being a wonderful


host

4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Acknowledgements

Special thanks are


due to Crystal
Dugger,
Professional
Development
Advisor, SEG, for
coordinating my HL
program in a highly
professional
manner.
4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

SEG Membership

Technical Journals in Print and Online


Networking Opportunities
Receive Membership Discounts on:
Continuing Education Courses
Publications
Workshops and Meetings

SEGmaterialsareavailabletoday!

Join Online x x x http://seg.org/join


4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Outline of the presentation

Motivation for studying Fresnel zones.


Definitions of Fresnel zones - in depth & time
Diffraction from a terminating reflector using
Fresnel zones.
Response of a disk as a function of its
radius using the concept of Fresnel zones.
Heuristic derivation of expressions for vertical and
lateral resolution for finite S/N ratio.
Significance of Fresnel zone for migration

4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Why study Fresnel zones?-1

1. The study of Fresnel


zones will help us
understand how the
seismic response of an
object depends on its
lateral size.
This in turn will lead us
to understand the limit
of lateral resolution.

Zero offset response of


a circular disk with
radius = r
4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Why study Fresnel zones?-2


h

Kirchoff sum over


diffraction response
using half aperture = h

r
Zero offset response of a
circular disk with radius = r

2. If h = r, then the sum of the traces in the left frame = sum of the traces
in the right (for a laterally uniform medium). Thus, the study of Fresnel
zones can help us understand how Kirchhoff migration response
depends on migration aperture.

4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Fresnel Zones for a point monochromatic source


with wavelength
S
d

Divide the plane into circular zones such that distance of S from
the boundaries of successive circles differ by /4.
i.e. SQ SP = SR SQ = =

/4

4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Fresnel Zones - for a line source


Line source
S

Divide the plane into strips parallel to the source line such that
distance of S from the boundaries of successive strips differ by

/ 4, i.e. SQ SP = SR SQ = =

/4

4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Definition of First Fresnel Zone - zero offset case


S/ R

d+/4

r2= (d+/4)2 d2
r

r~d /2

for d >>

r =Radius of 1st Fresnel Zone

The 1st Fresnel zone is the portion of the reflector from which the reflected
energy can reach the receiver within the first half cycle of reflection; amplitudes
reaching the detector from this zone add constructively to produce a
reflection. R. E. Sheriff, Monogram for Fresnel zone calculation,
Geophysics, v. 45, 5 (1980), p. 968
4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

The 1st Fresnel zone on a zero offset time section


for a flat reflector

Response of a
diffractor located
on a flat reflector.
Within a Fresnel
zone, the seismic
response has the
same polarity.

Source: Claerbout, J. F. 1985,


Imaging the Earths Interior,
Blackwell Scientific Publications.

4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Definition of First Fresnel Zone - finite offset case


S

SQR = SPR+/2

For d >> , r { 1 + x2 / 4 d2 }3/4 (d/2)


Ref: John C. Bancroft and Shuang Sun, Fresnel zones and power of
stacking in preparation of data for AVO analysis, SEG Conference, 2003

4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

The 1st Fresnel zone on a finite offset time section


for a flat reflector

The Fresnel zone is the area bounded between the diffraction response shown here in red - and the half cycle of the finite offset time response of the
reflector. Source: John C. Bancroft and Shuang Sun, SEG Conference, 2003

4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

1st Fresnel Zone - Dipping reflector (zero-offset)


Mid-point axis

C
S/R

r2= (d+/4)2 d2

d+/4

d = d Sec
For d >> ,

P
Q

r~(d Sec /2)

r = Radius of 1st Fresnel Zone,


CP = Path of specular reflection
CQ = A paraxial ray from the edge of 1st Fresnel zone

4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

1st Fresnel Zone - dipping reflector (zero-offset)


Mid-point axis
Specular
rays
generate
time
response
PQ of the
reflector
PQ

C S/R
Paraxial rays generate
diffraction curve
Reflector
P

CP = Path of specular reflection


CP = 2-way time for the reflection from P

4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

1st Fresnel Zone / aperture for a dipping reflector


(zero-offset case)
Mid-point axis
Time
response
PQ of the
reflector
PQ shown
in the
previous
slide.

C S/R
Paraxial rays generate
diffraction curve

1st
Fresnel
zone

4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

The 1st Fresnel zone on a time section for a dipping


reflector

The half time period of the zero-offset response is represented by the dashed lines.
The intersection of the lower dashed line with the diffraction defines the spatial
extent of the 1st Fresnel zone. Note that the diffraction response is tangential to
the zero offset response at the point where specular reflection takes place. Some
authors also call Fresnel zone defined thus as Fresnel Aperture.
Source: John C. Bancroft and Shuang Sun, SEG Conference, 2003
4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Contribution of 1st Fresnels Zone > the


Total Sum from all Zones
S/R

++

Amplitudes fall due to


spherical divergence
& directivity

--

C1

Source/Receiver

-M1

++
M2

M3

C1 > C2 > C3

Each point on the reflector sends secondary wavelets some of which are
received at R; some elsewhere. The two-way path difference of successive
Fresnel zones from the point S/R is now half wave length, i.e., the signal
received back at S/R from successive zones have opposite phase. Let C1, C2,
.. indicate the average absolute amplitudes received at S/R from successive
half-zones.

4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Contribution from 1st Fresnel Zone > Total


Amplitude

2{ C1 C2 + C3 C4 + .. } = A (Say)
C1 > A/2 + [ C2 C3 + C4 -]
C1 > A/2
i.e. Contribution from 1st Fresnel zone = 2 C1 > A

4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

We will show that contribution of 1st Fresnel Zone


to Amplitude ~ 2 (Total amplitude of infinite plate)
S/R

S/R

S/R
_

Response of a finite disc

Response of an infinite
plate

Response of an infinite
plate with a circular
hole

4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Let, f (t) = wavelet,

v = velocity in the medium

T0 = 2-way vertical travel time = 2 d /v


T = 2-way time from S/R to the edge of the disk = 2 r /v
S/R

S/R

S/R
d

r=d+/4

Zero-offset trace

f ( t T0 )
2d

f ( t T ) Cos
2r

4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

In frequency domain
S/R

S/R

S/R
d

F ( ) exp( i T0 )
2d

r=d+/4

Zero-offset trace

2r

(1/ 2 d) F ( ) exp ( i T0)

= (1/ 2 d) F ( ) exp ( i T0)

F ( ) exp (i T)Cos

- (d / r )exp { i (T T0)} Cos


- (d / r )2 exp { i (T T0)}

We compute exp { i (T T0)} in the next slide -------->


4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Set T 0 = 2 d / v and T = 2 r / v = 2 ( d + / 4 )/ v.
Then, T T0 = / 2 v, and (T T0) = , exp { i (T T0)} = - 1
S/R

S/R

S/R

Zero-offset trace from1st Fresnel zone =

Total amplitude from infinite plate

r=d+/4

Amplitude from 1st Fresnel zone

(1 / 2 d) F ( ) exp ( i T0)

1+

1 +

(d / r ) 2

~2

[ 1 + ( / 4 d) ]2

4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Contribution from 1st k Fresnel Zones


Setting T 0 = 2 d / v and T = 2 ( d + k / 4 )/ v, T T0 = k / 2 v,
(T T ) = k , exp { i (T T )} = exp ( i k ) = (- 1)k;
0

Cos = d / r = d /( d + k / 4 )
S/R

S/R

S/R
d

d
1
2
k

Zero-offset trace from a disk


covering 1st k Fresnel zones

(1 / 2 d) F ( ) exp ( i T0)

r=d+k/4

1 - (-1)k(d / r ) 2

4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Contribution from 1st k Fresnel Zones (contd.)


Zero-offset trace from a disk
covering 1st k Fresnel zones

(1 / 2 d) F ( ) exp ( i T0)

Amplitude from 1st k zones


Total amplitude from infinite plate

1 - (-1)k(d / r ) 2

(-1)k
=

1 -

[ 1 + (k / 4 d) ]2

As k increases from 1, 2, 3,.. , the sum of the amplitudes from


the first k zones oscillates and stabilizes to 1 asymptotically.

4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Let us compare this heuristic result with


exact results from published literature.------>

4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Normalized reflection amplitude above center of a


disk as a function of the radius of the disk.
Wavelet (left frame) is monochromatic of 37.1 Hz. ( = 54 meters)

Input wavelet

Maxima & minima are the Fresnel zone boundaries

Source: Fresnel Zone for broadband data, Bruhl et.al, Geophysics, vol 61, p.600, 1996
4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Normalized Reflection amplitude (right panels) above the


center of a disk as a function of the disk radius:
Wavelets (left) are centered around 37.1 Hz ( = 54 meters).

2nd Fresnel zone boundary

4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

What would be the zero-offset time section


for a streak of limestone surrounded by
shale?
S/R

S/R

S/R

S/R

S/R

Shale Shale

Shale

Shale Shale Shale


Limestone streak

4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Zero-offset section for a terminating reflector


First, reconsider the zero-offset response (2-D) of a reflector of infinite
extent. (Fresnel zones are now strips perpendicular to this plane).
S/R
d
++

C3

--

C2

--

++

C1

C1 > C2 > C3

2{ C1 C2 + C3 C4 + .. } = A > 0 (Say)

4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Zero-offset response for a terminating


reflector at a point above the edge
P
d
++

--

++

C3 < C2 < C1

Now only half the Fresnels zones contribute.


Therefore, the amplitude at P = { C1 C2 + C3 C4 + .. } = A /2

4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Zero-offset response for a terminating


reflector at a point Q to the left of the edge
Q
d
++

C3

--

++

++

< C2 < C1

C1

Amplitude at Q = C1 + { C1 C2 + C3 C4 + .. }
= A /2 + C1

4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Zero-offset response for a terminating


reflector at a point R to the right of the edge
R

d
++

--

++

++

C3 < C2 < C1

C1

Missing
Fresnel zone

Amplitude at R = { C2 + C3 C4 + .. }
= { C1 C2 + C3 C4 + .. } C1
= A /2 - C1
Note the polarity reversal with respect to the amplitude when the
observation point Q is to the left of the edge as in the previous slide

4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Zero-offset section for a terminating reflector

Amp =1 at -

Amp =1/2

Polarity reversal

Source: A simple theory of seismic diffractions, A.W. Trorey, Geophysics,35, No.5, 1970

4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

What Causes Seismic Reflection and What


Causes Diffractions?

Reflection arises due to vertical changes in elastic


properties

Diffraction arises due to lateral changes (when the


wavelength of change is << seismic wavelengths)

Of course, this is a simplified view. Reflection can


also be explained as a sum of diffractions!!

4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Facies change

Rapid Facies change


4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Seismic Resolution

Vertical & lateral resolution


Difference between thresholds for
detecting & for resolving

4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Vertical Resolution: What is the minimum thickness


of a layer to resolve its top & bottom separately?

+R

=2d/v
-R
t

T/ 2
To see the top & bottom separately,
the second half cycles should have
minimum overlap.
i.e., > T/ 2 ; Or, d > / 4
4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Minimum thickness for a layer to be detectable


g(t) = -1 (4 / T) (t )
f (t) = 1 + 4 t / T
=2d/v
+1
T/ 2

t=0

-1

f (t) = 1 - 4 t / T

g(t) = -1 + (4 / T) (t )

4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Minimum detectable thickness depends on


wavelength and S/N ratio
h (t ) = f (t) + g(t) is the
composite wavelet in red
+1
=2d/v

h (t) = + 4 / T

t =0

-1

T/ 4

h (t) = - 4 / T

h (t) = 4 / T
8t/

t
t

For a layer to be detectable, the highest absolute value of the


total response > noise level (N).
i.e. 4 / T > N.
For N = 0.5, > T/ 8 Or d > V T / 16 = /16
4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Lateral Resolution

4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Zero-offset time-domain response of a finite disk


Source/Receiver

What will happen


as the size AA
shrinks?

D1 = D2 = V /2

After A simple theory of seismic diffractions, Trorey, A.W., Geophysics, 35, No 5, 1970

4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Zero-Offset time-domain response of a finite disk


Source/Receiver

D1 = D2 = V /2
where V = R.C.

Let be the 2-way


time difference here
between reflection &
diffraction

4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Limit of Lateral Resolution


= 2-way time difference
between reflection &
diffraction above the
center of the disk

= 2 (PQ -PC) /v
= r2/(d v).
For resolving the edges
of a diffractor, we must
have > T/2,

i.e, r2 > d / 2
Or, r > rF

4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Resolution before & after migration

Before Migration:
The resolution radius ~ rF (1st Fresnel zone radius)

= Sqrt [ (d + /4 )2 - d2 ] ~ Sqrt ( d /2) for d>>


After Migration:
Migration collapses diffractions and theoretical limit is
obtained by setting d = 0.
i.e. resolution radius ~ /4
Setting d = 0 can be understood also from the
concept of migration as a process of downward
continuation to each depth and picking up the
reflected energy
4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

A numerical example on resolution

2 Km

shale
sand

70 m

Will sand lens be


resolved laterally on
a stack section? (a)
before migration (b)
after migration.
Dominant frequency
= 50 Hz Vshale = 2
Km/s, Vsand = 3 Km/s

4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Answer to the exercise on lateral resolution

For computing Fresnel zone, the relevant wavelength is the


wavelength in the overburden and not in the target geo-body.
= c / f = 2000 /50 = 40 m
Therefore, radius of 1st Fresnel zone = rF = Sqrt ( d * /2 ) = Sqrt
(2000* 40 /2) = 200 m

Since the radius of the sand lens = 35 m is < rF , lens will not be
resolved laterally on un-migrated stack.

After migration the limit of resolvability is radius of /4 . Since the


radius of the lens = 35 m is > /4 = 10 m, it will be resolved on the
migrated section.

4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

How big a disk must be for it to be


detectable?
Diffracted amplitude = - cos2 () X reflected
amplitude
As radius shrinks, goes to zero, and we may apply
the result derived for vertical resolution limits,
namely, the highest absolute value of the
total response (sum of reflection and diffraction) >
noise level (N).
i.e. 4 / T > N.

4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Threshold of Lateral Detectability

Detectability : 4 / T > N
For N = 0.5, 4 {r2/(d v)} / T > 0.5

i.e., r2/(d v T ) > 1/8


r2/ d > 1/8
Or, r > Sqrt ( d / 8 ) ~ 0.5 * rF

If Signal / Noise is higher, even smaller lateral size can be


detected

Correct treatment of the amplitude of diffraction, by keeping


cos2 term, reduces the threshold of detectability

4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Zero-offset Time Response (band-limited) above the center of a disk


as a function of the radius (in units of h, the depth of the disk). T0 is
2-way time = 2h/v for the model below, rF ~ 0.1h

Reflection

Diffraction

What is the amplitude of a point diffractor?


How big should be the disk for it to be detectable?

How big
should be the
disk for
reflection to
separate
from
diffraction? If
we take, r/h ~
0.1, we get r
~ rF

Source: Fresnel zones in the light of broadband data, Knapp, R.W.,Geophy 56,
3(1991), p. 354
4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Migration as Diffraction Summation


Following Huygens principle, a seismic reflector is viewed as
composed of closely spaced diffractors. Migration of a seismic section
is achieved by collapsing each diffraction hyperbola to its origin
(apex). Thus, each point on the output migrated section is produced by
adding all data values of the input un-migrated section along a
diffraction that is centered at that point and placing the result at the
vertex of the diffractor .
Migrated section

Un-migrated

4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Migration Aperture

Migration aperture is defined as the lateral


extent of input traces required in input to
generate one output trace.

Question: What should be the aperture for


migration of seismic data? ---->

4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Migration Aperture
h

Kirchoff sum over


diffraction response
using half aperture = h

r
Zero offset response of a
circular disk with radius = r

If h = r, then the sum of the traces in the left frame = sum of the traces in
the right (for a laterally uniform medium). Now recall the result for the
zero offset response of a disk as a function of its radius --->.

4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Normalized Reflection amplitude (right panels) above the


center of a disk as a function of the disk radius:
Wavelets (left) are centered around 37.1 Hz ( = 54 meters).

2nd Fresnel zone boundary

4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Minimum Migration
Aperture

----> Based on numerical experiments by a


number of authors, notably, Shuang Sun & John
Bankroft (SEG, 2001) and the above discussion,
the aperture should be minimum two times the
size of the 1st Fresnel zone. However, note that
minimum aperture is not the same thing as
sufficient aperture and best aperture should be
evaluated on the basis of actual migration
response in a time and space varying fashion.

4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

A numerical experiment on Migration Aperture

The dip = 450. Velocity = 2000 m/s. Size


(diameter) of 1st Fresnel zone for the diffractor,
flat reflector and the dipping reflector (at its
lowest point) are 160 m , 224 m & 266 m,
respectively.

4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Stack section obtained by processing


synthetic records for the model

Courtesy: Private communication with Dr. JVSSN Murty, ONGC


4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Post-stack migration aperture = 200 meters

Courtesy: Private communication with Dr. JVSSN Murty, ONGC


4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Post-stack Migration - aperture = 300 meters

Courtsey: Private communication with Dr. JVSSN Murty, ONGC


4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Post-stack Migration - aperture = 500 meters

Courtesy: Private communication with Dr. JVSSN Murty, ONGC


4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Post-stack Migration - aperture > 1000 meters

Courtsey: Private communication with Dr. JVSSN Murty, ONGC


4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Effect of too low or too large aperture on migration


(SEG/EAGE Over-thrust data set)

Source: Rastogi, et. al, Aperture width selection criterion in Kirchhoff


Migration Seminar of Association of Exploration Geophysics, Nov 810, 2000, Goa, India
4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

1st Fresnel Zone - Dipping reflector (zero-offset)


Mid-point axis
Specular
rays
generate
time
response
PQ of the
reflector
PQ

C S/R
Paraxial rays generate
diffraction curve
Reflector
P

CP = Path of specular reflection


CP = 2-way time for the reflection from P

4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Principle of Fresnel Aperture Migration


Mid-point axis
Time
response
PQ of the
reflector
PQ shown
in the
previous
slide.

C S/R

P
1st
Fresnel
zone

Fresnel Aperture
Migration consists of
summing the
amplitudes over
Fresnel Apertures
(for each offset)
rather than over the
full diffraction curve.
The selection of
Fresnel apertures is
user-guided.

4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Fresnel aperture pre-stack depth migration

The Marmousi velocity model with target area.


Source: Hosine Tabti, Leiv-J Gelius & Thomas
Hellmann, First Break V.22, March 2004

4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Fresnel aperture pre-stack depth migration

Left Panel: Conventional Kirchhoff PSDM. Right Panel: Fresnel


Aperture PSDM. Only one offset (near offset) is migrated to
illustrate the potential of the method. Source: Hosine Tabti, LeivJ Gelius & Thomas Hellmann, First Break V.22, March 2004

4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

4th Aug 2009, SHELL, INDIA

Potrebbero piacerti anche