ASQR-01

Revision 7
Checklist

Supplier Information
Member Division

Supplier Name

(e.g., HS. PW, PWC, SAC, UTP)

& Supplier Code(s)

Street Address
State/Post Code
Country/Province
Supplier
Participant(s) &
Title
Assessment
Performed By,
Division & Date

Summar y Results

Use is to be defined by the division

Score:

1. All questions must be scored by entering a single "X" in either the ACC, REJ, or N/A. column.
2. The Comment section will reference supplier procedures, documents, practices, other pertinent information, and comment/indicate why a
assessment question response is N/A.
3. The Finding section will describe the non-compliance.
Note: Alternate Process Control systems that achieve the same results will be considered for approval.

Page 1 of 12

REQUIREMENT

ACC

REJ

N/A

Is the entire supply chain compliant to applicable Quality Management System Requirements and ASQR-01?
Ref. ASQR-01 Para. 1.2/AS 9100 Para. 7.4.1

Guidance: Evidence must be provided to show compliance to those portions of the QMS not satisfied by the sub tier are satisfied by the higher tier (e.g., higher tier satisfies the
requirement as documented by SRI/ASQR-01 Form 3, etc.).
Comment

Finding

Is the supplier certified/registered to the AS/EN/JISQ 9100 standard? Ref. ASQR-01 Para. 1.2.1/AS 9100
Para. 4.1
2

Comment

Finding

Is the Stockist distributor certified/registered to AS/EN/JISQ 9100 or AS9120 standard? Ref. ASQR-01 Para.
1.2.2/AS 9100 Para. 4.1
3

Comment

Finding

Are special process suppliers certified/registered to AS/EN/JISQ9100 or approved to AS7003 (via Nadcap
AC7004)? Ref. ASQR-01 Para. 1.2.3/AS 9100 Para. 4.1
4

Comment

Finding

Is the AS/EN/JISQ 9100 Certificate of Registration issued by a Certification Registration Body (CRB)
accredited under the control of International Aerospace Quality Group (IAQG)? Ref. ASQR-01 Para. 1.3/AS
9100 Para. 4.1
5

Guidance: Refer to the IAQG website for a listing of accredited CRBs: http://www.iaqg.sae.org/iaqg/audit_information/registrars.htm. To view the list of accredited CRBs register on the
IAQG website to receive a password.
Comment

Finding

Are Certificate(s) of Registration or NADCAP Accreditation entered into the OASIS or NADCAP databases, if
the registration/accreditation certificates were not submitted to each UTC member that issued a PO? Ref.
ASQR-01 Para. 1.4/AS 9100 Para. 7.2.3
6

Comment

Finding

Are UTC members granted access to all data in OASIS and Nadcap databases including registration
documentation, certification, audit reports, findings, corrective actions, etc. Ref. ASQR-01 Para. 1.5/AS 9100
Para. 7.2.3
7

Comment

Page 2 of 12

REQUIREMENT

ACC

Finding

Have UTC member(s) been notified of changes in the certification/ registration / accreditation/ major audit
findings within (2) business days of receiving notification of the change or finding (e.g. new certification,
suspension or expiration)? Ref. ASQR-01 Para. 1.6/AS 9100 Para. 7.2.3
8

Guidance: Verify notification has been sent to the Quality Organization.

Comment

Finding

Is work accomplished to the revision level specified on the PO? Ref. ASQR-01 Para. 2.3/AS 9100 Para. 4.2.3
9

Comment

Finding

Are corrections to work instructions/documents recorded, dated, signed in ink or other permanent method with
the original data being legible and retrievable after the change? Ref. ASQR-01 Para. 4.2.3b/AS 9100 Para.
4.3.3
10

Comment

Finding

Are quality records (non-electronic) documented in ink or other permanent marking? Ref. ASQR-01 Para.
4.2.3e/AS 9100 Para. 4.2.3
11

Comment

Finding

Are electronic records controlled, retained and retrievable per the same requirements identified for hard copy
records? Ref. ASQR-01 /AS 9100 Para. 4.2.4
12

Comment

Finding

Is storage media capable of maintaining data integrity for full retention period when electronic records are
transferred from computer files? Ref. ASQR-01/AS 9100 Para. 4.2.4
13

Comment

Finding

Are quality records properly retained/maintained? Ref. ASQR-01/AS 9100 Para. 4.2.4
Guidance: 40 years flight safety parts, 30 years Manned Space Programs, 10 years all other parts, 8 years for aftermarket parts, 4 years off-the shelf/industry parts.

14
Comment

Page 3 of 12

REJ

N/A

14

REQUIREMENT
Finding

Page 4 of 12

ACC

REJ

N/A

REQUIREMENT

ACC

REJ

N/A

Are radiographs retained per retention period requirement(s)? Ref. ASQR-01/AS 9100 Para. 4.2.4

15

Guidance: Radiographs: The Supplier shall retain radiographs.

*40 Years for: Flight safety, Critical / major rotor parts (i.e., turbine and compressor disks, hubs, shafts, free turbine couplings and turbine disk side plates), Space Shuttle fuel cells as well
as serialized major engine (cast / fabricated) cases, (i.e., inlet fan, compressor, intermediate, diffuser, combustion, turbine and exhaust cases), and main shaft bearing supports which are
not integral to a major case and engine components traceable by Engineering Drawing / Quality Assurance Data required serial numbers.
*10 Years for: Castings or parts where the PO, engineering drawing or specifications require serial number traceability. Castings or parts where the PO, engineering drawing or
specifications do not require serial number traceability, shall be retained only if no other inspection record is retained that documents completion and final acceptance of radiographic
inspection.
*5 Years for: Military hardware - turbine airfoil (blades) casting radiographs for initial casting quality.
Military hardware - Radiographs of airfoils for the presence of foreign material need not be retained provided an inspection record is retained that documents completion and final
acceptance of radiographic inspection.

Comment

Finding

Are procedures documented and implemented to ensure eye examinations are administered? Ref. ASQR01/AS 9100 Para.6.2.2

16

Guidance: Unless otherwise specified, administered annually by a medically qualified/trained person to individuals performing visual inspection. In at least one eye, either corrected or
uncorrected. Color Perception testing one time only. Individuals shall be capable of adequately distinguishing and differentiating colors used in the method for which certification is
required, the process being performed or inspection activity. Documentation/Records shall be retained for each individual.
(1) Individuals performing visual inspection (i.e. calibration, nonweld, inprocess, layout, dimensional) shall be compliant with near vision requirements of Snellen 14/18, (20/25), Jaegar 2
at 14 inches, or OrthoRater 8.
(2) Individuals performing visual inspections on welds shall be compliant with the American Welding Society Standard (AWS) D17.1.
(3) Individuals performing nondestructive testing (NDT) shall be compliant with Aerospace Industries Association National Aerospace Standard (AIA/NAS) 410
Note: Vision tests may be substituted for the options listed above providing the equivalence is verified and documented by a licensed optometrist.

Comment

Finding

Are verbal agreements or instructions construed as approval or authorization to proceed? Ref. ASQR-01/AS
9100 Para. 7.2.2
Guidance: Verify work is accomplished per PO/Contract.

17
Comment

Finding

Are changes that may affect quality documented and communicated to UTC member(s) Quality
Assurance/Purchasing Representative prior to effectivity of the change? Ref. ASQR-01 Para. 7.2.3a/AS 9100
Para. 7.2.3
Guidance: Verify documentation for UTC member(s) notification. Examples of changes - Ownership, Manufacturing location, Process, Product, Inspection Techniques.

18
Comment

Finding

Page 5 of 12

REQUIREMENT

ACC

REJ

N/A

Is an SRI/ASQR-01 Form 3 used to process product nonconformances or altering contractual requirements?

Ref. ASQR-01 Para. 7.2.3b/AS 9100 Para. 7.2.3
19

Guidance: SRIs are not to be used for nonconformities or altering contractual requirements . Review submitted/approved SRIs.
Comment

Finding

Are all communications between the supplier and UTC written in English? Ref. ASQR-01 Para. 7.2.3c/AS
9100 Para. 4.2.1
Guidance: Communication includes - Quality Systems Manual and Procedures. Process documentation which requires approval or source qualification by the UTC member.

20
Comment

Finding

Has the UTC member Supplier Quality Assurance (SQA) organization received a current company owned
email address? Ref. ASQR-01, Para. 7.2.3c.2/AS 9100 Para. 7.2.3
Guidance: Verify current company owned email address

21
Comment

Finding

When specified on the drawing or PO, are only UTC member approved special process sources used? Ref.
ASQR-01/AS 9100 Para. 7.4.1

22

Guidance: Link to approved source lists or contact for each division for verification (When Available). Each special process supplier must obtain initial approval through each specific
UTC member company. The use of directed sources does not relieve the responsibility for sub-contractor control? Examples include, an approved source for non destructive testing,
plating, coating, ...etc.

Comment

Finding

Does the PO for (UTC member-designed product) subcontracted work contain a statement reflecting articles
are for UTC Member End Use and controlled per applicable PO requirements? Ref. ASQR-01/AS 9100
Para. 7.4.2
23

Guidance: Review POs for subcontracted work.

Comment

Finding

Does supplier provide raw materials test reports, certification results, laboratory analysis requirements as
defined by the product definition and / or the PO? Ref. ASQR-01 Para. 7.4.3a/AS 9100 Para. 7.4.3
Guidance: Report examples - tensile strength, stress rupture, hardness, chemical composition, etc.

24
Comment

Page 6 of 12

24

REQUIREMENT

ACC

Finding

Does the supplier notify the Government Representative that services the facility or the Government
Inspection office nearest the facility upon receipt of a UTC member PO requiring Government oversight? Ref.
ASQR-01 Para. 7.4.3b/AS 9100 Para. 7.4.3
25

Guidance: Examples - Government Contract Quality Assurance (GOQA), Department of Energy, (DOE), etc.
Comment

Finding

Are Flight Safety Part requirements complied with when invoked by PO? Ref. ASQR-01 Para.
7.5.1a1/AS9100 Para. 7.5.2
Guidance: The requirements and definition for flight safety parts are contained in ASQR-09.1 See ASQR-09.1 Checklist

26
Comment

Finding

Is a Process Certification program implemented per UTCQR-09.1? Ref. ASQR-01 Para. 7.5.1a2/AS 9100
Para. 8.1
Guidance: Use UTCQR - 9.1 checklist (Form 2) to verify compliance.

27
Comment

Finding

Is product identified with UTC member acceptance symbol only shipped to the UTC member or a UTC
member approved destination? Ref. ASQR-01, Para. 7.5.1f and Para. 7.5.1
Guidance: Create Symbol List, Link to SQA Website to verify approved destination ask for evidence of destination approval.

28
Comment

Finding

Has the Supplier implemented the requirements of ASQR-07.5 for software control? Ref. ASQR-01/AS 9100
Para. 7.5.1.3
Guidance: Create and use ASQR -07.5 check list to verify compliance.

29

Comment

Finding

Are UTC member approved suppliers used when a specific material or manufacturing special process is
identified by individual UTC member? Ref. ASQR-01 Para. 7.5.2a/AS 9100 Para. 7.4.1
Guidance: Link to approved source lists or contact for each division for verification. (When Available) Select 2-3 CoCs to validate the use of approved supplier training.

30
Comment

Page 7 of 12

REJ

N/A

30

REQUIREMENT
Finding

Page 8 of 12

ACC

REJ

N/A

REQUIREMENT

ACC

REJ

N/A

Are NADCAP approved suppliers used by all members of the supply chain? Ref. ASQR-01 Para. 7.5.2a,2/AS
9100 Para. 7.4.1

31

Guidance: Nadcap requirements may be further defined by a UTC Member. Special Process suppliers (not part manufacturing suppliers) include braze, chemical processing, coating,
heat treatment, material test, nonconventional machining, nondestructive test, shot peen, and weld. Note: Nadcap accreditation is not required for materials testing laboratories with
American Association for Laboratory Accreditation (A2LA).

Comment

Finding

Is there a documented procedure to return all documents, records, gaging, stamps, or other customer supplied
product upon written notification from UTC member or when business with the UTC member has ceased?
Ref. ASQR-01/AS9100 Para. 7.5.4
32

Comment

Finding

Are the requirements for Handling, Storage, Packaging, and Preservation complied with? Ref. ASQR-01/AS
9100 Para. 7.5.5
Guidance: Use the ASQR-15.1 checklist

33

Comment

Finding

Does the Calibration System meet the applicable requirements of ISO 10012, ISO 17025 or ANSI/NCSL
Z5401? Ref. ASQR-01/AS 9100 Para. 7.6
34

Guidance: Determine there is a system and how they verify compliance..

Comment

Finding

Does the calibration interval analysis methodology used, maintain a minimum 95% reliability target at the end
of their interval schedule. Ref. ASQR-01 Para. 7.6a1/ANSI/NCSL Z540 Para. 18.4/AS 9100 Para. 7.6

35

Guidance: Verify calibration interval analysis methodology used to maintain the reliability of M&TE, has a stated reliability goal to meet a minimum 95% reliability target for M&TE in
tolerance at the end of their interval schedule.
Comment

Finding

Are Significant OutofTolerance conditions defined as any M&TE outoftolerance condition exceeding 25%
of the product tolerance. Ref. ASQR-01 Para. 7.6a2/ANSI/NCSL Z540-2 Para. 18.6/AS 9100 Para. 7.6

36

Guidance: Verify the Suppliers Significant OutofTolerance conditions are defined. These conditions require documented review of impact on quality and notification to UTC member if
product received by UTC member has been affected.
Comment

Page 9 of 12

36

REQUIREMENT

ACC

REJ

N/A

Finding

Does the Supplier perform audits of the entire Quality Management System annually? Ref. ASQR-01/AS
9100 Para. 8.2.2
Guidance: For alternate methods refer to ASQR-01 Form 3, Supplier Request for Information.

37
Comment

Finding

Are statistical techniques used when performing inspection of articles /characteristics? Ref. ASQR-01, Para.
8.2.4(1)/AS 9100 Para. 8.2.4
Guidance: Use ASQR -20.1 and check list to verify compliance.

38
Comment

Finding

Is the operator certification program/other special manufacturing methodologies approved prior to

implementation by the appropriate UTC member via SRI, ASQR-01 Form 3? Ref. ASQR-01 Para. 8.2.4(2)/AS
9100 Para. 8.2.4
39

Guidance: Examples include - manufacturing controlling features, die/mold control, method of manufacturing, etc.
Comment

Finding

Is M&TE selected with an accuracy ratio of 10 to 1 (product tolerance to M&TE tolerance)? Ref. ASQR-01
Para. 8.2.4(3)/AS 9100 Para. 8.2.4.1d

40

Guidance: Accuracy ratios as low as 4 to 1 are not acceptable unless a detailed measurement uncertainty analysis per ANSI/NCSL Z5402 indicates an uncertainty ratio of 1.5 to 1, or
better, and the measurement process is maintained under statistical quality control.
Comment

Finding

When functional performance/test data is required, are the minimum requirements included? Ref. ASQR-01,
Para. 8.2.4.1c/AS 9100 Para. 8.2.4.1c

41

Guidance: Minimum requirements are 1) Test specification number, revision status, amendment number and addendum. 2) Part number/serial number and revision letter of material /
component being tested. 3) Test paragraph, required reading, actual reading (use positive statement, e.g., No Leakage if actual reading is not quantifiable). 4) Date test was performed.
5) Operator identification. 6) Inspection approval signature/stamp. 7) Blank entries that are not applicable shall be noted N/A.

Comment

Finding

Page 10 of 12

REQUIREMENT

ACC

REJ

N/A

Are First Article Inspections (FAI) performed in accordance with SAE AS 9102 and additional member
requirements when applicable? Ref. ASQR-01/AS9100 Para. 8.2.4.2

42

Guidance: Verify a full or partial FAI shall be performed for affected characteristics when any of the following changes occurs in: Design, Manufacturing source(s), Process(s), Inspection
method(s), Locations of manufacture, Tooling or Materials, Numerical Control Program or Translation to Another Media, Natural or Man-made Event, which may adversely affect a
manufacturing process, Lapse in production for two years or as specified by the customer.
Verify Supplier assures - 1) Completion of the FAI Report. 2) Includes within it, a replication of product part marking (via photograph or sample) that represents production marking, for all
finished part characteristics generated by Subtier Suppliers. 3) Supplier records - UTC Member assigned Supplier Code, PO Number, FAI Inspection Measuring Equipment used as a
media of inspection, and FAI inspector identification (e.g., signature, stamp, electronic authorization, etc.) signifying the person that accomplished the inspection.

Comment

Finding

Are reports of nonconformance coordinated with UTC member supplied material? Ref. ASQR-01 Para.
8.3b/AS 9100 Para. 8.3
Guidance: Refer to applicable UTC members requirements.

43
Comment

Finding

Are scrap articles clearly identified and rendered unusable within 30 days of final disposition unless otherwise
instructed in writing by the applicable UTC member? Ref. ASQR-01, Para. 8.3c/AS 9100 Para. 8.3

44

Guidance: Review/verify designated scrap storage areas/locations where items receive or are pending disposition to ensure articles deemed scrap are clearly identified and rendered
unusable. Validate receipt of alternate instructions from UTC member in writing.
Comment

Finding

Are there provisions for notifying the UTC member immediately when suspect nonconforming product has
been shipped regardless of destination? Ref. ASQR-01, Para. 8.3c/AS 9100 Para. 8.3

45

Guidance: Immediate in this circumstance is next business day or not to exceed 24 hours. Review escape history and member communication.

Comment

Finding

Are related characteristics that may be affected by rework/repair operations re-inspected after these
operations are performed? Ref. ASQR-01, Para. 8.3c/AS 9100 Para. 8.3
Guidance: Verify the system is capable of determining the affect on related characteristics.

46
Comment

Finding

Page 11 of 12

REQUIREMENT
Do corrective action reports document the occurrence, findings, assessment of the affected product and
submitted to UTC members upon request? Ref. ASQR-01 Para. 8.5.2d/AS 9100 Para. 8.5.2
47

Guidance: Verify documentation of relentless root cause analysis and implementation of effective preventive action that eliminates risk of reoccurrence.

Comment

Finding

Has 100% inspection been performed on deviated characteristics for the next (3) three consecutive
manufactured lots to ensure corrective action effectiveness? Ref. ASQR-01, Para. 8.5.2e
Guidance: Verify documentation.

48
Comment

Finding

Are effective corrective/preventive actions implemented from items previously identified during ASQR-01
assessments?
Guidance: Follow-up on items to ensure root cause was properly identified and sustainable corrective/preventive actions are in place.

49
Comment

Finding

Page 12 of 12

ACC

REJ

N/A