Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
To,
Date: 13-07-10
is 16% and plastic limit is 0 being non-plastic (Refer Annexure-1). Thus consistency limits
are within the permissible range.
4) The maximum limit of 10% clay is related to the need for fill to be sufficiently free draining
to provide stability during construction (Refer Annexure-3). The clay content of soil can be
difficult to measure and large variations are common. The liquid limit and the plasticity
index give a more direct indication of mechanical properties, in which case a measure of the
clay content may be omitted. As soil is non-plastic and liquid limit is within limit, the
presence of clay is almost nil. Annexure-4 illustrates back fill materials which have been
successfully used for construction of reinforced soil wall in past (Boden et al, 1979).
5) Minimum moisture condition values in the range 6-10 will normally produce satisfactory
conditions relating to stability and workability (Refer Annexure-3). As minimum moisture
content at 6% and optimum moisture content (OMC) at 10% are indicated in soil test report
(Refer Annexure-1), the values are in the satisfactory range.
6) IRC Code of practice: HRB SR. No. 16, 1996 titled as ``State of the Art: Reinforced soil
structures applicable to Road Design & Construction also cohesion less fill for reinforced
soil. As the soil sample falls in category of cohesive frictional soil and satisfies all its
requirements of gradation, angle of internal friction, consistency limits and moisture content,
it is a valid material to be used as reinforced fill for reinforced soil wall.
7) BS 8006:1995,`` Code of practice for strengthen/Reinforced, soils & other fills also
permits use of cohesive frictional fill and selected waste fills (fly ash, chalk fill, colliery
spoil, argillaceous materials etc.) for reinforced soil wall (Refer 9.2.3.3. page 122 of BS
8006:1995) (Refer Annexure-2). Thus it can be concluded from above stated observations,
that backfill obtained from quarry having properties identical to soil sample sent to us can be
used as reinforced soil fill as it conforms to international codal provisions.
8) As far as stipulations given in MORTH regarding RE walls are concerned, they are
incomplete and outdated. Those guidelines refer to both cohesionless soil and cohesive
frictional soil while setting the lower limit of internal angle of friction (i.e. 25), as
cohesionless soil in compacted condition is always equal or above 30. Cohesive frictional
fill may exhibit value of internal frictional 20 & above depending on gradation
characteristics.
9) In contrast, the gradation limits specified referred in MORTH refer to cohesionless soil and
the gradation limits for cohesive frictional soil are not specified, which shows the
incompleteness of specifications. Further MORTH does not give any details regarding
design & methodology of construction of RE wall. There is no comprehensive code in India
to deal with these issues. Thus it is pertinent to refer to comprehensive international codes of
practice which give detailed guidelines regarding design and construction practices. Thus
following codes are advised to be referred while taking any decision regarding suitability of
material or load cases or various factor of safeties:
BS 8006:1995, ``Code of Practice for Strengthened/ reinforced soils and other fills.
FHWA-NHI-00-043, `` Mechanically Stabilized Earth walls and Reinforced soil
slopes Design & Construction Guidelines.
We hope to have replied to your various queries. In case of any further queries, kindly write to us,
we shall be most willing to clarify the same.
Thanking You,
With Regards,
Annexure -3:
TABLE 1:
Gradation for Cohesionless Fill:
Sieve Size
% Passing
425m
10-65
75 m
0-10
2 m
0-10
TABLE 2:
Gradation for Cohesive Frictional Fill:
Sieve Size
% Passing
425m
11-100
75 m
11-100
2 m
Properties
Angle of internal
friction
Liquid Limit
0-10
Limits
> 200
45%
Plasticity Index
20%
Min. Moisture Content
Max clay %
6-10%
10%