Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
e-mail: farzad.houshmand@gmail.com
Yoav Peles1
e-mail: pelesy@rpi.edu
Department of Mechanical,
Aerospace, and Nuclear Engineering,
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute,
110 8th Street,
Troy, NY 12180
During nucleate flow boiling, the bubble dynamics affect the liquid flow field and the corresponding heat transfer process through several distinct mechanisms. At the microscale,
this effect is different than at the macro scale partly because the bubble dimensions are
comparable to the characteristic length scale of the channel. Since the process involves
several mechanisms, an attempt to isolate and study them independently from one another
is desired in order to extend knowledge. To remove the evaporation effect from the heat
transfer process, noncondensable gas bubbles were introduced upstream of a
1 mm 1 mm heater into a 220 lm deep and a 1.5 mm wide microchannel and the heat
transfer coefficient was measured and compared to single-phase liquid flow. High speed
imaging and micro particle image velocimetry (l-PIV) measurements were used to elucidate the bubble dynamics and the liquid velocity field. This, in turn, revealed mechanisms
controlling the heat transfer process. Acceleration and deceleration of the liquid flow due
to the presence of bubbles were found to be the main parameters controlling the heat
transfer process. [DOI: 10.1115/1.4025435]
Keywords: bubbles, microchannel, convective heat transfer, two-phase flow, micro-PIV
Introduction
C 2014 by ASME
Copyright V
Fig. 1
2.3 Experimental Procedure. Following the fabrication process, the heaters electrical resistance was measured at different
temperatures in a controllable oven and a calibration curve was
generated. With the calibration curve, the heater was also used to
measure the average wall temperature during experiments.
After setting the water flow ratecontrolled by the tanks pressure and a valveand the air flow rate, the voltage and current
across the heater were recorded, and the heater power and average
temperaturebased on the calibration curvewere calculated.
To prevent gaseous cavitation in the microchannel, the distilled
water was initially degassed for several hoursusing a vacuum
pumpand then pressurized by helium.
To estimate heat loss through conduction, the device was vacuumed and the corresponding steady state heater temperatures
were recorded for a range of powers. Heat loss was calculated
based on the heater temperature and then subtracted from the total
power to obtain the effective heat dissipated to the flow.
To capture the sequence of bubble growth and detachment,
high speed camera recorded the images through a 5 magnification lens, while the test section was illuminated by the halogen
lamp. The recorded sequence of images was used to track the
motion of individual bubbles, and using the time interval between
the frames, parameters such as bubble velocity and frequency
were obtained. For frequency calculation, the time interval for 20
to 30 bubbles to pass a certain point was measured and average
frequency was calculated. For micro particle image velocimetry
(l-PIV) measurements, the main flow was seeded with 0.71 lm
fluorescent particles (peak emission wavelength of 612 nm) and
double pulses of Nd:Yag laser with wavelength of 532 nm illuminated the test section. Double frame images were recorded by the
CCD camera through a 10 magnification lens and a 570 nm
high pass filter to eliminate background light. Finally, double
frame images were processed in DavisV software through crosscorrelation algorithmsafter masking out the bubblesto extract
the velocity field. Initially, ensemble average of a set ofusually
500images (used as background image) was obtained and subtracted from individual images to reduce the background noise.
For two-phase images, the gas phase sections of the image were
masked out to provide accurate results in the surrounding area.
Finally, the images were cross-correlated in 64 64 and 32 32
R
h
qVD
l
(1)
Ci
Ac
(2)
where i denotes the fluid (i.e., water or air), Ci (m3s1) is the volumetric flow rate of fluid i, and Ac (m2) is the cross-sectional area
of the channel.
Based on the volumetric flow rate of the gas and the bubble frequency, the volume of an individual bubble was estimated according to
Cg
B
f
(3)
(5)
(6)
where tSiO2 (m) is the SiO2 layer thickness, A (m2) is the heater
area, and kSiO2 (Wm1K1) is the thermal conductivity of the
SiO2 layer. This correction for the wall temperature, however,
was very small (<1 C) in the present study. The average heat
transfer coefficient was then calculated based on the convection
heat transfer equation
Tw T0
Q_ net hA
(7)
h
hD
kl
(8)
hb hsp
hsp
(9)
hb and hsp denote bubbly flow and single-phase heat transfer coefficients, respectively.
2.5 Heat Loss and Uncertainties. As discussed before, heat
losses were measured based on the heater temperature and subtracted from total power. The actual heat loss in the presence of
FEBRUARY 2014, Vol. 136 / 022902-3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5 Sequence of high speed images from bubble growth and detachment at 6300 fps;
jl 5 0.95, jg 5 0.25 (m/s)
flow might be slightly different from the measured values as discussed in Ref. [14]. However, since the heat loss was between 5%
and 7% for the maximum and the minimum flow rates, this discrepancy was assumed to be negligible.
Standard uncertainty analysis methods were used to estimate
the uncertainties of the reduced data [15]. For flow ratesand
consequently superficial velocity and Reynolds numberuncertainties were associated with the accuracy of the rotameter measurement, which ranged between 63% and 66% for the twophase experiments. The uncertainty in temperature measurements
was less than 1 C. Based on Eq. (7), uncertainties in heat transfer
coefficient and Nusselt number were estimated to vary between
63% and 65% depending on DTs. These values were the total
estimation of the biased and unbiased uncertainties. The standard
deviation of the temperature fluctuations around the timeaveraged value is the unbiased part for the uncertainty, and therefore the true measure of the uncertainty in the enhancement factor,
E. This uncertainty was estimated to be 0.1 C, corresponding to
61% in the enhancement factor. Uncertainty in the velocity,
through the l-PIV measurements, was estimated to be less than
3%, and the uncertainty associated with the bubble frequency was
less than 2%.
which led to smaller bubbles at higher frequencies. This force balance also explains the higher bubble frequencies at higher liquid
flow rates. At each liquid flow rate, the bubble frequency quickly
reached an asymptotic value with increased gas flow rates. For
very low gas flow rates, the bubble frequency and the bubble size
fluctuated, and therefore, some data points are not presented in the
figures. This effect can be attributed to slow pressure built-up in
the flow linedue to compressibility of the gasrequired to
overcome the initial stage of bubble formation. For heat transfer
measurements in these cases, the average values were used.
Fig. 12 Velocity field around developing bubbles injected from Orifice I; jl 5 0.95, jg 5 0.25 (m/s)
before and after the steady state condition indicating a higher heat
transfer coefficient at a lower gas flow rates.
l-PIV velocity measurements around the injected bubbles were
obtained to reveal the mechanism of the observed trends. The
results for six different cases taken at midplane of the channel are
presented in Fig. 11. Flow fields at different stages of the bubble
development were also captured and are presented in Fig. 12. (It
should be noted that in Fig. 12, because of the low frequency of
the CCD cameramaximum 15 Hzthe images were not taken
from the same bubble at different stages; instead images from various bubbles at different stages were obtained and the sequence
was reconstructed.) The results identified several mechanisms
controlling the enhanced heat transfer process during bubble formation: (a) acceleration of the carrier liquid flow corresponding to
reduced effective cross-sectional area because of the presence of
bubbles and (b) acceleration around the bubbles. On the other
hand, low velocity regions downstream of the bubbles hinder heat
transfer. The mixing in the shear layer between the high and low
velocity regions can enhance the heat transfer. Oscillations of the
bubbles displace the fluid around them and create high velocity
regions especially when the bubbles detach and the tail recoils
into the bubble (Fig. 12(b)). Another factor that affects the heat
transfer, especially at high gas flow rates, is related to the region
trapped beneath the bubbles. In these regions, a thin liquid film
forms between the wall and the bubble interface. The heat transfer
It should be noted that the total effect of the bubbles on the heat
transfer was reflected through the area average heat transfer coefficient over the entire heated area.
At low liquid flow rates, the effect of bubbles on flow acceleration was comparably small and the bubbles were bigger. Consequently, a thin liquid layer over a large segment of the heater
formed and as the liquid layer stagnated, lower heat transfer coefficients were observed. At higher liquid flow rates, the flow acceleration became more appreciable and the bubbles were smaller.
As a result, a larger heater area was influenced by the favorable
effects of the bubbles on the heat transfer process, while a smaller
area was exposed to their adverse effects. In addition, higher bubble frequency helped replenish the liquid film near the heater
more frequently, thus, preventing it from heating up.
To examine the effect of bubbles introduced farther upstream
and presumably past the acceleration stagebubbles with the
same gas flow rates were injected from Orifice II, and their effect
on the heat transfer coefficient was investigated (Fig. 13). At low
liquid flow rates, after an initial increase, the heat transfer
enhancement decreased as the gas flow rate increased, but an
inflection point was observed. At high liquid flow rates, the
enhancement factors increased with increased gas flow rates. Observation of the velocity field (Fig. 14) revealed a low velocity
region in the center of the channelin the vicinity of the bubblesand a high velocity region on the sides. The average heat
transfer coefficient may increase or decrease depending on the
magnitude and the location of the high velocity region with
respect to the heater. Furthermore, as reported in several studies,
e.g., Refs. [19, 20], the liquid film thickness varies with capillary
number. Assuming constant properties, it can be inferred that the
film thickness increases with bubble velocity. This concurs with
the higher heat transfer enhancements at higher liquid flow rates.
Conclusion
Acknowledgment
This work was supported by the Office of Naval Research (Program Manager Dr. Mark Spector). The authors would like to
acknowledge the staff of the Micro and Nano Fabrication Clean
Room (MNCR) at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute for their assistance in fabrication of the micro devices.
Nomenclature
A
Ac
cp
Dh
E
f
h
H
ji
kl
kSiO2
Nu
P
Q_ loss
Q_ net
Q_ tot
Re
t
T0
Theater
Tw
V
Vb
Greek Symbols
a
Ci
li
q
t
r
Subscripts
b
g
l
sp
bubble
gas
liquid
single-phase
References
[1] Collier, J. G., and Thome, J. R., 1996, Convective Boiling and Condensation,
Oxford University Press, New York.
[2] Krishnamurthy, S., and Peles, Y., 2010, Flow Boiling Heat Transfer on Micro
Pin Fins Entrenched in a Microchannel, ASME J. Heat Transfer, 132(4),
p. 041007.
[3] Basu N., Warrier G. R., and Dhir V. K., 2005, Wall Heat Flux Partitioning
During Subcooled Flow Boiling: Part 1Model Development, ASME J. Heat
Transfer, 127(2), pp. 131140.
[4] Bertsch, S. S., Groll, E. A., and Garimella, S. V., 2009, Effects of Heat Flux,
Mass Flux, Vapor Quality, and Saturation Temperature on Flow Boiling Heat
Transfer in Microchannels, Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 35(2), pp. 142154.
[5] Kandlikar, S. G., 2004, Heat Transfer Mechanisms During Flow Boiling in
Microchannels, J. Heat Transfer, 126(1), pp. 816.
[6] Kim, J., 2009, Review of Nucleate Pool Boiling Bubble Heat Transfer Mechanisms, Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 35(12), pp. 10671076.
[7] Kuo, C.-J., and Peles, Y., 2009, Flow Boiling of Coolant (HFE-7000) Inside
Structured and Plain Wall Microchannels, ASME J. Heat Transfer, 131(12),
p. 121011.
[8] Kuo, C.-J., and Peles, Y., 2007, Local Measurement of Flow Boiling in Structured Surface Microchannels, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 50, pp. 45134526.
[9] Krishnamurthy, S., and Peles, Y., 2010, Flow Boiling on Micro Pin Fins
Entrenched Inside a MicrochannelFlow Patterns and Bubble Departure Diameter and Bubble Frequency, ASME J. Heat Transfer, 132(4), p. 041002.
[10] Betz, A. R., and Attinger, D., 2010, Can Segmented Flow Enhance Heat
Transfer in Microchannel Heat Sinks?, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 53(1920),
pp. 36833691.
[11] Asthana, A., Zinovik, I., Weinmueller, C., and Poulikakos, D., 2011,
Significant Nusselt Number Increase in Microchannels With a Segmented
Flow of Two Immiscible Liquids: An Experimental Study, Int. J. Heat Mass
Transfer, 54(78), pp. 14561464.
[12] Han, Y., and Shikazono, N., 2011, Stabilization of Flow Boiling in a Micro
Tube With Air Injection, Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., 35(7), pp. 12551264.
[13] Xu, J., Liu, G., Zhang, W., Li, Q., and Wang, B., 2009, Seed Bubbles Stabilize
Flow and Heat Transfer in Parallel Microchannels, Int. J. Multiphase Flow,
35(8), pp. 773790.
[14] Browne, E. A., Michna, G. J., Jensen, M. K., and Peles, Y., 2010,
Experimental Investigation of Single-Phase Microjet Array Heat Transfer,
ASME J. Heat Transfer, 132, p. 041013.
[15] Kline, S. J., and McClintock, F. A., 1953, Describing Uncertainties in SingleSample Experiments, Mech. Eng. (Am. Soc. Mech. Eng.), 75(1), pp. 38.
[16] Elcock, D., Honkanen, M., Kuo, C., Amitay, M., and Peles, Y., 2011, Bubble
Dynamics and Interactions With a Pair of Micro Pillars in Tandem, Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 37(5), pp. 440452.
[17] Elcock, D., Jung, J., Kuo, C.-J., Amitay, M., and Peles Y., 2011, Interaction of
a Liquid Flow Around a Micropillar With a Gas Jet, Phys. Fluids, 23(12),
p. 122001.
[18] Shah, R. K., and London, A. L., 1978, Laminar Flow Forced Convection in
Ducts, Advances in Heat Transfer, (Supplement 1), Academic Press, New York.
[19] Han, Y., and Shikazono, N., 2009, Measurement of Liquid Film Thickness in
Micro Square Channel, Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 35(10), pp. 896903.
[20] Bretherton, F. P., 1961, The Motion of Long Bubbles in Tubes, J. Fluid
Mech., 10, pp. 166188.