Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
advocato
r
Goals
Mother Tongue
Natural Approach
Communicative Language
Teaching (CLT)
Audio-lingual Method
(ALM)
?/1972
Be able to communicate
with others in the target
language in different
situations
Both mother tongue and
target language
Merits
Limits
Features
2. Students pronunciation
unnecessary to teach
and grammatical
students without using
knowledge is poor.
native languages.
3. It is difficult for teachers 4. Its boring for students to
to evaluate students
overlearn the drills and
expression in the learning
its tiring for teachers to
process.
teach.
(a)Interesting and meaningful Textbooks, drills, tapes,
materials, such as linguistic language labs
games, role plays, and
problem solving materials.
(b) Technologyfilms,
videos, TV, computers, can be
used as teaching aids.
1. 5 important hypothesis 1.
A. the Acquisition-Learning H
Students acquire language
subconsciously in the
natural and communicative
situations.
B. the Monitor H
2.
Students may call upon
learned knowledge to
correct themselves when
they communicate, but that
conscious learning has only
this function.
C. the Natural Order H
3.
The acquisition of
grammatical structures
proceeds in a predictable
order.
4.
D. the Input (i+1) H
Students acquire language
best by understanding input
that is slightly beyond their
current level of competence. 5.
E. the Affective Filter H
Student work should center
on meaningful
6.
Language learning is
1.
learning to communicate.
The primary function of 2.
language is for
interaction and
communication.
Classroom goals are
3.
focused on all of the
components of
communicative
4.
competence and not
restricted to grammatical
or linguistic competence
Students learn to use the
appropriate language
5.
forms in the different
places.
Communicative activities 6.
include functional
communicative activities
and social interaction
activities.
Teachers are assistants,
guides, counselors and 7.
group process managers.
Students are expected to
Hypothesis
Definition
the Acquisition-Learning H
the Monitor H
Conscious learning can function only as a monitor or editor that checks and
repairs the output of the acquired system.
Direct Method
Natural Approach
Similarity
Difference
DM focuses on:
1. Teacher monologues
2. Direct repetition
3. Formal questions and answers
4. Accurate production of target language sentences
NA focuses on:
1. Exposure input
2. Optimizing emotional preparedness for learning
3. Listening & Reading
Proposer/
advocator
Goals
Asher/ 1964
Curran/1961
No mother tongue
1.
2.
3.
Limits
Be able to respond
To get the language competence and performance by asking
physically to the sentences questions.
made in the target language.
Mother Tongue
Merits
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
language proficiency,
but then loses its
distinctiveness as
learners advance in their
competence.
Teaching Aids
Features
No text. Body language and Various materials for different purposes; colored coded
practical materials.
signals; tapes; recorders
1.
Based on 3 important
hypothesis:
(A) the Bio-program H
Children, in learning
their first language,
appear to do a lot of
listening before they
speak, and their listening
is accomplished by
physical responses.
(B) the Brain
Lateralization H
Motor activity is a rightbrain function that
should precede left-brain
language processing
speaking.
(C) Reduction of Stress H
An important condition
for successful language
learning is the absence
of stress.
2. Imperative()
drills are the major
classroom activity in
TPR.
3. Commands are easy
first, and then become
more and more
complex.
4. Students are listeners
and performers. They
do a lot of listening and
acting until they master
1.
5.
Suggestopedia / Suggestology
Gattegno/ 1972
Lozanov/ 1978
Proposer/
advocato
r
Goals
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Merits
1.
Students interact not only with teachers but 1. Students are willing and able to
also with each other.
communicate in the target language and
students learn the target language in a
relaxing atmosphere.
2. Easy grammatical explanation helps
students learn the target language more
easily.
Limits
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1840~1940
Proposer/
advocator
Goals
Mother Tongue
Limits
No mother tongue
4.
Merits
1.
2.
1
2
3
4
3.
4.
5.
6.
Proposer/
advocator
Goals
Microwave Device
?/1951
Stevick/1964
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Merits
1.
2.
3.
4.
Limits
1.
2.
Not limited
1.
2.
3.
4.
Proposer/
advocator
Goals
1.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
Limits
Hall/1978
Not limited
2.
Merits
Mother Tongue
Features
1.
2.
3.
Not limited
3.
Teaching Aids Authentic languages
Proposer/
advocator
Goals
Mother Tongue
Features
Stylized Mnemonics
Structured Tutoring
Lipson/1971
Harrison/1976
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Merits
1.
2.
Limits
1.
2.
3.
4.