Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Project
Security Classification:
Project Internal
Khazzan Commissioning
Hazard Identification and Task Risk Assessment
(HITRA) Procedure (CPF)
Khazzan Project
Revision History
Amendment
Date
Revision
Number
Amender
Initials
24/02/2016
A01
RT
Amendment
Related Documents
Document Number
Document Name
Description of Content
Khazzan Commissioning
Control of Work
KZ01-SA-PLN-53-0005
KZ01-CG-PRO-53-0111
Energy Isolation
Procedure
A02
24/02/2016
A01
05/02/2016
Rev.
Date
RT
CM
VK
Author
EC
Checked
CE
ELIE
LAHOUD
Approved
Rev.
KZ01-CG-PRO-53-0113
Holds
Section Number
Abbreviations
AA
Area Authority
AAD
ALARP
CoW
Control of Work
KZ01-CG-PRO-53-0113
Page 2 of 41
Rev: A02
Project Internal
A02
Khazzan Project
CSE
GPO
GRoS
HITRA
ISA
Isolating Authority
MOC
Management of Change
PA
Performing Authority
PTW
Permit to Work
PTWC
SA
Site Authority
TBT
Toolbox Talk
TRA
TRAT
KZ01-CG-PRO-53-0113
Page 3 of 41
Rev: A02
Project Internal
Khazzan Project
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0.
2.0.
INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................
1.1.
PURPOSE......................................................................................................................................
1.2.
SCOPE...........................................................................................................................................
2.2.
SITE AUTHORITY..........................................................................................................................
2.3.
AREA AUTHORITY.........................................................................................................................
2.4.
2.5.
PERFORMING AUTHORITY..........................................................................................................
2.6.
4.0.
5.0.
6.0.
7.0.
3.2.
3.3.
3.4.
HAZARDS.....................................................................................................................................
4.2.
DETERMINING CONSEQUENCES.............................................................................................
4.3.
4.4.
IDENTIFICATION OF CONTROLS...............................................................................................
PERFORM TASK................................................................................................
5.1.
5.2.
5.3.
5.4.
LESSONS LEARNED...................................................................................................................
GENERAL.....................................................................................................................................
6.2.
LEVELS OF TRAINING................................................................................................................
Page 4 of 41
Rev: A02
Project Internal
Khazzan Project
KZ01-CG-PRO-53-0113
Page 5 of 41
Rev: A02
Project Internal
Khazzan Project
1.0. INTRODUCTION
Hazard Identification and Task Risk Assessment (HITRA) is used during the planning and execution stages
of Commissioning Control of Work (CoW) to identify hazards associated with performing tasks. It prescribes
the control measures to implement during task execution to prevent or eliminate, isolate or minimize task
risks so that work is executed in a safe, systematic and compliant manner. This document should be read in
conjunction with Khazzan Commissioning Control of Work Procedure KZ01-CG-PRO-53-0107 and the
Energy Isolation Process KZ01-CG-PRO-53-0111
1.1. Purpose
The purpose of this procedure is to describe how to identify work-related hazards and assess risks
associated with activities undertaken as part of the Khazzan Project Commissioning scope. It provides the
necessary detail to illustrate what good hazard identification and task risk assessment looks like.
The HITRA process forms an essential part of the Commissioning Control of Work (CoW) process.
Before conducting HITRA, evaluate:
1. Is the job really necessary?
2. Is there an alternate way(s) to do the work that eliminates inherent hazard(s) involved?
It is a Khazzan Project principle that no unnecessary work will be done. Only work that provides business
value will be undertaken.
1.2. Scope
This procedure applies to work undertaken inside the CPF boundary limits. See Figure 1 below illustrating
the CPF Commissioning CoW document structure. An equivalent approach managed by BP for GWES
Category 1 scope.
KZ01-CG-PRO-53-0113
Page 6 of 41
Rev: A02
Project Internal
Khazzan Project
KZ01-CG-PRO-53-0113
Page 7 of 41
Rev: A02
Project Internal
Khazzan Project
All activities within their area of responsibility comply with this procedure
CoW audit, assurance and self-verification systems are in place, including lessons learned and continual
improvement processes
Sufficient resources (time, people and budget) are allocated to implement this procedure
Responsibility can be delegated but not accountability. This delegation must be documented (Refer to CPF
Commissioning CoW ProcedureKZ01-CG-PLN-53-0107.
Ensure that an adequate number of competent persons are appointed to manage the work and the
associated risks, as defined in this procedure
Confirm that a process is in place to manage the appointment of competent persons as:
o
Review and self-verify the HITRA process to confirm that the quality of the HITRAs and areas of
improvement have been identified and implemented
Ensure that the HITRA process is subject to regular monitoring and Self Verification , acting upon the
results of Self Verification to maintain the integrity of the system and proposing any recommendations for
system improvement
Ensure that the training and competency standards, and formal authorization of personnel, as defined in
this document and in Control of Work Procedure (KZ01-CG-PLN-53-0107) are followed
Note: The SA is the Single Point of Accountability for CoW on their site. The responsibilities but not the
accountabilities can be delegated to a competent person with proper documented approval from the SPA.
Review and authorization of all Level 1 & 2 HITRA should be commensurate with the level of risk. It is
incumbent on the SA to request a higher level of risk assessment should they consider that risks have not
been fully addressed.
KZ01-CG-PRO-53-0113
Page 8 of 41
Rev: A02
Project Internal
Khazzan Project
Ensure that everyone associated with the work activity is aware of the requirements of HITRA, permit to
work conditions and any risks or hazards
Ensure that the appropriate level of risk assessment is conducted for the task
Ensure that the Performing Authority (PA. Refer to Section 2.5) participates in risk assessments and
conducts Tool Box Talks associated with the work activity
Ensure that the HITRA is communicated to the workforce in commonly used language(s)
Ensure that the risk assessment requirement is included in the planning for each work activity
Ensure that a pre-job site visit is conducted with the PA to identify all hazards and appropriate controls
that need to be included in the Work Permit or risk assessment
Ensure that the appropriate level of HITRA has been carried out for the task
Ensure that all the appropriate control measures have been put in place prior to a permit being issued,
confirming that the PA fully understands the scope of work and tasks involved
Ensure that active permits and hazard control measures are effective at the work site and can continue
simultaneously with other PTW tasks
Page 9 of 41
Rev: A02
Project Internal
Khazzan Project
The PA can be responsible for more than one task at a time providing they can safely manage the tasks
simultaneously. This should be discussed and agreed with the Area Authority
The PA shall ensure that:
All personnel under their supervision comply with this procedure when involved in risk-assessed activities
Level 1 HITRA is completed where required and that adequate consultation has taken place, typically with
AA and the line supervisor
Where other persons are involved in the task, they fully understand the scope of the work and the
hazards and controls for the job by holding a toolbox talk meeting. This includes ensuring that all of those
involved in the specific work activity sign the worksite hard copy of the Work Permit
The controls identified in the HITRA are effectively in place and that the activity is executed in accordance
with this procedure
Work activities have been reviewed and pertinent information exchanged with all other affected parties
The proposed controls reduce the risks associated with the task; consider the controls specified by any
relevant local procedure and the capability of the person in charge.
Work is stopped immediately when there is any change to the Work Permit conditions, including an
emergency, and that hazards and risks are reassessed before the work is resumed
Confirm that adequate consultation has taken place, typically with the AA and / or line supervisor
1.1.2.
HITRA Level 2 Facilitator (Typically AA or
representative from the HSE site team)
The main responsibilities are to:
Lead the assigned team in performing a Level 2 HITRA as described in this procedure
Ensure the team understands the assessment process and its objectives
Ensure that the assessment team includes personnel with the necessary experience, knowledge and
competence for the task involved
Ensure that the HITRA includes a worksite visit prior to issuing PTW
KZ01-CG-PRO-53-0113
Page 10 of 41
Rev: A02
Project Internal
Khazzan Project
Ensure that all members of the HITRA team have full opportunity to contribute and that the details of the
assessment are agreed by all team members
Ensure that the details of the assessment are accurately recorded and correspond with the agreed level
of risk
Take appropriate guidance on health, safety and environmental legislation and consequent limits on
operation
It is not possible to comply fully with the standards in a relevant local procedure or other recognized
source of guidance
Excavation of a trench or pit more than 4 feet or 1.2 metres deep or other ground disturbance, such as
piling
Activities that could involve exposure to substances for which there are defined exposure limits,
including:
inert gases
Work that could result in performance or availability of safety critical equipment or systems falling
below expected standards, for example:
o
KZ01-CG-PRO-53-0113
Page 11 of 41
Rev: A02
Project Internal
Khazzan Project
Note, safety critical performance shall be considered with respect to the hazards present in a
Commissioning, pre hydrocarbon environment.
More examples of activities, and whether they warrant Level 1 or Level 2 assessment, are included in the
TRAT, Appendix F.
Identify the site and process hazards that could result in harm such as injury, illness, damage to the
environment, plant or process
Identify risk; determine the credible consequences and their probabilities to assess the level of risk(consequence x probability = risk) including who or what could be affected
Reduce risk by eliminating or substituting the hazards AND controlling and / or mitigating the risks
Evaluate residual risk that remains with all the planned controls in effect. Confirm that residual risk has
been considered and no additional controls are needed for the task(s) to be conducted safely
Communicate the hazards and controls to all personnel involved in performing the task. Confirm that
the controls are effective throughout the task.
Monitor the on-going work to identify any new hazard that may be introduced during or because of the
activities.
KZ01-CG-PRO-53-0113
Page 12 of 41
Rev: A02
Project Internal
Khazzan Project
This approach shall also be followed when considering Risk Assessed Procedures and the existing HITRA
shall be reviewed for applicability and any lessons learned from previous application of the procedure.
Figure 2: Example from Cold Work Permit - Hazards and Controls Checkboxes
KZ01-CG-PRO-53-0113
Page 13 of 41
Rev: A02
Project Internal
Khazzan Project
4.1. Hazards
Hazards are anything with the potential to result in harm such as injury, illness or damage.
KZ01-CG-PRO-53-0113
Page 14 of 41
Rev: A02
Project Internal
Khazzan Project
NOTE: Through Commissioning, the absence of hydrocarbons and associated SIMOPs makes the process
of hazards identification and risk assessment less complex than Operational facilities.
To identify all the hazards, consider the aspects below:
Affected Hazards: The energy sources affected by the work, e.g. commissioning fluids and the system in
which they are transported and contained (e.g. operations equipment).
Applied Hazards: Uncontrolled or unwanted contact with an energy source that may occur while setting
up tools and equipment at the job site.
Ambient Hazards: The site conditions that may cause uncontrolled or unwanted contact with an energy
source (e.g. weather conditions or concurrent work).
Access
Sensitivity of the location within the premises, including proximity to Health, Safety, Security and
Environment (HSSE) critical plant or systems such as:
Flare header
Possible interactions between simultaneous activities within the task, or with another task taking place
nearby, that call for close coordination or controls.
Energy Sources and Hazard Identification prompts are found in Appendices A and B.
Also, consider what would occur in the event of an emergency.
KZ01-CG-PRO-53-0113
Page 15 of 41
Rev: A02
Project Internal
Khazzan Project
For example, impact level F and probability level 4 gives a ranking of 6, which falls in Risk Area II, requiring
approval by Site Authority.
Prerequisite controls that should be in effect prior to job execution. These may or may not include a
PTW.
Supplementary controls that should be applied during the job. Consideration should be given whether
supplementary controls introduce another hazard, while in effect.
Before the task is authorised to start, the person controlling the work activity should confirm that:
The persons allocated to perform the task are competent to initiate and manage the supplementary
controls
The output from the risk assessment (with Work Permit where applicable) has been communicated in
writing and signed off by all involved in the task
Monitoring activities are arranged e.g. controls are still effective, no new hazard is introduced
Actions in the event of an emergency are understood by all involved in the task.
Controls Check
KZ01-CG-PRO-53-0113
Page 16 of 41
Rev: A02
Project Internal
Khazzan Project
KZ01-CG-PRO-53-0113
Page 17 of 41
Rev: A02
Project Internal
Khazzan Project
If any control measures are practicable to implement and would reduce the residual risk, they should be
recorded.
If further control measures cannot reduce the risk to a level that allows the task to be completed safely,
the HITRA team cannot authorize the task and should refer back to the work requester.
The assessment including all the identified control measures that should be in effect for the defined task.
The residual risk level for each identified hazard, with the highest residual risk defining the level of
approval. (Appendix E)
Approval to proceed is sought when the HITRA team unanimously agrees that the hazards and risks are
controlled to the point that the task(s) can be conducted safely
The HITRA team shall record the findings in the HITRA format included as Appendix G
Control measures in effect or planned and how they relate to the hazards
All involved in the task have the opportunity to identify further hazards and control measures that may have
been overlooked in the HITRA. The HITRA Facilitator should be notified if such improvements are identified.
Be satisfied that all the defined controls are actually in place and effective (even though the task has been
duly authorised)
KZ01-CG-PRO-53-0113
Page 18 of 41
Rev: A02
Project Internal
Khazzan Project
Feel empowered (and obliged) to voice any concerns to their supervisor and not start the job if they do
not think it can be completed safely
If necessary, personnel should stop the job so that the hazards and risk can be re-assessed.
HITRA records.
Lessons learned should be communicated to all concerned through existing methods such as meetings,
circulars, training and toolbox talks.
6.1. General
All personnel involved in the HITRA process are trained on HITRA process & procedure and competent.
The competency of all relevant personnel shall be established during the planning process for a particular
risk assessment. The AA shall ensure that the personnel involved in the activity have the correct
competencies through training records or requesting individuals to produce relevant certification.
While it is simple, successful application of the HITRA method depends upon participants having industry
experience, different perspectives and understanding of relevant hazards, realistic consequences and a
hierarchy of risk reduction measures (hierarchy of controls is shown in Section 4.5 above).
All personnel involved in the HITRA process should complete the fundamental training module (Refer to
Section 6.2 below for links) which covers:
Definitions of hazard, consequence, probability, risk, control, hierarchy of controls and risk matrix
Expectations of team members: the need to contribute personal experience, reach agreement and record
divergent views
Responsibility after the completion of the HITRA (communication, responding to changes at the task
location)
KZ01-CG-PRO-53-0113
Page 19 of 41
Rev: A02
Project Internal
Khazzan Project
Before selection for training, Level 2 HITRA Facilitators should be able to demonstrate an extensive
knowledge of the work environment. They should be able to apply informed judgment when using checklists
and other available tools.
Experience
1. Has led and facilitated
Level 1 and 2 HITRAs
using the HITRA process.
Training
1.
2. Practical demonstration
in leading a level 2 HITRA
2.
AA
1.
2.
PA
KZ01-CG-PRO-53-0113
1.
Completed
training for both
HITRA
participation and
facilitation
modules.
Satisfactorily
passed the HITRA
knowledge
assessment
criteria.
Complete the
HITRA
participation and
facilitation training
course.
HITRA Awareness
(participation)
Page 20 of 41
Assessment Criteria
Practical field assessment shall include:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
2.
3.
4.
Rev: A02
Project Internal
Assessor
SPA with
support
from
Technical
Discipline
Engineers
(if needed)
SA
AA
Khazzan Project
List the appropriate permit to work types (including procedures and routine)
The Site Authority is accountable for the management of the TRAT. When a task is not covered in the TRAT,
the Site Authority will determine the level of TRA required by applying the HITRA process.
KZ01-CG-PRO-53-0113
Page 21 of 41
Rev: A02
Project Internal
Khazzan Project
Description / guidance
Biological - including wildlife and viruses or bacteria, e.g., as found in sewage systems, drain
lines, cooling towers
Biological
Body Mechanics - human strength and agility applied to a task involving lifting, pushing,
pulling, climbing or positioning
Body
Mechanics
Chemical - in the form of reactive or life-threatening gases, liquids, solids, e.g., water, methane,
nitrogen, process chemicals, etc.
Chemical
Electrical - includes all types and voltages of electricity: high voltage power systems ( (AC),
battery systems (DC) and static.
Electrical
Involves transfer of fluids, powers, etc. or friction between nonconducting materials which could generate static electrical charges. Are
systems and equipment where this could occur adequately grounded and /
or bonded.
Gravity - causes tools, equipment or people to fall or move. This affects lifting task, work at
height and potential dropped objects
Gravity
Mechanical - includes mobile equipment as well as moving parts on stationary equipment and
rotating equipment. Even though items are non-powered, their momentum as they are moved
may crush or cut people or vulnerable equipment. Also includes sharp edges of tools and / or
equipment.
Mechanical
KZ01-CG-PRO-53-0113
Page 22 of 41
Rev: A02
Project Internal
Khazzan Project
Energy
sources
Description / guidance
Noise - A form of pressure energy.
Consideration should be given to whether:
Noise
Pressure - air, water, pneumatics, springs, gases are all possible sources of significant
pressure.
Pressure
Thermal - energy associated with hot or cold surfaces and fluids, undesired chemical reactions
and / or ambient temperatures.
Thermal
KZ01-CG-PRO-53-0113
Page 23 of 41
Rev: A02
Project Internal
Khazzan Project
Type of harm
Trapping (crushing, pressing, drawing in
and shearing injuries)
Examples
Two moving parts, or one moving
part and a fixed surface
Conveyor belt and drive
V belt and pulley
Power press
Using hammer
Hoist, crane
Cartridge tool
Hammer and chisel
Abrasive wheel
Abrasive blasting
Electrical
Explosion
DC electricity, especially
batteries (hydrogen gas) when
charging
Ignition sources
Static
Batteries
Pressure
Release of energy
Compressed air
(explosion / injection /
Compressed gas
implosion)
Process fluid
Steam
Vacuum
Hydraulic system
KZ01-CG-PRO-53-0113
Page 24 of 41
Rev: A02
Project Internal
Khazzan Project
Category
Type of harm
Examples
Hydro-blasting
Stored energy
Flying objects,
Gravity
Thermal
Hot surface
Welding flame / arc
Refrigerant
Steam
Process fluid, heat transfer
medium
Radiation
Ionizing radiation
X Rays
or radiation
Ultra violet
Burns
Micro wave
Radio frequency
Laser
Infrared
Noise
Vibration
Pneumatic drill
Driving mobile plant
Using jackhammer
Stability
Crushing
Crushing
Page 25 of 41
Crane overload
Rev: A02
Project Internal
Khazzan Project
Category
Type of harm
mechanical failure
Examples
Chain sling
Scaffold overload
Structure overload, especially
extreme weather
Fire / explosion
Burns
Combustion
Paper store
Grease
Plastic foam
Flammable substances
(highly and extremely
flammable)
Burns
Burns
Gas explosions
Dust explosions
Wood dust
Health hazards
Corrosive / irritating
materials
Silica dust
Wood dust
Iron dust
Vapours
Benzene
Toluene
Acetone
Fumes
Lead fume
Rubber fume
Asphalt fume
Gases
Carbon monoxide
Hydrogen sulphide
Sulphur dioxide
Mists
Asphyxiates
Nitrogen
Carbon monoxide
Smoke
Argon
Corrosive liquids
Rev: A02
Project Internal
Khazzan Project
Category
Type of harm
Examples
Poisoning
Toxins
All harmful aerosols
Polluted water
Contaminated food and drink
Hazards by contact
Cuts, abrasions
Metal swarf
Concrete blocks
Environmental Hazards
Biological / hazardous waste
storage and disposal
Burns, frostbite;
Molten metal
Cryogenic gases
Crude / condensate
transportation and storage
Storage of hazardous sludge /
material in pits
Infectious and non-infectious
diseases, parasites
Injuries, illness
Shift work
Work patterns
Driving
Poor ergonomic design of plant
Control / alarm systems
Procedures
KZ01-CG-PRO-53-0113
Page 27 of 41
Rev: A02
Project Internal
Khazzan Project
Environmental
Every employee associate with this project has the ultimate responsibility for Health, Safety, Security & Environmental performance. This will be achieved through a
positive HSSE culture at all the levels and by implementing a robust HSSE Management system. Petrofac and its Sub-Contractor management will continually strive
towards reducing HSSE risks to As Low As Reasonably Practical (ALARP) in all its operations to achieve the Project HSSE goals.
KZ01-CG-PRO-53-0113
Page 28 of 41
Rev: A02
Project Internal
Khazzan Project
Severity
KZ01-CG-PRO-53-0113
Page 29 of 41
Environmental
Khazzan Project
Severity
KZ01-CG-PRO-53-0113
Page 30 of 41
Environmental
and which can be restored to an equivalent capability in a period of days or
weeks.
Rev: A02
Project Internal
Khazzan Project
Financial Impact
Severity
>$20 billion
Loss of license to operate a major asset in a major market US, EU, Russia.
Intervention from major Government US, UK, EU, Russia.
Public or investor outrage in major western markets US, EU.
Damage to relationships with key stakeholders of benefit to the Group.
Loss of license to operate other material asset, or severe enforcement action against a major asset in a major
market.
Intervention from other major Government.
Public or investor outrage in other material market where we have presence or aspiration.
$1 billion - $5 billion
Severe enforcement action against a material asset in a non-major market, or against other assets in a major
market.
Interventions from non-major Governments.
Public or investor outrage in a non-major market, or localised or limited interest-group outrage in a major
market.
Prolonged adverse national or international media attention.
Widespread adverse social impact.
Damage to relationships with key stakeholders of benefit to the Segment.
$100 m to $1 billion
$5m -$100m
Regulatory compliance issue which does not lead to regulatory or other higher severity level consequence
Prolonged local media coverage.
Local adverse social impact.
Damage to relationships with key stakeholders of benefit to the Performance Unit (PU).
$500k-$5m
$50k -$500k
Isolated and short term complaints from neighbours (e.g., complaints about specific noise episode).
<$50k
KZ01-CG-PRO-53-0113
Page 31 of 41
Rev: A02
Project Internal
Khazzan Project
Impact
Level
A similar
A similar
Similar
Similar
A similar
Likely to Event likely Common
event has event has event has event has event has occur once
to occur
occurrence
not yet
not yet
occurred
occurred occurred, or or twice in
several
(at least
occurred in occurred in somewhere somewhere is likely to the facility times in the annually) at
our industry our industry.
in our
within the
occur,
lifetime.
facility
the facility.
and would
industry.
BP Group. within the
lifetime.
only be a
lifetime of
remote
10 similar
possibility.
facilities.
8
7
6
9
8
7
10
9
8
11
10
9
12
11
10
13
12
11
14
13
12
15
14
13
10
11
12
10
11
Area
IV
10
Area
III
Area
II
Area
I
A
B
Probability
Less than Less than Less than Less than Less than Less than Greater
1 in a
1 in
1 in
1 in 1,000 1 in 100 1 in 10
than 1 in
million
100,000 10,000
10
KZ01-CG-PRO-53-0113
Page 32 of 41
Rev: A02
Project Internal
Greater
than 1 in
4
Area
V
Khazzan Project
Residual risk
Area V
Area IV
Area III
Area II
Area I
KZ01-CG-PRO-53-0113
Not allowed
Not foreseen during commissioning phase
Project Director
Commissioning Manager / Deputy Commissioning Manager
Site Authority
Page 33 of 41
Rev: A02
Project Internal
Khazzan Project
CW
HW spark potential
Supplementary
certificates
Other CoW
documentation to
consider
Chemical data sheet
ICC if relevant
Risk assessment
Minimum
recommended TRA
participants
TRA Approval
Level 1
AA/AAD, PA
AA
Level 1
AA, PA
AA
Isolation plan
Level 1
AA, PA
AA
CW or HW spark
potential (task
dependent)
Isolation plan
Level 1
AA, PA
AA
CW
Isolation plan
Level 1
AA, PA
AA
HWSP
Isolation plan
Level 1
CW, HW spark
potential,
(task dependent)
Level 1
AA, PA
AA
CW
Level 1
AA, PA
AA
Level 1
AA, PA
AA
KZ01-CG-PRO-53-0113
Page 34 of 41
Isolation plan
Rev: A02
Project Internal
AA
Khazzan Project
Supplementary
certificates
Other CoW
documentation to
consider
Risk assessment
Minimum
recommended TRA
participants
TRA Approval
Isolation plan,
Locked Open/Locked Level 1
Closed register
AA, PA
AA (or based on
residual risk in
approval table)
Level 1
AA, PA
AA
CW
AA, PA
AA
CW
Insulation procedure,
Level 1
chemical data sheet
AA, PA
AA
CW
AA, PA
AA
CW
Level 1
AA, PA
AA
CW
CW, HW spark
potential (dependent
on equipment used)
KZ01-CG-PRO-53-0113
Ground disturbance
Page 35 of 41
Rev: A02
Project Internal
Khazzan Project
Task
Breaking containment
(as per isolation procedure)
Permit to work
type
CW
Supplementary
certificates
Other CoW
documentation to
consider
Risk assessment
TRA Approval
Minimum
(or
higher, based on
recommended TRA
the
residual risk in
participants
the approval table)
ICC
AA
Level 2
SA
Breaking containment
(does not meet energy isolation
procedure)
CW
ICC
Procedure,
non-conformant
isolations approval,
chemical data sheet
Task dependent
CSE, ICC
Level 2
PA, AA
Site Authority
CSE
ERRP
Level 2
Site Authority
ICC
Level 2
Site Authority
Bypass/inhibit override
register; temporary
operating procedure, if
required
Level 2,
Site Authority
Level 2/ Level 1
(AA to determine
appropriate level of risk
assessment based on local
conditions and plant status)
Site Authority
Level 2
HW open flame in
non-classified hazardous area or
greenfield
CW
HW open flame
ICC
KZ01-CG-PRO-53-0113
Page 36 of 41
Commissioning
procedure
Rev: A02
Project Internal
Site Authority
Khazzan Project
Task
Permit to work
type
Supplementary
certificates
Other CoW
documentation to
consider
Risk assessment
TRA Approval
Minimum
(or
higher, based on
recommended TRA
the
residual risk in
participants
the approval table)
CW
ICC
(task dependent)
Bypass/inhibit override
register, Locked
Open/Locked Closed
register, isolation plan,
temporary operating
procedure
CW
Lifting plan
Level 2
Site Authority
CW
Pressure/leak test
procedure, chemical
data sheet, isolation
plan
Level 2
PA, AA
Site Authority
Specific procedure,
competency verification, Level 2
ERRP
Site Authority
Energized electrical
Commissioning
procedure
Level 2
Site Authority
Ground disturbance
CSE (if applicable)
Level 2
Site Authority
ICC
Level 2
Site Authority
Pressure/leak testing
ICC
KZ01-CG-PRO-53-0113
HWSP
CW
Page 37 of 41
Level 2/ Level 1
(AA to determine
appropriate level of risk
assessment based on local
conditions and plant status)
Site Authority
Rev: A02
Project Internal
Khazzan Project
Legend: CW (Cold Work), HW (Hot Work), HWSP (Hot Work Spark Potential), MSDS (Material Safety Data Sheet), Ops (operations) RA (Risk Assessment)
Task
Permit to work
type
Supplementary
certificates
Other CoW
documentation to
consider
Risk assessment
KZ01-CG-PRO-53-0113
Page 38 of 41
Rev: A02
Project Internal
Minimum
recommended
Level 2 TRA
participants
Khazzan Project
Performing Authority:
Task
description
Body
Toxic
Biological mechanics
substances Electrical
Gravity
Thermal Mechanical
Hazard description
What, How and Detail
Noise
Pressure Radiation
Human
factors
Control measures
What, How and Detail
SIMOPS
Hazardous
Weather process
materials
Pre
requisite
Y/N
Residual Risk:
Eliminate Substitute Engineering Isolation/Segregation Administrative PPE
PA
Signature
AA
Signature
KZ01-CG-PRO-53-0113
Page 39 of 41
Rev: A02
Project Internal
Khazzan Project
PERMIT No :
DEPARTMENT/SYSTEM/LOCATION:
HITRA REF No :
date of assessment
ORA
NAME
POSITION
TASK DESCRIPTION:
Who, What, Why, How and When. As the task becomes more complex, the level of detail and
supporting documentation increases. Consider system boundaries, the extent of equipment, hardware,
or software affected by the activity.
Will the work be carried out on isolated or un-isolated systems? Where are the isolations, or interfaces
with other systems?
What area could be affected in an accident? People working or passing nearby, working on related
activities or connected systems.
Time and duration of work, one shift or multiple shifts? During the day, night or both?
Tools and equipment to be used: hand tools, power tools, ladders, lifting equipment, specific PPE?
Interfaces with adjacent work fronts, will work affect or be affected by other simultaneous work?
I, the HITRA Facilitator confirm that the HITRA has been reviewed to ensure that the risks
identified are relevant and that all control measures are in place.
Name:
Date:
Sign:
HITRA REF No :
Page 40 of 41
Rev: A02
Project Internal
Khazzan Project
1. SubTask No
KZ01-CG-PRO-53-0113
6. Initial Risk
9. Residual Risk
10.
Approver
Page 41 of 41
Rev: A02
Project Internal
11. Actions
closed