Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Prepared by
An Introduction
-
Prepared by
Chapter I
Physical Environment
Table 1: showing Objects, targets & Time Line
Objective
Targets
Activity
Enhancing
50 Government
Audit and making
proportion of
buildings in 26 cities accessible
accessible public
buildings
25 Government
Audit and making
buildings in another accessible
22 cities
50% of all
Fully accessible
Government
buildings in National
capital
50% of all
Fully accessible
Government
buildings in 10 cities
in all states
Source: http://disabilityaffairs.gov.in/content/accessible_india.php
Time Line
July 2016
July 2016
July 2019
July 2022
Karnataka
Chennai
Tamil Nadu
Coimbatore
Tamil Nadu
Delhi
Delhi
Hyderabad
Andhra
Vishakapatnam
Andhra
Kolkata
West Bengal
Mumbai
Maharashtra
Pune
Maharashtra
Nagpur
Maharashtra
Nashik
Maharashtra
Ahmadabad
Gujarat
Vadodara
Gujarat
Surat
Gujarat
Gndhinagar
Gujarat
Bhopal
Kanpur
Madhya
Pradesh
Madhya
Pradesh
UP
Luknow
UP
Jhansi
UP
Varanasi
UP
Jaipur
Rajasthan
Patna
Bihar
50 Most
Building
imp
Raipur
Chhathisgarh
50 Most
Building
imp
Gurgaon
Haryana
50
imp
Indore
50 Most
Building
50 Most
Building
imp
Gov.
imp
50 Most imp
Building
50 Most imp
Building
50 Most imp Gov.
Building
25
most
important
Government Building
50 Most imp Gov.
Building
50 Most imp Gov.
Building
50 Most imp Gov.
Building
25
most
important
Government Building
50 Most imp Gov.
Building
50 Most imp Gov.
Building
50 Most imp Gov.
Building
50 Most imp Gov.
Building
25
most
important
Government Building
25
most
important
Government Building
50 Most imp Gov.
Building
Most
Faridabad
Haryana
Srinagar
Jammu
Kashmir
Thiruvananthapuram Kerala
Building
25
most
important
Government Building
& 50 Most imp Gov.
Building
50 Most imp Gov.
Building
50 Most imp Gov.
Building
&
6764
villages)
1:22 (3 cities
&6652 villages)
1: 14 (7 cities
&1453 villages)
1:30 (11 cities
&
47529
villages)
Ut with 23
villages
1:32 (27 cities
&25590
villages)
1:19 (28 cities
&5485 mapped
villages)
Ut with 2
divisions
1:2 (with 20
cities)
UT
Bhubneshwar
Odisha
Chandigarh
UT
Guwahati
Assam
Itanagar
Arunachal
Pradesh
25
most
important
Government Building
Portblair
Andaman
Panaji
Goa
Daman
UT
Shimla
Ranchi
Himachal
Pradesh
Jharkand
Kavaratti
Lakshdweep
Imphal
Manipur
Shillong
Meghalaya
Aizawl
Mizoram
Kohima
Nagaland
Pondicherry
Pondicherry
Gangtok
Sikkim
25
most
important
Government Building
25
most
important
Government Building
25
most
important
Government Building
25
most
important 1:12
Government Building
25
most
important 1:22 (11 cities
Government Building
&
32623
villages)
25
most
important This island has
Government Building
10 panchayats
25
most
important 1:9
(2639
Government Building
villages)
25
most
important 1:11 (21 cities
Government Building
&6861 villages)
25
most
important 1:8 ( 23 towns
Government Building
& 830 villages)
25
most
important 1:8 (27 towns
Government Building
&
1317
villages)
25
most
important 1: 4units (UT)
Government Building
25
most
important 1:4 (16 cities &
50 Most
Building
50 Most
Building
imp
Gov.
imp
Gov.
Prepared by
Agartala
Dehradun
Silvassa
Ludhiana
Government Building
25
most
important
Government Building
25
most
important
Government Building
460 villages)
Tripura
1:4 (20 cities &
858 villages)
Uttarkhand
1: 10 (7 cities
&16826
villages)
Dadra
& 25
most
important UT
Nagar Haveli Government Building
Punjab
25
most
important 1:22 (17 cities
Government Building
&
12673
villages
Source: the data source is from census India, Wikipedia and maps of India.
Clarifications:
1. How many cities are covered compared to total cities?
48 cities out of 200 cities in the country are covered.
2. What is the rationale for choosing these cities?
The website of the department for the empowerment of persons with disabilities,
MSJE,( http://disabilityaffairs.gov.in/content/index.php), the strategy paper do not
contain any details on the rationale for the selection of these cities. However upon
analysis, it was found that these cities either fall under the category of Mega Cities
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cities_in_India_by_population) or Million plus
Cities (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cities_in_India_by_population)
3. Do they cover the entire public buildings in these chosen cities?
No. They cover 50 important Government buildings in 26 cities (refer Table 2
above) & 25 important Government buildings in the remaining cities chosen (refer
Table 2 Above). There is no mention of other public buildings.
4. What are important government buildings?
(http://disabilityaffairs.gov.in/content/accessible_india.php) This link will guide one to
know the list of buildings chosen. To take an example, for Chennai the chosen
buildings are the collectorate, Agricultural Department, Museum and few sub-urban
railway stations and the recently built MRTS.
5. Is there any time line provided for other cities?
By 2022 another 10 cities, which do not form part of the above mentioned cities will
be covered. But no mention could be found for ensuring accessibility to public
building in all the other cities in the country.
Prepared by
law, right to life with dignity and so on and so forth. Therefore, accessibility is crucial
for all population irrespective of their place of residence or any other human
diversity.
14. Which is the responsible department / Ministry?
Department for the empowerment of persons with disabilities, MSJE.
15. Should it really be the responsibility of MSJE?
It should not. This scheme has to be ideally be recognized as a cross cutting
programme. If one looks at the XII Plan commitments of the Union Government
provision of accessibility has been committed by almost all departments & Ministry.
So the responsibility and funding should be from across Ministries and has to be a
component of the existing programmes of the Ministries and cannot be from the
specific pool as this would amount to breach of the mandate of Article 4 of CRPD.
The reason being, there is a pre-existing legal mandate and cannot be seen just as a
programme or a campaign. Provision of accessibility should be an ongoing agenda.
16. Details of Funding?
No clarity. It looks like the resources for allocation to SIPDA and few programmes
of urban development such as HRIDAY, smart cities will be used for this.
Prepared by
Chapter 2
Transportation
Table 3 showing Objects, targets & Time Line
Objects
Targets
Activity
Enhancing
All International
Conducting accessibility
proportion of
Airports
audit of all the
accessible
international airports
airports
and converting them
into fully accessible
international airports
All domestic
Conducting accessibility
airports
audit of all domestic
airports and converting
them into fully
accessible international
airports
Enhancing
25% of all railway
Conducting and
proportion
stations
accessibility audit and
accessible
converting into fully
railway stations
accessible railway
stations
50% of all railway
Conducting and
stations
accessibility audit and
converting into fully
accessible railway
stations
Enhancing the
25% of Government Into fully accessible
proportion of
owned public
carriers
accessible
transport
public
transport
Time Line
July 2016
July 2017
July 2016
July 2017
July 2017
Clarifications:
1. Is accessible travel guaranteed by the campaign?
The guarantee in not accessible travel but only of proportionate stations / ports
Prepared by
Do not know but it is very small. If we take the example of trains run by India
Railways, there are around 14300 trains (http://www.facts-about-india.com/indianrailway-facts.php). 25% of this itself would amount to 3575 trains only. All the
remaining 10725 trains will remain inaccessible. This can help us to understand that
only very numbers of carriers can only be made accessible according to this
commitment.
Prepared by
Chapter 3
Information & Communication & eco-system accessibility
Table 4:
Objects
Enhancing
proportion of
accessible and
usable public
documents and
websites
Enhancing the
pool of sign
language
interpreters
Enhancing the
proportion of
daily captioning
& sign language
interpretation
of daily news
Targets
50% Government
and State
Government
websites
Activity
Making them fully
accessible
Time Line
July 2016
50% Public
documents issues by
Union and State
Governments
200 additional sign
language
interpreters
July 2017
Training and
Development
July 2016
Developing standards
for captioning
July 2016
fully accessible
July 2018
Clarifications
1. What are covered under information and communication accessibility?
a. Government websites to adhere to the standards.
b. Public documents include laws, rules, forms, brochures and reports.
2. What are the documents not covered under public documents?
Prepared by
Financial documents, Policy notes, citizens charter etc,. that are released by
Government and any documents produced for public access by nongovernmental agencies are not covered.
3. Will information and communication accessibility include AAC, plain language
etc,.
As per the targets mentioned above, there is specific mention of web content
accessibility and provision of sign language captioning to be more specific. Though
accessibility includes plain language and AAC, there is no specific mention on the
same.
4. Will sign language be recognized as a National language?
No. Not under this campaign. There is no mention in the strategy on this.
5. Will captioning include programmes such as films, dramas, music etc,?
No as per the strategy captions and sign language interpretation is provided for
only news.
Prepared by
Conclusion
Does this campaign adheres to the principle on Non-Discrimination mandated by
CRPD?
No. The following table illustrates the same:
Table 5: Objectives , Targets and Discrimination
Objectives
Targets
Is
it
NonDiscriminatory
Enhancing
1. 50
proportion of
Governm
accessible public
ent
No
buildings
buildings
in 26
cities
Remarks
It only covers
select building in
only 48 cities.
Persons
with
disabilities living
the rest of the
cities , towns and
villages in the
remaining
676
districts will be
discriminates.
To conclude the
69.5% of the rural
population
will
not benefit from
this campaign
Overall there is a
commitment to
cover only 50% of
any
given
transport stations
with exemption
of airports. This
is discriminating
all
those
belonging to a
particular
economic status
and that of the
place of living
25% of all carriers
is
miniscule
compared to the
2. 25
Governm
ent
buildings
in another
22 cities
Enhancing the
proportion of
accessible
transportation
Enhancing the
proportion of
airports
NO
Enhancing the
proportion of
Railway stations
Enhancing the
proportion of
public carriers
Prepared by
wide range of
public
carriers
used
in
our
country.
Only restricted
to
government
documents and
websites to the
extent of 50%.
Enhance
50% of websites
NO
proportion
and documents
accessible
information and
communication
Overall there is no commitment for full accessibility for all.
What can be done?
1. Engage now by writing letters to the concerned official to relook at the
design of the campaign
2. Ask for inclusive accessible India Campaign that No one is left behind.
3. Demands for expansion of the programme in terms of coverage
4. Apply for empanelment from all over India.
Why should we engage? To ensure Equality & Non-Discrimination.
Prepared by