Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
School of Planning, Architecture and Civil Engineering, Queens University Belfast, BT9 5AG, UK
School of Environmental Sciences, University of Liverpool, L69 3GP, UK
c
School of Civil Engineering and Surveying, University of Portsmouth, PO1 2UP, UK
b
h i g h l i g h t s
Physical and chemical properties influencing the reactivity of fly ash (FA) were assessed.
Optimum activator dosages were identified giving compressive strength of 70 MPa.
FA samples cured at 70 C were considerably stronger than samples cured at 50 C.
Partial FA replacement with ggbs leads to increases in the compressive strength.
Microstructural investigations on paste indicated the nature of reaction products.
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 15 September 2015
Received in revised form 22 November 2015
Accepted 26 November 2015
Available online 22 February 2016
Keywords:
Geopolymer
Alkali activated material
Fly ash
Slag
Structural characterisation
Mechanical properties
Alkali dosages optimisation
a b s t r a c t
Several factors affecting the reactivity of fly ash (FA) as a precursor for geopolymer concrete have been
investigated. These include physical and chemical properties of various FA sources, inclusion of ground
granulated blast furnace slag (ggbs), chemical activator dosages and curing temperature. Alkaliactivated FA was found to require elevated curing temperatures and high alkali concentrations. A mixture
of sodium hydroxide and sodium silicate was used and this was shown to result in high strengths, as high
as 70 MPa at 28 days. The presence of silicates in solution was found to be an important parameter affecting strength. Detailed physical and chemical characterisation was carried out on thirteen FA sources from
the UK. The most important factor affecting the reactivity was found to be the particle size of FA. The loss
on ignition (LOI) and the amorphous content are also important parameters that need to be considered
for the selection of FA for use in geopolymer concrete. The partial replacement of FA with ggbs was found
to be beneficial in not only avoiding the need for elevated curing temperatures but also in improving
compressive strengths. Microstructural characterisation with scanning electron microscope (SEM) coupled with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) was performed on FA/ggbs pastes. The reaction
product of FA and ggbs in these binary systems was calcium aluminium silicate hydrate gel (CASH)
with inclusion of Na in the structure.
2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The term geopolymer was introduced by Davidovits in the
1970s referring to alkali-activated metakaolin [1]. It has since been
used for a range of synthetic low-calcium aluminosilicate polymeric materials, as a sub-range of a more general definition which
is alkali-activated binders (AAB). Although the initial studies were
focused on geological materials such as metakaolin activated with
siliceous solutions [26], the potential of using other synthetic
Corresponding author.
E-mail address: m.soutsos@qub.ac.uk (M. Soutsos).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.11.045
0950-0618/ 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
reactive aluminosilicate materials activated with a range of concentrated alkaline solutions became apparent [1,7,8].
AABs have been studied for the last 40 years [9] and have applications in ceramics, hazardous waste containment, fire-resistant
construction materials and refractories [10,11]. One of the most
interesting applications is their use as a cement-free binder that
can replace Portland cement-based pastes in construction materials such as concrete and mortar products [12].
Geopolymers can provide a desirable alternative to Portland
cement (PC) binders, not only for the environmental benefits arising from the avoidance of CO2 emissions associated with PC production, but also in terms of their performance and durability,
356
where such properties are not only equivalent, but often better
than those achieved with PC. The nature of the reactions occurring
in geopolymerisation can be summarised in three basic steps [13]:
(1) Dissolution of the aluminosilicate solids: aluminosilicates in
the pozzolanic solid are dissolved by alkaline hydrolysis in
the high pH solution of the concentrated alkaline activator.
This forms a solution of silicate, aluminate and aluminosilicate species.
(2) Gel formation: species released by dissolution are held in the
aqueous phase, which may also contain silicate present from
the activating solution. This supersaturated aluminosilicate
solution forms a gel as oligomers form long chains and networks. This stage releases complexing water, which resides
in pores.
(3) Polycondensation: the gel species continue to rearrange and
reorganise, forming an increasingly larger network. This
results in the three-dimensional aluminosilicate network
of the geopolymer binder.
These processes often occur contemporaneously throughout the
mixture, rather than in a linear time series. The dense inorganic
polymer that forms the geopolymer binder thus provides physicochemical features that may be superior to Portland cement systems, i.e.
The interconnected framework gives geopolymers high compressive strengths [13,14].
Due to the microstructure of the reaction products, geopolymer
and AAB can show good to very good resistance to chemical
degradation (sulphate attack, acid attack, seawater attack) [9].
The geopolymer matrix shows high thermal and fire resistance
up to 10001200 C [14].
Geopolymers may exhibit rapid setting without long term deterioration of strength [13].
Of particular interest is the selection of precursor aluminosilicate materials that arise from waste-streams or as by-product pozzolans, which are readily available from existing industries [15].
These include fly ash (FA) and ground granulated blast furnace slag
(ggbs). Although ggbs has a relatively high demand from an existing market-base, and an associated relatively high value, perhaps
equivalent to that of Portland cement, waste-stream pozzolans
such as FA are not fully recycled into value added products, and
excesses are stockpiled or landfilled.
Reaction mechanisms responsible for the creation of an amorphous gel from fly ash are complex and still not fully understood
[9]. A wide variability in chemical dosages can be found in the scientific literature related to the activation of FA systems [16], indicating
that optimum proportions of alkali species (hydroxides and silicates) in the activating solution, as well as quantity of alkali per binder mass, still need to be investigated to improve our understanding
of the reaction mechanisms. Curing parameters such as curing temperature and stand time, i.e. the time elapsed before the start of high
temperature curing, play an important role in the full development
of the reaction products. Information available in technical literature is relatively limited, and thus a systematic investigation is still
needed for determining optimum curing conditions.
Fly ashes are not a standard product as their physical and
chemical properties vary considerably not only from source to
source but also over time from the same power station [9]. The
Department of Energy and Climate Change in its digest of UK
energy statistics [17] quoted 14 power stations operational at the
end of May 2014 that were using coal or coal mixed (gas/oil) fuel,
representing 26% of total electricity generated. Heath et al. [18]
reported that FA production in UK is estimated at about 6106 t
357
SiO2
TiO2
Al2O3
Fe2O3
Mn3O4
MgO
CaO
Na2O
K2O
P2O5
SO3
V2O5
Cr2O3
SrO
ZrO2
BaO
NiO
CuO
ZnO
PbO
LOI
Total
FA sources
ggbs
51.52
0.97
23.58
7.11
0.07
1.75
3.86
0.74
2.42
0.37
0.84
0.09
0.02
0.10
0.00
0.14
0.02
0.02
0.04
0.03
4.92
98.61
48.90
0.95
23.51
12.36
0.15
1.97
3.41
0.93
3.26
0.41
0.49
0.06
0.02
0.08
0.07
0.14
0.02
0.02
0.04
0.04
3.60
100.43
44.58
0.91
21.94
10.59
0.13
1.93
3.61
0.83
2.61
0.38
0.59
0.06
0.02
0.08
0.06
0.14
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.03
11.17
99.73
49.28
0.95
23.43
10.61
0.10
1.73
2.68
1.55
3.57
0.32
0.47
0.07
0.02
0.07
0.07
0.14
0.02
0.02
0.04
0.05
5.01
100.20
48.48
1.08
24.86
9.49
0.12
2.22
4.53
0.98
2.60
0.45
0.63
0.07
0.03
0.15
0.07
0.20
0.02
0.02
0.06
0.04
4.07
100.17
56.40
0.92
22.14
6.63
0.07
1.59
2.97
0.97
1.91
0.58
0.47
0.05
0.02
0.12
0.07
0.20
0.02
0.01
0.04
0.05
4.61
99.84
51.32
1.03
24.85
7.24
0.09
1.56
2.88
0.57
1.63
0.75
0.41
0.06
0.03
0.13
0.07
0.18
0.02
0.02
0.06
0.06
6.99
99.95
43.38
0.84
23.63
6.56
0.13
1.36
2.83
0.79
1.39
0.72
0.28
0.03
0.01
0.15
0.11
0.26
0.01
0.00
0.02
0.02
17.40
99.92
51.33
0.97
24.12
8.51
0.11
1.92
2.75
0.80
3.61
0.25
0.49
0.06
0.02
0.06
0.06
0.15
0.01
0.01
0.04
0.04
4.62
99.93
51.05
1.02
25.06
8.60
0.09
1.79
2.37
0.98
3.47
0.33
0.32
0.07
0.03
0.07
0.07
0.16
0.02
0.02
0.04
0.04
4.53
100.13
51.23
0.80
18.37
4.55
0.06
1.36
2.55
0.45
1.60
0.61
0.39
0.03
0.01
0.15
0.07
0.22
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.02
17.28
99.77
49.90
1.02
27.12
7.38
0.08
1.45
2.25
0.67
3.23
0.33
0.18
0.06
0.02
0.07
0.06
0.21
0.02
0.02
0.06
0.05
5.20
99.38
51.76
0.89
24.51
8.58
0.15
1.92
3.78
0.49
2.87
0.25
0.32
0.05
0.02
0.05
0.06
0.18
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.02
4.28
100.21
35.82
0.00
13.00
0.53
0.51
8.00
40.62
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.66
99.19
Fig. 1. XRD spectra for the 13 investigated FA sources. Labels AM equate to labels AM in Table 1.
Table 2
Physical properties of the 13 FA sources investigated.
D50 (lm)
Am.%1
% 45 lm2
1
2
23.8
82
66.9
29.2
89
63.2
41.6
86
51.0
27.3
90
69.0
20.2
79
77.6
26.5
76
62.4
30.5
75
61.0
37.3
83
54.9
32.9
86
57.3
17.3
87
76.4
34.7
75
56.4
13.2
79
84.8
91.2
81
18.9
358
Fig. 2. Grain size distribution curves for the 13 investigated FA sources. Labels AM equate to those in Fig. 1 and Table 1.
1 min. The alkali solution was then added and the material was mixed for a further
9 min. A flow table test was then performed according to BS EN 12350-5 [24]. Mixing was continued for a further 5 min, giving a total mixing time of 15 min. The
mortar was then transferred to 50 mm cube moulds and compacted on a vibrating
table for 60 s. Moulds were then sealed by wrapping in polyethylene film.
In the first series of mixes, four sets of curing conditions were used: (a) 1 h at
20 C followed by curing at 50 C; (b) 24 h at 20 C followed by curing at 50 C;
(c) 1 h at 20 C followed by curing at 70 C; (d) 24 h at 20 C followed by curing
at 70 C. One cube from each curing regime was tested in compression after 1, 3
and 7 days curing, with two cubes from each curing regime tested at 28 days. Stand
time and oven curing time were included for the computation of the total curing
time. Some of the mixes were replicated to confirm the reliability of the results.
A 300 kN capacity compression testing machine was used for all testing with a loading rate of 0.8 kN/s.
In the second series of mixes, two sets of curing conditions were used: (a) 1 h at
20 C followed by curing at 50 C and (b) 1 h at 20 C followed by curing at 70 C.
Same procedure as in the first series of mixes was used for determining the compressive strength.
In the third series of mixes, two sets of curing conditions were used: (a) 1 h at
20 C followed by curing at 70 C and (b) curing at 20 C (ambient/room temperature). Two replica cubes from each curing regime were tested in compression at
1, 7 and 28 days.
X-ray diffraction on raw materials and reacted pastes was carried out with Panalytical XPert Pro MPD Diffractometer with XCelerator detector scanned the range
of 470 2h, using Cu Ka radiation. Zincite was used as internal standard. HighScore
Plus software was used to obtain semi-quantitative mineral weight percentages.
Images for microstructural analysis were acquired with either a Philips XL30
scanning electron microscope equipped with an Oxford Instruments INCA energy
dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) system or a Hitachi TM300 SEM equipped with
a Bruker Quantax 70 EDS systems. The EDS systems allow the collection of chemical
information for spots and areas in the samples. The samples comprised broken
pieces (5.0 5.0 2.5 mm) of hardened paste mounted onto aluminium stubs
using epoxy adhesive, orienting the fractured surface in a convenient position
towards the SEM beam also bearing in mind the location of the EDS detector. Samples were coated with a thin goldpalladium layer to provide a conductive pathway
to prevent surface electrical charging.
359
0.5
1
3
7
28
1.25
1.5
1 h stand
time
M+
50 curing
24 h stand
time
M+
50 curing
1 h stand
time
M+
70 curing
24 h stand
time
M+
70 curing
7.5
10
12.5
7.5
12.5
7.5
10
12.5
7.5
10
12.5
15
17.3
5.4
20.2
28.3
23.6
21.0
9.7
13.0
11.7
13.0
13.3
10.1
14.8
13.9
14.4
14.6
13.6
13.7
12.7
14.5
14.7
16.4
15.8
18.2
8.5
7.5
7.7
25.4
32.3
36.6
15.7
17.4
27.5
40.9
47.4
49.5
38.1
38.3
45.0
19.1
15.7
24.4
43.6
44.8
51.9
42.5
44.1
47.1
28
23.9
22.8
12.4
16.9
24.0
24.4
41.5
43.1
46.0
45.8
51.6
48.6
44.3
44.1
41.0
43.9
49.9
48.3
56.1
55.6
54.3
57.7
49.4
52.2
53.9
52.4
6.6
7.7
5.9
23.0
32.4
39.3
17.0
16.3
25.7
37.8
49.3
63.9
37.6
42.1
44.6
21.8
18.2
24.4
37.1
48.6
63.0
43.6
50.4
28
23.5
24.8
19.6
17.7
23.4
24.5
38.3
38.5
49.4
51.7
59.5
62.2
42.3
42.7
46.7
48.4
57.8
59.2
69.5
51.2
64.4
67.1
66.1
56.2
1
3
7
28
4.2
15.7
20.5
23.9
23.1
4.9
17.3
20.5
22.7
22.9
4.8
21.7
29.5
21.9
22.4
2.2
17.8
23.1
23.5
22.1
1
3
2.3
8.9
3.1
15.4
3.5
23.4
13.7
14.1
15.4
14.2
24.5
24.1
24.8
27.4
23.3
25.1
1.7
19.2
10.0
22.9
34.1
24.5
23.4
37.0
27.1
1.0
12.6
14.5
17.0
17.7
0.0
7.5
19.6
19.4
17.4
28
1
3
7
28
7.8
9.8
10.7
10.8
15
14.0
17.9
17.5
16.0
3.9
3.5
3.9
26.9
27.6
33.8
32.2
28.2
27.6
27.7
28.3
2.6
1.6
21.4
20.4
24.6
24.9
22.9
23.8
22.2
23.4
3.1
21.4
18.1
15.9
10
15
11.3
24.2
18.2
20.4
14.6
15.8
22.4
20.7
13.6
24.5
24.0
22.9
13.3
16.5
23.4
23.9
19.4
18.9
39.0
39.3
28.7
29.8
30.0
28.0
36.4
40.7
41.3
53.5
57.5
52.0
51.2
50.8
51.3
54.9
51.0
40.6
30.4
63.4
55.7
53.3
48.8
55.5
57.5
54.7
54.7
13.4
15.1
23.1
22.1
15.8
24.5
23.2
24.6
18.6
17.3
23.1
22.4
13.7
22.7
24.3
14.5
17.5
19.6
18.9
17.3
24.0
24.8
24.5
12.4
23.0
25.5
21.5
18.3
30.1
29.5
27.7
28.3
26.8
37.6
39.9
44.6
42.2
38.9
64.5
58.2
61.3
62.0
39.1
63.0
57.1
57.2
59.4
25.1
26.9
37.4
30.3
43.5
44.3
46.3
42.3
51.9
60.8
61.6
61.7
41.4
45.1
49.9
49.1
8.9
12.0
13.9
10.3
11.4
17.3
21.6
27.3
34.7
57.0
29.9
28.3
18.9
32.3
59.8
44.3
14.1
14.4
16.2
14.3
24.1
27.2
57.5
57.9
54.7
20.0
19.6
19.2
19.7
55.9
35.8
33.1
24.2
37.4
24.3
27.5
38.9
37.5
35.6
23.6
23.6
15.7
17.9
17.9
18.2
32.6
27.6
26.3
37.5
29.8
36.2
32.8
42.5
35.3
37.1
39.0
58.3
58.2
55.2
43.0
53.6
50.6
46.9
46.1
4.5
9.1
10.7
10.6
3.9
18.1
16.9
17.8
19.8
21.8
19.3
20.5
1.5
25.7
24.9
25.7
6.4
10.3
11.6
13.4
13.5
14.3
23.1
22.6
24.8
24.2
16.5
24.8
28.1
31.9
31.9
9.9
22.5
25.7
26.0
26.1
11.9
12.9
14.2
14.0
22.8
23.1
27.0
24.4
37.5
27.8
33.2
36.4
35.5
26.4
35.8
38.1
14.1
13.3
25.1
29.4
24.4
24.1
24.8
15
46.9
48.1
44.1
360
Fig. 3. Compressive strengths at 28 days for 1 h and 24 h of stand time of 100% FA mortars (70 C curing temperature) for a range of alkali modulus (AM) and alkali dosage (M
+). Error bars represent the range of obtained values.
Fig. 4. Compressive strengths at 28 days of 100% FA mortars for 50 C and 70 C curing temperatures (1 h stand time) for a range of alkali modulus (AM) and alkali dosage (M
+). Error bars represent the range of obtained values.
361
Fig. 5. 3-D plot showing the combined effects of alkali dosage and modulus on the
28-day strength of 100% FA mortars (1 h at 20 C followed by 70 C).
Fig. 6. 28-Day compressive strength of 9 FA sources at different curing temperatures. Letters AL equate to same in Table 1 and Figs. 1 and 2. Error bars represent
the range of obtained values.
Table 4
Compressive strengths for mortars produced with the 13 FA sources investigated. Values are given in MPa.
Ash source
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
70 curing
50 curing
1-Day
3-Day
7-Day
28-Day
1-Day
3-Day
7-Day
28-Day
35.3
31.4
22.4
41.3
44.1
27.2
20.1
29.1
50.5
63.9
52.1
28.5
63.6
68.2
50.1
36.4
52.7
62.0
63.0
43.5
28.6
60.8
68.1
43.9
32.3
51.1
63.4
60.9
45.7
30.4
53.8
64.1
51.2
27.9
52.0
61.9
3.9
4.2
3.6
7.0
6.9
4.5
3.4
6.0
10.39
25.7
17.8
15.3
20.6
27.0
18.3
18.9
21.1
23.8
24.4
18.2
15.1
24.8
22.2
23.0
18.6
24.5
40.3
24.0
18.6
15.1
26.4
19.3
21.5
17.7
27.1
38
49.2
25.2
54.8
58.7
44.3
39.3
44.0
58.8
16.9
14.9
27.1
20.2
22.6
17.3
25.4
35.4
362
Mortar mixtures containing only FA did not develop any significant strength at room temperature. However, the addition of ggbs
at any level gave significant strength enhancements even at room
temperature. Fig. 9 shows the strength of FA/ggbs based mortars
with M+ 7.5% and AM 1.25. There is an almost linear relationship
between the amount of ggbs in the binder and the strength at 1,
7 and 28 days where cubes were cured at room temperature
(20 C). This seems to suggest that FA did not contribute much to
the strength. There was a significant increase in the strength from
20 MPa to 50 MPa with the addition of only 20% ggbs when
cured for 1 day at 70 C. Higher levels of ggbs cured for 1 day
resulted in smaller incremental increases up to 60 MPa at 100%
ggbs.
Continued curing at 70 C for 7 and 28 days resulted in strength
reductions for mixes with greater than 20% ggbs. This is believed to
be due to self-desiccation and resulting drying shrinkage, which is
an effect that has previously been observed in alkali-activated slags
[7]. In accordance with this effect, the highest strength was
achieved for specimens cured at room temperature and not for
oven-cured samples. Compressive strength of 80 MPa was
363
Fig. 9. Effect of ggbs substitution rate on the strength of sodium silicate/sodium hydroxide-activated binders with M+ 7.5% and AM 1.25. (A) 1 day; (B) 7 days; (C) 28 days.
Error bars represent the range of obtained values.
Fig. 10. 3-D plot showing the combined effects of FA/ggbs ratio and M+ variation on the 28-day compressive strength of sodium silicate/sodium hydroxide-activated binders
cured at room temperature.
obtained at 28 days for the mortar containing 80% slag and cured at
room temperature.
Subsequent investigations focussed on the effect of alkali
dosage on the strength development of FA/ggbs blends. The AM
was kept constant whilst the M+ was varied from 3% to 10% for
varying levels of FA replacement with ggbs. Fig. 10 shows the 3D plot of the 28-day compressive strength of specimens cured at
room temperature. M+ 10% mixes could not be easily cast for ggbs
contents higher than 20% due to quick setting. It can be observed
that the increase in ggbs content led to an incremental increase
in the compressive strength.
3.4. X-ray diffraction results for raw materials and reacted pastes
In order to investigate the nature and composition of the reaction products, raw material and reacted pastes were analysed with
364
Fig. 11. XRD diffractograms of raw materials and reacted pastes. (A) 100% FA (B)
100% ggbs (C) 50/50 FA/ggbs.
in about 98% after depuration from the 10% crystalline ZnO, with
about 1.7% in weight of crystalline CaCO3 and traces of quartz.
Fig. 11 shows the compared diffractograms for 100% FA (A),
100% ggbs (B) and 50/50 FA/ggbs (C).
No new crystalline phase was obtained from the activation of
FA. Quartz and mullite, as expected, did not participate to the
reaction, as their mass contents remained almost unchanged. On
the contrary, the activation of ggbs resulted in a decrease in
365
Fig. 12. SEM back-scattered electron (AG) and secondary electron (H) images of geopolymer paste broken surfaces. Numbered spots on A, C, D, E and F are locations of EDS
chemical analyses. (A and B) Paste made with 100% ggbs. (C and D) Paste made with 100% FA. (EH) Paste made with 50% ggbs and 50% FA.
Table 5
EDS analysis of 100% ggbs paste. Spot numbers refer to Fig. 12(A). Analyses with Oxford Instruments INCA.
Spot
Na
Mg
Al
Si
Ca
Ti
Mn
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
53.42
50.95
46.93
49.80
43.54
43.57
36.59
20.99
16.29
20.21
19.25
5.30
7.08
3.71
2.00
3.13
1.07
1.38
3.60
3.65
3.14
3.22
4.03
3.00
3.18
5.80
4.94
5.22
9.96
11.07
11.38
11.25
15.09
13.72
15.97
0.15
0.31
0.42
0.27
0.41
0.53
0.61
9.95
13.69
16.63
14.20
25.23
24.72
33.99
0.13
0.27
0.23
0.23
0.28
0.60
0.56
0.17
0.23
0.28
0.60
1.05
0.56
Fe
Al/Si
Ca/Si
Na/Si
Description
0.16
0.323
0.405
0.301
0.319
0.582
0.496
0.524
0.999
1.237
1.461
1.262
1.672
1.802
2.128
2.107
1.472
1.776
1.711
0.351
0.516
0.232
C(N)ASH gel
C(N)ASH gel
C(N)ASH gel
C(N)ASH gel
Unreacted ggbs particle
Unreacted ggbs particle
Unreacted ggbs particle
366
Table 6a
EDS analysis of 100% FA paste. Spot numbers refer to Fig. 12(C). Analyses with Oxford Instruments INCA.
Spot
Na
Mg
Al
Si
Ca
Ti
Mn
1
2
3
47.27
54.2
49.77
2.78
8.53
10.24
0.76
0.54
0.58
15.02
11.15
8.96
26.5
19.08
22.88
3.58
1.51
2.18
0.94
2.08
2.7
0.78
0.28
0.51
Fe
Al/Si
Ca/Si
Na/Si
Description
2.36
2.62
2.17
1.508
1.119
0.900
0.035
0.109
0.118
0.105
0.447
0.448
Unreacted FA particle
NASH gel
NASH gel
Fe
Al/Si
Ca/Si
Na/Si
Description
2.37
3.20
3.03
3.29
1.424
0.961
0.780
1.109
0.057
0.083
0.093
0.099
0.051
0.709
1.083
0.331
Unreacted FA particle
NAS crystal
NAS crystal
NASH gel
Table 6b
EDS analysis of 100% FA paste. Spot numbers refer to Fig. 12(D). Analyses with Oxford Instruments INCA.
Spot
Na
Mg
Al
Si
Ca
Ti
1
2
3
4
53.09
47.03
48.34
51.39
1.21
14.67
18.89
7.02
0.89
0.53
0.49
0.76
14.18
9.57
7.77
11.05
23.50
20.68
17.44
21.23
2.89
1.94
1.93
1.93
1.34
1.72
1.63
2.11
0.44
0.42
0.53
1.18
Mn
0.23
Table 7a
EDS analysis of 50/50 FA/ggbs paste (1st sample). Spot numbers refer to Fig. 12(E). Analyses with Oxford Instruments INCA.
Spot
Na
Mg
Al
Si
Ca
Ti
Mn
Fe
Si/Al
Ca/Si
Na/Si
Description
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
38.00
29.37
45.51
40.95
49.12
48.95
40.81
39.53
0.27
0.37
1.25
0.47
8.41
5.10
5.41
6.31
4.86
4.41
1.17
4.53
1.21
2.83
2.20
1.93
6.98
7.49
18.27
6.95
7.04
6.42
6.96
8.45
18.58
19.39
24.38
17.02
20.92
17.77
21.86
23.71
0.51
0.51
2.19
0.47
1.28
1.03
1.55
1.55
29.44
37.24
1.22
28.54
10.44
16.37
19.17
15.8
0.63
0.61
0.64
0.40
0.39
0.31
0.44
0.39
0.46
0.39
0.26
0.23
5.39
0.37
1.06
0.87
1.12
1.84
0.701
0.752
1.834
0.698
0.707
0.645
0.699
0.848
1.584
1.921
0.050
1.677
0.499
0.921
0.877
0.666
0.015
0.019
0.051
0.027
0.402
0.287
0.247
0.266
0.32
0.38
0.49
0.5
Table 7b
EDS analysis of 50%/50% FA/ggbs paste (2nd sample). Spot numbers refer to Fig. 12(F). Analyses with Bruker Quantax 70.
Spot
Na
Mg
Al
Si
Ca
Ti
Mn
Fe
Si/Al
Ca/Si
Na/Si
Description
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
44.01
44.37
51.08
49.55
46.36
49.03
51.84
1.20
3.06
7.82
7.53
8.01
8.32
7.97
4.42
1.19
1.08
0.86
1.54
1.78
1.54
6.33
16.12
6.88
7.16
7.12
7.18
5.95
17.39
26.12
18.22
18.21
20.92
20.29
17.14
0.52
3.51
1.85
2.14
0.96
2.05
1.54
24.98
2.16
12.79
12.67
13.64
10.17
12.17
0.46
0.37
0.27
0.57
0.24
0.29
0.55
0.13
3.10
0.41
0.89
1.20
0.65
0.97
0.636
1.618
0.691
0.719
0.715
0.721
0.597
1.436
0.083
0.702
0.696
0.652
0.501
0.710
0.069
0.117
0.429
0.414
0.383
0.410
0.465
0.25
0.89
367
the pure geopolymeric gel (NASH), resulting in a more compact and dense structure that is responsible for the increase in
mechanical strength compared to the 100% pfa paste. The coexistence of NASH and CASH gels has been reported in the literature [33,3637].
4. Conclusions
Fig. 13. Triangular plot of Ca, Al, Na compositions normalised to Si content for FA
and GGBS particles, various gels, and some NaSi crystals formed in one sample.
Calculated compositions for the pastes are plotted as six pointed stars. Added NaOH
and sodium silicate solution would plot on the Na/Si corner. See text for further
explanation and discussion.
Fig. 14. Back-scattered electron images of 100% ggbs paste surface 9 months after images in Fig. 12. A shows distribution of sodium carbonate crystals (dark areas) grown
on the paste surface (light area). B shows a detail of the rosette structure formed by the sodium carbonate crystals and the characteristic desiccation cracks in the gel.
368
Acknowledgements
This research was carried out at the University of Liverpool in
the framework of the Carbon Trust Applied Research Grant 09110252 Ultra High Performance Fibre Reinforced Cementless Precast
Concrete Products. The work was then continued at Queens
University of Belfast with the financial support of the SUSCON project, which has received funding from the European Union Seventh
Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under Grant Agreement
No. 285463 (Call FP7-2011-NMP ENV-ENERGY-ICT-EeB).
References
[1] J. Davidovits, Geopolymer Chemistry and Applications, Institut Geopolymere,
2008.
[2] J. Davidovits, Geopolymers and geopolymeric materials, J. Therm. Anal. 35 (2)
(1989) 429441.
[3] J. Davidovits, Geopolymers, J. Therm. Anal. 37 (8) (1991) 16331656.
[4] J. Davidovits, Geopolymer cements to minimise carbon-dioxide greenhousewarming, Ceram. Trans. 37 (1993) 165182.
[5] V.F. Barbosa, K.J. MacKenzie, C. Thaumaturgo, Synthesis and characterisation of
materials based on inorganic polymers of alumina and silica: sodium
polysialate polymers, Int. J. Inorg. Mater. 2 (4) (2000) 309317.
[6] W.M. Kriven, J.L. Bell, M. Gordon, Microstructure and microchemistry of fullyreacted geopolymers and geopolymer matrix composites, Advances in Ceramic
Matrix Composites IX 153 (2003) 227250.
[7] C. Shi, D. Roy, P. Krivenko, Alkali-activated Cements and Concretes, CRC Press,
2006.
[8] J.G.S. Van Jaarsveld, J.S.J. Van Deventer, Effect of the alkali metal activator on
the properties of fly ash-based geopolymers, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 38 (10)
(1999) 39323941.
[9] J.L. Provis, J.S. van Deventer, Alkali activated materials, in: J.L. Provis (Ed.),
Springer, 2014.
[10] A.M.F. Jimenez, E.E. Lachowski, A. Palomo, D.E. Macphee, Microstructural
characterisation of alkali-activated PFA matrices for waste immobilisation,
Cement Concr. Compos. 26 (8) (2004) 10011006.
[11] D.L. Kong, J.G. Sanjayan, Effect of elevated temperatures on geopolymer paste,
mortar and concrete, Cem. Concr. Res. 40 (2) (2010) 334339.
[12] S.E. Wallah, B.V. Rangan, Low-calcium fly ash-based geopolymer concrete:
long-term properties. Res. Report-GC2, Curtin University, Australia, 2006. pp.
7680.
[13] P. Duxson, A. Fernndez-Jimnez, J.L. Provis, G.C. Lukey, A. Palomo, J.S.J. Van
Deventer, Geopolymer technology: the current state of the art, J. Mater. Sci. 42
(9) (2007) 29172933.
[14] S. Andini, R. Cioffi, F. Colangelo, T. Grieco, F. Montagnaro, L. Santoro, Coal fly
ash as raw material for the manufacture of geopolymer-based products, Waste
Manage. 28 (2) (2008) 416423.
[15] P. Duxson, J.L. Provis, G.C. Lukey, J.S. Van Deventer, The role of inorganic
polymer technology in the development of green concrete, Cem. Concr. Res.
37 (12) (2007) 15901597.
[16] M.N. Soutsos, R. Vinai, A. Rafeet, Effect of alkali dosage and modulus on
strength development and microstructure of alkali-activated binders. 14th
International Congress on the Chemistry of Cement (ICCC 2015), 1316
October 2015, Beijing, China, 2015.
[17] Department of Energy & Climate Change, Electricity: Chapter 5, Digest of
United Kingdom Energy Statistics (DUKES). <https://www.gov.uk/
government/statistics/electricity-chapter-5-digest-of-united-kingdom-energystatistics-dukes> (accessed 17.06.15).
[18] A. Heath, K. Paine, S. Goodhew, M. Ramage, M. Lawrence, The potential for
using geopolymer concrete in the UK, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil
Engineers: Construction Materials 166 (4) (2013) 195203.
[19] F. Puertas, A. Fernndez-Jimnez, Mineralogical and microstructural
characterisation of alkali-activated fly ash/slag pastes, Cement Concr.
Compos. 25 (3) (2003) 287292.
nez-Ramrez, S. Alonso, T. Vazquez, Alkali-activated fly ash/
[20] F. Puertas, S. Mart
slag cements: strength behaviour and hydration products, Cem. Concr. Res. 30
(10) (2000) 16251632.
[21] S. Puligilla, P. Mondal, Role of slag in microstructural development and
hardening of fly ash-slag geopolymer, Cem. Concr. Res. 43 (2013) 7080.
[22] I. Ismail, S.A. Bernal, J.L. Provis, R. San Nicolas, S. Hamdan, J.S. van Deventer,
Modification of phase evolution in alkali-activated blast furnace slag by the
incorporation of fly ash, Cement Concr. Compos. 45 (2014) 125135.
[23] S. Kumar, R. Kumar, S.P. Mehrotra, Influence of granulated blast furnace slag on
the reaction, structure and properties of fly ash based geopolymer, J. Mater.
Sci. 45 (3) (2010) 607615.
[24] British Standards Institution, Testing fresh Concrete Part 5: Flow table test,
BS EN 12350-5:2000.
[25] G. Kovalchuk, A. Fernndez-Jimnez, A. Palomo, Alkali-activated fly ash: effect
of thermal curing conditions on mechanical and microstructural development
Part II, Fuel 86 (3) (2007) 315322.
[26] A. Palomo, S. Alonso, A. Fernandez-Jimnez, I. Sobrados, J. Sanz, Alkaline
activation of fly ashes: NMR study of the reaction products, J. Am. Ceram. Soc.
87 (6) (2004) 11411145.
[27] S. Chithiraputhiran, N. Neithalath, Isothermal reaction kinetics and
temperature dependence of alkali activation of slag, fly ash and their blends,
Constr. Build. Mater. 45 (2013) 233242.
[28] British Standards Institution, Fly ash for concrete. Definitions, specifications
and conformity criteria, BS EN 450-1:2005 + A1:2007.
[29] A. Fernndez-Jimnez, A. Palomo, Characterisation of fly ashes. Potential
reactivity as alkaline cements, Fuel 82 (18) (2003) 22592265.
[30] R. Kumar, S. Kumar, S.P. Mehrotra, Towards sustainable solutions for fly ash
through mechanical activation, Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 52 (2) (2007) 157
179.
[31] J.I. Escalante-Garca, A.F. Fuentes, A. Gorokhovsky, P.E. Fraire-Luna, G.
Mendoza-Suarez, Hydration products and reactivity of blast-furnace slag
activated by various alkalis, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 86 (12) (2003) 21482153.
[32] I.G. Richardson, A.R. Brough, G.W. Groves, C.M. Dobson, The characterization of
hardened alkali-activated blast-furnace slag pastes and the nature of the
calcium silicate hydrate (CSH) phase, Cem. Concr. Res. 24 (5) (1994) 813829.
[33] I. Ismail, Durability as a Function of Microstructure of Alkali-Activated Slag/Fly
Ash Binders, University of Melbourne, 2013 (Ph.D. thesis).
[34] I.G. Richardson, The nature of CSH in hardened cements, Cem. Concr. Res. 29
(8) (1999) 11311147.
[35] J.L. Provis, Geopolymers and other alkali activated materials: why, how, and
what?, Mater Struct. 47 (12) (2014) 1125.
[36] C.K. Yip, G.C. Lukey, J.S.J. Van Deventer, The coexistence of geopolymeric gel
and calcium silicate hydrate at the early stage of alkaline activation, Cem.
Concr. Res. 35 (9) (2005) 16881697.
[37] I. Garcia-Lodeiro, A. Palomo, A. Fernndez-Jimnez, D.E. Macphee,
Compatibility studies between NASH and CASH gels. Study in the ternary
diagram Na2OCaOAl2O3SiO2H2O, Cem. Concr. Res. 41 (9) (2011) 923931.