Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
1
1 S.Ct. 125
27 L.Ed. 629
In re AMENDMENTS TO RULES 1 AND 10.
same term the first rule for printing the records was adopted,
which provided for the taxation of the fees for one manuscript
copy of the record in the bill of costs. When this rule was
promulgated the court consisted of Chief Justice MARSHALL
and Associate Justices JOHNSON, STORY, THOMPSON,
MCLEAN, and BALDWIN. Mr. Justice BALDWIN dissented
on this provision of the rule, for the reason, among others, that
it allowed the clerk a fee for a copy whether one was made or
not. Under the rule thus adopted the printing of records began,
and from the first the original records were sent to the printer,
and a fee for one manuscript copy was charged in the costs,
when in fact no copies were made. There is abundant evidence
that at the outset this practice was directly or indirectly
approved by the court. In 1839 the house of representatives
instructed the judiciary committee to 'inquire what costs are
charged against the United States for printed copies of records
of suits pending in the supreme court which have been printed
at the expense of the United States, * * * and whether any
legislation is necessary in relation to costs of suits in said court.'
The committee reported, submitting a statement of the clerk on
the subject, and were discharged. From this statement of the
clerk, and from other evidence on file, we are satisfied the
committee, or some of its members, visited the office during the
progress of their inquiries, and possessed themselves fully of
the mode of doing the business, and of the compensation
therefor.
In 1859 the rules were revised by Chief Justice TANEY under
the direction of the court, and the provision for printing the
records was put into the form in which it now appears in
paragraphs 2, 3, 4, and 5 of rule 10. We are advised that prior
to the death of Chief Justice TANEY no manuscript copies of
the records were ever made, and that the fee for one copy was
always charged in the costs. Since the death of Chief Justice
TANEY copies have in some cases been made. The present
clerk has followed the practice of his predecessors.