EACHERS need to keep order in their classrooms and
schools. To do this, it is sometimes necessary to discipline unruly students; those who break rules and cause disorder. In order to examine the issue of where the boundaries must be drawn - in this, the punishing of students - we must first examine what our society deems as acceptable punishment. Our Judiciary system has a variety of methods by which it punishes perpetrators of crimes. These methods are, on the whole, seen as fair, just and corrective. The punishments are as follows: Incarceration, which involves the detention of a convict in a jail or correction facility; Community service, where a convict is sentenced to labor in support of the community they wronged; Fines, where a convict is forced to pay reparation for the crime they committed and lastly; Warnings and probation, in which a convict is officially warned and will possibly be put under closer scrutiny in their actions. Possibly involving a TAG or police visits. These methods are what we use to punish criminals. So why not apply this same sort of punishments to schools, where one aim is to prepare pupils for life in the real world. Punishments in schools do, however, need to be corrective. This is because the school is there to prepare. This involves allowing students room to correct their misconduct. This means that punishments should only focus on justice, equity and retribution in so far as to prepare students morally and socially for the real word. All punishments should for this reason mostly focus on correcting students and alerting them to their failings; Not on finding some form of elusive justice for a victim. So the punishments I would recommend for schools would be as follows: To match incarceration, I would introduce detentions. A teacher would force an unruly student who has done something very disruptive or has repeatedly perpetrated an offense, to stay in a classroom, against their will, during what would otherwise be free time. As in the world, detention would be reserved as the peak of all punishments and allows the criminal to reflect upon their wrong doings. Much like in prisons, pupils sentenced to detention should be given a corrective activity. The process should be to reform. This reformation would, if successful, stop the student from misbehaving in the future and hopefully make them a better person. To match community service is fairly obvious. We can take students who have caused harm to the grounds and force them to clean up their mess. In much the same way as vandals may be sentenced to clean graffiti from walls. This punishment would be there to teach students about the work needed to fix
their mistakes. It should make them think twice about their
behavior. Next is to the fines. It would be absurd to charge schoolchildren - who have no method to earn money - fines, this means we will need to find a suitable alternative. For a student using a toy or a tool to cause havoc and disarray, it would become appropriate for a teacher to temporarily deprive that student of that toy or piece of equipment. This, though not a perfect reflection of a fine, would help disable the students from perpetrating any more crimes with the toy/tool and would disincentives using toys/tools to misbehave. This is similar to fines as it disincentives the activity. Lastly is the Warnings and probation. In a school, this would be if a teacher were to say This is your last warning. This form of punishment is subtle but effective, in my opinion. For a teacher to make a student feel that they have misbehaved is surely the point of a corrective punishment. It also has the imitate effect of stopping misbehavior. This method does, however, require the use of the other methods; Threats do need to appear credible and a teacher who just warns will never be listened to. In conclusion, punishments need to corrective and proportional. They should not focus on retribution and should attempt to reflect punishments of the wider legal system. 681 words 40 mins