Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
Contents
1 KEY ENGAGEMENT INFORMATION
5 STAKEHOLDERS RELATIONSHIP
12
13
14
17
19
1.1
Telephone
Name
Mal Osborne
Sid Jain
Peter Kocian
Name
Audit Partner
David Wall
Principal
Travis Bate
2.1
Background
The Town of Port Hedland (the Town) is a Western Australian Local Government
located in the Pilbara Region. The Town is home to around 20,000 people from
diverse cultural backgrounds and covers 11,844 square kilometers. Port Hedland is
the worlds largest bulk export facility with Pilbara Ports Authority recording a record
annual tonnage throughput of 372.3 million tonnes in 2013/14.
The Town contributes significantly to the Western Australian and national economies,
while delivering high quality facilities and services to its community. Rapid growth has
brought many positive changes to the region and set the path to becoming a vibrant
and attractive regional city, yet this also carries the challenge of balancing economic
and commercial development with the needs of the local community.
2.2
Corporate structure
The following diagram summarises the Towns corporate structure:
Council
Chief
Executive
Officer
Engineering
Services
Planning &
Development
Services
3.1
Statutory accounts
Community
Development
Corporat
e
Services
The statutory accounts will be general purpose financial statements for the financial
year ended 30 June 2015, prepared in accordance with the Australian Accounting
Standards (as they apply to local governments and not-for-profit entities), other
authoritative pronouncements of the Australian Accounting Standards Board and the
financial reporting provisions of the Local Government Act 1995 and accompanying
regulations.
Page | 2
3.2
1. gives a true and fair view of the Town of Port Hedlands financial position
as at 30 June 2015 and of its performance for the financial year ended 30
June 2015;
Include in our report if we became aware of any instance where the Council did not
comply with the requirements of the Local Government Act 1995 and Local
Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996 as they relate to financial
statements.
3.3
Grants
Grants received by the local government, depending on its nature, are required to be
audited and to provide a Grant Acquittal report demonstrating that the Town has met
all obligations in respect of discharging the grant in accordance with the Terms and
Conditions of its Funding/Grant Agreement.
The Auditor is required to form an opinion that the receipts and payments are true
and fair and that the Terms and Conditions of the Funding/Grant Agreement have
been adhered to.
The Grant Acquittals have different reporting deadlines which need to be adhered to
in order to receive funds on time and in the near future. We will complete audits of
grants as and when required to meet the Towns reporting obligations.
3.4
Management letters
Significant findings, emerging issues and their recommended resolution that arise
during the audit will be progressively discussed and communicated to the relevant
departments and the Manager of Financial Services. Any weaknesses in controls,
which may be identified during the current year audit, will be highlighted in the
management letter following the conclusion of the preliminary and final audits.
Prior year management letter points, if any, will be followed up as part of the current
year audit procedures.
3.5
Other Deliverables
Entrance interview with AFC
The entrance interview will be held with the Audit and Finance Committee (AFC) and
will mainly comprise the presentation and discussion of the Audit Planning
Memorandum (APM).
Closing meeting with CEO
Significant accounting issues and findings noted during the final audit will be discussed with
the Chief Executive Officer (CEO).
Exit interview with Audit Committee
The exit interview will comprise discussion of any significant matters, statutory
accounts, management letters and any improvements for future audits with the Audit
Committee.
Terms of Engagement
4.1
Arrangements
Audits are not an absolute guarantee of the accuracy or reliability of Towns
information, and may not have identified all matters of significance. This is because
the work undertaken to form an opinion is permeated by judgement and most audit
evidence is persuasive rather than conclusive. In addition, there are inherent
limitations in any audit, including the use of testing, the effectiveness of internal
control structures and the possibility of collusion.
Primary responsibility for the detection, investigation and prevention of irregularities
rests with Towns management. Consequently it is the Towns management who
remains responsible for keeping proper accounts and maintaining adequate systems
of internal control, preparing and presenting the financial statements, complying with
the Local Government Act 1995 and other relevant laws.
4.2
We will rely on the Chief Executive Officer signing the financial statements as
evidence that they confirm:
They have fulfilled their responsibility for the preparation of the financial
statements in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework,
including their fair presentation;
Stakeholders relationship
5.1
5.2
Independence
RSM International audit methodology requires that we conduct an annual re-evaluation of
our independence prior to the commencement of each assignment. We have fully
satisfied ourselves that we do not have any actual or perceived conflict of interest.
6
Areas of audit emphasis and audit
considerations
6.1
The following table lists those areas that are assessed as significant or high risk. The
areas assessed as low risk are listed in Appendix B.
Page | 5
Audit Approach
Risk Area
Valuation of NonCurrent Assets
2
Appropriate accounting
treatment of revenue
recognition or unearned
income
4
Timely delivery of capital
projects and asset
maintenance
Page | 6
Audit Approach
Risk Area
Significant judgements
and estimates
2
Non-compliance with the
tendering and quotation
procedures
Compliance
management override of
controls will vary from
entity to entity, the risk is
nevertheless present in all
entities)
11
Risk Area
Audit Approach
Revenue Cycle
Rates revenue;
Government grants;
User pays revenue;
Profit on sale of noncurrent assets; and
Other income.
Trade and other
receivables
6.2
6.3
6.4
6.5
7.1
7.2
Summary
of
assessments
business,
fraud
and
accounting
risk
Business, fraud and accounting risks are assessed as low based on the audit
findings in prior year, except for those specific assertions classified as high risk as
detailed in Section 10.
7.3
7.4
Page | 9
7.5
Audit approach
balances
for
significant
and
high
risk
material
For all significant and high risk material (HRM) account balances, the engagement
team will identify audit assertions that pose high audit risk (i.e. existence, rights and
obligations, completeness, valuation and cut-off). It is likely that not all the assertions
will be deemed to be high risk. Those assertions that are assessed as low risk within
a high risk account balance will be tested in the same manner as low risk material
(LRM) balances and disclosures.
7.5.1
Test of Controls
Where we determine that an assessed risk of material misstatement at the assertion
level is a significant risk and we intend on relying on the operating effectiveness of
controls intended to mitigate that significant risk, we will obtain audit evidence about
the operating effectiveness of those controls from tests of controls performed in the
current period.
7.5.2
Substantive Procedures
Where we have determined that an assessed risk of material misstatement at the
assertion level is a significant risk, we will perform substantive procedures that are
specifically responsive to that risk.
7.6
7.7
For the current year, we will be conducting in depth testing on the following business
cycles:
Revenue cycle;
Payroll cycle.
Page | 10
7.8
Preliminary audit visit - We will liaise with the Manager Financial Services to
arrange meetings with relevant personnel with reference to the areas that we are
going to cover, prior to the commencement of the preliminary audit visit.
Approach summary
The RSM Audit Methodology is an international audit methodology, utilised by all
RSM International independent network firms worldwide, that blends technical
competencies with a detailed and robust knowledge of the client, its markets and the
industry sector. Using these methodologies, the Firm offers a tailored audit and
assurance approach, with a strong emphasis on early planning and how the clients
business functions. This enables us to identify key audit and assurance components
and to tailor our procedures to the unique aspects, size and nature of a clients
business and their service requirements. Our approach ensures audit resources are
directed at high risk business cycles and resources are not wasted on trivial balances
or issues that will not add value to you as a client. The result is an efficient and cost
effective audit that adds value to your operations
The following model presents a flowchart of our approach:
Preliminary
Business risk
planning
assessment
Test of detail
procedures
Sunbstantive
analyical
procedures
Reporting
Audit plan
developm
ent
Control
reliance
procedur
es
9.1
Page | 13
10
Timing
e
l
Td
i w
mo
er
t k
a
b
l
e
Pr
e
Pl
an
ni
ng
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
P
r
e
li
m
i
n
a
r
y
A
u
di
t
F
i
Task
Indicative
Responsible
Time Frame
Party(ies)
March/April 2015
RSM
22 April 2015
RSM
21 April 2015 to
24 April 2015
y em
P ent
ra
eu
ld
ii
t
m
i
f
ni
an
rd
yi
Au
n
g
dit
Ms
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
L
e
tt
Dr
e
ra
af
nt
d
/f
oi
rn
pa
rn
c
ei
li a
ml
is
nt
aa
rt
Town
RSM
Town
30 April 2015
RSM
Town
7 May 2015
Town
8 May 2015
RSM
May 2015
RSM
30 September
2015
Town
wort P UM
n He 30
dl Ju
o an ne
20
fd
15
T
AU
oPDIT Pa
ge |
14
ieldwork
T
i
m
e
t
a
b
l
e
F
i
n
a
l
A
u
d
i
t
F
Final Audit
Management
Letter (if
applicable)
Task
Indicative
Time Frame
14 to 17
September 2015
Responsible
Party(ies)
RSM
Town
30 September
2015
Town
September 2015
RSM
October 2015
RSM
30 September
2015
RSM
7 October 2015
RSM
8 October 2015
C
l
o
s
i
n
g
epres
entati
on
L
e
tt
e
r
R
e
p
o
r
t
and
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
R
Town
RSM
30 September
2015
RSM
7 October 2015
Town
8 October 2015
RSM
Ju
ne
201
5
Pa
T ge
|
A 15
3
ort
Task
T
i
m
e
t
a
b
l
e
E
x
i
t
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
F
i
n
a
l
R
e
p
o
r
t
Issue
Closin
g
Repor
t and
Final
Mana
geme
nt
Repre
sentat
ion
Letter
to
Town
and
AFC.
Exit
meeti
ng
with
Town
includ
ing
prese
ntatio
n to
the
Audit
and
Finan
ce
Com
mitte
e.
A
u
d
i
t
Sign
Final
Accou
nts
and
the
Mana
geme
nt
Repre
sentat
ion
Letter.
R
e
p
R
S
M
t
o
s
i
g
n
a
n
d
i
s
s
u
e
t
h
e
A
u
d
i
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
t
o
T
o
w
n
.
Indicative
Time Frame
Responsible
Party(ies)
9 October 2015
RSM
18 September
2015
RSM
Town
9 October 2015
Town
12 October 2015
RSM
Hedla
nd
AUDIT
T PLANNI
NG
o MEMO
w RANDU
nM
of 30 June
P 2015
o Page |
16
rt
Purchase
I
and
n
payment c
o
cycle
r
r
1 Tra e
de and c
other t
payable
c
s
a
2 Ac l
cruals c
u
l
a
Interest ti
Bearing o
Liabilities n
o
f
a
c
c
r
u
a
l
s
.
Taxation
GST U
n
d
e
r
Continge s
t
nt
liabilities a
t
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
p
a
y
a
b
l
e
s
.
Cla
s
s
i
fication 1
s
.
betweenPerf
current
or
and nonm 3
current
s R
e
u
4
Li
v
b
i
abilitie
e
s are
st
w
not
a
properl
nt
s
y
u
iv
brough
b
e
t to
s
a
accou
e
nt.
q
n
u
al
5
The
e
yti
n
split
t
between c
al
current
p
liabilities re
a
and
vi
y
noncurren e
m
t liabilities w.
e
n
is
t
inaccurat
s
R
e.
e
a
6
Failu v
f
re
to i
t
comply
e
e
with debt w
r
covenant
s.
t
y
h
e
e
a
r
c
7
GST a
e
n
has not l
c
d
been
u
.
properly l
calculate a
d in
t
accordan i
o
ce with
n 4
GST
A
legislatio
o
n
n.
f
a
l
8
All
m
y
contingen a
s
t liabilities t
e
e
are not
y
properly ri
e
identified a
a
and
l
r
disclosed
a
in the
e
n
financial c
d
statement cr
s.
u
i
a
n
l
t
e
r
e
st
b
e
a
ri
n
g
li
a
bi
lit
y
b
al
a
n
c
e
s.
Det
e
r
m
i
n
e
t
h
e
c
o
r
r
e
c
t
s
p
l
i
t
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
a
n
d
n
o
n
b
e
e
n
cur
ren
t
por
tion
.
p
r
o
p
e
r
l
y
Anal
yti
c
al
re
vi
e
w
to
d
et
er
m
in
e
th
at
fi
n
a
n
c
e
c
o
st
s
h
a
v
e
b
r
o
u
g
h
t
t
o
a
c
c
o
u
n
t
.
R
e
v
2
0
1
5
P
a
g
e
|
Town
of
1
Port 7
Hedla
nd
AUDIT
PLANN
ING
MEMO
RAND
UM
30
June
iew
lis
debt
t.
coven
ants 11
and
A
test
n
for
a
compl
l
iance
y
where
s
neces
i
sary.
s
8
Obtai
n
confirmati o
on from f
lender at
year
to y
confirm e
a
the
balances. r
R
eview
year
end
GST
recon
ciled
to
BAS
state
ment.
e
n
d
c
o
n
t
i
n
g
e
n
10 Revie t
w
the
l
contingent i
liabilities
a
b
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
i
n
c
o
m
p
a
r
i
s
o
n
w
i
t
h
p
r
i
o
r
p
e
r
i
o
d
b
a
l
a
n
c
e
s
.
12
R
evie
w
minu
tes
of
mee
tings
thro
ugh
out
the
year
to
ident
ify
undi
sclo
sed
conti
nge
nt
liabil
ities.
Financial
statement
disclosures
Financial statements
are not in accordance
with Local
Government Act 1995
and Australian
Accounting
Standards.
nt
n
ate
provi
Perform
employ c
sions
il
ee
a
records i
walkthrou
a
.
gh on the
ti
key
3
o
Overp
manag
n
ay
ement
s
me
a
control
nt
r
s over
or
e
Cash cycle
the
un
n
payroll
aut
o
1 Cash
hor
cycle.
t
and cash
ise
r
equivalen
Assess
d
e
ts
the
pa
v
adequacy
ym
2 Restr
i
ent
icted
of payroll
e
s.
cash and
w
except
cash
e
ion
4
U
equivalen
d
nders
reporti
ts
b
tatem
ng and
ent of y
control
provi
a
sions
s.
p
.
p
5
Inac r
Perform
curate o
substanti
calculatio p
ve
ri
n
of
analytical
provision a
t
s.
review.
e
Test
6
R o
adequacy
econc ff
of
iliation i
c
s are
provision
e
not
for
prepa r.
emplo
red on8
yee
a
Mis
entitleme
cycle.
nts.
Perform
walkthroug
h over cash
cycle.
Assess
Perform
the
effectiveness test of
control on
of internal
controls key
manage
operating
ment
within
controls
cash
T
o
w
n
o
f
P
o
v
e
r
c
a
s
h
outsta
nding
or
unusu
al
items.
Obtain
bank
confirmati
on as at
year
end.
Rev
iew
the
rec
onci
liati
c on
y for
c any
l
lon
e g
ort T PLANNING
Hed MEMORANDU
M
land
AUDI
30 June 2015
Page | 18
Page | 19