Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Cost to Replace
dishwasher
front door locks
ipod
bluetooth
hammer drill
reciprocating saw
iphone
screen door locks
sleepy's matress
3 laptop computers
Cost to Repair Computers from Hacking
Wet/Dry Vac
cordless phone
cable boxes and modem
Sakrete 3 bags
misc clothes
2 vapor pens
1 iphone
Total
$476.00
$400.00
$400.00
$60.00
$100.00
$100.00
$600.00
$30.00
$2,300.00
$800.00
$400.00
$65.00
$40.00
$100.00
$12.00
$100.00
$100.00
$600.00
$6,748.00
Page 1
Stan J. Caterbone Allstate Property Claim
Page 1 of 69
ADDFADDFDFAAFAADADTAAAFAFTDDFTDDAFDTDAADAADTTAFDFTADFDFAAFTDFDTAF
STAN CATERBONE
1250 FREMONT ST
LANCASTER PA 17603-6812
How to contact us
Give your Allstate Agent a call at (717) 871-1721 if you have any questions. Its our job to make sure youre in
good hands.
Sincerely,
Steven P. Sorenson
President, Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company
RP378-4
Page 2 of 69
Page 2 of 2
Policy
Declarations*
The Policy
Declarations
lists policy
details, such as
your property
details and
coverages.
Important
Notices
We use these
notices to call
attention to
particularly
important
coverages, policy
changes and
discounts.
Insurance Made
Simple
Insurance seem
complicated?
Our online
guides explain
coverage terms
and features:
www.allstate.com/
madesimple
Espanol.allstate.com
/facildeentender
* To make it easier to see where you may have gaps in your protection, weve highlighted any coverages you do not have in the
Coverage Detail section in the enclosed Policy Declarations.
Page 3 of 69
Page 1 of 4
Total Premium for the Premium Period (Your bill will be mailed separately)
Summary
$525.14
Total
$525.14
If you do not pay in full, you will be charged an installment fee(s). Refer to your bill for
installment fee information.
Named Insured(s)
Stan Caterbone
Mailing address
1250 Fremont St
Lancaster PA 17603-6812
Policy number
952 500 478
30%
18%
Protective Device
4%
Policy period
Begins on February 3, 2016 at 12:01 A.M.
standard time, with no fixed date of
expiration
Rating Information*
Please review and verify the information regarding your insured property. Please
refer to the Important Notice (X67831-1) for additional coverage information.
Contact us if you have any changes.
The dwelling is of brick construction and is occupied by 1 family
Your dwelling is 1 mile to the fire department
Dwelling Style:
Built in 1953; 1 family; 1100 sq. ft.; center row house - 2 stories
Foundation:
100% Basement (100% finished)
Interior details:
One basic kitchen
Premium period
Beginning February 3, 2016 through
February 3, 2017 at 12:01 A.M. standard
time
Your Allstate agency is
Dan Naumann Agy Inc
355R Manor Avenue
Millersville PA 17551
(717) 871-1721
DANIELNAUMANN1@ALLSTATE.COM
Some or all of the information on your
Policy Declarations is used in the rating
of your policy or it could affect your
eligibility for certain coverages. Please
notify us immediately if you believe
that any information on your Policy
Declarations is incorrect. We will make
corrections once you have notified us,
and any resulting rate adjustments, will
be made only for the current policy
period or for future policy periods.
Please also notify us immediately if you
believe any coverages are not listed or
are inaccurately listed.
PA070RBD
(continued)
Page 4 of 69
Page 2 of 4
Mortgagee
None
Limits of Liability
$140,669
Applicable Deductible(s)
$1,000 All peril
$14,067
$84,402
(continued)
Page 5 of 69
Coverage
Dwelling Protection - with Building
Structure Reimbursement Extended
Limits
Other Structures Protection
Personal Property Protection Reimbursement Provision
Additional Living Expense
Family Liability Protection
Guest Medical Protection
Building Codes
Building Materials Theft
Business Property Protection
Business Pursuits
Electronic Data Processing Equipment
Extended Coverage on Cameras
PA070RBD
Limits of Liability
Not purchased*
Applicable Deductible(s)
Not purchased*
Not purchased*
Not purchased*
Not purchased*
Not purchased*
Not purchased*
Not purchased*
Not purchased*
Not purchased*
Not purchased*
Not purchased*
Not purchased*
* This coverage can provide you with valuable protection. To help you stay current with
your insurance needs, contact your agent to discuss available coverage options and
other products and services that can help protect you.
PA070RBD
Page 6 of 69
Page 4 of 4
Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company's Secretary and President have signed this policy with legal authority at
Northbrook, Illinois.
Susan L. Lees
Secretary
Page 7 of 69
PA070RBD
Steven P. Sorenson
President
Important notices
Policy number:
Policy effective date:
Your Allstate agency is
Dwelling Profile
Allstate has determined that the estimated cost to replace
your home is: $140,669
The enclosed Policy Declarations shows the limit of liability
applicable to Dwelling ProtectionCoverage A of your
homeowners insurance policy. The estimated replacement
cost of your home is the minimum amount for which we will
insure your home.
The decision regarding the limit applicable to your Dwelling
ProtectionCoverage A is your decision to make, as long as, at
a minimum, your limit equals the estimated replacement cost
as determined by Allstate and does not exceed maximum
coverage limitations established by Allstate.
It is important to keep in mind that your Coverage A limits
reflect a replacement cost that is only an estimate based on
data that was available to us when we made this estimate (this
information is described in the Rating Information section of
your Policy Declarations). The actual amount it will cost to
replace your home cannot be known until after a covered total
loss has occurred.
Page 8 of 69
No deductibles to meet
Furs
Musical instruments
Manuscripts or books
X73168 Even if you currently have SPP coverage, its a good idea to
review it annually. Its possible that the value of your property
has changed or that youve purchased new items that have not
been added to your coverage.
Most
Page 9 of 69
Important notices
Policy number:
Policy effective date:
Your Allstate agency is
Price
Coverage
Features
Discounts
Page 10 of 69
Page 11 of 69
Privacy Statement
Policy number:
Policy effective date:
Your Allstate agency is
Page 12 of 69
Page 2 of 2
952 500 478
February 3, 2016
Dan Naumann Agy Inc
(717) 871-1721
(ed. 10/2015)
X73180v6
Page 13 of 69
Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document37
36 Filed
Filed04/15/16
04/14/16 Page
Page14
1 of
of10
69
This exhibit, is intended to help the Court understand the complexity of the PETITIONER's
obligation to provide the Court with the evidence and insight to support the PETITIONER's claims
and statements.
Steven P. Caterbone and the address of Stanley J. Caterbone is not 114 N. Old
Stonehouse Road, Harrisburg, PA.
evidence of the City of Lancaster and the Lancaster City Police Department changing the
ownership of the residence of Stanley J. Caterbone and using this to ignore the complaints of
harassment, vandalism, thefts, etc., while occupying said property.
bolster the false reports of mental illness to the Lancaster County Administrator who was required
to sign off on all of the 302 mental health warrants.
15-03984
EXHIBIT Lancaster
Fraud Claim
Stan
J. Caterbone
AllstateCity
Property
Page 114ofof
1069
Page
Thursday,
April15,
14, 2016
2016
Friday,
April
Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document37
36 Filed
Filed04/15/16
04/14/16 Page
Page15
2 of
of10
69
These documents will also provide the Court with sufficient knowledge of the PETITIONER's claim
of the value of the PETITIONER's litigation of up to $50 million dollars as stated in the U.S.
Bankruptcy Case No. 05-23059 and 16-10167. The APPELLANT does not intend to overburden the
Court with unnecessary filings, however this burden of supporting the claims and statements falls
on the shoulders of all those in the government that ignored the PETITIONER's pleas for help to
resolve these issues dating back to the days immediately following the meeting with International
Signal & Control, Plc., (ISC) Executive Larry Resch on June 23, 1987.
15-03984
EXHIBIT Lancaster
Fraud Claim
Stan
J. Caterbone
AllstateCity
Property
/S/
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se
Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance
Advanced Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
scaterbone@live.com
(717) 669-2163
Page 215ofof
1069
Page
Thursday,
April15,
14, 2016
2016
Friday,
April
Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document37
36 Filed
Filed04/15/16
04/14/16 Page
Page16
3 of
of10
69
15-03984
EXHIBIT Lancaster
Fraud Claim
Stan
J. Caterbone
AllstateCity
Property
Page 316ofof
1069
Page
Thursday,
April15,
14, 2016
2016
Friday,
April
Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document37
36 Filed
Filed04/15/16
04/14/16 Page
Page17
4 of
of10
69
15-03984
EXHIBIT Lancaster
Fraud Claim
Stan
J. Caterbone
AllstateCity
Property
Page 417ofof
1069
Page
Thursday,
April15,
14, 2016
2016
Friday,
April
Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document37
36 Filed
Filed04/15/16
04/14/16 Page
Page18
5 of
of10
69
15-03984
EXHIBIT Lancaster
Fraud Claim
Stan
J. Caterbone
AllstateCity
Property
Page 518ofof
1069
Page
Thursday,
April15,
14, 2016
2016
Friday,
April
Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document37
36 Filed
Filed04/15/16
04/14/16 Page
Page19
6 of
of10
69
15-03984
EXHIBIT Lancaster
Fraud Claim
Stan
J. Caterbone
AllstateCity
Property
Page 619ofof
1069
Page
Thursday,
April15,
14, 2016
2016
Friday,
April
Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document37
36 Filed
Filed04/15/16
04/14/16 Page
Page20
7 of
of10
69
15-03984
EXHIBIT Lancaster
Fraud Claim
Stan
J. Caterbone
AllstateCity
Property
Page 720ofof
1069
Page
Thursday,
April15,
14, 2016
2016
Friday,
April
Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document37
36 Filed
Filed04/15/16
04/14/16 Page
Page21
8 of
of10
69
15-03984
EXHIBIT Lancaster
Fraud Claim
Stan
J. Caterbone
AllstateCity
Property
Page 821ofof
1069
Page
Thursday,
April15,
14, 2016
2016
Friday,
April
Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document37
36 Filed
Filed04/15/16
04/14/16 Page
Page22
9 of
of10
69
15-03984
EXHIBIT Lancaster
Fraud Claim
Stan
J. Caterbone
AllstateCity
Property
Page 922ofof
1069
Page
Thursday,
April15,
14, 2016
2016
Friday,
April
15-03984
EXHIBIT Lancaster
Fraud Claim
Stan
J. Caterbone
AllstateCity
Property
Page
Page10
23ofof1069
Thursday,
April15,
14, 2016
2016
Friday,
April
Dear Sir;
I again need t o bring t o your at t ent ion Police m isconduct and abuse on t he part of t he
Lancast er Cit y Police Depart m ent . I asked you before in person for a m eet ing t o resolve t hese
issues and have writ t en you, but you cont inue t o ignore t hese problem s, which cont inue and are
causing m e dire problem s wit h m y Federal and St at e lit igat ion effort s. My com plaint s t o your
depart m ent fall on deaf ears, which in it self is illegal and a violat ion of m y Pennsylvania and Unit ed
St at es Const it ut ional right s. I n addit ion t here are violat ions of civil and crim inal st at ut es. These
m at t ers, if left unat t ended could lead t o physical violence.
The harassm ent and int im idat ion by your officers is not above t he rule of law, and I will hold
you and your police depart m ent account able in t he court of law when I am able. I also have m ade
several pleas wit h Mayor Rick Gray regarding t he sam e; for a civil resolut ion t o t hese issues. I had a
m eet ing wit h Mayor Rick Gray on February 6, 2007. I n t hat m eet ing t he Mayor of Lancast er Cit y
began yelling and scream ing at m e wit h no int ent but t o provoke and int im idat e m e. I did not get a
chance t o say anyt hing t o him , and he lit erally was having a nervous breakdown in front of m e
because he was filled wit h such rage. I believe he was upset at t he fact t hat I was referred t o him
by Robert Kagel and m et wit h him in 1987- 1988 regarding m y civil com plaint s and disclosed t his t o
aut horit ies.
There are several m at t ers t hat I need t o address. They are as follows:
1. Conflict s of I nt erest Chris Depat t o is an officer on t he Lancast er Cit y Police
force and his fat her, John Depat t o have a vest ed int erest in seeing t hat m y
Federal False Claim s Act ( Whist le- Blowing) lit igat ion in t he Unit ed St at es
Dist rict Court for t he East ern Dist rict of Pennsylvania regarding I nt ernat ional
Signal & Cont rol, ( I SC) be at least int errupt ed and at m ost be dism issed. John
Depat t o is m at erial in several ways.
a. John Depat t o was t he form er president of Parent Bank, owned and
operat ed by Jam es Guerin and I SC.
b. John Depat t o and Parent Bank foreclosed on m y propert y at 2323 New
Danville Pike, Conest oga in 1988; which is t he subj ect of current
lit igat ion in Federal Court s.
c. John Depat t o and Sylvia Depat t o were business associat es of m y
brot her Thom as Cat erbone and were responsible for writ ing a fraudulent
check t o m y brot her which is now m at erial t o a wrongful deat h
Page 24 of 69
Page 1 of 3
Page 25 of 69
Page 2 of 3
I would ask t hat you forward t his t o your solicit or and your int ernal affairs depart m ent for a
t horough review and invest igat ion.
Respect fully,
Page 26 of 69
Page 3 of 3
Page 27 of 69
Mediation in May of 2008. Keith Sadler communicated to the Lancaster Mediation Center on May
8, 2008 that he would not cooperate and mediate with CATERBONE.
7. On several occasions in 2007 several police officers of the Lancaster City Bureau of Police
instructed CATERBONE, in person upon responding to complaints, not to call 911 or the Lancaster
City Police Department and that the Lancaster City Bureau of Police would not respond or take
complaints.
8. The Lancaster City Bureau of Police only took one (1) incident of gas siphoned and stolen from
CATERBONEs 1991 Dodge pickup truck, and refused to take the over 50 (from December 20,
2007 to present), or so other incidents as a complaint, regardless of the efforts to have Lancaster
City Mayor Rick Grey and the Lancaster City Solicitor to look into the allegations and complaints.
CATERBONE had meticulously documented the incidents in a journal and a log of gas receipts,
photographs, and odometer miles for all of the incidents. CATERBONE also made a thorough and
documented calibration of his 1991 Dodge Dakota Pick-Up truck with logs of mileage and times
and dates of gas purchases in a report to prove the gas was stolen. Lancaster City Police Bureau
Officer Cosmore returned the report with such words as counterfeit, fake, written on it and had
the audacity to ask CATERBONE if he had a certification of the gas pumps that were listed on
gas receipts. There were some days when the gas was stolen 2 or more times. CATERBONE
alleges that perpetrators were using a kerosene battery operated siphon, or like kind, to siphon
the gas from the gas tank.
9. The Lancaster City Bureau of Police had responded to approximately 10 or so 911 calls in the
last eighteen (18) months to 1250 Fremont Street, residence of CATERBONE, for complaints of
property damage; stolen property, missing legal and business files and evidence for litigation;
computer and electronic hacking with deleted electronic files; harassment; terrorist threats,
stalking, stolen mail, etc.,.
10. CATERBONE had complained of abuse of process to state and federal law enforcement
regarding the situation, including U.S. Senator Arlen Specters office. CATERBONE had also visited
the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in both Harrisburg and Philadelphia for help and
intervention.
11. CATERBONE also had personal meetings with Lancaster City Mayor Rick Gray in Lancaster City
Hall on at least 4 occasions to find a solution to the problems and for help to mediate the
problems and or resolve the conflicts. The resulting pain and suffering, as well as loss and
destruction of property and financial loss that CATERBONE was undergoing was unprecedented.
12. In November of 2007, CATERBONE and the Advanced Media Group went public with their
Downtown Lancaster investments and business plans that were culminated over the past 9 years.
The Advanced Media Group also formerly and publicly introduced their Downtown Lancaster Action
Plan via handouts, websites, and blogs; and began meetings and negotiations with major
stakeholders, City of Lancaster Public Officials, Developers, and investors.
13. In 1997 CATERBONE had solicited Attorney Christina Rainville of Philadelphia and pro bono
attorney for Lisa Michelle Lambert in the Laurie Show murder case. The murder trials and appeals
of the Lambert case demonized Ms. Christina Rainville and U.S. District Court Judge Stewart
Dalzell. After CATERBONE submitted documents and audio recordings, Ms. Christina Rainville had
communicated with CATERBONE that she was not able to take his case due to the fact that her
Philadelphia law firm had banned her from taking on any more Lancaster County residents,
despite the fact that many more sought her legal counsel. On December 31, 1997, CATERBONE
had also personally delivered a CD-ROM to the chambers of U.S. District Court Judge Stewart
Dalzell in an effort to bring attention to his case. In May of 1998 CATERBONE submitted an
AFFADAVIT to the law firm of Schneider and Harrison outlining the prosecutorial misconduct or
Finding of Facts of the 1987 cover-up for Ms. Christina Rainville. CATERBONE alleges that these
facts were part of the attitude and the motives for the law enforcement-at-large of Lancaster
County and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to ignore the rule of law and procedure in order to
bring these false arrests and malicious prosecutions. The Lancaster County community-at-large
had the same attitude toward CATERBONE. The Lambert case received national notoriety when
Page 28 of 69
U.S. District Judge Stuart Dalzell freed Lambert on a Habeus Corpus appeal hearing citing she was
actually innocent beyond a reasonable doubt. Judge Dalzell was quoted in chambers as saying,
"I can tell you, Mr. Madenspacher, that I've thought about nothing else but this case for over three
weeks, and in my experience, sir, and I invite you to disabuse me of this at oral argument, I want
you and I want the Schnader firm to look for any case in any jurisdiction in the English-speaking
world where there has been as much prosecutorial misconduct, because I haven't found it. The
case was covered by a 3 part series in the Los Angeles Times by writer Barry Seigel on November
10, 1997 and a television episode on the A&E Network American Justice Series. The Lancaster
community gathered over 10,000 signatures on a petition to impeach U.S. District Judge Stewart
Dalzell for his rulings. In the end, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania took control of the case and
appealed the ruling that freed Lambert sending her back to prison. The case went all the way to
the U.S. Supreme Court in 2005, after being denied any review. The case accentuated the rights
of Federal Law vs. State Law and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania solicited a team of attorney
generals from across the nation to help their cause. CATERBONE attended a hearing before former
Lancaster County Court Common Pleas Judge Larry Stengel in the Lancaster County Court of
Common Pleas. To this day, due to his knowledge and experience with the Lancaster County
Judicial System and Law Enforcement, and his own dire civil complaints, CATERBONE believes that
the over zealous prosecution proves that prosecutorial misconduct was never thoroughly
investigated or prosecuted in the Lambert case. CATERBONE will not let that happen in his cases.
CAUSES OF ACTION
14. On or about April 14, 2008 1999 HP Notebook n5150 laptop was rendered useless by an
intruder shorting the power cord. This was the third computer rendered useless since November of
2007, and the last computer available for use in the home and office. Other incidents were
happening while at 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, PA since 1997. The only computer available
for use was the public computer at the Lancaster County Library on North Duke Street in
downtown Lancaster.
15. On March 18, 2008 CATERBONE went to the Hotel Brunswick in Downtown Lancaster to
continue take measurements of the Movie Theater for his continued efforts of a business and
development plan. (The Brunswick Movie Theater, or Eric, had been closed since 1995.
CATERBONE and Advanced Media Group had an agreement with the Owner of the Brunswick,
Hamid Zahedi, to make a formal proposal and offer for leasing the site. CATERBONE had begun
discussions in 2006.) On March 18, 2008 CATERBONE noticed that the United States Department
of Justice Office of Trustee was conducting hearings for Chapter 11 petitioners in the Presidential
Room of the Hotel Brunswick. CATERBONE had not received ORDERS from his United States Third
Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 08-3054 for his appeal of an issue in his Chapter 11 Case No.
05-23059. CATERBONE alleged that the ORDERS were stolen or never mailed from the clerk of
courts. CATERBONE thought maybe Dave Adams, the trustee for the United States Department of
Justice Office of Trustee might be conducting the hearings. The following day CATERBONE received
a disturbing email from Mr. Barry A. Solodky, Esquire, of Blakinger, Byler & Thomas, P.C., 28 Penn
Square, Lancaster, PA 17603. CATERBONE had known Mr. Solodky since the 1980s and had even
solicited him to review his bankruptcy matters before the Appllent filed his Chapter 11 case on
May 23, 2005. The following email exchanges detail the incident and the false reports and
allegations from a member of Blakinger, Byler & Thomas, P.C.:
Page 29 of 69
1 of 2
https://ecf.paed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?490294791050398-L_1_0-1
Plaintiff
STANLEY J. CATERBONE
Plaintiff
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
V.
Defendant
LANCASTER CITY POLICE BUREAU
Defendant
SECTOR 9 OF THE LANCASTER CITY
BUREAU OF POLICE
Defendant
KEITH SADDLER
LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE
CHIEF
Defendant
RICK GRAY
LANCASTER CITY MAYOR
Defendant
CITY OF LANCASTER
Page 30 of 69
2 of 2
https://ecf.paed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?490294791050398-L_1_0-1
# Docket Text
06/18/2008
07/11/2008
07/11/2008
07/22/2008
07/25/2008
09/25/2008
10/10/2008
Description:
Docket Report
Search
Criteria:
2:08-cv02982-MAM
Billable
Pages:
Cost:
0.10
Page 31 of 69
Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
2:08-cv-02982-MAMDocument
Document
373 Filed
Filed04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
Page32
1 of
of33
69
Page 32 of 69
Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
2:08-cv-02982-MAMDocument
Document
373 Filed
Filed04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
Page33
2 of
of33
69
Page 33 of 69
Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
2:08-cv-02982-MAMDocument
Document
373 Filed
Filed04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
Page34
3 of
of33
69
Page 34 of 69
Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
2:08-cv-02982-MAMDocument
Document
373 Filed
Filed04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
Page35
4 of
of33
69
Page 35 of 69
Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
2:08-cv-02982-MAMDocument
Document
373 Filed
Filed04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
Page36
5 of
of33
69
Page 36 of 69
Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
2:08-cv-02982-MAMDocument
Document
373 Filed
Filed04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
Page37
6 of
of33
69
Page 37 of 69
Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
2:08-cv-02982-MAMDocument
Document
373 Filed
Filed04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
Page38
7 of
of33
69
Page 38 of 69
Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
2:08-cv-02982-MAMDocument
Document
373 Filed
Filed04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
Page39
8 of
of33
69
Page 39 of 69
Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
2:08-cv-02982-MAMDocument
Document
373 Filed
Filed04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
Page40
9 of
of33
69
Page 40 of 69
Case 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document37
3 Filed 04/15/16
07/11/08 Page 41
10 of 69
33
Page 41 of 69
Case 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document37
3 Filed 04/15/16
07/11/08 Page 42
11 of 69
33
Page 42 of 69
Case 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document37
3 Filed 04/15/16
07/11/08 Page 43
12 of 69
33
Page 43 of 69
Case 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document37
3 Filed 04/15/16
07/11/08 Page 44
13 of 69
33
Page 44 of 69
Case 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document37
3 Filed 04/15/16
07/11/08 Page 45
14 of 69
33
Page 45 of 69
Case 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document37
3 Filed 04/15/16
07/11/08 Page 46
15 of 69
33
Page 46 of 69
Case 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document37
3 Filed 04/15/16
07/11/08 Page 47
16 of 69
33
Page 47 of 69
Case 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document37
3 Filed 04/15/16
07/11/08 Page 48
17 of 69
33
Page 48 of 69
Case 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document37
3 Filed 04/15/16
07/11/08 Page 49
18 of 69
33
Page 49 of 69
Case 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document37
3 Filed 04/15/16
07/11/08 Page 50
19 of 69
33
Page 50 of 69
Case 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document37
3 Filed 04/15/16
07/11/08 Page 51
20 of 69
33
Page 51 of 69
Case 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document37
3 Filed 04/15/16
07/11/08 Page 52
21 of 69
33
Page 52 of 69
Case 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document37
3 Filed 04/15/16
07/11/08 Page 53
22 of 69
33
Page 53 of 69
Case 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document37
3 Filed 04/15/16
07/11/08 Page 54
23 of 69
33
Page 54 of 69
Case 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document37
3 Filed 04/15/16
07/11/08 Page 55
24 of 69
33
Page 55 of 69
Case 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document37
3 Filed 04/15/16
07/11/08 Page 56
25 of 69
33
Page 56 of 69
Case 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document37
3 Filed 04/15/16
07/11/08 Page 57
26 of 69
33
Page 57 of 69
Case 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document37
3 Filed 04/15/16
07/11/08 Page 58
27 of 69
33
Page 58 of 69
Case 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document37
3 Filed 04/15/16
07/11/08 Page 59
28 of 69
33
Page 59 of 69
Case 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document37
3 Filed 04/15/16
07/11/08 Page 60
29 of 69
33
Page 60 of 69
Case 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document37
3 Filed 04/15/16
07/11/08 Page 61
30 of 69
33
Page 61 of 69
Case 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document37
3 Filed 04/15/16
07/11/08 Page 62
31 of 69
33
Page 62 of 69
Case 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document37
3 Filed 04/15/16
07/11/08 Page 63
32 of 69
33
Page 63 of 69
Case 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document37
3 Filed 04/15/16
07/11/08 Page 64
33 of 69
33
Page 64 of 69
Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
2:08-cv-02982-MAMDocument
Document
377 Filed
Filed04/15/16
10/10/08 Page
Page65
1 of 69
1
:
:
:
:
LANCASTER CITY POLICE BUREAU, et al.:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 08-2982
O R D E R
AND NOW, this
GRANTED; and
(2)
Page 65 of 69
1 of 4
http://www.justice.gov/crt/split/documents/polmis.php
En Espaol
Main Page
AAG Thomas E. Perez
About Us
Section Sites
FOIA
Press Releases
Speeches & Testimony
Frequently Asked Questions
Special Topics
Post 9/11 Backlash
H1N1 Response
ADA
FACE
Cases & Briefs
Recruitment & Employment
Contact Us
Go to the
Department of Justice
Privacy Act Statement
The vast majority of the law enforcement officers in this country perform their very difficult jobs with
respect for their communities and in compliance with the law. Even so, there are incidents in which this is
not the case. This document outlines the laws enforced by the United States Department of Justice (DOJ)
that address police misconduct and explains how you can file a complaint with DOJ if you believe that
your rights have been violated.
Federal laws that address police misconduct include both criminal and civil statutes. These laws cover
the actions of State, county, and local officers, including those who work in prisons and jails. In addition,
several laws also apply to Federal law enforcement officers. The laws protect all persons in the United
States (citizens and non-citizens).
Each law DOJ enforces is briefly discussed below. In DOJ investigations, whether criminal or civil, the
person whose rights have been reportedly violated is referred to as a victim and often is an important
witness. DOJ generally will inform the victim of the results of the investigation, but we do not act as the
victim's lawyer and cannot give legal advice as a private attorney could.
The various offices within DOJ that are responsible for enforcing the laws discussed in this document
coordinate their investigation and enforcement efforts where appropriate. For example, a complaint
received by one office may be referred to another if necessary to address the allegations. In addition,
more than one office may investigate the same complaint if the allegations raise issues covered by more
than one statute.
What is the difference between criminal and civil cases?
Hints...
Feedback Form
Criminal and civil laws are different. Criminal cases usually are investigated and handled separately from
civil cases, even if they concern the same incident. In a criminal case, DOJ brings a case against the
accused person; in a civil case, DOJ brings the case (either through litigation or an administrative
investigation) against a governmental authority or law enforcement agency. In a criminal case, the
evidence must establish proof "beyond a reasonable doubt," while in civil cases the proof need only
satisfy the lower standard of a "preponderance of the evidence." Finally, in criminal cases, DOJ seeks to
punish a wrongdoer for past misconduct through imprisonment or other sanction. In civil cases, DOJ
seeks to correct a law enforcement agency's policies and practices that fostered the misconduct and,
where appropriate, may require individual relief for the victim(s).
Page 66 of 69
11/23/2009 5:17 AM
2 of 4
http://www.justice.gov/crt/split/documents/polmis.php
Page 67 of 69
11/23/2009 5:17 AM
3 of 4
http://www.justice.gov/crt/split/documents/polmis.php
Page 68 of 69
11/23/2009 5:17 AM
4 of 4
http://www.justice.gov/crt/split/documents/polmis.php
Page 69 of 69
11/23/2009 5:17 AM