Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Did you watch the Week 2 lectures? Promise? Ok, start reading.
Quick mindset recap:
Teachers with growth mindsets are more coachable because they are
more willing and able to accept feedback. They seek out feedback and
are unafraid to process it because it enables them to be better. They can
separate out description of their ineffective practice from commentary
on who they are as a person.
People with a fixed mindset, on the other hand, have trouble
separating self-identity from their performance, which means they tend
to react badly to feedback and failure.
A fixed mindset leads teachers to avoid getting feedback and gathering
data on their teaching because of the emotional risk it poses to them.
Less feedback and less data means a less effective teacher.
The Four Horsemen of Fixed Mindset
In our experience, teachers with fixed mindsets
about their own teaching react to critical
feedback in one of four poor ways. We call
these ways the Four Horsemen of Fixed Mindset.
1. You're right, I suck. Teachers who give some form of this
response beat themselves up and take critical feedback as
commentary on themselves, rather than on their teaching
performance. Any constructive criticism is a major event, and
even the most well-intentioned feedback cuts and stings.
2. You're wrong, I rule. In which teachers dispute the feedback as
inaccurate, becoming defensive, and insisting on separate
narrative of what happened...one which doesn't pose a threat to
their self-image.
3. Blame it on the Rain In this case, teachers dismiss the feedback by
blaming external factors for their own performance. i.e., The kids
were in a weird mood today, Fractions are boring, etc. Like
Before we get into how to deal with fixed mindset, we should talk a little
bit more about each of the four ways that teachers can poorly read data
on themselves and their teachingheres a brief rundown.
The first two, Youre Right I Suck and Youre Wrong I Rule, come from a
very similar place. In both cases, people who do these read any piece of
data on themselves as being Personal (Its my fault), Pervasive (This is
me in a microcosm), and Permanent (Theres nothing to be done about
it). The difference between the two behaviors is that people who go to
Youre Wrong I Rule have built up some nice defensive mechanisms
that outwardly deny the validity of the data, while internally feeling the
sting. If it didnt hurtif it wasnt dangerousthe data wouldnt
engender such powerful responses.
While those two horsemen are defined by giving the data too much
power, the next two are united by the way in which they dont give the
data enough. With both Blame it On The Rain and Optimist Without a
Cause, the data never makes its way in. In both cases, it gets dismissed
a priori to the teacher having to ever really grapple with it as being
useful or valid to their practice. This happens in two different ways.
make good use of the feedback that you do hear. Save your coaching
analysis for the Zoomwe want it, but thats where it belongs.
Instead, remind yourself about how skilled they arehow much they
have to impart. If you can actively think of them as an expert resource,
it becomes much harder to block them out.
Video Analysis
Horseman What does it look/sound
like?
Personal Connections?
Youre
Right I
Suck
Youre
Wrong I
Rule
Blame It
On the
Rain
Optimist
Without a
Cause
Horseman
Growth Mindset/Agency
Blame It On
the Rain
10
Horseman
Growth Mindset/Agency
11