Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Introduction
Experimental
386
can be reached after 30 min. The aqueous samples were taken
from the outlet of the liquid phase at preset time intervals. The
double indicator titration method [10] was used to determine
the concentration of solute (CO2) or bivalent ion (CO32) in
the outlet of the liquid phase. Therefore, the overall mass
transfer coefficient can be written as follows
KL =
DC = PxH Fig. 1 Schematic diagram of experimental setup
1: CO2 cylinder; 2: depressed valve; 3: adjustive valve; 4: four
way valve; 5: liquid seal tank; 6: U-pressure metre; 7: pump;
8: membrane module; 9: tank of absorbent; 10: stock liquid tank;
11: clip
Table 1 Parameters of membranes
No
1#
2#
3#
4#
5#
6#
7#
8#
Material
PTFE
PTFE
PTFE
PTFE
PP
PP
PP
PP
Thickness of membrane /m
6
4.15x10
2.10x106
1.15x106
1.04x106
5.20x104
5.20x104
5.20x104
1.52x103
LxCout
ADC
Cout
(De-ionized water as absorbent)
2
(1a)
(1b)
Porosity /%
45.0
73.0
93.0
51.0
1.5
11.5
39.8
13.8
Note: PTFE membrane was provided by the Soldier Center of the Quartermaster Research Institute of the General Logistics Department of PLA,
PP membrane was prepared by authors (being boring by laser).
387
under various membrane micro shapes conditions were
investigated.
3.1
388
the pores was set as d. The thicnness of mass transfer boundary layer near the membrane surface was set as l, which
reflected the diffusion distance of the solute in absorbent. The
diffusion of solute in mass transfer boundry layer was mainly
molecular diffusion. In the case of l>d, the concentration
profile of the solute could cover the whole membrane surface
as shown in Fig. 7(a), here the effect of the membrane surface
porosity on mass transfer is small. In the case of l<d, the
concentration profile of the solute could not cover the whole
membrane surface as shown in Fig. 7(b), here the porosity has
a large influence on the membrane absorption process.
When the velocity of liquid phase is increased, the flowing
boundry layer became thin, which resultes in the mass transfer boundry layer, l, small. When the case of l>d changes to
the case of l<d, the influence of porosity on the mass transfer
become more obvious. Thus, in oder to study the influence
of porosity on mass transfer, the liquid phase flow rate was
increased. As shown in Fig. 8, it is indicated that the mass
transfer coefficient increases with increasing porosity when
the liquid phase flow rate at 0.003 m s1. It is because that the
mass transfer boundary layer became smaller with increased
liquid phase flow rate. From the discussion memtioned above,
here the mass transfer area was not the full membrane surface
area, and it is related with porosity of membrane. The higher
porosity leads to higher mass transfer coefficient. The comparison of calculated thickness of boundary layer based on
Prandt boundary layer theory and half pore interval of the PP
membrane is shown in Table 2. With the absorbent flow rate
at 0.002 m s1, it is the case of l>d; with the absorbent flow
rate at 0.003 m s1, it is the case of l<d. Thus the porosity
will influence the the mass transfer.
3.4 Influence of porosity on mass transfer with
0.1 mol L1 NaOH solution as absorbent
When 0.1 mol L1 NaOH solution is used as absorbent, CO2
is converted rapidly and almost had no diffusion on the liquid
phase due to the enhancement effect of chemical reaction,
thereby l tends to be 0. According to the description above,
the porosity should have a large influence on the membrane
absorption process. The results of membrane absorption
experiments with 0.1 mol L1 NaOH solution as absorbent
are shown in Fig. 8. Combining Fig. 6 and the discussion
above, the porosity almost has no influence on the mass transfer coefficient for PP and PTFE membranes, when de-ionized
water is used as absorbent and the liquid phase flow rate
was at 0.002 m s1. However, when 0.1 mol L1 NaOH is
Fig. 7 Schematic of the solute diffusing on the membrane surface of liquid side
389
Fig. 8 Influence of porosity on mass transfer with 0.1 mol L1 NaOH solution as absorbent
Table 2 Comparison between the thickness of boundary layer of concentration and the pore interval of PP membrane, when de-ionized water
is absorbing
Velocity
/ (m s1)
0.002
0.003
Boundary layer
of concentration
/ (l m1)
4.1x104
1.2x104
6#
7#
3.4x104
2.7x104
1.5x104
Conclusions
KL
L
P
uL
References
1. Zhang Q, Cussler E L. Microporous hollow fibers for gas absorption. I. Mass transfer in the liquid. J Membr Sci, 1985, 23(2):
321329
2. Zhang Q, Cussler E L. Hollow fiber gas membranes. AIChE J,
1985, 31(9): 1,5481,553
3. Karoor S, Sirkar K K. Gas absorption studies in microporous
hollow fiber membrane modules. Ind Eng Chem Res, 1993, 32(4):
674684
4. Gao J, Zhang W D, Chen S, Zhang Z T. The influence of chemical
reaction on mass transfer behavior in the membrane absorption
process. Sep Sci & Tech, 2005, 40(61): 227231
5. Zhang W D, Gao J, Shi J F. The study on concentration polarization of membrane absorption process. The Chinese Journal of
Process Engineering, 2003, 4(3): 308312 (in Chinese)
6. Kreulrn B H, Smolders C A, Versteeg G F, van Swaaij W P M.
Microporous hollow fiber membrane modules as gas-liquid
contactors. Part I. Physical mass transfer processes. A specific
application: Mass transfer in highly viscous liquids. J Membr Sci,
1993, 78(1): 197105
7. Kim Y S, Yang S M. Absorption of carbon dioxide through hollow
fiber membranes using various aqueous absorbents. Sep Purif &
Tech, 2000, 21(1): 101113
8. Baudot A, Floury J, Smorenburg H E. Liquid-liquid extraction of
aroma compounds with hollow fiber contactor. AIChE J, 2001,
47(8): 1,7801,791
9. Huseni A, Rangwala. Absorption of carbon dioxide into aqueous
solutions using hollow fiber membrane contactors. J Membr Sci,
1996, 112(2): 229240
10. Seate Environmental Protection Administration of China. The
Monitoring and Analytical Method of Water and Watste Water
(The 4th Edition). Bejing: China Environmental Science Press,
2002 (in Chinese)
11. Gao J, Zhang W D, Zhang Z T, Ren Z Q. The influence of
membrane micro-structure on membrane absorption process.
Asian International Conference on Advanced Materials. 2005, 11:
167173
12. Zhang X L, Zhang Z T, Zhang W D. Porous membrane porosity
gas absorption mass transfer mathematical model. J Chem Eng of
Chinese Univ. 2005, 19(4): 427432 (in Chinese)