Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
189
Key words: benthic assemblages, biogeographic comparison, diversity, macrobenthos, spatial distribution, species
richness, tidal flat, tropics
Abstract
Tidal flats extend seaward from mangrove forests along many tropical coastlines. This contribution compiles the
current knowledge on tropical tidal flats with regard to species richness, abundance, spatial distribution patterns
and ecological roles taken by major organisms. Tidal flats encompass a variety of soft-sediment habitats which are
inhabited by a species-rich fauna. Species numbers are generally higher than in temperate tidal flats, but vary widely
between tropical sites where they have not yet been fully assessed due to lack of research and taxonomic problems.
The assessment of biodiversity is further complicated by a low species frequency, the small size of macroinfaunal
organisms and variations in the occurrence of species between sites. Mean abundance ranges from 10002000
individuals m2 , although figures ten times higher have been recorded in a mudflat in Costa Rica, and there
are great variations in general. Individual densities of small-sized macrofauna are about ten times higher than for
larger macrobenthos. A generalized zonation scheme for intertidal distribution patterns of tropical tidal flat fauna is
presented. The comparison shows that the occurrence of macrofauna and especially of ecosystem engineers varies
between sites, which can in turn explain the great variability in species abundance patterns recorded in benthic
surveys of tidal flats within and between regions. This review revealed similarities as well as differences between
various tropical tidal flats, which underlines the need for further comparative studies to be done, using the same
methodology, before generalizations can be made.
Introduction
190
1962; Day, 1974; Warwick and Rushwayuni, 1987;
Reise, 1991; Dittmann, 1995; Michaelis and Wolff,
2001). Spatial distribution patterns in relation to intertidal gradients are known from temperate and tropical
locations (Beukema, 1976; Whitlatch, 1977; Dankers
and Beukema, 1983; Ricciardi and Bourget, 1999;
Dittmann, 2000) and I will compile a generalized
zonation scheme for tropical tidal flat fauna. As it
has been proposed that structural and functional similarities between benthic assemblages originate either
from closely related species occupying similar niches
or unrelated species performing analogue ecological
functions (Reise, 1991; Vargas, 1996), I will compare
the occurrence of burrowing species between various
tropical tidal flat locations.
In the literature surveyed, the sampling procedures
varied with regard to the size of the corer, sampling
depth and sieve size used as well as the subsequent
treatment of samples. Some sites were studied only
once while other studies were more encompassing.
The studies also varied in their approach (e.g. being quantitative or qualitative) and the presentation
of data. The comparison is restricted to macrofauna
and only records from intertidal sand- to mudflats are
compiled here, leaving out beaches, seagrass beds and
mangrove forests.
Species richness
Diversity increases towards the tropics in many marine habitats (Thorson, 1957; Sanders, 1968; Ormond
et al., 1997). Does this trend apply to tidal flats as
well? Alongi (1989, 1990) and Vargas (1996) deny an
increase in diversity towards the tropics, while other
studies revealed higher species numbers at lower latitudes (Macnae and Kalk, 1962; Day, 1974; Reise,
1991; Dittmann, 1995; Michaelis and Wolff, 2001).
Table 1 compiles records of species numbers from
temperate and tropical tidal flats. In general, species
richness is higher in the tropical locations, but species numbers vary greatly within the tropics with some
sites having lower values comparable to temperate
locations and several other sites yielding very high
records. Thereby both high and low species numbers
occur within biogeographic regions.
However, this comparison remains tentative until
the species stock of tropical tidal flats has been fully
assessed. At most sites only selected taxa were treated
to species level because of taxonomic problems. Surveys are often incomplete and species-area curves in-
Abundances
Lower abundances in tropical versus temperate tidal
flats were shown in a comparison by Reise (1991).
Yet, how great is the variation within tropical tidal
flats? Mean values from various tropical locations
range from around 10002000 indivduals m2 for
macrofauna, despite far higher records from a mudflat in Costa Rica, and variations are high (Table 2).
The use of smaller sieve sizes increases individual
densities. For example, 712 times as many mesothan macrofaunal organisms were found at two sites
in north-eastern Australia (Table 2, Dittmann, 1995).
Still, compared to several hundred thousand individuals m2 in temperate tidal flats, the lower values from
tropical locations compiled here confirm the finding of
Reise (1991).
Based on quantitative benthic surveys, the rank order of abundance of macrobenthic organisms can be
compared between several tropical tidal flats. Table 3
presents the five most abundant species from tidal flats
in West Africa, Australia and Central America and reveals a great variation among benthic assemblages, as
each tidal flat has a distinct set of common taxa.
191
Table 1. Total numbers of macrozoobenthic species reported from tidal sand- and mudflats around the world. Sandy
beaches or sites within mangrove forests were not considered for this comparison. Methods differed in the cited
studies and mesh sizes of the sieves used are provided.
Location
Species number
78
82
74
43
1 mm
0.75 mm
1.5 mm
0.25, 0.5, 1 mm
132
465
292
118
51
92
140
112
114
161
202
96
76
108
77
0.6 mm
Handpicking, sieving
Handpicking, sieving (1 mm)
0.25, 0.5 mm
Handpicking
Handpicking
Handpicking, sieving (1, 1.5, 5 mm)
1, 2 mm
1 mm
1 mm
0.25, 1 mm
0.25, 0.5, 1 mm
0.5 mm
0.5 mm
0.5 mm
1) Michaelis and Wolff (2001), 2) Sanders et al. (1962), 3) Johnson (1970), 4) Reise (1991), 5) Macnae and Kalk
(1962), 6) Day (1974), 7) Sasekumar (1974), 8) Berry (1964), 9) Vohra (1971), 10) Wells (1983), 11) Piersma et al.
(unpubl.), 12) Pepping et al. (1999), 13) Dittmann (in press), 14) Dittmann (1995), 15) Molina and Vargas (1994),
16) Vargas (1987, unpubl.), 17) Acheampong (2001).
mean
min
max
1405
992
1287
1363
1919
14798
152
356
40
57
57
6345
5635
4186
16280
8531
29548
25421
16080
14140
0
0
59000
59000
192
Table 3. The five most abundant benthic species (retained on 0.5 or 1 mm sieve) according to a rank order of abundance in various tropical tidal
flats. A = Amphipoda, B = Bivalvia, Br = Brachiopoda, C = Cumacea, D = Decapoda, G = Gastropoda, O = Ophiurida, Os = Ostracoda, P =
Polychaeta.
rank
Banc dArguin,
Mauritania 1)
Roebuck Bay,
Australia 2)
Hinchinbrook
Channel,
Australia 3)
Haughton
estuary,
Australia 4)
Estero de
Jaltepeque,
El Salvador 5)
Punta
Morales,
Costa Rica 6)
1.
Capitella
capitata (P)
Euclymene oerstedii
(P)
Naineris laevigata
(P)
Chaetopteridae
indet. (P)
Oweniidae indet.
(P)
Amphiuridae indet.
(O)
Theodoxus
oualaniensis (G)
Cerithium cf.
coralium (G)
Amygdalum
glaberrima (B)
Dasybranchus
lumbricoides (P)
Cumacea indet.
(C)
Acesta lopezi
(P)
Coricuma
nicoyensis (C)
Mediomastus
californiensis (P)
Paraprionospio
pinnata (P)
Loripes lacteus
(B)
Hydrobia ulvae
(G)
Anodontia cf.
omissa (B)
Glyceridae indet.
(P)
Lingula antina
(Br)
Pitar coxeni (B)
Tellina australis
(B)
Gammaridae
indet. (A)
Armandia
secundariopapillata (P)
Haustoriidae indet.
(A)
Barantolla sp. (P)
Haploscoloplos
elongatus (P)
Sigambra
ocellata (P)
Cyprideis pacifica
(Os)
Pinnixia valerii
(D)
2.
3.
4.
5
1) Wolff et al. (1993), 2) Pepping et al. (1999), 3) Dittmann (in press), 4) Dittmann (2000 and unpubl.), 5) Molina and Vargas (1984), 6) Vargas
(1987).
Ecological roles
Many of the taxa named in the above zonation scheme
modify the substrate or nutrients in such a way that
they become more or less suitable for other species,
and can thus be classified as ecosystem engineers
sensu Jones et al. (1994). In tidal flats, where promotive interactions are known to play an important
role (Reise, 1985), these are common and important
species interactions structuring or regulating benthic
assemblages. In tropical tidal flats, such promotive interactions were described by Macnae and Kalk (1962),
Morton and Morton (1983) and Dittmann (1996).
Burrows of macrobenthic organisms do not only
provide accommodation for smaller infauna, the burrowing activities are often also important for sediment
193
Table 4. Occurrence of several burrow-building benthic taxa in tidal flats at various tropical locations. This list is not complete and gives
only major burrowing organisms. If taxa were not recorded on species or genus level, their occurrence is indicated at a higher taxonomic
level.
Taxa
Crustacea
Uca
Dotilla
Scopimera
Macrophthalmus
Callianassidae
Squilla
Sipunculida
Sipunculus
Siphonosoma
Phascolosoma
Holothuroidea
Echiurida
Brachiopoda
Lingula
Glottidia
Enteropneusta
Saccoglossus
Balanoglossus
Ptychodera
Glossobalanus
Banc
Inhaca
Roebuck Anna
Bor4)
5)
Kong6) Bay7)
Punta
estuary10) Morales11)
Hinchinbrook Haughton
Plains8) Channel9)
1) Mauritania, Wolff et al. (1993), 2) Mozambique, Macnae and Kalk (1962), 3) Mozambique, Day (1974), 4) Thailand, Frith et al.
(1976), Reise (1991), 5) Vohra (1971), 6) Morton and Morton (1983), 7) Pepping et al. (1999) 8) Piersma et al. (1999), 9) Dittmann
(1995, in press and unpubl.), 10) Dittmann (1995, 2000 and unpubl.), 11) Vargas (1987 and unpubl.).
destabilisation, bioturbation and benthic-pelagic coupling. Taking burrowers as an example for an ecological role, the occurrence of burrowing taxa in tropical
tidal flats has been compiled in Table 4. Because of
taxonomic uncertainties, this comparison is not carried
out on a species level. As Table 4 shows, similar taxa
occur at various sites and certain genera are especially
widely distributed in the Indo-West Pacific. Each site
has a site-specific mix of burrowers. At some sites like
Inhaca Island, a great many burrow-building species
co-exist, including closely-related taxa.
The presence or absence of species or taxa
with certain ecological functions can result in sitespecific variations in processes structuring or regulating benthic assemblages. I hypothesize that a greater
habitat diversity in tropical tidal flats determines sitespecific occurrences of ecosystem engineers, which
accounts for the greater variation in benthic assemblages between tropical tidal flats (Dittmann and
Vargas, 2001). A comparison of taxa responsible for
certain ecological roles in tidal flats of northern Australia and Central America revealed that mainly related taxa fill similar ecological niches (Dittmann and
Vargas, 2001).
Conclusions
This literature survey was set out to assess possible
variations in benthic assemblages of tropical tidal flats
to facilitate future global comparisons. The analysis
shows that most tropical tidal flats are rich in species
and low in individual abundances. Species occurrence
appears to be site-specific, in spite of similarities in
spatial distribution patterns, especially in the IndoWest Pacific. Site-specific idiosyncrasies in the presence or absence of certain ecosystem engineers can
account for variations in benthic assemblages between
sites. Therefore, processes structuring and regulating benthic assemblages can vary between tropical
tidal flats. Such singularities have applied implica-
194
tions, as they complicate generalizations for impact
assessments. Using the same methodology, further
biogeographic comparisons of intertidal assemblages
should be carried out in the future.
Acknowledgements
I thank the organizers of the MMM conference for an
inspiring meeting and the opportunity to see tidal flats
on the coast of Kenya.
References
Acheampong, E. 2001. Distribution of Macrozoobenthos Abundance and Biomass in Intertidal Soft Sediments of North-East
Brazil. MSc-Thesis, University of Bremen, Germany.
Alongi, D.M. 1989. Ecology of tropical soft-bottom benthos: a review with emphasis on emerging concepts. Revista de Biologia
Tropical 37: 85100.
Alongi, D.M. 1990. The ecology of tropical soft-bottom benthic
ecosystems. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol., Ann. Rev. 28: 381496.
Berry, A.J. 1964. The natural history of the shore fauna of North
Penang. Malayan Nat. J. 18: 81103.
Beukema, J.J. 1976. Biomass and species richness of the macrobenthic animals living on the tidal flats of the Dutch Wadden
Sea. Neth. J. Sea Res. 10: 236261.
Dankers, N. and Beukema, J.J. 1983. Distributional patterns of macrozoobenthic species in relation to some environmental factors.
In: Wolff, W.J. (ed.), Ecology of the Wadden Sea. Vol. 1. pp.
69103. Balkema, Rotterdam.
Day, J.H. 1974. The ecology of Morrumbene estuary, Moambique.
Trans. Royal Soc. South Afr. 41: 4397.
Dittmann, S. 1995. Benthos structure on tropical tidal flats of
Australia. Helgolnder Meeresunters. 49: 539551.
Dittmann, S. 1996. Effects of macrobenthic burrows on infaunal
communities in tropical tidal flats. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 134:
119130.
Dittmann, S. 2000. Zonation of benthic communities in a tropical
tidal flat of north-east Australia. J. Sea Res. 43: 3351.
Dittmann, S. (in press). Benthic fauna in tropical tidal flats of
Hinchinbrook Channel, NE Australia: abundance, distribution
and temporal variation. Wetlands Ecology and Management.
Dittmann, S. and Vargas, J.A. (2001). Tropical Tidal Flat Benthos
Compared Between Australia and Central America. In: Reise,
K. (ed.), Ecological Comparisons of Sedimentary Shores. Ecological Studies, Vol. 151. pp. 275293. Springer-Verlag, Berlin,
Heidelberg, New York.
Frith, D.W., Tantanasiriwong, R. and Bhatia, O. 1976. Zonation of
macrofauna on a mangrove shore, Phuket Island. Phuket Mar.
Biol. Cent., Res. Bull. 10: 137.
Gibbs, P.E. 1978. Macrofauna of the intertidal sand flats on low
wooded islands, northern Great Barrier Reef. Phil. Trans. Royal
Soc. London, B. 284: 8197.
Johnson, R.G. 1970. Variations in diversity within benthic marine
communities. Amer. Nat. 104: 285300.
Jones, C.G., Lawton, J.H. and Shachak, M. 1994. Organisms as
ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69: 373386.
Macnae, W. and Kalk, M. 1962. The fauna and flora of sand flats at
Inhaca Island, Moambique. J. Animal Ecol. 31: 93128.
Michaelis, H. and Wolff, W.J. (2001). Soft-bottom fauna of a tropical and a temperate intertidal area (Banc dArguin, Mauritania
Juist area, German North Sea Coast). In: Reise, K. (ed.), Ecological Comparisons of Sedimentary Shores. Ecological Studies,
Vol. 151. pp. 255274. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New
York.
Molina, O.A. and Vargas, J.A. 1994. Estructura del macrobentos del
estero de Jaltepeque, El Salvador. Revista de Biologia Tropical
42: 165174.
Morton, B. and Morton, J. 1983. The Sea Shore Ecology of Hong
Kong. Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong.
Ormond, R.F.G., Gage, J.D. and Angel, M.V. 1997. Marine Biodiversity: Patterns and Processes. Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, UK.
Pepping, M., Piersma, T., Pearson, G. and Lavaleye, M. 1999. Intertidal sediments and benthic animals of Roebuck Bay, Western
Australia. NIOZ-Report 19993, Netherlands Institute for Sea
Research.
Peterson, C.H. 1991. Intertidal zonation of marine invertebrates in
sand and mud. Amer. Sci. 79: 236249.
Piersma, T., de Goeij, P. and Tulp, I., 1993. An evaluation of intertidal feeding habitats from a shorebird perspective: towards
relevant comparisons between temperate and tropical mudflats.
Neth. J. Sea Res. 31: 503512.
Piersma, T., Lavaleye, M., Pearson, G. and Crean, M. unpubl.
Anna Plains benthic invertebrate and bird mapping 1999. (NIOZ,
unpublished report).
Reise, K. 1985. Tidal Flat Ecology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.
Reise, K. 1991. Macrofauna in mud and sand of tropical and temperate tidal flats. In: Elliott, M. and Ducrotoy, J.-P. (eds.),
Estuaries and Coasts: Spatial and Temporal Intercomparisons.
pp. 211216. Olsen and Olsen, Fredensborg.
Ricciardi, A. and Bourget, E. 1999. Global patterns of macroinvertebrate biomass in marine intertidal communities. Mar. Ecol.
Prog. Ser. 185: 2135.
Sanders, H.L. 1968. Marine benthic diversity: a comparative study.
Amer. Nat. 102: 243282.
Sanders, H.L., Goudsmit, E.M., Mills, E.L. and Hampson, G.E.
1962. A study of the intertidal fauna of Barnstable Harbour,
Massachusetts. Limnol. Oceanogr. 7: 6379.
Sasekumar, A. 1974. Distribution of macrofauna on a Malayan
mangrove shore. J. Animal Ecol. 43: 5169.
Schrijvers, J., van Gansbeke, D. and Vincx, M. 1995. Macrobenthic
infauna of mangroves and surrounding beaches at Gazi Bay,
Kenya. Hydrobiologia 306: 5366.
Thorson, G. 1957. Bottom communities (sublittoral or shallow
shelf). Geol. Soc. Amer. 67: 461534.
Vargas, J.A. 1987. The benthic community of an intertidal mud flat
in the Golf of Nicoya, Costa Rica. Description of the community.
Revista de Biologia Tropical 35: 299316.
Vargas, J.A. 1996. Ecological dynamics of a tropical intertidal mudflat community. In: Nordstrom, K.F. and Roman, C.T. (eds.),
Estuarine Shores: Evolution, Environments and Human Alterations. pp. 355371. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., Chichester,
UK.
Vohra, F.C. 1971. Zonation on a tropical sandy shore. J. Animal
Ecol. 40: 679709.
Warwick, R.M. and Ruswahyuni 1987. Comparative study of the
structure of some tropical and temperate marine soft-bottom
macrobenthic communities. Marine Biol. 95: 641649.
Wells, F.E. 1983. An analysis of marine invertebrate distributions in
a mangrove swamp in north-western Australia. Bull. Marine Sci.
33: 736744.
195
Whitlatch, R.B. 1977. Seasonal changes in the community structure
of the macrobenthos inhabiting the intertidal sand and mud flats
of Barnstable Harbor, Massachusetts. Biol. Bull. 152: 275294.
Wijnsma, G., Wolff, W.J., Meijboom, A., Duiven, P. and De Vlas, J.
1999. Species richnes and distribution of benthic tidal flat fauna
of the Banc dArguin, Mauritania. Oceanologica Acta 22: 233
243.
Wolff, W.J., Duiven, A.G., Duiven, P., Esselink, P., Gueye, A.,
Meijboom, A., Moerland, G. and Zegers, J. 1993. Biomass of
macrobenthic tidal flat fauna of the Banc dArguin, Mauritania.
Hydrobiologia 258: 151163.