Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
difficulty are relative: a thing is more difficult to do depending on how much practice we have had
at doing it.
Similarly, we must not talk about some languages as if they were primitive languages. This
happens with tribes of south America. But just because a tribe happens to be primitive
(anthropologically speaking) is no reason to argue its language is (linguistically speaking)
primitive. Just because a some tribe does not have as many words as enlgish, it doesnt mean it
is more primitive than English. It has enough words for its purposes. Language are not better or
worse, they are different.
Aesthetics and language
A language , word, sound is said to be more beautiful, ugly than another. This was very common
when beauty was associated with the Classics. These days, aesthetic judgements about language
are common when talking about peoples accents, or ways of pronunciation. No one sound is
better or more beautiful than another.
History and language
Here the argument is that the true or correct meaning of a word is its oldest one. Thus, the real
meaning of nice is fastidious, as this was one of the senses it had in Shakespeares time.
It is easy the absurdity of this dependence on history in discussing meaning (etymological fallacy
sometimes called) by following the reasoning to its logical conclusion. If the oldest meaning of a
word is the correct, then we can hardly stop with Shakespeare! We must trace the meaning of nice
back into Old French and then to Latin and so on.
The best authors
Another authority is the usage of the best authors. Most of the quotation illustrating grammatical
rules are from famous novelists. The result of applying such a standard is to produce a description
of a very restricted, specialized, literary English.
Impression
Another authority invoked by grammarians is themselves. Many textbooks are clearly
impressionistic (lacking detail) at many points, rules based on half-baked (badly thought out)
awareness of the authors own usage.
Definitions
Traditional grammar is characterized by extreme vagueness of defition and a failure to be explicit
avout important issues. The clearest example of badly defined terms is that of the parts of speech.
Parts of speech are supposed to tell us something about how the grammar of a language works.
But the traidional definition of many of the parts of the speech are usually ungrammatical. The
noun, is usually defined as being the name of a person, place of thing. But this definition tells us
nothing about the grammar of nouns at all. A grammatical definition of noun mus give us
grammatical information: it should tell us where in a sentence nouns can appear, how they inflect
and so on. Rules of grammar should not be based on the meaning of the frorms ( a word, a clause)
but on the way these forms behave in relation to other forms.