Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
MEETING DATE:
April 5, 2016
Planning Commission: March 9, 2016
APPLICANT:
REQUEST:
BACKGROUND
Only a Dim Image Productions is proposing adding onto the Zephyr Depot building and
renovating the structure into a 332 seat stage theatre and bakery/coffee shop. The design of the
structure has not yet received a HPC design permit but is scheduled for the April 4, 2016 HPC
agenda. However, on March 9 the Planning Commission approved the following:
Besides the HPC design permit, only the height variance request remains to be acted upon by
the City. The decision on height variances must be made by the City Council.
REQUEST
The specific consideration for the City Council is consideration of a 13 variance to the 37
maximum height in the Central Business District Historic (CBDH) Height Overlay District
Local Economy Goal 2: Promote and maintain the downtown as a central focus for
community economic and cultural activity.
Local Economy Policy 5: Encourage downtown as a relocation destination for
successful businesses.
Tourism Policy 2: Support year around activities that enliven the downtown public and
cultural life.
Tourism Policy 3: Promote activities which lengthen the time visitors spend in
Stillwater.
focused on park, trail and recreational uses. All comments received to date are attached for the
Councils review.
The use or structure will not constitute a nuisance or be detrimental to the public welfare of the
community.
In the Planning Commissions analysis and subsequent approvals, numerous conditions of
approval were made to preempt potential nuisances. A copy of the Planning Commission SUP
and Variance permits are attached for the Councils review.
The applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying
with this chapter. "Practical difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a
variance, means that all of the following must be found to apply:
The property owner proposes to use the land in a reasonable manner for a use permitted in the zone where
the land is located, but the proposal is not permitted by other official controls.
As the Planning Commission found, with certain conditions the use of a theatre in the
Central Business District is reasonable. The installation of a fly loft area, to allow for the
changing of sets is integral to the types of performances the applicant would like to perform,
is reasonable. Additionally, as noted in City Code Section 31-514, the maximum height
specified in the zoning code be exceeded by necessary mechanical appurtenances usually
carried above the roof level, provided such structure is an integral part of a building.
The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property and that are not created by the
landowner.
For all variances requested, the uniqueness presented on this parcel is its proximity to the
floodplain and the requirement to construct all improvements at an elevation that is one
foot above the base flood elevation. However, in conjunction with the building department,
the applicant has been able to determine this portion of the structure may be outside of the
floodplain. As a result, the 13 variance is the worst case scenario. If further site planning
determines this portion of the structure is located outside of the floodplain and adequate
flood proofing measurements could be put in place, then the building could be lowered and
the size of the actual variance would be reduced to 7.3 feet.
The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood.
While the view will be impacted for units in the complex across the street, the essential
character of the neighborhood will be retained. The development will help create an
entrance from the north and serve as a gateway node to the downtown.
Nonconforming uses or neighboring lands, structures or buildings in the same district or other
districts may not be considered grounds for issuance of a variance. The city may impose
Case No. 2016-12 (601 Main Street North)
CC: April 5, 2016
Page 3 of 4
conditions in the granting of a variance. A condition must be directly related to and must bear a
rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance.
FINDINGS
Staff finds that neither the use nor structure will constitute a nuisance or be detrimental to the
public welfare of the community. With the certain conditions, the proposed structure or use
conforms to the requirements and the intent of this chapter, and of the comprehensive plan,
relevant area plans and other lawful regulations.
ALTERNATIVES AND RECOMMENDATION
The Council may approve, approve with conditions, deny, or table the height variance requests.
Planning Commission
The Planning Commission found the proposed 13 height variance was not in keeping with the
purpose and intent of the CBD Height Overlay district and recommended denial of the height
variance.
City Staff
Staff recommends the City Council move to approve the 13 variance to the 37 maximum
height for structures in the CBD Height Overlay Historic District on the basis the application
meets the requirements set forth for the issuances of variances.
ATTACHMENTS
Site Location Map
Applicant Narrative (2 pages)
Structural Perspectives (2 pages)
Massing Comments (3 pages)
Public Comments (28 pages)
HPC Narrative Request
HPC Guideline Analysis (5 pages)
Structural Perspectives
Previous (CPC) Submittal (2 pages)
Floor Plans
Elevations (2 pages)
Color Board
Material Schedule (2 pages)
Site Plans (4 pages)
ST
RE
ET
OND
SEC
THIR
EET
STR
Y
RR
CHE
RT
FOU
ST
160
320
640
Feet
NORTH
NORTHERN RAILROAD
N
MAI
T
EAS
EN
LIND
T
REE
TH
NOR
EET
STR
EET
STR
NOR
TH
EET
STR
WAT
ET
TRE
S
EN
LIND
T
S
WE
EET
STR
T
EAS
N
BURLINGTO
MAIN
TH
NOR
TH
NOR
TH
NOR
REL
LAU
EET
STR
EET
STR
L
RE
LAU
T
S
EA
STATE
HWY 95
EET
STR
EY
ALL
OOL
SCH
STREE
T
NORTH
NORTH
STATE
HWY 9
NORTH
SECOND
STREET
THIRD
EA
ST
ELM
ER
ARCHNET
333 North Main Street
Suite 201
S t i l l w a t e r, M N 5 5 0 8 2
Architecture - Interiors
Sustainable Design
Phone 651/430-0606
Fax
651/430-2414
w w w. a r c h n e t u s a . c o m
We feel that this project, at this location, will become the north anchor to Main Street
that has been missing for all these years. This is the opportunity for an indoor gathering
space, serving multiple functions, located in the heart of all of the river front activities,
and it will form a natural gateway to the newly expanded park land to the north.
We feel that this project, at this location, will be a community asset, not only to the City
of Stillwater, but to the entire river valley. We feel we have addressed the concerns of
the Planning Commission and the neighborhood to the best of our ability, and created a
structure that the city can be proud of for decades to come. We look forward to presenting our new proposal in more detail to you on April 5th. Thank you for your thoughtful
consideration.
Sincerely,
Roger Tomten
Associate, ARCHNET
SITE PLAN
1=100-0
MARCH 18, 2016
SITE PLAN
1=100-0
MARCH 18, 2016
ARCHNET
Architecture l Interiors
Sustainable Design
Phone 651/430-0606
Fax
651/430-2414
w w w. a r c h n e t u s a . c o m
Dear Abbi,
Attached please find our submittal packet for the Heritage Preservation Commission regarding our
proposal for the addition to the Zephyr Depot building at 601 Main Street North. We have modified the
proposal from the Planning Commission submittal to address concerns raised regarding height,
massing and design. We feel we have successfully accommodated the concerns noted with the attached proposal. Understanding that this is the beginning of the design process and not the end,
there are several components of the project (signs, lighting, etc.) that we will bring back to the HPC in
future submittals, once the designs have been completed, and more detail is available.
The major concern noted at the Planning Commission dealt with the height of the structure at the fly
space. We have been able to lower the height of the structure to reduce our variance request from 13
feet to 7.3 feet. We were able to achieve this by confirming that the addition itself will be out of the official flood fringe district and proposing water-proofing measures for spaces below the one hundred
year flood elevation.
Additional concerns centered around the massing of the original proposal, the concept of a theatre in
a rail maintenance building and its relationship to the mass and style of the existing structure. Our
goal was to address the mass of the structure by breaking the building shell into smaller elements
and carving away as much unused space as possible. In doing this, we have transitioned from the
concept of a theatre in a shell, to a theatre that is complimentary to the original depot building. The
inspiration for the design of the existing building was the historic rail depot at the corner of Myrtle and
Water street, razed in 1970. This included elements of Richardsonian Romanesque architecture, such
as wide, round topped arches, heavy masonry walls and hipped roof forms that we have integrated
into the design of the addition.
We feel we have addressed the concerns of the Planning Commission, the neighborhood, created a
structure the city can be proud of, and we look forward to the discussion with the HPC.
Sincerely,
Roger Tomten
Associate, ARCHNET
following the
DESIGN MANUAL
Commercial Historic District
Stillwater, Minnesota
OVERVIEW OF DESIGN MANUAL
DESIGN PRINCIPLES FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION
New infill buildings should fit into the fabric of existing buildings and the overall
streetscape and not present a jarring contrast with what is already there. The basic
principal for new construction . . . is to maintain the scale and character of present
buildings . . . provide height, massing, setback, materials and rhythm compatibility to
surrounding structures.
When reading this first statement from the Design Manual, if one is thinking only of the
existing site and the existing building, one may react that the proposal is too large or
jarring with what is already there, a rather low horizontal, one story building. If,
however, one is looking at the entirety of the existing Central Business District, then one
would relate new construction to the scale and character of the present buildings
throughout the CBD, tall masonry structures with vertical proportions. Over the decades
the CBD has grown, built new buildings, torn down buildings, rebuilt buildings, over and
over again. Many times on the same lot. Sometimes the buildings are small, sometimes
the buildings are large. This is the ongoing life of a Central Business District, as it has
been for this particular lot which is the site of the former Minnesota Thresher Company
and the Seymour, Sabin & Co machine shops. The later was a 3 story structure built
around 1874 and razed in 1946. The lot sat empty until the construction of the existing
structure in 1992.
Our proposal will integrate a new theatre on Main Street in Stillwater. Such an endeavor
requires the creation of a large structure. We feel that we have successfully integrated
and transitioned from the low portion of the building on the south, to the taller portion of
the building on the north.
PEDESTRIAN-ORIENTED DESIGN
Theaters, Opera Houses and Auditoriums have a long history in Stillwater, however,
they have been missing from the fabric for several decades. Finally, with this proposal,
we aim to bring Heritage
a Theatre back
to Main Street Stillwater.
Preservation
Commission Submittal
MARCH 18, 2016
The design of the building should help make the street enjoyable, visually interesting
and comfortable.
Page 1 of 5
Stillwater Auditorium
Majestic Theatre
Page 2 of 5
PEDESTRIAN-ORIENTED DESIGN
DESIGN CRITERIA
-SETBACK
-HEIGHT
Our proposal builds up to the property line on Main Street, and we have
requested a variance from the Planning Commission for both front and
rear yard setbacks. We feel this is consistent with the fabric of the CBD
and aides in creating the architectural gateway and the expected main
street experience. The Planning Commission has granted approval of the
setbacks.
Our proposal builds upon the stepped transitions of the existing building. Obviously
our use requires a taller volume than can be accommodated in the height of the
existing building, but the transitions are comparable with the existing structure and
with other stepped transitions found on Main Street. The tallest element of the
structure is the fly space over the stage that is common in all theaters. After reviewing
multiple locations and configurations for the stage/seating relationship, the current
location was selected for having the least negative impact on Main Street and the
residents across the street. The proximity to the flood plain has created difficulties in
lowering the facility enough to meet the current zoning height ordinance, so we have
requested a variance from the Planning Commission and City Council. The Planning
Commission recommended that the Council deny our request for a 13 foot variance
to the 37 height requirement but that we attempt to lower the height as much as
possible. The request before you is the culmination of that effort. We have lowered
the theatre, setting the stage at the same elevation as the existing lobby (698.3). This
will require that the height of the fly space on the theatre be 748.3 feet (698.3 + 50.0),
which would result in a 7.3 variance. This variance is only for the fly space as the
remainder of the building fits within the height allowed by ordinance.
-PROPORTION
Historical vertical proportions are articulated on all facades of the new
construction. The existing building, starts on the south end with strong
horizontal lines associated with the deep overhangs and canopies of
passenger rail structures, and transitions at the main lobby to a vertical
form.
-HEIGHT
Our proposal builds upon the stepped transitions of the existing building.
Obviously our use requires a taller volumeNEW
than CONSTRUCTION
can be accommodated in
EXISTING
the height of the existing building, but the transitions are comparable with
the existing structure and with other stepped
transitions found on Main
50'-0" (748.3)
Street. The tallest element of the structure
fly space over the stage
Heightis
at the
Fly Space
that is common in all theaters. After reviewing multiple locations and
configurations for the stage/seating relationship, the current location was
selected for having the least negative 36-6
impact
on Main Street and the
(734.8)
residents across the street. The proximity
flood plain has created
Heightto
of the
Addition
difficulties in lowering the facility enough to meet the current zoning height
ordinance, so we have requested a variance from the Planning
Commission and City Council. The Planning Commission recommended
that the Council deny our request for a 13 foot variance to the 37 height
requirement but that we attempt to lower the height as much as possible.
The request before you is the culmination of that effort. We have lowered
the theatre, setting the stage at the same elevation as the existing lobby
(698.3). This will require that the height of the fly space on the theatre be
748.3 feet (698.3 + 50.0), which would result in an 8 variance. This
variance is only for the fly space as the remainder of the building fits within
the height allowed by ordinance.
-PARKING
VERTICAL
PROPORTION
The parking requirements for our use will utilize the existing parking lot on
Heritage
Commission
Submittal
the south and the
continued Preservation
use of overflow parking
on the City owned
parking lot to theMARCH
north. We
18, have
2016 met with the Downtown Parking
Commission and reached an agreement contingent upon the lease
-PARKING
The parking requirements for our use will utilize the existing parking lot on the south
and the continued use of overflow parking on the City owned parking lot to the north.
We have met with the Downtown Parking Commission and reached an agreement
contingent upon the lease renewal for the north lot and the proposed uses of the
current proposal.
35-6 (733.8)
Height of Exg. Bldg.
-REAR ENTRANCES
Given the accessibility and visibility of the Theatre, all sides of the building and thus,
all entrances, will be articulated and designed in a welcoming and well-maintained
way.
-ROOFS
roof
0-0The
(698.3)
form of the existing structure, passenger rail structure, came from the former
depot building which utilized Richardsonian Romanesque architectural features. We
Exg. Floor Elev.
have picked up on this vocabulary and have utilized the sloped roof forms to reduce
the volume of the building wherever possible. This form will allow us to shield any roof
top equipment from the ground and from elevated positions to the west.
Page 2 of 1
Page 3 of 5
The roofs of the existing structure will remain in their current form.
-UTILITY AREAS AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT
Any ground-mounted mechanical equipment or trash receptacles will be shielded
DESIGN CRITERIA
DESIGN CRITERIA
-PARKING
The parking requirements for our use will utilize the existing parking lot on the south and
the continued use of overflow parking on the City owned parking lot to the north. We have
met with the Downtown Parking Commission and reached an agreement contingent upon
the lease renewal for the north lot and the proposed uses of the current proposal.
-REAR ENTRANCES
Given the accessibility and visibility of the Theatre, all sides of the building and thus, all
entrances, will be articulated and designed in a welcoming and well-maintained way.
-ROOFS
The roof form of the existing structure, passenger rail structure, came from the former
depot building which utilized Richardsonian Romanesque architectural features. We have
picked up on this vocabulary and have utilized the sloped roof forms to reduce the volume
of the theatre addition wherever possible. This form will allow us to shield any roof top
equipment from the ground and from elevated positions to the west of Main Street.
The roofs of the existing structure will remain in their current form.
-UTILITY AREAS AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT
NEW CONSTRUCTION
EXISTING
-FACADE OPENINGS
While not a typical commercial retail building, the theatre will include a front facade
that is open and inviting to pedestrians. Along Main Street, a colonnade of stone
arches creates a covered drop-off area that opens to a side lobby through a glass
wall. The north elevation, or service side of the building houses emergency exits and
delivery areas. The east elevation will run parallel with the Browns Creek Trail and is
the back of the stage area. We are proposing one large operable door on this wall
that would accommodate opening the stage to the trail for small performances, or
providing a visual backdrop of the trees and bluff lines of the valley for the theatre
patrons. (Think of the winter scene from the movie Holiday Inn, starring Bing Crosby.)
HIPPED ROOF FORMS
The openings of the existing structure will remain.
-MATERIALS
-DETAILING
Utilizing a Richardsonian Romanesque vocabulary, the proposal includes the use of wide,
round-topped arches, masonry walls with rough faced stone fields and smooth stone
detailing (belt courses, lintels, etc.) and hipped roof forms.
The detailing of the existing structure will remain in current form.
-FACADE OPENINGS
The exterior materials of the addition will consist of stone and brick. The roof forms
will be clad in metal
The materials of the existing structure will remain in their current form.
-COLOR
The color of the stone for the addition will complement the stone style and color on
the existing building. The brick will complement the stone but offer a slight contrast.
While not a typical commercial retail building, the theatre will include a front facade that is
Metal or entry frame materials will offer accents in the red tones. Existing entry and
open and inviting to pedestrians. Along Main Street, a colonnade of stone arches creates
trim areas will be repainted to match the new accent color scheme. The new roofing
ROUND TOPPED ARCHES
a covered drop-off area that opens to a side lobby through a glass wall. The north
on the addition will complement the brick and stone colors. The asphalt shingles on
elevation, or service side of the building houses emergency exits and delivery areas. The
the existing building, while not proposed to be replaced now, will be in the near future.
east elevation will run parallel with the Browns Creek Trail and is the back of the stage
At thatPage
time the
roof1may be replaced with metal to match the theatre or a material
Heritage
Submittal
2 of
area. We are
proposing Preservation
one large operableCommission
door on this wall that
would accommodate
and color to complement the theatre.
opening the stage
to the trailPreservation
for small performances,
or providing a
visual backdrop of the
Heritage
Commission
Submittal
Page 4 of 5
trees and bluff lines
of
the
valley
for
the
theatre
patrons.
(Think
of
the
winter
scene
from
MARCH 18, 2016
the movie Holiday Inn, starring Bing Crosby.)
-LIGHTING
DESIGN CRITERIA
DESIGN CRITERIA
-FACADE OPENINGS
-COLOR
While not a typical commercial retail building, the theatre will include a front facade that is
open and inviting to pedestrians. Along Main Street, a colonnade of stone arches creates
a covered drop-off area that opens to a side lobby through a glass wall. The north
elevation, or service side of the building houses emergency exits and delivery areas. The
east elevation will run parallel with the Browns Creek Trail and is the back of the stage
area. We are proposing one large operable door on this wall that would accommodate
opening the stage to the trail for small performances, or providing a visual backdrop of the
trees and bluff lines of the valley for the theatre patrons. (Think of the winter scene from
the movie Holiday Inn, starring Bing Crosby.)
The color of the stone for the addition will complement the stone style and color on the
existing building. The brick will complement the stone but offer a slight contrast. Metal or
entry frame materials will offer accents in the red tones. Existing entry and trim areas will
be repainted to match the new accent color scheme. The new roofing on the addition will
complement the brick and stone colors. The asphalt shingles on the existing building,
while not proposed to be replaced now, will be in the near future. At that time the roof may
be replaced with metal to match the theatre or a material and color to complement the
theatre. At the time of Design Development, a detailed color board will be presented for
approval by the HPC.
-MATERIALS
The exterior materials of the addition will consist of stone and brick. The roof forms will be
clad in metal. At the time of Design Development, a detailed material board will be
presented for approval by the HPC.
The materials of the existing structure will remain in their current form.
-COLOR
All exterior lighting on the addition will be shielded or concealed from motorists &
pedestrians. It is anticipated that certain elevations of the building will be lit from the
exterior.
-AWNINGS
No awnings are proposed for the addition or the existing building.
NEW CONSTRUCTION
EXISTING
The color of the stone for the addition will complement the stone style and color on the
existing building. The brick will complement the stone but offer a slight contrast. Metal or
entry frame materials will offer accents in the red tones. Existing entry and trim areas will
be repainted to match the new accent color scheme. The new roofing on the addition will
complement the brick and stone colors. The asphalt shingles on the existing building,
while not proposed to be replaced now, will be in the near future. At that time the roof may
be replaced with metal to match the theatre or a material and color to complement the
theatre.
-LIGHTING
Much of the landscaping is in place on the site. Any improvements included in final plans
will enhance existing landscaping features and themes. As the building plans are finalized,
a more detailed landscaping plan will be submitted for review by HPC.
All exterior lighting on the addition will be shielded. It is anticipated that certain elevations
of the building will be lit
Theaters have historically utilized signage in a much more dramatic way than commercial
retail uses. While we have initiated discussions about how we would like to sign the
building, no plans have formalized at this time. When plans are finalized, a complete
submittal will be brought forward to the HPC through the Planning Department.
-LANDSCAPING
-AWNINGS
No awnings are proposed for the addition or the existing building.
Heritage
Preservation Commission Submittal
-SIGNS AND
GRAPHICS
Theaters have historically utilized signage in a much more dramatic way than commercial
MARCH 18, 2016
retail uses. While we have initiated discussions about how we would like to sign the
building, no plans have formalized at this time. When plans are finalized, a complete
Page 2 of 1
Page 5 of 5
DESIGN CRITERIA
Southwest Perspective
MARCH 18, 2016
Northwest Perspective
Previous Submittal
Previous Submittal
MARCH 18, 2016
North Elevation
South Elevation
NEW CONSTRUCTION
West Elevation
SCALE: 1/16 = 1-0
MARCH 18, 2016
EXISTING
North Elevation
EXISTING
East Elevation
SCALE: 1/16 = 1-0
MARCH 18, 2016
NEW CONSTRUCTION
Example of Similar
Structure & Roof
Construction
Metal Roofing
Terra Red
Exterior Brick
Milwaukee Cream
2/25/2016
Example of Interior
Theatre trusses
Example of Exterior
Stage Doors
NEW CONSTRUCTION
MC
MC
MR
MATERIAL LEGEND
S
STONE
BRICK
East Elevation
MR
METAL ROOFING
SCALE: = 1-0
MC
METAL CORNICE
EXISTING
MC
B
MR
MR
MATERIAL LEGEND
North Elevation
SCALE: = 1-0
MARCH 18, 2016
STONE
BRICK
MR
METAL ROOFING
MC
METAL CORNICE
MC
NEW CONSTRUCTION
EXISTING
50'-0" (748.3)
MC
36-6 (734.8)
Height of Addition
35-6 (733.8)
Height of Exg. Bldg.
MR
MR
0-0 (698.3)
Exg. Floor Elev.
MATERIAL LEGEND
S
STONE
BRICK
MR
METAL ROOFING
MC
METAL CORNICE
West Elevation
SCALE: = 1-0
MARCH 18, 2016
E RICKSON
Civil
DRAWING PHASE:
OWNER REVIEW
AGENCY REVIEW
BID DOCUMENT
PERMIT SET
AS-BUILT DOCUMENT
7
3
TODD A. ERICKSON, PE
8
7
40418
LICENSE NO.
02/19/2016
DATE:
15-177
EXISTING
CONDITIONS &
DEMO PLAN
C1
SHEET 1 OF 5
E RICKSON
Civil
DRAWING PHASE:
OWNER REVIEW
AGENCY REVIEW
BID DOCUMENT
PERMIT SET
AS-BUILT DOCUMENT
1
1
40418
LICENSE NO.
02/19/2016
DATE:
1
4
1
1
1
1
TODD A. ERICKSON, PE
15-177
LAYOUT PLAN
C2
SHEET 2 OF 5
E RICKSON
Civil
DRAWING PHASE:
OWNER REVIEW
AGENCY REVIEW
BID DOCUMENT
PERMIT SET
AS-BUILT DOCUMENT
1
1
TODD A. ERICKSON, PE
40418
LICENSE NO.
02/19/2016
DATE:
3
3
3
3
11) SLOPES 3:1 AND GREATER SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH EROSION CONTROL
BLANKET.
INSTALL 5-FT WIDE RIP RAP SPILLWAY ALONG AREA DESIGNATED FOR SPILLWAY
RECESS ROCK SO TOP OF ROCK IS AT THE GUTTER ELEVATOIN
930
930
93
0.5
0
gl
15-177
GRADING PLAN
C3
SHEET 3 OF 5
E RICKSON
Civil
DRAWING PHASE:
OWNER REVIEW
AGENCY REVIEW
BID DOCUMENT
PERMIT SET
AS-BUILT DOCUMENT
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS
PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME
OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A
DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL
ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF
THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
5
4
103
TODD A. ERICKSON, PE
40418
102
LICENSE NO.
02/19/2016
DATE:
101
100
1
CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER VAULT
100
15-177
UTILITY PLAN
C4
SHEET 4 OF 5