PVSYST V6.

42

01/04/16 Page 1/5

Stand Alone System: Simulation parameters

Project :

Greater Iqbal Park

Geographical Site
Situation
Time defined as
Meteo data:

Lahore

Country

Latitude
Legal Time
Albedo
Lahore

31.6N
Longitude
Time zone UT+5
Altitude
0.20
MeteoNorm 7.1 - Synthetic

Pakistan
74.3E
219 m

L
A
I
R
T
t
s
y
s
V
P

Simulation variant :

Greater Iqbal Park 100 Kw

Simulation date

01/04/16 09h09

Simulation parameters

Tilt

Collector Plane Orientation

Models used

Transposition

PV Array Characteristics
PV module
Original PVsyst database

Si-poly

Number of PV modules
Total number of PV modules
Array global power
Array operating characteristics (50C)
Total area

Model
Manufacturer
In series
Nb. modules
Nominal (STC)
U mpp
Module area

30

Azimuth

Perez

ET-P672 250
ET Solar
20 modules
620
155 kWp
624 V
1203 m

Diffuse

Perez, Meteonorm

In parallel
Unit Nom. Power
At operating cond.
I mpp
Cell area

31 strings
250 Wp
140 kWp (50C)
224 A
1086 m

Uv (wind)

0.0 W/mK / m/s

PV Array loss factors

Thermal Loss factor

Uc (const)

Wiring Ohmic Loss

Global array res.
Serie Diode Loss
Voltage Drop
Module Quality Loss
Module Mismatch Losses
Incidence effect, ASHRAE parametrization
IAM =
System Parameter
Battery
Battery Pack Characteristics

Controller

Converter
Battery management control

PVsyst Evaluation mode

System type
Model
Manufacturer
Voltage
Nb. of units
Temperature
Model
Manufacturer
Technology
Maxi and EURO efficiencies
Treshold commands as
Charging
Discharging

20.0 W/mK
47 mOhm
0.7 V

1 - bo (1/cos i - 1)

Loss Fraction
Loss Fraction
Loss Fraction
Loss Fraction
bo Param.

1.5 % at STC
0.1 % at STC
1.5 %
1.0 % at MPP
0.05

Stand Alone System

Shoto 2V / 500 Ah
Shoto
48 V
Nominal Capacity
24 in series x 45 in parallel
Fixed (20C)

22500 Ah

Infini 10 KW
Infini
MPPT converter
97.0/95.0 %

15
-5.0 mV/C/elem.

Battery voltage
51.2/50.1 V
51.2/48.9 V

nb units
Temp coeff.

Corresp. SOC
Corresp. SOC

1.00/0.75
1.00/0.45

PVSYST V6.42

01/04/16 Page 2/5

Stand Alone System: Simulation parameters (continued)

System type

System Parameter
Battery

L
A
I
R
T
t
s
y
s
V
P

Battery Pack Characteristics

Controller

Converter

Battery management control

User's needs :

PVsyst Evaluation mode

Stand Alone System

Model
Manufacturer
Voltage
Nb. of units
Temperature

Model
Manufacturer
Technology
Maxi and EURO efficiencies
Treshold commands as
Charging
Discharging

Daily household consumers

average

Shoto 2V / 500 Ah
Shoto
48 V
Nominal Capacity
24 in series x 45 in parallel
Fixed (20C)

22500 Ah

Infini 10 KW
Infini
MPPT converter
97.0/95.0 %

15
-5.0 mV/C/elem.

Battery voltage
51.2/50.1 V
51.2/48.9 V

nb units
Temp coeff.

Corresp. SOC
Corresp. SOC

Constant over the year

700 kWh/Day

1.00/0.75
1.00/0.45

PVSYST V6.42

01/04/16 Page 3/5

Stand Alone System: Detailed User's needs

Project :

Greater Iqbal Park

Simulation variant :

Greater Iqbal Park 100 Kw

Main system parameters

PV Field Orientation
PV modules
PV Array
Battery
battery Pack
User's needs

System type
tilt
Model
Nb. of modules
Model
Nb. of units
Daily household consumers

Stand alone
30
azimuth
ET-P672 250
Pnom
620
Pnom total
Shoto 2V / 500 Ah
Technology
1080
Voltage / Capacity
Constant over the year
global

L
A
I
R
T
t
s
y
s
V
P

0
250 Wp
155 kWp
vented, tubular
48 V / 22500 Ah
256 MWh/year

Daily household consumers, Constant over the year, average = 700 kWh/day

Annual values

Lamps (LED or fluo)

Stand-by consumers
Total daily energy

Fraction of daily enegy [%]

Power

100

1000 W/lamp

Use

7 h/day
24 h/day

Hourly profile

60000
50000
40000
30000
20000
10000

PVsyst Evaluation mode

Number

12

15

18

21

24

Energy
700000 Wh/day
24 Wh/day
700024 Wh/day

PVSYST V6.42

01/04/16 Page 4/5

Stand Alone System: Main results

Project :

Greater Iqbal Park

Simulation variant :

Greater Iqbal Park 100 Kw

Main system parameters

PV Field Orientation
PV modules
PV Array
Battery
battery Pack
User's needs

System type
tilt
Model
Nb. of modules
Model
Nb. of units
Daily household consumers

Stand alone
30
azimuth
ET-P672 250
Pnom
620
Pnom total
Shoto 2V / 500 Ah
Technology
1080
Voltage / Capacity
Constant over the year
global

0
250 Wp
155 kWp
vented, tubular
48 V / 22500 Ah
256 MWh/year

Available Energy
Used Energy
Performance Ratio PR
Time Fraction

Specific prod.
244.6 MWh/year
0.4 MWh/year
Excess (unused)
0.1 %
Solar Fraction SF
91.6 %
Missing Energy

1578 kWh/kWp/year
243.1 MWh/year
0.2 %
255.1 MWh/year

L
A
I
R
T
t
s
y
s
V
P

Main simulation results

System Production

Loss of Load

Normalized productions (per installed kWp): Nominal power 155 kWp

8

Lu : Unused energy (full battery)

Lc : Collection Loss (PV-array losses)
Ls : System losses and battery charging
Yf : Energy supplied to the user

4.3 kWh/kWp/day
0.89 kWh/kWp/day
0.03 kWh/kWp/day
0.01 kWh/kWp/day

PR : Performance Ratio (Yf / Yr) :

0.001
SF : Solar Fraction (ESol / ELoad) : 0.002

0.012

0.010

Performance Ratio PR

Normalized Energy [kWh/kWp/day]

Performance Ratio PR and Solar Fraction SF

0.014

0.008

0.006

0.004
2

0.002

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

0.000

Dec

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Greater Iqbal Park 100 Kw

Balances and main results
GlobHor

GlobEff

E Avail

EUnused

E Miss

E User

E Load

kWh/m

kWh/m

MWh

MWh

MWh

MWh

MWh

January

89.2

121.2

17.06

16.34

21.50

0.200

21.70

0.009

February

110.9

142.0

19.40

19.34

19.60

0.000

19.60

0.000

March

153.3

172.6

22.84

22.79

21.70

0.000

21.70

0.000

April

167.0

167.4

21.85

21.78

21.00

0.000

21.00

0.000

May

189.5

174.0

22.12

22.08

21.70

0.000

21.70

0.000

June

190.2

168.3

21.55

21.49

21.00

0.000

21.00

0.000

July

170.7

154.1

19.90

19.80

21.65

0.050

21.70

0.002

August

171.7

164.9

21.41

21.33

21.70

0.000

21.70

0.000

September

163.4

176.3

22.79

22.73

21.00

0.000

21.00

0.000

October

130.1

156.5

20.63

20.62

21.70

0.000

21.70

0.000

November

97.1

130.5

17.92

17.87

21.00

0.000

21.00

0.000

December
Year
Legends:

PVsyst Evaluation mode

SolFrac

86.1

122.9

17.11

16.90

21.55

0.150

21.70

0.007

1719.2

1850.8

244.58

243.06

255.11

0.400

255.51

0.002

GlobHor

Horizontal global irradiation

E Miss

Missing energy

GlobEff

Effective Global, corr. for IAM and shadings

E User

Energy supplied to the user

E Avail

Available Solar Energy

E Load

Energy need of the user (Load)

EUnused

Unused energy (full battery) loss

SolFrac

Solar fraction (EUsed / ELoad)

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

PVSYST V6.42

01/04/16 Page 5/5

Stand Alone System: Loss diagram

Project :

Greater Iqbal Park

Simulation variant :

Greater Iqbal Park 100 Kw

System type
tilt
Model
Nb. of modules
Model
Nb. of units
Daily household consumers

Main system parameters

PV Field Orientation
PV modules
PV Array
Battery
battery Pack
User's needs

Stand alone
30
azimuth
ET-P672 250
Pnom
620
Pnom total
Shoto 2V / 500 Ah
Technology
1080
Voltage / Capacity
Constant over the year
global

L
A
I
R
T
t
s
y
s
V
P

0
250 Wp
155 kWp
vented, tubular
48 V / 22500 Ah
256 MWh/year

Loss diagram over the whole year

1719 kWh/m

Horizontal global irradiation

+10.9% Global incident in coll. plane
-2.9%
-2.9%

1851 kWh/m * 1203 m coll.

1851 kWh/m * 1203 m coll.
efficiency at STC = 12.93%
-30.1%
efficiency at STC = 12.93%
287.8 MWh
287.8 MWh

IAM
IAM factor
factor on
on global
global

Effective irradiance on collectors

Effective irradiance on collectors
PV conversion
Battery
Energy
PV conversion
Self-discharge
supplied to the
Current
user
Array nominal energy (at STC effic.)
Array
nominal
energy (atlevel
STC effic.)
-0.4%
PV loss
due to irradiance
-0.4%
PV loss due to irradiance level
-11.3% PV loss due to temperature
-11.3% PV loss due to temperature
-1.5%
Module quality loss
-1.0%
Module
loss
-1.5%
Module array
qualitymismatch
loss
-1.2%
Ohmic
wiring
loss
-1.0%
Module array mismatch loss
-1.2%

Ohmic wiring loss

-99.2% Unused energy (full battery) loss

-99.2% Unused energy (full battery) loss

2.0 MWh
-23.4%
2.0 MWh
0.0%
0.0%
Missing energy
0.0%
-23.4%
99.8%
1.5 MWh
0.0%
Direct
Stored
use
0.2% 0.0%
Missing energy 99.8%
+29.0%
0.0%
99.8%
1.5 MWh
-3.0%
Direct
Stored
use
-2.3%
99.8%
0.2% +29.0%
-4.3%
-30.1%
255 MWh
0.4 MWh
-3.0%
-2.3%
255.5 MWh
-4.3%
255.5
255 MWh
MWh
0.4 MWh

PVsyst Evaluation mode

Effective energy at the output of the array

Converter Loss during operation (efficiency)
Effective
Converter energy
Loss due
at to
thepower
output
threshold
of the array
Converter Loss over nominal conv. voltage
Converter Loss
Loss during
due to operation
voltage threshold
Converter
(efficiency)
Converter
losses
overload)
Converter Loss
due(effic,
to power
threshold
Battery Storage
Converter
Loss
over
nominal
conv. voltage
Energy Stored
need
of
the user
(Load)
Battery
Energy
balance
Converter Loss due to voltage threshold
Converter
lossesloss
(effic, overload)
Battery
efficiency
Battery Storage
Charge/Disch.
Current Efficiency Loss
Battery
Energy
balance
GassingStored
Current
(electrolyte
dissociation)
Battery Self-discharge Current
Energy efficiency
supplied loss
to the user
Battery
Charge/Disch. Current Efficiency Loss
Energy need of the user (Load)
Gassing Current (electrolyte dissociation)