Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
ON THE INSTALLATION OF
GEO-THERMAL HEAT SINK
SYSTEM AT
KNOWLEDGE PARK-IV.
DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
There are several methods available to calculate the cooling load of a commercial building, such as :
1) Total Equivalent Temperature Difference/Time Average (TETD/TA)
2) Cooling Load Temperature Difference/Cooling Load Factor (CLTD/CLF)
3) Transfer Function Method (TFM)
4) Heat Balance (HB) & Radiant Time Series (RTS)
5) Manual J Method for Residential Applications & Manual N for Commercial Buildings: These methods are simplified
versions, jointly developed by Air conditioning contractors of America (ACCA) and the Air conditioning and
Refrigeration Institute (ARI).
These different methods may yield different results for the same input data. This is primarily due to the way; each
method handles the solar effect and building dynamics. But in true sense all the above approaches attempt to consider the
fundamental principle that heat flow rates are not instantaneously converted to loads and heat addition or extraction incident
upon the building do not immediately result in a change in temperature. Thermally heavy buildings can effectively delay the
cooling or heating load for several hours.
Most designers use the TETD and CLTD methods because these methods are simple to use, give component loads
and tend to predict load on conservative side.
For strictly manual cooling loads calculation method, the most practical to use is the CLTD/CLF method.
Here in the cooling load calculation for KNOWLEDGE PARK - IV, we have considered this same method.
DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
Q = U * A * (CLTD)
Q = HEAT GAINED IN BTU'S
DBT = DRY BULB TEMPERATURE.
U = Thermal transmittance for roof or wall or glass. See 1997 ASHRAE Fundamentals, Chapter 24 or 2001 ASHRAE
Fundamentals, chapter 25.
A = area of wall or glass calculated from building plans
CLTD = Cooling Load Temperature Difference for roof, wall or glass. Refer 1997 ASHRAE Fundamentals, Chapter 28,
tables 30, 31, 32, 33 and 34.
CLTD correlated = CLTD + (78-tr) + (tm-85)
Design Consideration:
INSIDE TEMPERATURE = 64.4 F or 18 C
OUTSIDE TEMEPRATURE = 113 F or 45 C
tr =64.4 F (room temperature)
tm = 88.7 F (mean temperature = (tr+to)/2))
BASEMENT
GROUND FLOOR
FIRST FLOOR
SECOND FLOOR
THIRD FLOOR
CAFETERIA IN TERRACE
OPEN AREA FOR OUTDOOR UNITS
EXISTING STRUCTURE
ADDITIONAL AREA
HEAT LOAD FOR THIS ADDITIONAL AREA WILL DEPEND UPON INTERNAL SEATING PLAN (EITHER
CABINS OR OPEN AREA INCLUDING WORK STATIONS & CUBICLES)
VRFs are typically installed with an Air conditioner inverter which adds a DC inverter to the
compressor in order to support variable motor speed and thus variable refrigerant flow
rather than simply on/off operation. By operating at varying speeds, VRF units work only at
the needed rate allowing for substantial energy savings at partial-load conditions. Heat
recovery VRF technology allows individual indoor units to heat or cool as required, while
the compressor load benefits from the internal heat recovery. Energy savings of up to 55%
are predicted over comparable unitary equipment. This also results in greater control of
the building's interior temperature by the building's occupants.
SEVERAL VENDORS ARE PRESENT IN THE MARKET WHICH ARE PROFICIENT IN THE
AIR SOURCED VRF TECHNOLOGY LIKE:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
MITSUBISHI
LG ( VRF UNITS INSTALLED AT CHI-IV ARE LG MAKE)
DAIKIN
TOSHIBA
CARRIER
TRANE
VENDORS PRESENT IN THE MARKET WHICH ARE PROFICIENT IN THE WATER SOURCED VRF
TECHNOLOGY LIKE:
1.
2.
3.
MITSUBISHI
DAIKIN
LG
We have not yet raised our formal enquiries for Water Sourced VRF system but asked for
tentative price schedule for water source VRF.
*Water Sourced VRF are 1.5-2 times costlier than Air-Sourced VRF system.
zoning systems require only a 3-inch opening in the exterior of a building for the refrigerant
lines and wiring to run through, connecting the indoor units to the outdoor units.
7. MODERN CONTROLS. For residences, you can take advantage of mobile control
technology that lets you adjust temperature settings for each zone from your mobile
device. For commercial settings, the VRF systems built-in controls may allow you to skip
purchasing expensive building management software.
GEO-THERMAL HEAT SINK SYSTEM Commercial buildings that are centrally air-conditioned use an air-cooled or water-cooled
heat exchanger to pump out heat inside the building into the atmosphere. The atmospheric
temperature conditions contribute to the efficiencies of the air-conditioning systems. If the
atmospheric temperatures are higher, efficiency of the air-conditioning system is lower and
vice versa.
Geothermal heat sink system uses the earth as heat sink instead of outside atmosphere in
conventional systems. The earth temperatures in most cases are much lower than the
atmospheric temperatures. With the lower temperatures the efficiencies of the airconditioning systems are significantly higher.
Geothermal works because the ground beneath our feet is warmer then the outside air in
the winter and cooler in the summer. Inserting a series of small pipes into the ground
allows heat to be transferred to and from enclosed area. In this process heat is not created,
it is transported therefore no fuel is burned.
Summer Operation: The indoor heat pump takes the hot air from the office building and
removes the heat. This leaves behind cool air to be distributed through vents as airconditioning. The removed heat from the air is rejected into the earth through the ground
loop. In this case the water is warmer leaving the office area then when it returns since
heat is rejected into it.
Winter Operation: The underground pipes, called a ground loop, circulate water which
absorbs the heat from the earth and returns it to the indoor heat pump. The heat pump
extracts the heat from the liquid then distributes it throughout as warm air. With the heat
removed, the water is re-circulated to collect more heat from the ground. In this case the
loop water is warmer when it comes into the enclosed area than when it goes back into the
earth since the heat is being removed.
There are two primary types of loop systems available for use with geo-exchange /
geothermal systems. These are:
1. CLOSED-LOOP SYSTEMS
HORIZONTAL
This type of installation is generally most cost-effective for residential installations,
particularly for new construction where sufficient land is available. It requires trenches at
least four feet deep. The most common layouts either use two pipes, one buried at six feet,
and the other at four feet, or two pipes placed side-by-side at five feet in the ground in a
two-foot wide trench.
VERTICAL
Large commercial buildings and schools often use vertical systems because the land area
required for horizontal loops would be prohibitive. Vertical loops are also used where the
soil is too shallow for trenching, and they minimize the disturbance to existing landscaping.
For a vertical system, holes (approximately four inches in diameter) are drilled about 20
feet apart and 100 to 400 feet deep. Into these holes go two pipes that are connected at
the bottom with a U-bend to form a loop. The vertical loops are connected with horizontal
pipe (i.e., manifold), placed in trenches, and connected to the heat pump in the building.
Actually system is an open loop system but due to the upstream and downstream water
flow beneath aquifers, the system is converted in natural close loop system.
Combining Two Technologies: Geothermal + VRF Zoning SystemsWater-source VRF zoning systems combine the efficiency benefits of a geothermal system
with the sophistication of VRF zoning systems. This technology takes advantage of an
INVERTER-driven compressor, coupled with a closed geothermal loop, instead of utilizing
air as a heat exchange medium.
PROS & CONS OF WATER SOURCE VRF ZONING SYSTEM PAIRED WITH GEO-THERMAL SYSTEM:
PROS:
1. Upto 15-20% Energy savings compared to traditional HVAC (Chiller & Cooling
Tower). Energy saving as a result of lower Entering Cooling Water Temperature
(ECWT) in the water sourced VRF since ground offers a much lower temperature
compared to ambient environment.
2. System offered by M/s. GIBBS is not an actual closed loop system but converted into
a Natural Closed loop system using upstream & downstream water flow beneath
aquifers. Hence, does not require any make-up water upto Heat-Exchanger as
compared to traditional HVAC (Chiller & Cooling Towers)
3. Flexible installation - Installation is possible in tight spaces because the two-pipe
design of the VRF system requires less space than ducted systems. Moreover, both
injection field and production field are below ground. Hence, space above ground
can be used for other purposes.
4. Application variety - Water-source VRF zoning condenser units can be connected to
an array of indoor unit styles to accommodate the specific needs of the space. The
configuration of the below-ground loop system can be customized to accommodate
the buildings surroundings.
5. Clean energy source. Water-source VRF zoning systems use the clean and
sustainable energy stored in the earth to cool and heat buildings, a more
environmentally friendly and efficient source of energy than non-renewable fossil
fuels. Reduction in Carbon Footprints by 30%. The combined system can provide
upto 10 LEED points for Green building certification.
6. System efficiency. The INVERTER-driven compressor varies the speed of the motors
rotation, allowing it to precisely meet each zones load requirement while reducing
overall power consumption. Geothermal VRF zoning systems are also able to take
advantage of stable ground temperatures for even greater efficiencies.
CONS:
1. Earlier we were working on Air-Source VRF unit for whole Knowledge Park-IV building.
Geo-Thermal heat exchange system cannot work with Air-Source VRF system. If we want
to implement Geo-Thermal heat exchange system, we need move from Air-Source VRF
system to Water Source VRF system which is major issue for us. Initial cost of water source
VRF system approximately 2 times that of air source VRF system. Apart from this,
installation and commissioning cost of water source VRF system is 15-20% higher as it
includes additional Piping and Instrumentation job (water circuit).
2. Installing a geothermal system is expensive. The major disadvantage of geothermal
heat pumps is increased upfront initial costs, which are in average two to three times
higher than conventional systems. This really becomes a disadvantage if the system is
not installed properly. Thousands of heating and cooling systems are installed each year
that do not produce the intended energy savings due to improper installation
techniques. The costing will depend on the soil conditions, plot size, system
configuration, site accessibility and the amount of digging and drilling required. Even so,
a geothermal system will cost about 40 percent more than a traditional HVAC system.
3. Almost 50-60% of the total project cost involves Ground Thermal Analysis, Modeling
and Sensitivity Analysis for the designing of primary and secondary loops. These
processes are done by highly accredited professionals. Hence, sizing, design and
installation require pro-expertise for the most efficient system. There are very few
installers involved in erection and commissioning of water sourced VRF system in
combination with Geo-thermal system with natural closed loop system.
4. Heavy drilling and digging is required on earth surface which is quite a tedious
job. However, vertical installations are typically much more expensive than
horizontal installations because of the cost of drilling several hundred feet
underground.
5. Most of the Water Source VRF units have factory installed stainless steel plate heat
exchangers. In order to protect these heat exchangers, it is recommended to use
closed geothermal water loops. Should open geothermal systems be used, an
intermediate heat exchanger should be installed to isolate VRF units from
contaminants in the water system. Open geothermal loops may contain minerals,
biological contaminants, corrosive agents, or other substances which can cause
scale, fouling or corrosion, that could degrade performance or shorten the life of the
heat exchanger and unit.
Hence, an intermediate heat exchanger will be necessary which will add up extra cost.
6. De-mineralized or RO water will be required as a makeup water for the primary
loop between Water Sourced VRF unit and intermediate heat exchanger. Since, we
are planning to construct Ion-Exchange plant for drinking water supply in the building
with capacity 300-400 LPH. Hence, we have to increase our plant capacity which will
again add up extra cost.
7. There will be a huge piping and instrumentation job required at both sides
(VRF outdoor units as well as Geo-thermal Exchanger side). Hence, a separate
maintenance team including a Mechanical Engineer & Fitter will be required in
each shift as there will be every time occupancy in the building (Central Control
Room or Load Dispatch Centre) which will again add up extra cost. (Piping &
Instrumentation drawing for such a system is shown below in the diagram)
8. One of the reasons to not consider Traditional HVAC system (Chiller & Cooling Tower)
and to consider Air-Sourced VRF system was low maintenance and minimal Piping &
Instrumentation (PI) job. Though there will be less maintenance required in GeoThermal system but the same is not true in case of water source VRF coupled with
Geo-Thermal system.
9. There are very less references available in India for Water source VRF system
coupled with Geo-Thermal system. Hence, operational issues or problems are not
known.
10. Almost 10-year payback period. This cost includes extra CAPEX* for installing water
source VRF + Geo-Thermal Heat Sink system. Return of Investment can be achieved
thru OPEX.
Extra CAPEX*
Cost of Air Source VRF system = Rs. X
Cost of Water Source VRF System = Rs. 2X
Cost of Geothermal System = Rs. Y
Total cost of Water Source VRF coupled with Geo-Thermal system = Rs. (2X+Y)
Complete ROI calculation is also available in the next attachment.
11. Of course Geo-Thermal system is an efficient system leading to energy saving but on the
other hand Air-Source VRF system which is typically installed with an Air conditioner
inverter which adds a DC inverter to the compressor in order to support variable motor
speed and thus variable refrigerant flow rather than simply on/off operation. By operating
at varying speeds, VRF units work only at the needed rate allowing for substantial energy
savings at partial-load conditions. Heat recovery VRF technology allows individual indoor
units to heat or cool as required, while the compressor load benefits from the internal heat
recovery. Energy savings of up to 55% are predicted over comparable unitary equipment
in case of AIR Source VRF.
12. Geo-Thermal system can provide upto 10 LEED points under innovation category for Green
Building Certification. On the other hand, the Air-Sourced VRF systems use R-410A
refrigerant, which is applicable for LEED. The combination of the more efficient refrigerant,
variable refrigerant volume, inverter driven compressor, and DC fan and compressor motors
provide high coefficients of performance (COP), even at low temperatures.
13. While if we talk about only Water source VRF system and not Geo-Thermal system, we are
totally dependent on water for primary loop between VRF unit and intermediate heat
exchanger. If there occurs any sort of obstacle in the primary water circuit then whole AirConditioning system will be compromised. While, in case of Air-Source VRF there is no such
requirement of water circuit. Each unit can be separately taken OFFLINE for maintenance
without disturbing existing unit.
14. If we take the reference from recent visit to ISB, Mohali :
They have installed 3 nos. water cooled chillers each of 300 TR. At a time only 2 chillers are
working while 3rd is a standby.
a. Chiller 1 300 TR (Heat Exchange done thru Cooling Towers)
b. Chiller 2 300 TR (Heat Exchange done thru Cooling Towers)
c. Chiller 3 300 TR (Heat Exchange done thru Geo-Thermal Heat Sink System)
Looking at the benefits of only Geo-Thermal system, ISB management can easily dismantle
existing cooling towers and can sync their other 2 chillers with Geo-Thermal system but
they have not done yet.
Of course, M/s. GIBBS makes out a case that they were called for design, engineering,
supply, erection & commissioning of Geo-Thermal Heat Sink system at the very later stage
of the construction of ISB, Mohali project but the fact cannot be denied that ISB facility is
not fully dependent on Geo-Thermal Heat sink system.
Since, Geo-thermal heat sink system technology is new in India, ISB team doesnt want to
take any sort of risk.