1. The contract is not enforceable.

A contract of an immovable property entered orally is not

enforceable. It should be in writing to be enforceable regardless of amount. If it is partly
executed , meaning an amount was already given, then the contract is already enforceable,
because of the acceptance of benefits therein.
2. ARTICLE 1381. (1) -- It cannot be rescinded. A contract entered into by guardians
whenever the wards whom they represent suffer lesion by more than one-fourth of the value
of the things which are the object thereof can be rescinded by the person under guardianship,
the period after the termination of incapacity. 1,000 (41,000-40000) is not more than onefourth of 41,000, so it cannot be rescinded.
However, if the sale is only 1,000 (damage is already 40,000), then it is more than one-fourth
of the value of the object thereof, then Maya can rescind the sale after she reach the age of
majority.
3. NOT SURE . Solidarity is not presumed. The presumption where there are two or more
persons in one and the same obligation is that it is joint.
4. ARTICLE 1191. -- A contract of sale involves reciprocal obligation. Santos has the power
to rescind obligations is implied in reciprocal ones, in case one of the obligors should not
comply with what is incumbent upon him. The injured party may choose between the
fulfilment and the rescission of the obligation, with the payment of damages in either case. He
may also seek rescission, even after he has chosen fulfilment, if the latter should become
impossible.
Santos may demand payment of the equivalent value of the car with damages or rescission of
contract of sale between them with payment of damages also.
5. ARTICLE 1182. When the fulfilment of the condition depends upon the sole will of the
debtor, the conditional obligation shall be void. However, if the obligation is a pre-existing
one and, therefore, does not depend for its existence upon the fulfilment by the debtor of the
potestative condition, only the condition is void leaving unaffected the obligation itself. The
condition is imposed on the fulfilment.
Chastine can insist Domingo to pay not later than August 30, 2014.
6. This is a passive solidary obligation. He who made payment may claim from his codebtors only the share which corresponds to each, with the interest for the payment already
made. If the payment is made before the debt is due, no interest for the intervening period
may be demanded. When one of the solidary debtors cannot, because of his insolvency,
reimburse his share to the debtor paying the obligation, such share shall be borne by all his
co-debtors in proportion to the debt of each.
(a) Abihgale can collect 10,000 (30,000/3) each from Nancy and Jhunjhun.
(b) No, since Abihgale paid before the due date. There shall be no interest incurred between
the intervening period from September 9, 2014 to September 10, 2014.

(c) Abihgale can collect 15,000 from Nancy. The share of Jhunjhun shall be borne by Nancy
and Abihgale herself, equally at 5,000. Since, Nancy should reimburse Abihgale, 10,000 plus
her share in the insolvency of Jhunjhun, 5,000 equals 15,000.