Superior Court of Pennsylvania Case No. 1915 MDA 2015 ORDER Denying Motion To Quash by Lancaster County District Attorney Until Time of Disposition April 1, 2016

Filed 04/01/2016
Stanley J. Caterbone, et al.
V.
Lancaster City Police
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA
(C.P. Lancaster County

No.CP-36-MD-00011082015)
No. 1915 MDA 2015
ORDER
Disposition of appellees motion to quash this appeal, is hereby

deferred to the panel that will decide the merits of this appeal.
Per Curiam
By Directive Of: __________________________________________
Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq.

Prothonotary
Jennifer Traxler, Esq.
Deputy Prothonotary
Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Middle District
April 1, 2016
Pennsylvania Judicial Center

P.O. Box 62435
601 Commonwealth Avenue, Suite 1600
Harrisburg, PA 17106-2435
(717) 772-1294
www.pacourts.us/courts/superior-court
Stanley J. Caterbone
1250 Fremont St
Lancaster, PA 17603
RE:
Caterbone, J. & Adv. Media Grp. v. Lanc. Police

No. 1915 MDA 2015
Trial Court Docket No: CP-36-MD-0001108-2015
Dear Stanley J. Caterbone:

Enclosed please find a copy of an order dated April 1, 2016 entered in the above-captioned
matter.
Very truly yours,

Deputy Prothonotary
/af
Enclosure

Prothonotary
Deputy Prothonotary

Middle District
April 1, 2016

P.O. Box 62435
(717) 772-1294
Andrew James Gonzalez, Esq.

Lancaster County District Attorney's Office
Lancaster CO Da's Office
50 N Duke St
Lancaster, PA 17602-2805
RE:

No. 1915 MDA 2015
Dear Mr. Gonzalez:

matter.
Very truly yours,

Deputy Prothonotary
/af
Enclosure

Prothonotary
Deputy Prothonotary

Middle District
April 1, 2016

P.O. Box 62435
(717) 772-1294
Craig William Stedman, Esq.

50 N. Duke Street
Lancaster, PA 17602
RE:

No. 1915 MDA 2015
Dear Attorney Stedman:

matter.
Very truly yours,

Deputy Prothonotary
/af
Enclosure
File Copy
Docket No: 1915 MDA 2015
AOPC 1013
Rev. 04/01/2016
Instance: 2023689339
Service List
Addressed To:
Stanley J. Caterbone
1250 Fremont St
Lancaster, PA 17603
PACFile Registered
Andrew James Gonzalez, Esq.

Lancaster CO Da's Office
50 N Duke St
Lancaster, PA 17602-2805
PACFile Registered
Craig William Stedman, Esq.

50 N. Duke Street
Lancaster, PA 17602
PACFile Registered
J-A06020-16
STANLEY J. CATERBONE

PENNSYLVANIA
Appellant
v.
RESIDENTS OF THE COUNTY OF
LANCASTER PENNSYLVANIA
Appellees
No. 1561 MDA 2015
Appeal from the Order Entered September 1, 2015

In the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County
Civil Division at No(s): CI-15-06985
BEFORE: LAZARUS, J., STABILE, J., and DUBOW, J.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 1st day of March, 2016, the appellants Motion for
Extension of Time (Request for Continuance) is hereby GRANTED.
The
Prothonotary is directed to reschedule oral argument on the next available

panel.
PER CURIAM
Received 03/11/2016 Superior Court Middle District

Filed 03/11/2016 Superior Court Middle District
1915 MDA 2015
Stanley J. Caterbone, Appellant
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
:
Superior Court 1915 MDA 2015
MD-1108-2015
vs.
KIETH SADLER, Chief, Lancaster City Police Department

LANCASTER CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
DETECTIVE CLARK BEARINGER, Lancaster City Police Department
OFFICER WILLIAMS
OFFICER BINDERUP
RESPONSE TO MOTION TO QUASH

AND NOW, this 11th day of March, 2016, comes Stan J. Caterbone, pro se appellant, to presents
the following in support of an ORDER TO DISMISS motion to quash for the following reasons:
1.
The email, beginning on the following page, of June 16, 2008 to Patricia
Hartman of the United States Attorney's Office in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, which is one of
many communications back and forth, and the attached law regarding the Federal Tort
Claims Act should suffice to DISMISS THE MOTION TO QUASH!
Date: March 11, 2016

_________/S/ ______________
Pro Se
Advanced Media Group
Stan J. Caterbone
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
1915 MDA 2015 - Response to Motion To Quash
Page 1 of 65
March 11, 2016
__________________________________________________
RE: Request for a Formal Investigation into the
Lancaster County District Attorney Office
From: Stan Caterbone (amgroup01@msn.com)
Sent:Mon 6/16/08 6:52 AM
To: Hartman, Patricia (USAPAE) (patricia.hartman@usdoj.gov)
Cc: amgauctions@comcast.net
June 16, 2008
To: Patricia Hartman, USDOJ
Re: Complaint and Attorney General Gray in 1991
The following may be of interest to your office:
I have filed complaints to the FBI for Obstruction of Justice just last Friday, on October
24, May of 2006, and on and on.
December 30, 1991 9:50 am - Stan Caterbone travels to the U.S. Courthouse in Philadelphia, PA, and
personally delivers the chronology and a copy of the "1987" Pennsylvania Securities Commission
meeting to Chief Judge Bechtle, who is presiding over the ISC court preceding.
10:00 am Stan Caterbone visits the U.S. Attorney Generals office in the same building and files a formal
complaint, "Criminal Conspiracy to "cover-up" the International Signal a Control scandal. The proper
form is filed with the clerk. Assistant U. S. Attorney General Gray asks Stan Caterbone to briefly
describe his complaint. Stan Caterbone gives Gray the chronology along with the tapes. Stan Caterbone
briefly describes the meeting of June 23, 1987 with Larry Resch 1, the nay 23, 1991 phone call from Jay
Curtis, the arrests by Manheim Township, and the attempts on his life. Agent Gray took notes, and said
he is not familiar with the case, but would personally see that the information is passed to the proper
authorities involved in the case. During the conversation, Mr. Gray asked the exact same question that
was asked by both Joe Roda 2 and Investigator Eisler of the Pennsylvania Securities Commission) "But
you did not work for them (ISC), you were not involved with them?" Stan Caterbone 3 gave this
response to all questions by Mr. Gray: It's all in there (the chronology), all of the information and
events".
Larry Resh, without disclosure to Stan Caterbone, was one of 3 defendants sued by
Ferranti International for some $300 million dollars and held responsible for the $ Billion
Dollar Fraud.
2
Former Attorney for Stan J. Caterbone in 1987 who later represented In-HouseCounsel William Clark of International Signal & Control in Clark v. Guerin, and did not cite a
conflict of interest)
3
Stan Caterbone was a shareholder of record since 1983 and was formally and officially
solicited in person to finance operations of both ISC and United Chem Con by Mr. Larry Resh. See
the attached transcript of the meeting with Howard Eisler.
Page 2 of 65
March 11, 2016
The 'Lectric Law Library's Legal Lexicon On Federal Tort Claims Act
FEDERAL TORT CLAIMS ACT - The FTCA provides a limited waiver of the federal government's
sovereign immunity when its employees are negligent within the scope of their employment. Under the
FTCA, the government can only be sued 'under circumstances where the United States, if a private
person, would be liable to the claimant in accordance with the law of the place where the act or
omission occurred.' 28 U.S.C. S 1346(b). Thus, the FTCA does not apply to conduct that is
uniquely governmental, that is, incapable of performance by a private individual. 28 U.S.C. S
2680(h) provides that the government is not liable when any of its agents commits the torts
of assault, battery, false imprisonment4, false arrest5, malicious prosecution6, abuse of
process7, libel8, slander9, misrepresentation10, deceit11, or interference with contract rights12.
However, it also provides an exception. The government is liable if a law enforcement officer commits
assault, battery, false imprisonment, false arrest, abuse of process (not acting on complaints), or
malicious prosecution. The government is not liable if the claim against law enforcement officers is for
libel, slander, misrepresentation, deceit, or interference with contract. Congress has not waived the
government's sovereign immunity against all law enforcement acts or omissions.
Furthermore, the FTCA is limited by a number of exceptions pursuant to which the government is not
subject to suit, even if a private employer could be liable under the same circumstances. These
exceptions include the discretionary function exception, which bars a claim 'based upon the
exercise or performance or the failure to exercise or perform a discretionary function or duty on the
part of a federal agency or an employee of the Government, whether or not the discretion involved be
abused.' 28 U.S.C. S 2680(a).
In order to determine whether conduct falls within the discretionary function exception, the courts
must apply a two-part test established in Berkovitz v. U.S., 486 U.S. 531, 536 ('88). See Kennewick
4 Continues to this day, which invokes Civil and Criminal
Limitations in Civil Complaints.
5 Continues to this day, which invokes Civil and Criminal RICO,
Civil Complaints.
Civil Complaints.
Civil Complaints.
Civil Complaints.
Civil Complaints.
Civil Complaints.
Civil Complaints.
Civil Complaints.
Page 3 of 65
RICO, which Tolls the Statute of

which Tolls the Statute of Limitations in
March 11, 2016
Irrigation Dist. v. U.S., 880 F.2d 1018, 1025 (9th Cir.'89). First, the question must be asked whether the
conduct involved 'an element of judgment or choice.' U.S. v. Gaubert, 499 U.S. 315, 322 ('91)
(quotation omitted). This requirement is not satisfied if a 'federal statute, regulation, or policy
specifically prescribes a course of action for an employee to follow.' Berkovitz, 486 U.S. at 536. Once
the element of judgment is established, the next inquiry must be 'whether that judgment is of the kind
that the discretionary function exception was designed to shield' in that it involves considerations of
'social, economic, and political policy.' Gaubert, 499 U.S. At 322-23.Absent specific statutes or
regulations, where the particular conduct is discretionary, the failure of the government properly to train
its employees who engage in that conduct is also discretionary. See, e.g., Flynn v. U.S., 902 F.2d 1524
(10th Cir.'90) (failure of National Park Service to train its employees as to proper use of emergency
equipment was discretionary). The FTCA specifies that the liability of the U.S. is to be determined 'in
accordance with the law of the place where the [allegedly tortious] act or omission occurred.' 28 U.S.C.
S 1346(b). In an action under the FTCA, a court must apply the law the state courts would apply in the
analogous tort action, including federal law. See Caban v. U.S., 728 F.2d 68, 72 (2d Cir.'84); see also
Richards v. U.S., 369 U.S. 1, 11-13 ('62).
Under California law, a California court would apply federal law to determine whether an arrest by
a federal officer was legally justified and hence privileged. See Trenouth v. U.S., 764 F.2d 1305, 1307
(9th Cir.'85) (applying federal law in an FTCA action for false imprisonment to determine legality of
arrest by Department of Defense officers in California); cf. Gasho v. U.S., 39 F.3d 1420, 1427-32 (9th
Cir.'94) (applying federal law in FTCA false imprisonment action against federal customs officials to
determine if probable cause justified arrest in Arizona).
A plaintiff cannot bring an FTCA claim against the United States based solely on conduct that violates
the Constitution because such conduct may violate only federal, and not state, law. See FDIC v. Meyer,
114 S.Ct. 996, 1001 ('94).
The substitution provision of the Federal Employees Liability Reform and Tort Compensation Act
(FELRTCA) provides that '[u]pon certification by the Attorney General that the defendant employee was
acting within the scope of his office or employment at the time of the incident out of which the claim
arose . . . the United States shall be substituted as the party defendant.' 28 U.S.C. S 2679(d)(1). The
purpose of this amendment to the Federal Tort Claims Act was to 'remove the potential personal liability
of Federal employees for common law torts committed within the scope of their employment, and . . .
instead provide that the exclusive remedy for such
torts is through an action against the United States under the FTCA.' H.R. Rep. No. 700, 100 th Cong., 2d
Sess. 4 (1988) Under the FTCA, the U.S. is subject to liability for the negligence of an independent
contractor only if it can be shown that the government had authority to control the detailed physical
Page 4 of 65
March 11, 2016
performance of the contractor and exercised substantial supervision over its day-to-day activities.
See U.S. v. Orleans, 425 U.S. 807, 814-15 ('76); Letnes v. U.S., 820 F.2d 1517, 1519 (9 th Cir.'87).
"Well, there's an even greater right, and that's the right of life, liberty and to
live crime-free."
Craig Stedman, Lancaster County District Attorney
January 3, 2008
Lancaster Intelligencer Journal
Stan J. Caterbone
Visit Our Blog For Journey of a Whistleblower
Visit Our Blog For Research Into ESP - Mental Telepathy & The U.S. Governments Activities
Visit Our Video Biography
Notice and Disclaimer:
Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have been slandered, defamed, and
publicly discredited since 1987 due to going public (Whistle Blower) with allegations of misconduct and fraud within
International Signal & Control, Plc. of Lancaster, Pa. (ISC pleaded guilty to selling arms to Iraq via South Africa and
a $1 Billion Fraud in 1992). Unfortunately we are forced to defend our reputation and the truth without the aid of
law enforcement and the media, which would normally prosecute and expose public corruption. We utilize our
communications to thwart further libelous and malicious attacks on our person, our property, and our business. We
continue our fight for justice through the Courts, and some communications are a means of protecting our rights to
continue our pursuit of justice. Advanced Media Group is also a member of the media. Reply if you wish to be
removed from our Contact List. Number 7.
Page 5 of 65
March 11, 2016
EMAILING FOR THE GREATER GOOD

Subject: RE: Request for a Formal Investigation into the Lancaster County District Attorney Office
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 07:34:26 -0400
From: Patricia.Hartman@usdoj.gov
To: amgroup01@msn.com
Dear Mr. Caterbone,
Im not quite clear is your issue one of public corruption?
___________________________________________________
From: Stan Caterbone [mailto:amgroup01@msn.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 8:26 PM
To: Hartman, Patricia (USAPAE)
Cc: Caterbone, Stan
Subject: Request for a Formal Investigation into the Lancaster County District Attorney
Office
June 12, 2008
Please see attached and respond asap. Thank You. I hope Mr. Meehan is a bit more honest, forthright,
and not as corrupt as the Lancaster County District Attorney's Office is. When you have further
questions, email me and we can arrange a meeting. "Well, there's an even greater right, and that's the
right of life, liberty and to live crime-free." Craig Stedman, Lancaster County District Attorney January
3, 2008 Lancaster Intelligencer Journal
Stan J. Caterbone
Visit Our Blog For Journey of a Whistleblower
Visit Our Blog For Research Into ESP - Mental Telepathy & The U.S. Governments Activities
Visit Our Video Biography
Notice and Disclaimer:
Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have been slandered,
defamed, and publicly discredited since 1987 due to going public (Whistle Blower) with allegations of misconduct
and fraud within International Signal & Control, Plc. of Lancaster, Pa. (ISC pleaded guilty to selling arms to Iraq via
South Africa and a $1 Billion Fraud in 1992). Unfortunately we are forced to defend our reputation and the truth
without the aid of law enforcement and the media, which would normally prosecute and expose public corruption.
We utilize our communications to thwart further libelous and malicious attacks on our person, our property, and our
business. We continue our fight for justice through the Courts, and some communications are a means of protecting
our rights to continue our pursuit of justice. Advanced Media Group is also a member of the media. Reply if you wish
to be removed from our Contact List. Number 7.
Date: March 11, 2016
_________/S/ ______________
Pro Se
Stan J. Caterbone
Page 6 of 65
March 11, 2016
1987 NOTES OF MEETING WITH ISC EXECUTIVE LARRY RESCH ON JUNE 23, 1987
DATE:
JUNE 23, 1987 10:00 am
PLACE:
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT GROUP, LTD 1755 OREGON PIKE LANCASTER, PA 17601
SUBJECT:
SCHEDULED MEETING OF STAN CATERBONE, LARRY RESCH, AND CARL JACOBSON OF

UNITED CHEM CON (COVERT ISC EXECUTIVE)
Upon the arrival of Mr. Larry Resch, Stan Caterbone net him in the lobby of FMG, Ltd., at
which time Larry Resell said "Carl Jacobson could not attend, we had to suddenly fly Mm
out of the country early this mourning.
The meeting was started with the subject of the financial difficulties of United Chem Con
and possible alternatives. Larry Resch specifically addressed the possibility of moving the
operations of United Chem Con to another facility, with specific regards to the Renevo
Plant, Larry Resch specifically addressed the financing capabilities of Stan Caterbone, along
with possible management opportunities.
Larry Resch also gave financial statements and documents to Stan Caterbone for the latest
fiscal year for United Chem Con.
Stan Caterbone went on to allege that United Chem Con had embezzled some $15,000,000
from the United States Government for contracts that contained improprieties.
Stan Caterbone also alleged improprieties of International Signal & Control and James
Guerin, with specific regards to its role in the United Chen Con, and its business activities
as related to government contracts.
Stan Caterbone noted that he, as a legal shareholder of International Signal & Control was
concerned about improper business activities.
Larry Resch was taken by surprise by all of the above.
Stan Caterbone became quite upset by the evasiveness and the lack of specifics with
regards to Larry Resch's conversation.
In efforts to thwart any further communication from James Guerin, United Chem Con, or
International Signal & Control, Stan Caterbone demanded a retainer fee of $10,000 before
anyone contacted him again.
It should be noted that it was quite evident that Larry Resch was merely acting as a
messenger for James Guerin and or others, and Stan Caterbone has continued a relationship
with Larry Resch that was not reflective of any improper activities or misconduct.
Page 7 of 65
March 11, 2016
RECORDED TRANSCRIPT WITH THE PENNSYLVANIA

SECURITIES COMMISSION
"JAMES GUERIN AND ISC OPERATIONS"
SEPTEMBER 29, 1987
Subject: Recorded excerpts from a recorded transcript between Stanley J.

Caterbone and Howard Eisler, Agent of the Pennsylvania State Securities
Commission.
This transcript was recorded with the approval of ail present parties.
Date of Conference: September 29th 1987
Place of Conference: 2323 New Danville Pike Conestoga, PA
Relationship to James Guerin: ISC Shareholder
Debtor to Parent Federal Savings and Loan
The following transcripts represent a few of the convections recorded during the
17512
meeting.
[DEFENSE ATTORNEY ROBERT BEYERS] Chem Con is the big local minority-held
corporation that was doing a lot of Defense contracts-it was associated with ISC. They
went under last spring, beginning of the summer, and there was a lot of criminal
allegations made, none of them substantiated.
[STAN CATERBONE] And I was connected with that. They sent a board member hi to
see me a week before this happened. Why. I don't know.
[STAN CATERBONE] "Jim Christian owned it - now I hear rumors that I was tied to
ISC and I am dose to several people in that organization. Why they sent someone in to
California to see me, I don't know. They wont answer me." "they wanted me to talk to
a guy from D.C, New York, a guy from the Caribbean. I don't know what the hell is
going on."
[DEFENSE ATTORNEY ROBERT BEYERS] "the supposition was - I don't know how
true it was a front for ISC."
[STAN CATERBONE] "It was, I'll tell you why. Because when Chem Con was
started, back to their inception, you look at ISC's books. They didn't have any
money. Well, the first thing Chem Con did was they went and got all that free money
from the government and you look where that money went. I bet I know where it
went, 'this guy named Guerin, James Guerin, And I know that they were setting
Page 8 of 65
March 11, 2016
contracts back. He runs ISC and he also has his fingers pretty deeply into Chem Con.
He's the one who started Chem Con, Guerin is the one who started it."
[BILL JOHNSON, CLIENT OF STAN CATERBONE] Wasn't there some allegations
about a tie to Wedtech?" (Defense Contractor of New York)
[STAN CATERBONE] "You bet they were tied, you'd better believe they were tied
with Wedtech. The same guys in Wedtech were involved with ISC and Chem Con.
ISC is sold over the London Exchange. (I bought my shares from Gib Armstrong) I
owned a thousand shares. I sold it when things started to hit the
. Now they just
did a multibillion dollar merger with a company in London.. They probably think this
is going to cover their tracks. "What they did was, they fronted all that money and
started the contracts, went bankrupt, and now the government is stuck for
$18,000,000. I know right now in this town's viewpoint, I stole money, I am insane,
and I am a lunatic. I tell you I will not condemn Jim Christian until he tells to my face
what happened. I was framed and set up. I don't know maybe Jim Christian doesn't
have the money. Maybe Guerin has ft or somebody else.
[HOWARD EISLER, AGENT PA SECURITIES COMMISSION] The items in the
column (newspaper column) is the reporting of your somehow somebody associated
with - oh, someone associated
[STAN CATERBONE] in your District Office?
[HOWARD EISLER, AGENT PA SECURITIES COMMISSION] Yea. of course you
were also one of the principals in the - I still am the minor one - yes, the Financial
Management Group - there is about 50 names I am dealing with here and they are all
very similar so I have to be Financial Management Group Ltd. filed for 202B
exemption. Now all the security sold in PA had to be registered. Some securities are
exempt but you have to apply the detention type of thing. It is a registration, not a
registration that
so the 203D exemption was filed for.
Of course we have added
the security statement - explanation of where the money is going to be spent, how it is
going to be run, who runs the corporation and all that sort of thing.
Now under the
umbrella of this Financial Management Group there is a whole (now I am repeating

what is in the 203D which I spent some time Friday reading) - there is about 15, 14-1
guess under that there is about 5 other corporations, which are going to be insurance
agency, an investment advising agency, a group - now a lot of these things

have not come about.
Page 9 of 65
[STAN CATERBONE] Well we simplified it.
March 11, 2016
[HOWARD EISLER, AGENT PA SECURITIES COMMISSION] What do you mean

simplified it?
[STAN CATERBONE] They are operating but because of the accounting procedures
they would have been a nightmare with all those subs. So, they are operating the only
one that's separate distinction is the RIA (Registered Investment Advisor).
Everything else is operating under Financial Management Group Limited.

[HOWARD EISLER, AGENT PA SECURITIES COMMISSION] So these other
corporations have not really come into being.

[STAN CATERBONE] Technically, legally, no.
[HOWARD EISLER, AGENT PA SECURITIES COMMISSION] I seen also; I guess
there is an application for an investment advisor.

Securities or dealing with
Now, if you are selling
_. Now that came in under your name
[STAN CATERBONE] at that time I was President

[HOWARD EISLER, AGENT PA SECURITIES COMMISSION] but now there is
another application in that is being acted on now by somebody else.

[STAN CATERBONE] There is? I don't know who. Is that for the advisor?
[HOWARD EISLER, AGENT PA SECURITIES COMMISSION] Yes, the Registered
investment advisor.
[STAN CATERBONE] Do your current records in Harrisburg indicate that he

is still an executive with FMG?
Yes, because this offering memorandum was
given back last March I think, - last August - when I initially did it.
[HOWARD EISLER, AGENT PA SECURITIES COMMISSION] Oh, no, pardon me.
We are talking about two different things.
You are talking about your
application for the investment advisor.

[STAN CATERBONE] No, I am talking about FMG - the offering memorandum
1915 MDA 2015
Response
Motion To
Quash that's
Pagewhen
10 of 65
March 11, 2016
was- done
lasttoAugust
because
I started raising the money. August
of 1986 is when I did the initial filing for the offering memorandum - the 144
Reg D. Coming up this October is the 203D, 15 months
after conception. Alright, yea. There is a report that is due a
year after - Right,
that's what is coming up - to explain how much money was
raised and where it was
spent with the idea then of protecting investors. The idea of the
Page 11 of 65
your are
March 11, 2016
limited to like 35 investors.
You can't sell to 105 - you are limited. What the
state
does is comes in and says, how are you going to raise the money in your
offering
memorandum. Then a year after it is raised, or a year after
_ they
come in
and say, now what did you do with the money. You raised 4 hundred and
some odd thousand, now how did you spend it? Now that has not been
filed yet. It is due, in fact I think it is overdue. It is due October 20. I
got the letter right here. They just sent me the letter. You guys just
sent me the letter, I have it right here.
I have nothing to do with that end of it. I just came, well whenever I called
you
______ I didn't get a hold of you the next day; it was the following day
which was
Friday that we made contact.
Our Idea in coming here was to let you ask whatever questions you had in
terms of the investigation. Of my limited knowledge of the type of securities
these guys deal with and securities in general, the things that came to
interest me was the fact that there
arc stock certificates in here in force with names on them that ____ , that
there
are with the annual report, his name is forged by someone else. This
gentleman has some involvement with the original group and the President
suggested that he make false reports to the bonding company so that he can
get money back. They are the three things that stuck out to me as a
regular criminal attorney, that I thought you might be interest in because,
but like I say, we are here to have you ask questions of anything that you
might.
O.K., this offering then - when Financial Management Group limited applied
for their 203D, I get the idea they were going to raise four hundred and
some odd thousand dollars. At that time, they listed Bob Kauffman at
60,000 shares and you and Hartlett 40,000 a piece. So, Kauff man at this
point is the main factor? Or, when 1 was talking to you, it was really your
idea that put this whole thing together. I put it all together. I brought him
up from Atlanta to be president because I have a lot of business interests
and I didn't want to be tied down to the day-to-day operation. Plus, I
never had any management experience. Most of my work was consulting,
business
deals,
this and
that, so Page
I actually
to 11, 2016
1915 MDA 2015
- Response
to Motion
To Quash
12 of 65brought him up from AtlantaMarch
be president And, Hartlett - is he a complete local person. He's local. We

all started together in IDS back in 1982. That's your connection with
Kauffman, you know him through IDS? He's the one that got me started in
business. I am the one who took him to FSC, that was our broker/dealer
and
Page 13 of 65
March 11, 2016
Page 14 of 65
March 11, 2016
Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
Page
Page
Page115
1ofofof
51
51
65
Thursday, December
March 11,
17, 2016
2015
scaterbone@live.com
https://www.scribd.com/stan5j.5caterbone
Stan J. Caterbone
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717)669-2163
PRESS RELEASE
Saturday, July 4, 2015
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Proposed ORGANIZED
STALKING AND DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS HARASSMENT BILL to Pennsylvania House of
Representative Mike Sturla (Lancaster, Pennsylvania) and City of Lancaster Mayor Richard Gray.
The draft legislation is the work of Missouri House of Representative Jim Guest, who has been
working on helping victims of these horrendous crimes for years. The bill will provide protections to
individuals who are being harassed, stalked, harmed by surveillance, and assaulted; as well as
protections to keep individuals from becoming human research subjects, tortured, and killed by
electronic frequency devices, directed energy devices, implants, and directed energy weapons.
Stan J. Caterbone has been a victim of organized stalking since 1987 and a victim of electronic and
direct energy weapons since 2005. He has also been telepathic since 2005. Stan J. Caterbone will
help introduce measures that also pertain to remote viewing; mental telepathy and synthetic
telepathy in more detail. Personal accounts of his pain and torture are also filed in various United
States federal and state courts.
We are urging you to contact your local representatives and support our efforts to pass this
legislation. Below you will find the listings of Pennsylvania State Representatives.
For More Information Please Contact Us At: scaterbone@live.com and visit our library of
documents at https://www.scribd.com/stan5j.5caterbone
_________________________________________________
The draft of the legislation can be found on the following page:
Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Grop
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
Page
Page
Page
Page
116
2
2ofof
1of
50
51
51
65
Thursday,
Friday, December
March 11,
17, 2016
2015
Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Grop
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
Page
Page
Page3
217
3ofofof
50
51
51
65
Thursday,
Friday, December
March 11,
17, 2016
2015
Capitol Office
State Capitol
Jefferson City Mo.
573-751-0246
District Office
Second Street
King City Mo.
660-535-6664
May 21, 2009

To Whom It May Concern,
This letter is to ask for your help for the many constituents in our country who are being affected unjustly
by electronic weapons torture and covert harassment groups. Serious privacy rights violation and physical
injuries have been caused by the activities of these groups and their use of so-called non-lethal weapons on
men, women, and even children.
I am asking you to play a role in helping these victims and also stopping the massive movement in the use
of Veri-chip and RFID technologies in tracking Americans.
Long before Veri-chip was known we were testing these devices on Americans, many without their
knowledge or consent.
There are new revelations of the cancer risk besides the privacy and human rights problems with the use of
Veri-chip and RF signals.
I am asking for your help in stopping these abuses and aiding those already affected.
Sincerely,
Rep. Jim Guest
Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Grop
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
Page
Page
Page4
318
4ofofof
50
51
51
65
Thursday,
Friday, December
March 11,
17, 2016
2015
Organized Stalking and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons Bill
Section 1. Short Title This bill may be cited as the Organized Stalking and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons
Bill
Section 2. Findings and Purpose
A) Findings
1) The constitution guarantees the right of the people to be secure in their person. The Declaration
of Independence asserts as self-evident that all men have certain inalienable rights and that among
these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
2) As Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis wrote in 1928, the framers of the Constitution sought
"to protect Americans in their beliefs, their thoughts, their emotions, and their sensations." It is for
this reason that they established, as against the government, the right to be let alone as "the most
comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men.
3) The first principle of the Nuremberg Code states that with respect to human research, the
voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. The Nuremberg Code further
asserts that such consent must be competent, informed, and comprehending.
4)There are current regulations implementing the obligations of the United States to adhere to
Article 3 of the United Nations Convention Against Torture and other Forms of Cruel, Inhumane or
Degrading Treatment including all terms that are Subject to any reservations, understandings,
declarations, and provisions contained in the United States Senate resolution of ratification of the
Convention.
B) Purpose
To establish regulations and penalties for those who use any type of electronic frequency devices,
directed energy devices, implants, surveillance technology, and directed energy weapon to
purposefully cause any of the following: stalking, harassing, mental or physical harm, injury,
harmful surveillance, torture, diseases, and death to any United States citizen.
Section 3. Organized Stalking
If two or more persons willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follow or willfully and maliciously
harass another person and who make a credible threat with the intent to place that person in
reasonable fear for his or her safety, or the safety of his or her immediate family, they are guilty of
the crime of organized stalking, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one
year, or by not more than one thousand dollars ($ 1,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment,
or by imprisonment in a federal prison.
If two or more persons violate subdivision (a) when there is a temporary restraining order,
injunction, or any other court order in effect prohibiting the behavior described in subdivision (a)
against the same party, they shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three,
or four years.
For the purposes of this section, "harass" means engages in a knowing and willful course of
conduct directed at a specific person that seriously alarms, annoys, torments, or terrorizes the
person, or damages his personal property or possessions and that serves no legitimate purpose. *
**
Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Grop
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
Page
Page
Page
Page
419
5
5ofof
2of
50
51
51
65
Thursday,
Friday, December
March 11,
17, 2016
2015
For the purposes of this section, "course of conduct" means two or more acts occurring over a
period of time, however short, evidencing a continuity of purpose. Constitutionally protected
activity is not included within the meaning of "course of conduct."
For the purposes of this section, "credible threat" means a verbal or written threat, including that
performed through the use of an electronic communication device, or a threat implied by a pattern
of conduct or a combination of verbal, written, or electronically communicated statements and
conduct, made with the intent to place the person that is the target of the threat in reasonable fear
for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family, or personal property or possessions and
made with the apparent ability to carry out the threat so as to cause the person who is the target
of the threat to reasonably fear for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family or personal
property or possessions. It is not necessary to prove that the defendant had the intent to actually
carry out the threat. The present incarceration of a person making the threat shall not be a bar to
prosecution under this section. Constitutionally protected activity is not included within the
meaning of "credible threat."
For purposes of this section, the term "electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited
to, telephones, cellular phones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or synthetic
telepathy devices.
The sentencing court also shall consider issuing an order restraining the defendant from any
contact with the victim, that may be valid for up to 10 years, as determined by the court. It is the
intent of the Legislature that the length of any restraining order be based upon the seriousness of
the facts before the court, the probability of future violations, and the safety of the victim and his
or her immediate family.
For purposes of this section, "immediate family" means any spouse, parent, child, any person
related by consanguinity or affinity within the second degree, or any other person who regularly
resides in the household, or who, within the prior six months, regularly resided in the household.
Section 4. Punishment for threats
Any person or persons who willfully threatens to commit a crime which will result in death or great
bodily injury to another person, with the specific intent that the statement, made verbally, in
writing, or by means of an electronic communication device, is to be taken as a threat, even if
there is no intent of actually carrying it out, which, on its face and under the circumstances in
which it is made, is so unequivocal, unconditional, immediate, and specific as to convey to the
person threatened, a gravity of purpose and an immediate prospect of execution of the threat, and
thereby causes that person reasonably to be in sustained fear for his or her own safety or for his or
her immediate family's safety, shall be punished by imprisonment in a federal prison not to exceed
one year..
For the purposes of this section, "immediate family" means any spouse, whether by marriage or
not, parent, child, any person related by consanguinity or affinity within the second degree, or any
other person who regularly resides in the household, or who, within the prior six months, regularly
resided in the household.
"Electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited to, telephones, cellular telephones,
computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or synthetic telepathy devices
Obscene, threatening or annoying communication
(a) Every person or persons who, with intent to annoy, telephones or makes constant contact by
means of an electronic communication device with another and addresses to or about the other
person any obscene language or addresses to the other person any threat to inflict injury to the
person or any member of his or her family, or any property or personal possessions is guilty of a
misdemeanor. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or electronic contacts made
in good faith.
Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Grop
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
Page
Page
Page
Page
520
6
6ofof
3of
50
51
51
65
Thursday,
Friday, December
March 11,
17, 2016
2015
(b) Every person or persons who makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by
means of an electronic communication device with intent to annoy another person at his or her
residence, is, whether or not conversation ensues from making the telephone call or electronic
contact, is guilty of a misdemeanor. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or
electronic contacts made in good faith.
(c)
Every person or persons who makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by
means of an electronic communication device with the intent to annoy another person at his or her
place of work is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than one thousand
dollars ($ 1,000), or by imprisonment in a federal prison for not more than one year, or by both
that fine and imprisonment. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or electronic
contacts made in good faith. This subdivision applies only if one or both of the following
circumstances exist:
(1) There is a temporary restraining order, an injunction, or any other court order, or any
combination of these court orders, in effect prohibiting the behavior described in this section.
(2) The person or persons makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by means of
an electronic communication device with the intent to annoy another person at his or her place of
work, totaling more than 10 times in a 24-hour period, whether or not conversation ensues from
making the telephone call or electronic contact, and the repeated telephone calls or electronic
contacts are made to the workplace of an adult or fully emancipated minor who is a spouse, former
spouse, cohabitant, former cohabitant, or person with whom the person has a child or has had a
dating or engagement relationship or is having a dating or engagement relationship.
(d) Any offense committed by use of a telephone may be deemed to have been committed where
the telephone call or calls were made or received. Any offense committed by use of an electronic
communication device or medium, including the Internet, may be deemed to have been committed
when the electronic communication or communications were originally sent or first viewed by the
recipient.
(e) Subdivision (a), (b), or (c) is violated when the person acting with intent to annoy makes a
telephone call requesting a return call and performs the acts prohibited under subdivision (a), (b),
or (c) upon receiving the return call.
(f) If probation is granted, or the execution or imposition of sentence is suspended, for any person
or persons convicted under this section, the court may order as a condition of probation that the
person participate in counseling.
(g) For purposes of this section, the term "electronic communication device" includes, but is not
limited to, telephones, cellular phones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or
synthetic telepathy devices.
Section 5. Assault and battery with an electronic or directed energy weapon

Any person or persons who in the course of organized stalking and harassment, commits an assault
upon the person of another with an unauthorized directed energy weapon shall be punished by
imprisonment in a federal prison for two, three, or four years or by a fine not exceeding ten
thousand dollars ($10,000).
For the purposes of this section the term directed energy weapon is defined as any device that
directs a source of energy (including molecular or atomic energy, subatomic particle beams,
electromagnetic radiation, plasma, or extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultra low frequency (ULF)
energy radiation) against a person or any other unacknowledged or as yet undeveloped means of
inflicting death or injury; or damaging or destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily health,
Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Grop
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
Page
Page
Page
Page
621
7
7ofof
4of
50
51
51
65
Thursday,
Friday, December
March 11,
17, 2016
2015
mental health, or physical and economic well-being of a person via land-based, sea-based, or
space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies
directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood
management, or mind control of such persons or populations; or by expelling chemical or biological
agents in the vicinity of a person.
Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Grop
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
Page
Page
Page
Page
722
8
8ofof
5of
50
51
51
65
Thursday,
Friday, December
March 11,
17, 2016
2015
Richmond council passes resolution

supporting ban on space-based
weapons
May 20, 2015

FacebookTwitterMore
9 comments
The Richmond City Council passed a resolution Tuesday supporting a ban on space-based
weapons after a lengthy discussion over whether individuals are being psychologically
and physically harmed by exotic government-patented attacks from high in the sky.
Councilmember Jovanka Beckles, a member of the Richmond Progressive Alliance (RPA),
introduced the resolution, saying it begins to address concerns of a Richmond resident
who claims shes been targeted by remote transmission from space-based weaponry.
Others claiming to have suffered physical and psychological attacks traveled from around
the country to speak at Tuesdays council meeting. One speaker claimed to have been
zapped multiple times right before his testimony at council.
The resolution supports the Space Preservation Act and Space Preservation Treaty
permanently banning space-based weapons, even though the legislation first introduced
by Rep. Dennis Kucinich in 2001 has never gained traction in Congress. It appears that
Richmond is the first municipality in the U.S. to take up this lofty issue in more than a
decade. In 2002, the City of Berkeley passed a similar resolution supporting the ban.
Conspiracy theorists believe the resolution is a step toward ensuring secret weaponry
such as chemtrails, which are trails left in the sky by high-flying aircraft that supposedly
emit a chemical or biological agent, can no longer target unwitting citizens. For RPA
members on the council, the resolution is also an anti-war initiative.
RPA members on council, Gayle McLaughlin and Eduardo Martinez, also voted in favor of
the resolution. Vice Mayor Jael Myrick and Councilmember Nat Bates were the final two
yes votes, although Bates claimed he was confused by the discussion.
Im going to support the resolution for the simple reason that we have voted on a lot of
Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Grop
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
Page
Page
Page
Page
823
9
9ofof
8of
50
51
51
65
Thursday,
Friday, December
March 11,
17, 2016
2015
dumb ideas, Bates said.

Mayor Tom Butt voted no, saying he believes the conspiracy theory behind space-based
weapons is above the heads of city leaders and has taken time away from more pressing
city matters such as the budget deficit, potholes, and crime. Butt has complained in the
past about the RPA attempting to hijack council sessions to push a radical agenda
regardless of whether the issues are important to Richmond residents.
The mayor also pointed to a signed 1967 treaty banning the militarization of space.
The other dissenting vote came from Councilmember Vinay Pimple, who pointed out that
supporting a limitation on the ability of the U.S. to defend against attacks from longrange missiles might not be wise.
Pimple disputed what he called knee-jerk reactions from RPA members who depicted
President Ronald Reagans proposed space-based anti-missile program of 1983, known as
the Star Wars initiative, as inherently evil. The Cold War initiative was intended to
defend against USSR missiles during the Cold War and was shelved not for the projects
moral ambiguity but its perceived effectiveness, Pimple said.
The idea behind Star Wars, Pimple said, is you can knock out someones weapons long
before they enter your air space. The U.S. used Patriot missiles to knock out Iraqi Scuds
targeting Israel and Saudi Arabia, he added.
RPA members, however, argued that this issue is not just about war but about the
individuals in the U.S. who believe governments are using futuristic weapons in space for
the purpose of inflicting pain and mind control. Martinez argued that they may very well
be telling the truth. He recalled a science fiction novel he wrote a paper on during college
that predicted truths 20 years in advance.
Its easy for me to see that things which are wrong can happen because we have the
wrong mindset, Martinez said.
Myrick said he supported the resolution because he doesnt support war.
The weaponization of spaceis something I think is extremely immoral and we should
not be as a nation engaging in, Myrick said. Maybe some wars are unavoidable, that
may be true. But whatever we can do to get our country away from that mindset..thats
why I support this resolution.
Amy Lee Anderson, a targeted individual who brought the matter to Beckles attention,
was thankful that the council took up the issue.
No where in the United States, no targeted individual can get this support, Anderson
said. We just needed one person, one city. Because of that, you all our heroes. We are
dying within because the technology is so sophisticated. Its hard for someone who has
no experience to fathom it, its so sophisticated.
Related posts:
1. Richmond councilmember pushes city resolution banning exotic space-based

weapons
2. Dirty bomb drill in Richmond alarms conspiracy theorists, including Alex Jones
Comments
1. Cmon Richmond Standard.your bias is showing!

Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Grop
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
10
910
24
of
of
9of
of
50
51
51
65
Thursday,
Friday, December
March 11,
17, 2016
2015
Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
October 10, 2015
Federal Whistleblower
and
Targeted Individual (Victim)
of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
Executive Summary
Updated on October 10, 2015
I remain,
Stan J. Caterbone
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL: Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant, and the Advanced Media
Group are victims of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control and has been engaged in litigation in both
Federal and State courts seeking financial remedies and a resolution of his Civil Liberties and
his Constitutional Rights. In 1987 Stan J. Caterbone, while managing the financial firm the he
founded, Financial Management Group, Ltd., Stan J. Caterbone became a Federal Whistleblower
when, as a shareholder, he claimed fraud and misconduct within the international arms dealer
and local start-up International Signal & Control, Plc., Some 4 years later ISC was indicted and
plead guilty to the 3rd largest fraud in U.S. history, some $1 Billion and selling arms to Irag via
South Africa. In June of 2015 Stan J. Caterbone became the Movant in the U.S. District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania case No. 5:14-cv-02559-PD for the Habeus Corpus
Petition of Lisa Michelle Lambert. The case is now before the U.S. Third Circuit Court of
Appeals, Case No. 15-3400.
Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Grop
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
Page
Page
Page11
10
25of
ofof
of41
50
51
51
65
Page
111
Thursday,
Friday, December
March10,
11,
17, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, LTD.,
&
STAN J. CATERBONE
Federal Whistleblower (Federal False Claims Act Violation in 1987 re ISC)
Targeted Individual of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
copyright 2009
Ya know what, I am beginning to analyze this War on Terror and am having difficulty understanding
it all. To me the most effective fundamental fight against Extreme Terrorism is to reduce the motive; or the
Hatred Against America. No one seems to talk about that subject. How do we reduce that Hatred Towards
America and the West?
See, from my perspective, my situation is very disturbing. I mean we have the United States Torturing Me, a
U.S. Citizen for no good or valid reason. I have warned EVERYONE about using my situation to feed this
HATRED towards America.
Low and behold a week or so ago I have had several Muslims sign up as Followers to my
www.scribd.com/amgroup01 online webspace, which I use to post documents. The following being the most
prominent IKWAN Scope, "The Largest Muslim Brotherhood's Scope on the Web":
http://ikhwanscope.net/main/
There have also been several Muslim individuals who signed up as followers around the same time, a week
or so ago. They have also signed up as followers on my www.twitter.com/StanCaterbone webspace.
You must understand, I am a VERY Patriotic Person and live a very patriotic life - I believe in the
U.S. Constitution and Our Founding Father's vision for America; I support Our Military and our
Troops; I believe in the Rule of Law; I am a Practicing Catholic, and have been my whole life; I
Believe in the TRUTH; I believe in Right v. Wrong; Good v. Evil; and finally I believe in God. What
do you believe in?
Posted on the Yahoo Fulton Bank Stock Message Board, January 7, 2010
Date Updated:
October 10, 2015
Date Completed:
Date Initiated:
July 28, 2009

July 8, 2009
Stan J. Caterbone
scaterbone@live.com
Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Grop
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
Page
Page
Page12
11
26of
ofof
of41
50
51
51
65
Page
212
Thursday,
Friday, December
March10,
11,
17, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
UDATE OF SEPTEMBER 27, 2015

In 2015 Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group had to again return to local,
state, and federal courts. Again the obstruction of due process, the local gang stalking, torture,
trespass, thefts, and the like began in earnest.
From the fabricated Petition for Involuntary
Psychiatric Commitment of April 2010 by Detective Clark Bearinger, until January of 2015, Stan J.
Caterbone and Advanced Media Group had been in seclusion and in a state of rehabilitation and
rest due to the forced medication by Fairmount Behavioral Hospital and Dr. Silvia Gratz.
The
psychotropic drugs reduce your motor skills and put you in an extreme state of confusion.
By
the
end
of
the
summer
of
2010
every
social
media
site,
including
the
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com website was taken off-line due to the intimidation and

coercion by Detective Clark Bearinger.
In May Stan J. Caterbone had again endured the Attacks and Torture from the
employees of the Lancaster County Courthouse, and the Lancaster County Government Building.
Then soon after the Residents of Lancaster County engaged in a massive Organized Stalking
Campaign. In addition an extreme Computer Hacking Campaign was initiated and executed in
an effort to again SILENCE Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group.
And Again, the
Lancaster City Police Department took the lead role. As usual Stan J. Caterbone summoned state
and federal authorities for help and assistance, including direct communications with the White
House, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and
Kathleen Kane, The Pennsylvania State Police, the Pennsylvania General Assembly, several U.S.
Congressmen, and of course the Lancaster County District Attorney's Office.
Since August 1,
2015 the Geek Squad had performed diagnostics and repairs six (6) times due to computer
hacking. On at least 2 occasions the entire hard drive had to be wiped clean and restored.
On June 23, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone was named MOVANT in the 2014 Habeus
Corpus Petition by Lisa Michelle Lambert, Case No. 14:02559 in the U.S. District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania after filing an Amicus on the case. Judge Paul
Diamond was presiding since it's filing in 2014. However, the Petition was not able to
be granted and the case was stalled on jurisdictional law based on new and compelling
evidence, or lack there of.
The Amicus was filed to cure that deficiency with direct
witness corroboration to the Prosecutorial Misconduct and Innocence of Lisa Michelle

Lambert.
In fact a working theory was filed that suggested that the East Lampeter
Police Department engaged in a strategy of Entrapment that lead to the unfortunate

murder in 1991. This, would of course, allow a wrongful death claim to be filed by the
Show family. The case is now before the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, Case No. 153400. There are three (3) questions that the Third Circuit may rule on; whether to free
Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Grop
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
Page
Page
Page13
12
27of
ofof
of41
50
51
51
65
Page
313
Thursday,
Friday, December
March10,
11,
17, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
Lisa Michelle Lambert, or grant her her Habeus Corpus, and whether to grant Summary
Judgment to Stan J. Caterbone in all civil actions in both state and federal courts.
Two weeks later, on July 9, 2015, Detective Clark Bearinger filed another fabricated
Petition for Involuntary Psychiatric Commitment. And again Stan J. Caterbone endured 7 days in
the Fairmount Behavioral Hospital in Philadelphia.
However, this time there was
no
MANDATORY Treatment Program Ordered by the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas.
So Stan J. Caterbone continued filing in the courts for assistance and resolution. In August, in a
desperate attempt to stop the local torture campaign, another Emergency Injunction was filed in
the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. On August 6, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone went so far
as to undertake a Professional Polygraph Test administered by Bonnie Lee of Polygraph Solutions
of West Chester, Pennsylvania. The test ended up being 4 grueling hours of torture and a scam of
$600.00.
On July 9th , 2015 a Private Criminal Complaint was filed against Detective Clark Bearinger,
Officer Williams, Officer Binderup, and 2 unidentified patrolman.
The Complaint contained
allegations of torture and abuse at every moment of contact.
The Lancaster City Police
Department were so desperate for retaliation from the Amicus filing in the Lisa Michelle Lambert
case, that they actually broke the door in of 1250 Fremont Street in order to execute the
fabricated 302 petition. The Complaint was denied by the Lancaster County District Attorney on
August 8th . The Complaint is now under a Petition for Review by the Lancaster County Court of
Common Pleas.
On August 17, 2015 another Emergency Injunction for Relief was filed in the Lancaster
County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 15-06985. The Injunction was heard by Judge Jeffrey
Wright, who dismissed it as frivolous. An appeal, MD 1561, is pending in the Superior Court of
Pennsylvania.
In addition, by September 26, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone had been granted Electronic Filing
Privileges in the local, state, and federal courts. This should alleviate the fraud and abuses of the
U.S. Postal Service and the computer hackers.
In 2015 Stan J. Caterbone identifies a trend that suggests that the Lancaster County
community-at-large was subject to either community targeting or community hypnosis.
The
community targeting theory is supported by experts Jullianne McKinney, Cheryl Welsh, and Dr.
John Hall. The community hypnosis theory is supported by direct personal relationships with the
Amazing Kreskin, Samuel P. Caterbone and Stan J. Caterbone.
Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Grop
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
Page
Page
Page14
13
28of
ofof
of41
50
51
51
65
Page
414
Thursday,
Friday, December
March10,
11,
17, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
In September of 2015 Stan J. Caterbone begins to digitize a library of approximately 45

audio cassette tapes from his father, Samuel P. Caterbone. The tapes range in date from 1971 to
1996. The tapes prove an identical targeting campaign against both Samuel P. Caterbone and
Stan J. Caterbone.
In addition the tapes confirm that Steven P. Caterbone, brother of Stan J.
Caterbone, was most likely a target dating back to the early 1960's. In addition, the death of
Samuel P. Caterbone on July 20, 2001 was confirmed to be that of murder, not natural causes.
In the early 1990's Dr. Phillip Caterbone, brother, had been solicited by the National
Institute of Health, or NIH in Washington, D.C., for a fellowship to research and catalog a study to
find a genetic marker for depression in the CATERBONE family.
Phil interviewed all living
descendants and relatives of my father, Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., and took blood samples. I am
alleging that this was a deliberate act to continue the cover story of mental illness to distract and
provide plausible deniability for any linkage to U.S. Sponsored Mind Control.
Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Grop
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
Page
Page
Page15
14
29of
ofof
of41
50
51
51
65
Page
515
Thursday,
Friday, December
March10,
11,
17, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
HISTORY
In 1987 Stan J. Caterbone went public with allegations of fraud within International Signal
and Control, or ISC as they were commonly referred.
After discussions with ISC and United
Chem Con officials (an ISC/James Guerin straw company), and as a shareholder of record since
1983 of ISC, Stan J. Caterbone had a meeting with an ISC executive on June 23, 1987, which
resulted in a 22 year legal odyssey. The discussions involved a joint venture with his company,
Financial Management Group, Ltd., or FMG, Ltd., but ended in disclosure of his recent public
allegations of fraud. Four years later, ISC founder and chairman James Guerin, and other officials
and companies pleaded guilty to a $1 Billion Dollar Fraud and export violations including the
selling of arms through South Africa to Iraq and Sadaam Hussein.
However, money, power,
influence and public corruption had been used to cover-up the activities and Federal False Claims
Act violations of Stan J. Caterbone for the next eighteen years. There ensued a total blockade of
all United States Courts for all redress and remedy available in accordance with federal, state, and
local laws.
This included recovery of his business interests; intellectual property; real estate;
personal and business real property; his unblemished and impressive reputation; and his most
valuable asset - the ability to produce income. This might be legally referred to as the Right-ToWork under federal statutes.
Notwithstanding, Stan J. Caterbone has never made a bad
investment or developed a business that did not make a profit over the next 22 years.
This
includes two real estate properties that were illegally seized through foreclosure proceedings.
Since 1987 Stan J. Caterbone has been a prisoner and enemy of the state.
ISC was a
Department of Defense (DOD) Contractor and a partner with United States Intelligence Agencies
since it's beginings in the early 1970's. One of it's first contracts was Project X with the National
Security Agency or NSA of Ft. Meade, Maryland.
In summary, the following are facts and part of the public record regarding
SIGNAL & CONTROL OR ISC:
INTERNATIONAL
Once the third (3rd) largest employer in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania, with
over 5,000 employees.
James Guerin, founder and CEO was once the largest philanthropist to charitable
organizations in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
The ISC/Ferranti Scandal was the third (3) largest white-collar fraud within the United
States as of 1992.
Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Grop
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
Page
Page
Page16
15
30of
ofof
of41
50
51
51
65
Page
616
Thursday,
Friday, December
March10,
11,
17, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
The following are some of the public officials and politicians associated with ISC:
George H.W. Bush, former U.S. President, and Director of the Central Intelligence
Agency (CIA).
Robert Gates, former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and current
Secretary of Defense.
Bobby Ray Inman, former Board of Directors if ISC, former Director of the NSA, and
currently associated and directly involved with Mind Control Research organizations.
Alexander Haig, former U.S. Secretary of State, and ISC lobbyist and Board of
Directors?
Joseph McDade, former Pennsylvania House of Representative and Chair of the

Appropriations Committee who was later investigated for the United Chem Con
scandal.
Carlos Cardoen/Cardoen Industries, a joint venture partner with ISC and arms
merchant for the cluster bomb who eventually sold to Iraq and other Middle Eastern
Countries under U.S. sanctions.
ISC was credited with the design of the cluster bomb, and has patents filed in the U.S.
Patent Office.
In 1987 ISC completed the merger with the 3rd largest defense contractor of Great
Britain, Ferranti International; who paid $1 billion dollars for ISC and all of it's
subsidiaries.
ABC News/Financial Times aired 3 episodes on ABC Nightline with Ted Koppel
regarding the ISC/CIA defense weapons; technologies; and cluster bombs to Iraq
story and lead into the allegations that then nominee for the Director of CIA Robert
Gates was involved with ISC and the selling of arms to Iraq.
ABC News 20/20 aired a story on the ISC/CIA efforts to sell cluster bombs to Saadam
Hussein and Iraq on February 1, 1991 days after the start of the Persian Gulf War I,
with the initial bombing raid destroying a cluster bomb factory built in Iraq by
Carlos Cardoen.
On July 1st and 2nd of 1987 Stan J. Caterbone solicited the legal counsel of Lancaster
Attorney Joseph Roda for counsel regarding, FMG, Ltd., International Signal &
Control (ISC); Commonwealth Bank, etc., and was billed for his services. Joseph
Roda did absolutely nothing but refute Stan J. Caterbone's claims and would not
believe him.
In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas),

Lancaster Attorney Joseph Roda represented William Clark, ISC's in-house legal
counsel, and never mentioned any conflict to Stan J. Caterbone in 1987.
In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas), James

Guerin deposited $1.75 million dollars into an escrow account at Fulton Bank,
Lancaster, County.
Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Grop
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
Page
Page
Page17
16
31of
ofof
of41
50
51
51
65
Page
717
Thursday,
Friday, December
March10,
11,
17, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October

Christopher Underhill of Harman, Underhill & Brubaker, represented James
Guerin. In 2005 Christopher Underhill represented the Manheim Township Police
Department (05-cv-2288 U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania) CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al.,.

Philadelphia Attorney Joseph Tate represented James Guerin and ISC, and in 2007
Joseph Tate represented Scooter Libby during his federal prosecution by U.S.
Special Prosecutor Fitzpatrick.
THE MANIFEST OF A COVER-UP

Not only did the allegations of fraud within ISC have to be silenced at a time when merger
negotiations were ongoing with Ferranti, but all of the fraud; extortion; public corruption;
burglaries; civil rights violations; anti-trust and intellectual property right violations; lender
liability torts; false arrests; false imprisonments; as well as other civil and criminal activities had
to be covered up and buried in bureaucratic red tape.
uncovered and discovered to this day.
Information and findings are still being
Contrary to popular belief, up until 1996 a grand jury
investigation into ISC was still ongoing. It is not known whether it has closed or not. All of these
activates constitute a RICO crime due to the pattern and organization of the perpetrators. The
pattern and source of the activities can be traced back to 1987, with subgroups changing over
time, but still engaging in the same practices. The following plan of action was followed in order
to perpetrate the cover-up:
Totally discredit Stan(ley) J. Caterbone and any and all allegations in every way
possible.
Fabricate a history of mental illness.

Fabricate a criminal record.
Attach his character and honesty with rumors and propaganda.
Extort and maintain his net worth to $ zero or load him with debts.
Keep him out of any profession and or occupation when and where possible.
Totally isolate him and disenfranchise him from his friends, colleagues, and family
into a life of solitaire.
Somehow persuade the community of Lancaster County to buy into this plan of
action through money, favors, etc.,
Always keep attorneys and anyone remotely involved with the legal community
away at times when efforts for justice are pursued.
When attempts to enter the U.S. legal system arise, isolate, harass, and extort
any monies and/or possessions of value.
Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Grop
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
Page
Page
Page18
17
32of
ofof
of41
50
51
51
65
Page
818
Thursday,
Friday, December
March10,
11,
17, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
Change the history of events and the truth.

THE COURTS AND THE UNITED STATES LEGAL SYSTEM
For 18 years, (from 1987 until 2005) it has always been fairly easy to keep these issues
from court dockets and judges.
During these years Stan J. Caterbone had solicited at least
twenty attorneys, some from large firms with national recognition in their respective fields of
specialties. Attorneys from New York City to Santa Barbara and San Diego California were visited
and consulted as well as a group of ex FBI agents who specialized in white collar crime that are
now globally recognized. However, the money and influence of persons and entities that wanted
these issues silence always prevailed. The issues were so complex and convoluted, and involved
such high profile politicians and U.S. agencies, it was far easier to state that there was no case, or
their were no claims that would result in remedy or redress. Between the Republican Party and
the Department of Defense, the CIA and the NSA, there was not an attorney that could not be
influenced. The obstruction of justice and due process in this case is most likely unprecedented in
nature and in malice.
However in 2005 that all changed when Stan J. Caterbone appeared as a pro se litigant
representing himself, without any counsel, in the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Pennsylvania in CATERBONE v. The Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or case no. 05-cv2288.
This case is still not settled and has been withdrawn by plaintiff Stan J.
Caterbone in October of 2008 after a successful ruling in the U.S. Third Circuit Court of
Appeals (07-4474) in September of 2008. The case will be continued upon the security
of evidence and the cease and desist of obstruction of justice and due process. On May
16, 2005 at the Federal Courthouse in Philadelphia, Stan J. Caterbone filed the case under seal.
One week later in the United States Bankruptcy Court for Eastern Pennsylvania in Reading,
Pennsylvania, again appearing as pro se, Stan J. Caterbone filed a petition for protection under
the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Code, in case no. 05-23059.
These acts of entering the United States legal system with these issues triggered yet
another round of attempts to keep these cases from the courts and judges - Organized Stalking
with Directed Energy Devices and Weapons, built on a foundation of mental telepathy or total
Mind Control.
Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Grop
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
Page
Page
Page19
18
33of
ofof
of41
50
51
51
65
Page
919
Thursday,
Friday, December
March10,
11,
17, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
REMOTE VIEWING; ORGANIZED STALKING; DIRECTED ENERGY DEVICES AND

WEAPONS.
Organized stalking and harassment began in 1987 following the public allegations of fraud
within ISC. This organized stalking and harassment was enough to drive an ordinary person to
suicide. As far back as the late 1980's Stan J. Caterbone knew that his mind was being read, or
"remotely viewed". This was verified and confirmed when information only known to him, and
never written, spoken, or typed, was repeated by others. In 1998, while soliciting the counsel of
Philadelphia attorney Christina Rainville, (Rainville represented Lisa Michelle Lambert in the Laurie
Show murder case), someone introduced the term remote viewing through an email. That was
the last time it was an issue until 2005. The term was researched, but that was the extent of the
topic.
Remote Viewers may have attempted to connect in a more direct and continuous way
without success.
In 2005 the U.S. sponsored mind control turned into an all-out assault of mental
telepathy; synthetic telepathy; and pain and torture through the use of directed energy devices
and weapons that usually fire a low frequency electromagnetic energy at the targeted victim.
This assault was no coincidence in that it began simultaneously with the filing of the federal action
in U.S. District Court, or CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or 05-cv-2288.
This
assault began after the handlers remotely trained Stan J. Caterbone with mental telepathy. The
main difference opposed to most other victims of this technology is that Stan J. Caterbone is
connected 24/7 with a person who declares that she is Interscope recording artist Sheryl Crow of
Kennett Missouri. Stan J. Caterbone has spent 3 years trying to validate and confirm this person
without success. Most U.S. intelligence agencies refuse to cooperate, and the Federal Bureau of
Investigation and the U.S. Attorney's Office refuse to comment.
See attached documents for
more information.
In 2006 or the beginning of 2007 Stan J. Caterbone began his extensive research into
mental telepathy; mind control technologies; remote viewing; and the CIA mind control program
labeled MK ULTRA and it's subprograms.
Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Grop
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
Page
Page
Page10
19
20
20
34of
of
of51
50
51
65
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
March10,
11,
17, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
FAMILY HISTORY
If you listen to the propaganda machine and the community of Lancaster County,
Pennsylvania, including professionals, the family history of Stan J. Caterbone goes something like
the following:
Father, Samuel Caterbone, Jr., Schizophrenic who ran out on his family
because of nervous breakdowns while trying to run a small dry cleaning
business.
He traveled the world looking for the Blessed Mother Mary and
Space Aliens. He ended up living in government subsidized housing broke

and with a severe mental illness.
Brother, Samuel A. Caterbone, suffered from the very same illness has his
father, Schizophrenia, who finally killed himself trying to live in California.
Brother, Thomas W. Caterbone, suffered from the very same mental illness as
his brother, Stan J., Bipolar Mood Disorder, who ran a lawn business and
finally committed suicide at an early age.
Stan J. Caterbone, suffered from Bipolar Mood Disorder, or Manic Depression and
had a nervous breakdown in 1987 trying to compete in the financial services
industry. When he has his nervous breakdowns, he always threatens to sue
everyone in court and is deeply paranoid in thinking the whole world is
against him. He always spends all of his money during his fits of mania and
has delusions about his success as a businessman.
The Family History was formulated back in the 1960's when Samuel Caterbone, Jr.,
father of Stan J. Caterbone, became engaged in a black budget mind control program that began
during his service in the United States Navy as a radioman and air gunner.
Samuel Caterbone,
Jr., was most likely a direct product of MK ULTRA or one of it's subprograms. His brother, Samuel
A. Caterbone, was most likely part of the LSD experiments of MK ULTRA. Stan J. Caterbone is
most likely part of a program sponsored by the Department of Defense Agencies, such as DARPA
or the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA). The facts of Stan J. Caterbone's intimate discussions
with both his father and brother over the years before they died, the totality of documents that
were preserved in their estate, including service records; letters; official court papers; high school
documents; and the like - all will prove that they were in fact part of MK ULTRA or one of it's
subprograms.
Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Grop
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
Page
Page
Page11
20
21
21
35of
of
of51
50
51
65
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
March10,
11,
17, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
The following are the facts and the real record of the family history:
Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., (Father) served in the Navy from 1943 to 1946 and
graduated with honors from Air Gunners School in Jacksonville, Florida. He was an exceptional
student/athlete while attending Lancaster Catholic High School, participating in the band as well
as sports. He was also his senior class secretary/treasurer. After the Navy, he went on to build a
successful dry cleaning business, which he is credited with inventing a filtration system for the
solvents.
He also developed a very good investment in real estate along the Manheim Pike,
owning several properties. By his own writings and from his personal accounts to me, he was
definitely a remote viewer or data miner for some U.S. Agency with telepathic abilities.
His
viewing is documented to have begun back in the early 1970's. He also suffered from organized
stalking, and was considered an enemy and prisoner of the state. Back in the 1960's, he was a
world traveler, this is documented by his passports. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., may have been a
covert carrier for someone in intelligence. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., had his mental health history
laced with electro shock therapy. Electro Shock Therapy Experiments is another subprogram of
MK ULTRA. In addition, and especially disturbing is his criminal record with the Lancaster City
Police Department and the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas.
In 1973 Samuel P.
Caterbone, Jr. was convicted of forging a 2 checks from the Caterbone Cleaners, Inc., checking
account.
The one check to Joe the Motorists Store at the Manor Shopping Center was never
entered into evidence, it was for a total of $70.00. The other check was made out to Lancaster
Attorney James Coho for $200.00 with "divorce proceedings" written in the memo. This was his
only criminal record. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., was sentenced to one year probation by President
Judge William Johnstone.
However, on August 29, 1973 after nine months, Judge Johnstone
wrote an ORDER releasing him from probation and ordering him to "leave the vicinity of the
County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania". The President Judge of Lancaster County Court of Common
Pleas literally threw my father out of Lancaster County for forging 2 checks from his own
corporation. In 1987 I was arrested for stealing my own files from my own company, Financial
Management Group, Ltd., You can research the life of Candy Jones and Kate O'Brien to learn more
on this topic. Samuel Caterbone, Jr., has left enough writings and documentation to know that his
life fits the model for targeted individuals, complete with economic ruin, isolation, disenfranchised
from family and friends, and of course a fabricated mental illness history. You can view most of
his record online.
On or about May 18, 2001 Samuel P. Caterbone Jr., finally received an
inheritance from his mother's (Mary Caterbone) estate.
The check was for some $70,000.00.
The estate was probated in November of 2000. Some two weeks later, on Memorial Day Weekend
of 2001, he had called me to come to New York City to help care for him.
He was in perfect
health until this time. In a matter of six (6) weeks he had succumbed to lung cancer. As per
Julianne McKinney,
former intelligence officer for the U.S. Army and victim activist of U.S.
Sponsored Mind Control, the weapons are lethal enough to kill and the one thing that I worry
Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Grop
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
Page
Page
Page12
21
22
22
36of
of
of51
50
51
65
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
March10,
11,
17, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
about is that of dying of cancer (paraphrase). There is no doubt now that my father's death was
a murder, not natural.
Samuel A. Caterbone, (Brother) served in the United States Air Force in 1968 to 1970.
In 1991, Stan J. Caterbone accused the United States Government of using his brother, Samuel
A. Caterbone for part of the LSD experiments on mind control, or MK ULTRA. A notarized letter of
October 23, 1991 was sent certified mail to the California Attorney General on the subject matter,
with a return letter from the California Attorney General on January 14, 1992.
By his own
admission before his death, Samuel A. Caterbone disclosed to Stan J. Caterbone of the "bad LSD"
trips while in the Air Force. Since his death of December 25, 1984, Stan J. Caterbone and others
questioned the classification of suicide, and made allegations of foul play that was ultimately
responsible for his death. Finally in a meeting in Santa Barbara, California with the Santa Barbara
Public Guardian's Office, an office admitted that the death was more likely due to foul plan than
suicide.
Samuel A. Caterbone was also an exceptional student and athlete while attending
Lancaster Catholic High School.
After playing varsity football as a sophomore, he had an
unfortunate accident while deer hunting the following November.
While in the woods in
Bellefonte, Pennsylvania, his hunting pants caught fire trying to stay warm.
It left him in the
Lancaster General Hospital for months, going through painful skin grafts and isolation.
hunting accident interrupted his athletic career and scared his legs for life.
The
The Schizophrenia
diagnosis was a combination of LSD flashbacks and organized stalking and harassment.
Thomas P. Caterbone, (Brother) had an unfortunate transaction at Fulton Bank that set
a course of action that resulted in a suicide. Although diagnosed with Bipolar Disease and Manic
Depression -- embezzled and extorted monies were most likely the reason for his suicide in 1996.
Fulton Bank was involved in a fraud that took $72,000 from a real estate settlement closing and
lead to his total financial ruin and collapse in June of 1995. The funds were never recovered and
Fulton Bank is a defendant for a wrongful death claim in the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania in CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., 05-cv-2288.
FULTON BANK triggered a severe and lethal death blow to Thomas P. Caterbone, and as of this
day has refused to acknowledge any wrongdoing or remorse. Thomas P. Caterbone was also an
exceptional athlete. Playing for Lancaster Catholic High School, Franklin and Marshall College, the
Harrisburg Patriots, and even the Philadelphia Eagles. Tom also coached football at J.P. McCaskey
and Franklin and Marshall College.
Thomas P. Caterbone had a very successful lawn and
landscaping business before joining forces with John DePatto of United Financial Services and
selling residential mortgages.
John DePatto was the former head of Parent Bank, owned by
James Guerin and ISC. Parent Bank, owned by ISC also foreclosed on 2323 New Danville Pike,
Conestoga, Pennsylvania in 1988, which was owned by Stan J. Caterbone. Thousands of dollars
of equity was extorted in the process, despite still being short sold for a profit to Mr. Keith
Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Grop
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
Page
Page
Page13
22
23
23
37of
of
of51
50
51
65
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
March10,
11,
17, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
Kirchner, an executive of Lancaster Newspapers and former graduate of Lancaster Catholic High
School.
Stan J. Caterbone is a remote viewer (at least one way in), is telepathic, and a
federal whistleblower with an exceptional entrepreneurial record in spite of all of his adversaries
and their assaults. In spite of the U.S. Sponsored mind control and torture, he has endured and
will prevail. Legally, Stan J. Caterbone has been able to preserve his claims, and progress his
legal challenges and claims through both the federal and state court system appearing pro se,
without the aid or expense of additional legal counsel. Some of his claims and briefs will most
likely be landmark decisions in years to come. Stan J. Caterbone was a 2-Sport MVP at Lancaster
Catholic High School, in both football and track. Stan J. Caterbone never received less than a B
grade in his four years of high school and had an 87+ average. Stan J. Caterbone excelled in
computer technologies, taking his first full term course in 1975, while in high school and
continuing into college at Millersville University, graduating with a degree in business
administration in 1980.
Stan J. Caterbone excelled profoundly at building his companies, first
beginning with Financial Management Group, Ltd., then working with Tony Bongiovi of Power
Station Studios and the "Digital Movie"; then building Advanced Media Group, Ltd..
Over the
years, despite the illegal seizures and foreclosures, Stan J. Caterbone has amassed a portfolio of
impressive real estate deals that have always paid off in profits, no matter how or when they
were sold.
The same was true of his businesses.
Financial Management Group, Ltd., was a
$20,000 dollar investment in 1986 and was still sold for approximately $100,000 two years later,
despite the false arrests and the extortion of most of it's real value and equity.
The mental health history and the criminal records were completely fabricated, and a
close review and investigation into the actual court records and hospital records can prove that in
very short fashion.
There are TWO (2) ways to quickly dispute the Mental Health History and
Record:
One - Review the word "Delusional; delusions; etc.,;
every instance of the word
used by mental health professionals, and the false reports by friends and family were associated
with facts, and matters of the official record, the complete opposite of the meaning of the word
"delusional". And they still exist to this very day.
Two - Review the 3 Fabricated Suicide Allegations of the following dates: August
10(?), 1987 at Burdette Tomlin Hospital (Cape May County New Jersey); February 18th(?), 2005
by Kerry Egan and the Southern Regional Police Department; and July 19, 2009 for the 302
Commitment by the Lancaster City Police Department at Lancaster General Hospital.
The Criminal Record is very similar, since 1987 Stanley J. Caterbone has had 31 false
arrests; formal charges and convictions dismissed prior to court proceedings or won on summary
appeals in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania; most of which Stan J. Caterbone appearing as
Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Grop
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
Page
Page
Page14
23
24
24
38of
of
of51
50
51
65
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
March10,
11,
17, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
pro se (representing himself). These have resulted in civil complaints filed in 2008 in CATERBONE
v. The County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania.
THE PUBLIC RECORD

The Public Record is comprised of court filings and exhibits in U.S. Federal Courts;
Pennsylvania State Courts; and the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. In all some 40,000
pages of documents are now filed and electronically scanned or microfilmed in prothonotary
offices. In addition in both the U.S. Federal Courts and the Lancaster County Court of Common
Pleas there are more than 11 hours of audio recordings; some 3,000 scanned images; and
several video broadcasts of the ISC News broadcasts all stored on a CD-ROM and filed as an
exhibit to some of the law suits filed by Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group, as
plaintiffs. Stan J. Caterbone has over 100 court docket sheet numbers in federal, state, and local
courts.
There are also Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation records; Department of Welfare

and Lancaster County Assistance Office records; Local Real Estate Tax records; Lancaster County
Tax Assessment records; Social Security Administration Benefits records; Lancaster Catholic High
School transcripts; Millersville University transcripts; all for Stan J. Caterbone, in addition to his
court filings.
For Samuel A. Caterbone, my brother, there are United States Air Force service
records; Lancaster Catholic High School transcripts; Millersville University transcripts; Social
Security Administration records; Santa Barbara County Guardian and Public Defender records;
and papers and documents persevered from his estate.
For Samuel P. Caterbone, my father, there are United States Naval records, Lancaster
Catholic High School transcripts; Social Security Administration records; Lancaster County
Assistance Office records; Local Real Estate Tax records; Lancaster County Tax Assessment
records; Samuel Caterbone Cleaners, Inc., corporate records; Real Estate Deeds and Mortgages;
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas civil and criminal records; and of course papers and
documents persevered from his estate
PUBLIC WEBSITE ADDRESSES OF INTEREST:

www.freedomffchs.com
https://www.scribd.com
Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Grop
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
Page
Page
Page15
24
25
25
39of
of
of51
50
51
65
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
March10,
11,
17, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
DOCUMENTS ATTACHED FOR REVIEW

** It is important to note that as of this writing, Remote Viewing has recently
been commercialized by corporate America, and certain Fortune 500 companies are
using Remote Viewers as consultants for trend analysis and market forecasts. This is
often the evolution of most technologies born out of the U.S. Department of Defense.
Top Secret experiments and the resulting technological advancements can stay
secretive for so long.
This has recently been used in a NBC story of the Television
drama "Medium" this last season.
On July 9, 2008 I had recorded an AM radio live
broadcast on WHAN Coast to Coast with a guest that was one of the leading Physicist
turned Remote Viewer and expert that testified to this same notion.
Dated: July 28, 2009

Stan J. Caterbone
scaterbone@live.com
The following are no longer in service:
www.advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com
www.scribd.com/amgroup01
www.facebook.com/scaterbone
www.twitter.com/StanCaterbone
www.mcvictimsworld.ning.com/profile/StanJCaterbone
http://www.youtube.com/advancedmediagroup
Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Grop
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
Page
Page
Page16
25
26
26
40of
of
of51
50
51
65
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
March10,
11,
17, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
September 7, 2009
Stan J. Caterbone
Advance Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17603
Derrick Robinson
Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance
P.O. Box 9022
Cincinnati, Ohio 45209
Phone 1-800-571-5618
Fax 1-866-433-4170
email: info@freedomfchs.com
Re: Is County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania Ground Zero for Organized Stalking and
Covert Surveillance?
Derrick,
My pleasure. Derrick, I was trying to get group rates at our new Lancaster Convention Center
Marriot Hotel last week, just as a little fact finding mission. I have a theory that I would like to
send your way. I thought it would be very fruitful to bring some TI's together for a conference,
unless you think the exposure would be harmful.
I believe that they try new models for harassment; organized stalking and surveillance on me
here in Lancaster. Remember, Lancaster is now one of the most "Watched Communities" in the
country. "With those cameras, the Safety Coalition will operate and monitor 165 cameras across
Lancaster City making Lancaster the most watched city of its size in the nation." See article
attached, Watching you: City to add 105 more cameras.
I believe that Lancaster may be ground zero for some of the models of organized stalking and
harassment that we TI's experience and wanted to get some reaction from Lancaster. Some
history on the Lancaster Convention Center. Dale High of High Industries is the lead partner in our
new convention center/hotel. It is first class all the way. Now in the late 1980's I was a joint
venture partner with Dale High in American Helix Technology Company/Advanced Media Group.
American Helix was a cd manufacturer and I and my company Advanced Media Group was the
CD-ROM division of American Helix. I was one of a handful of CD-ROM manufacturers in the
domestic United States back then. Also in 2005 I filed a civil action against the lead hotel, the
Eden Resort Inn, for trying to block the development and building of the Hotel/Convention Center,
see
attached.
Now, some history about Lancaster and the intelligence community. Back in the 1980's there were
several defense contractors located in Lancaster, the main being International Signal & Control,
which I, of course, blew the whistle on a billion dollar fraud and arms to Iraq.
Click here for an overview of ISC.
Click here to see the Lancaster Newspapers Archives regarding International Signal & Control, or
ISC.
Click here to view the live video of the WGAL-TV News Broadcast of October 31, 1991 the evening
of the ISC indictments. The U.S. Department of Justice and other U.S. Agencies held a Press
Conference in the Philadelphia Federal Courthouse to announce the indictments and $ Billion
Dollar Fraud.
Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Grop
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
Page
Page
Page17
26
27
27
41of
of
of51
50
51
65
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
March10,
11,
17, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
Click here for Part 2 of the WGAL-TV 8 Broadcast.

Now politically, Lancaster is and has always been predominately Republican. Lancaster is one of
the oldest cities in the country and our courthouse was one of the first in this country. Lancaster
has one of the oldest fraternities of the Masons. Lancaster and the George W.Bush administration
has a close and very "interesting relationship". George H. Bush had a very close relationship with
ISC, and of course the NSA and CIA all had a very "close" relationship with International Signal &
Control, or ISC. The following are some transcripts for Ted Koppel and ABC News Nightline
regarding ISC and Arms to Iraq and the intelligence community. The transcripts are contained in
my Amicus for Case No. 2006-cv-2160 filed in the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division.
Now, Robert Gates, presently the Secretary of the United States Defense Department, and his
relationship to Lancaster. First of all, the attached video is the authentic transcript of Robert
Gates' confirmation hearing in September of 1991 for the Director of the Central Intelligence
Agency (CIA). If you fast forward to approximately 9:00:00 you will see the back and forth
questions from Senator Murkowski to Robert Gates regarding the allegations by several members
of the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence regarding his alleged involvement with ISC
and the Arms deals with Carlos Cardoen and the shipping of cluster bombs through South Africa
and on to Iraq. Of course, he denied all of the allegations.
Robert Gates also has relatives that live in Lancaster County, if fact he attended a wedding here a
few months ago, on May 3, 2009 at St. John Neuman Catholic Church in Manhiem Township,
Lancaster County. His wife has a niece that lives in Manheim Township.
Now, I'll give you the ABC News Nightline May 23, 1991 excerpt regarding ISC and the NSA,
National Security Agency:
"It all started legally, if covertly, back in 1974. That's when the National Security Agency, a supersecret U.S. Intelligence unit asked ISC to help complete project X, a chain of electronic listening
posts based at South Africa's Simonstown Naval Station. South Africa was using these posts to
follow Soviet submarine traffic off of the Cape of Good Hope. To ensure secrecy, ISC and the NSA
made sure shipments could not be tracked back to them. They created a company called Gamma
Systems Associates. In fact, this company was nothing more than a post office box at John F.
Kennedy Airport. Gamma was a cut-out. ... But this sanctioned covert operation was stopped in
1977 when President Carter, a strong opponent of South Africa's apartheid regime, told U.S. firms
to stop any military-related business with Pretoria. But ISC continue shipping electronics, some
civilian, some military, to South Africa. The in the early 1980's, South Africa began to intensify its
efforts at ballistic missile development. For ISC, that was a golden opportunity because on of its
top executives was a man named Clyde Ivey, an American electronics expert who has been the
father of South Africa's missile program. Ivey had extraordinary contacts in the nations defense
structure. Begining in 1984, federal investigators say, senior ISC exeutives, including Ivey, began
regular contacts with CIA officials." You can read the rest. The entire transcript of the May 23,
1991 ABC News/Nightline broadcast.
Now remember, George H. Bush was director of CIA. "He served in this role for 357 days, from
January 30, 1976 to January 20, 1977.[22] The CIA had been rocked by a series of revelations,
including those based on investigations by Senator Frank Church's Committee regarding illegal
and unauthorized activities by the CIA, and Bush was credited with helping to restore the
agency's morale.[23] In his capacity as DCI, Bush gave national security briefings to Jimmy
Carter both as a Presidential candidate and as President-elect, and discussed the possibility of
remaining in that position in a Carter administration[24] but it was not to be," according to
Wikipedia.
Now, lets get to Bobby Ray Inman, former Navy, Director of the National Security Agency (NSA),
former Director of International Signal & Control (ISC), and currently part of the Mind Control
industry. The following appears on the Welcome page of my website:
Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Grop
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
Page
Page
Page18
27
28
28
42of
of
of51
50
51
65
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
March10,
11,
17, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
"S.A.I.C. involvement in 1993 American Para psychological Association meeting arrangements, via
their 'Cognitive Sciences Laboratory'. Science Applications International Corporation is a big time
defense contractor, has held the largest number of research contracts of any defense contractor.
Bobby Ray Inman (ISC Board of Directors) is on its board of directors, among others."
by John Porter, CIA Program on Mind Control copyright 1996. In 1994, after Bobby Ray Inman
requested to be withdrawn from consideration as Bill Clinton's first Defense Secretary, his critics
speculated that the decision was motivated by a desire to conceal his links to ISC. Inman was a
member of the so-called "shadow board" of the company which was allegedly either negligent or
approved the exports." by Wikipedia on International Signal and Control, (ISC).
Now, lets list the former Navy personnel:
George H. Bush, former President of the United States, former Director of CIA.
James Guerin, President and Founder of International Signal & Control.
Bobby Ray Inman, former Director of the National Security Agency (NSA) and Director of
International Signal & Control, (ISC).
My father, Samuel P. Cateronne, Jr.
His father, Samuel J. Caterbone, Sr.
George Noory, of Coast to Coast Radio (just anecdotal, nothing assumed or alleged).
George W. Bush flew with the Navy.
James Cross
I will Finish later and add more.
Next we get to Jim Guerin's attorney back in 1989 through at least 1992. His name was Joseph
Tate, of Philadelpha. This link will take you to a document regarding Joseph Tate, James Guerin
and Joseph Roda, Esq., of Lancaster, my former attorney who said I fabricated everything back in
1987. The document contains a letter of September 12, 2005 from Special Prosecutor Patrick
Fitzgerald regarding Scooter Libby, Former Vice President Dick Cheney's Chief of Staff. the letter
involves Scooter Libby's Grand Jury Indictment for leaking Covert CIA Operative Valerie Plame
and eventually outing her.
Now in Austin Texas in July of 2005 I was detained by 2 Agents from The Defense Intelligence
Agency. I was merely visiting a Military Museum, that had old and vintage helicopters and
airplanes. near where my brother, Dr. Phillip Caterbone lived. I was visiting on my way to
California. While inside the museum 2 Agents from the Department of Defense Defense
Intelligence Agency escorted me outside to my Honda Oddesey and interrogated me making me
confirm that I was visiting and staying with my brother. They caused a problem for my brother's
Medical Practice by shaking up one of his secretaries. The reviewed my court documents for
CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., Case No. 2005-cv-0288 filed in the U.S. District
Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The demanded that I stay off all military bases
before releasing me.
In 2006 I was telepathic with an older NSA executive on many occasions who wanted to meet me
at the Clipper Stadium who told me he wanted to rent a facility in Lancaster for a training
exercise. I told him to to and see Dale High and the High Group for space at the Greenfield
Industrial Park. He said he was retiring and that our discussions were keeping him a few weeks
longer than expected. We had intimate discussions of my history and the Chesapeake Bay Area.
We also discussed Sheryl Crow, and he told me his wife was a fan. I turned him on to her new
album, Wildflower, and he said she liked it. We had to disengage because he was being harassed
by other telepathic assailants.
My former secretary (Susan Bare) at Pflumm Contractors, Inc., where I was controller and was
hired to rescue the company from near bankruptcy in 1993, told me that her husband, Ross Bare,
who grew up just some 10 or so doors from me, worked for the NSA. She disclosed this soon
after I hired her in 1994 or 1995.
I will finish later and add to this allegation. This is a work-in-progress.
Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Grop
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
Page
Page
Page19
28
29
29
43of
of
of51
50
51
65
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
March10,
11,
17, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
Stan J. Caterbone
scaterbone@live.com
Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Grop
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
Page
Page
Page20
29
30
30
44of
of
of51
50
51
65
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
March10,
11,
17, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
AFFIDAVIT
BE IT ACKNOWLEDGED, that Stanley J. Caterbone, Financial Management Group, Ltd.,
FMG Advisory, and and all affiliates, Pro Financial Group, Ltd., Advanced Media Group, Advanced
Media Group, Ltd., Global Entertainment Group, Ltd., Power Productions I, Radio Science
Laboratories, Ltd., of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, the undersigned deponent, being of legal
age, does hereby depose and say under oath as follows:
I am now convinced that the situation surrounding my litigation and all factors attributed
to my financial and professional demise bore out of the fact that my Father, Samuel P. Caterbone
was a victim of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control, in the truest sense of the words.
The
whistleblowing activities of 1987 either were a coincidence or I was set up in the very beginning
by Pennsylvania State Senator Gibson Armstrong (former stock broker) in 1983 when he solicited
me to purchase the ISC stock. The preceding would have been the perfect cover story for my
demise; that I was involved in a fraud. Following this analysis would lead one to conclude that
the collateral damage from the activities of my financial ruin always left my fellow businesses in
financial ruin, for example Robert Kauffman and Michael Hartlett, partners, and the shareholders
and affiliated professionals of Financial Management Group, Ltd., Tony Bongiovi and Power Station
Studios, Jim and Lynn Cross as Cross Microwave Consultants, Dave Dering, Scott Robertson, and
James Boyer as American Helix/High Industries, Ralph Mazzochi and Gallo Rosa Restaurant;
Pflumm Contractors, Inc., Mike Caterbone's AIM Wholesaler's Business, Dr. Phillip Caterbone, D.O.
And associated Primary Care Practices of Austin, Texas, Sam Lombardo and Ralph Mazzochi as
S.N. Lombardo Associates for Lancaster Avenue Project, Sheryl Crow Singer Songwriter, my
immediate family, friends, and relatives.
Following this analysis would lead one to concur that the legal and financial remedies
would only be reconciled by the above named parties enjoining my civil litigation. This AFFIDAVIT
is to be considered a legal and binding document to accomplish that remedy.
Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Grop
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
Page
Page
Page31
21
30
31
45ofof
of51
41
50
51
65
Thursday,
Saturday,
Friday, December
October
March 10,
11,
17, 2015
2016
Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Grop
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
Page
Page
Page32
31
32
46ofof
of51
50
51
65
Thursday,
Friday, December
March 11,
17, 2016
2015
Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Grop
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
Page
Page
Page33
32
33
47ofof
of51
50
51
65
Thursday,
Friday, December
March 11,
17, 2016
2015
Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Grop
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
Page
Page
Page34
33
34
48ofof
of51
50
51
65
Thursday,
Friday, December
March 11,
17, 2016
2015
scaterbone@live.com
Stan J. Caterbone
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
ILLEGAL NO TRESPASS NOTICES AGAINST

STAN J. CATERBONE AND ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Violations of Public Accommodations Law re Discrimination
and Anti-Trust Violations with False Statements to Authorities
December 6, 2015
Work-In-Progress
Community Stalking and Organized Libel/Slander Campaign Strategy Issue a few every
year to support false arrests; false imprisonment; fabricated mental illness history. In addition to
isolate by prohibiting entrance to major entertainment venues with good live music. Prohibit from
defending against the lies and slander in public to a minimum. Also, destroy history of strong
Christian values and church attendance on a weekly basis by keeping away from church. The
Millersville University Graduate Studies No Trespass Notice was accommodated by the denial of
entitled benefits of LETA Job Training Education Course of the Paralegal program at HACC during
the same time period.
1. David Pflumm Properties by David Pflumm Served by State Constable in June of

2005, original not signed by David Pflumm
2. Eden Resort Inn, by Drew Anthon, Owner Sent via 1st Class Mail in 2005.
3. Barley Snyder, LLC Lancaster Office, by Shawn Long, Esq., Attorney representing
Fulton Bank in 2006 Sent via 1st Class Mail
4. Lancaster Newspapers, Inc., by Steve Weaver, Manager in 2006, No Notice,
Corraborated by Jack Buckwalter, Chairman and CEO and George Warner, Atty with Barley
Snyder, LLC, No Formal Notice, allowed to reenter in 2015.
5. Ruby Tuesday, Manor Shopping Center, Lancaster, by Manager and Lancaster City
Police in 2006, No Formal Notice, allowed to reenter in 2015.
6. Alley Kat Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster by Bartender Ms. Santinello, Brett Stabley,
and Lancaster City Police, No formal Notice in 2006
7. Village Nightclub, Lancaster by George in 2008, No Formal Notice
8. Marion Court Restaurant, Lancaster, by Security Personnel, corroborated by Michael
Geesey, in 2008, No Formal Notice, allowed to enter in 2015.
9. Valentinos Cafe, Lancaster, by Jeanine, Bartender,in 2008, corroborated by John
Valentino, Owner, No Formal Notice
10. Brunswick Hotel, Lancaster, by Staff Employees, in 2008, No Formal Notice
11. Lancaster County Library and Duke Street Business Center, by Executive Director in
March of 2009, by 1st Class Mail
12. Anne Bailey's Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster, by Manager in 2009, No Formal Notice
13. Millersville University Graduate Studies and Millersville University, Millersville, by
Lori Austin, Judicial Affairs, via Certified Mail in June of 2009.
Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
Page
Page
Page35
35
49ofof
of51
51
65
Thursday, December
March 11,
17, 2016
2015
14. TGIF Friday's, Lancaster, by Manager, in January of 2010, No Formal Notice

15. Lucky Dog Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster, by Robert Donnelly, in January of 2010, No
Formal Notice
16. Saint Mary's Catholic Church, Lancaster, by Don Spica, Usher and Lancaster City Police
Department in Feb of 2010, No Formal Notice
17. O'Halloran's Bar, Lancaster, March 25, 2010 by Male Staff Employee. No Formal Notice.
18. Fulton Bank, Fulton Financial Corporation, March 26, 2010 by Susan Follmer, Security
Officer.
19.Lancaster General Hospital, Gary S. Gehman, MD, May 25, 2010, for recording Dr. Brian
Sullivan of Abbeyville Family Health re U.S. Sponsored Mind Control and posting on my
Wordpress Blog.
20.Tobias Frog Restaurant and Bar, August 8, 2015 by Owner of Establishment, reason
was for complaining of harassment and stalking.
21. Millersville University, July 9, 2015, served notice by Millersville University Police
Chief Pete Anders, for negotiating a civil rights complaint with Assistant to the President,
Debra Hoeckler
22.Village Nightclub, July of 20015, by George..........., Owner, tried to enter several times,
with no reason and no written notice.
23.Lucky Dog Bar, August of 2015, met Abby and Keagan Pflumm outside, went inside and
was told by bartender to leave and not come back.
24.Barley Snyder, LLC Lancaster Office, receptionist Ms. Woods refused to let me
communicate with Attorney George Werner, who in 2011 entered appearance in 05-2288
for Fulton Bank in U.S. District Court.
25.Wennerstrom Property Management Company, June 2015, went to complain
regarding harassment, threats, etc., at 1252 Fremont Street and told to leave building.
26.Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, Nortwest Office Building, November 23, 2015,
Harrisburg, PA, Delivered COMPLAINT re Bars and Restaurants in Lancaster engaged in
Discrimination, Stalking, Harassment, Assaults, etc., Would not allow access to Legal
Counsel, and female who took complaint would not provide ID.
Dated: December 6, 2015
Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
Page
Page
Page36
36
50ofof
of51
51
65
Thursday, December
March 11,
17, 2016
2015
Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Grop
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
Page
Page
Page27
36
37
37
51of
of
of51
50
51
65
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
March10,
11,
17, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Grop
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
Page
Page
Page28
37
38
38
52of
of
of51
50
51
65
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
March10,
11,
17, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Grop
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
Page
Page
Page29
38
39
39
53of
of
of51
50
51
65
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
March10,
11,
17, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
! "
"
$% &
!
" #
%
"&#
(
'
!
(
,
"
"
")
"
""
-
)
!
! "
!
'
%
" !
"
!
)
+
!
" *
"
"
,
,
,
*
%
*
(
%
!
/"0
1
1 ,
"
"
4
!
"
"
!
!
#
.
.
&,,0
%
1 ,
2"3
!
)
** ! "
&,,..$/
&,,
%
&,,
%
&
, "
"
00
"
!,
"
6
7
7 , !
&,,-
8,
:
(
9
,
$;$
! " ,
, ,
** !
;
5
$
!
&,,@
"2
&<;=
>
1
,
.
&,,=
$
,
>
A
1 B3
.+
&,,=
1 B3
2
>
%
Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Grop
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
Page
Page
Page30
39
40
40
54of
of
of51
50
51
65
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
March10,
11,
17, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
<
1
1
* "
!
"
C#
"$
"
<
*
&, ,
24
#9
; "
&,,@(&,,= A
3
24
5
!
%
&,,0 4
! %3
"
"
!
&,,
%
!
4
'
5
4
D
%
%
"
""
,! "
0 =
0 =9
9
00&9 00
:
9
&,,-
&, , $
!
%
!
D
%
%
=
F
!
))
+
/4
),
"
0 =
/
$
G
3
%
00
3
3
"
%#
$
$
&, ,
&,,4
!- "
.
&,,@
,
*
&,,<
E
&,,
-) !
/ 4
24
/
$
D
&, ,
D
$
&,,-
&,,0
%
D
!
D
D %
7F !
>
!
D
$
A
8F
$
%
;
D
.
%
&,,3
E
$
*
00=; 00
$
5
! 7
0 =
00
Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Grop
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
Page
Page
Page31
40
41
41
55of
of
of51
50
51
65
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
March10,
11,
17, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
)
A
24
$;$
00
(F
&
%
B
5
00 9
" * <
00=( 00 9
:#
> ) "" ""

$
;3
#, " !
&,,-
"
"
"
0 =
&, ,
/
.
$
B
3
3
=
0 =
) "
.
&,,1
0 =
24
" "
3
"
&,,@
" E
""
B
$
<
&,,1
.
&,,-
,-(&&
2
=
@,
"
&,
3
&,,!
&,,@
&,,@
0 =
@, 1
&,,@
9
!
@,
#" !,
0 =
" "1 ,
"
"*
":
" E
F
&,,-
!
B
/
!
"
00=( 00 9
B
:
9
$
'
.
&,,1
9
0 =
&, ,
/
.
00 9
/
&,,9
&,
( "
!
.
00
$
!
&, ,
F
Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Grop
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
3
7
8
!
&,,
&, ,
Page
Page
Page32
41
42
42
56of
of
of51
50
51
65
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
March10,
11,
17, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
&
, * "
&&
*#
"
&:
;!
&<
:
%
$
&, ,
$
&,,-
!-
,
5
%
"
>
$
$
< !-
24
? "
;
>
&,,0
B
&,,%
(
$
&, ,
&-
A
.+ $
&@
! :
&,,$
: , *
&, ,
* @
&,,@
"
E
3
&,,
"
&,,0
7 "!
7 "
0 =
*
&=
) "
":
)"
&,,@
"
&
&0
!
< ")
+
9 &,,@
:
9
&, ,
&,,
00
:,
!6
"
"
" .
9 &,,0
0 = "&#
, *
&,,@
/
" F
0 =
;A
0 =
F
Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Grop
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
0 =
Page
Page
Page33
42
43
43
57of
of
of51
50
51
65
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
March10,
11,
17, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
3
"
$
+
$
.
0 =
I $
!
0 =
.
$
"2
'
+$;F
D
"$
&,;&,
3
A
00
'
$ 24
"1E1# $
K
E
A
00&
>
L
F
F
B
F
+
0=,K
A
$
$
1
+
>
1
$
>
B
!
3
F
1
00
) % 3
&,,-
!
>
! A !
00,K
1 B3
>
F
F
& 1
F
8
! 4
'
A
! 4
A
0=,K
F
00,K
0 ,K
0<,K
3
/
>
%
&,,
) %$
D 1
"
$
0 <9 F
0@,K
0@,K
$
2!
A? D!B
#
*
$
7
+
00
D 18
.
E
$
M 1
00= E
0 =
%
0 ,K
$
0 =
M
00
!
&,,9
(
9
!
1
,-(
$ !2B+EF2
(&&
Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Grop
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
Page
Page
Page34
43
44
44
58of
of
of51
50
51
65
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
March10,
11,
17, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
") !
"
7!
N
.
!
5
F
(
(
5
G
*
A'
, ?
*
? 1
!,
A
(
> "
!, '!
,
B
A
" " * #" !, " "
$C
* #" !, D
73
8
* 7
,
"
"
&
"
#
.
"
#(
5
7
9
'
5
%
7A
8 !
8 !
'
!
7D .2
O
% 8
'
7
'
(
(
%
%
4
K
K
M %
%
K
'
7E
(
8
"
%
'
%(
(
(
4
;
(
7
7
87
(
(
8
8
- 7 > !,
Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Grop
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
Page
Page
Page35
44
45
45
59of
of
of51
50
51
65
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
March10,
11,
17, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
* , "
!
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
.
.
&
B
B
B
B
B
@
E
@
E
&. @
DD
@
. DD
"
@
& DD
@
. DD
@
& DD
@
$ DD
@
DD
@
E
DD
@
EB& DD
@
EB DD
@
& B DD
@
DD
@
& DD
@
DD
@
& DD
@
DD
B@
)
B@
DD
!
!
))
1"
)
*
!
")
1
3
1
"
)
)
, "
*"
"
, "
!
*
"
")
"
7
"!
"
*
!
*
")
!
6, "
1
5
)
>
' "
*
, "
1 ,!
, "
)
!
"
"
!
!
1
"": !
1 , 1
"": !
"
1
"": !
!
"
! * !
)
*
"E
DD
")
E DD
%
,
!
!"
, "
"
"
"
1 ,"
DD
*)
PPPPPPP "
>7
%#
'?
Stan J. Caterbone
# PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
"
Stan J. Caterbone
# PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
"
June 19, 2015

PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
Pennsylvania
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
$
Lancaster
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
19
PPPPPPP
15
June
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
&,PP
Stan J. Caterbone - I was a notary from '94-'98

PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
F
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
SJC
I
.
I
&, ,
Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Grop
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
Page
Page
Page36
45
46
46
60of
of
of51
50
51
65
Page
of
41
Don't Know When
24
$
$
Q &, , "!
I
Thursday,
Friday, December
March10,
11,
17, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Grop
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Page
Page
Page37
46
47
47
61of
of
of51
50
51
65
Page
of
41
Page 35 of 41
Thursday,
Friday, December
March10,
11,
17, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
06/10/2007
Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Grop
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Page
Page
Page38
47
48
48
62of
of
of51
50
51
65
Page
of
41
Page 36 of 41
Thursday,
Friday, December
March10,
11,
17, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
06/10/2007
Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Grop
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
Page
Page
Page39
48
49
49
63of
of
of51
50
51
65
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
March10,
11,
17, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Grop
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
Page
Page
Page40
49
50
50
64of
of
of51
50
51
65
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
March10,
11,
17, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
Advanced
1915
MDAMedia
Medi
2015Group
-Group
Grop
Response
Press
Pressto
Release
Release
Motion To Quash
Page
Page
Page41
50
51
51
65of
of
of51
50
51
65
Page
of
41
Thursday,
Friday, December
March10,
11,
17, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
J-A06020-16

PENNSYLVANIA
Appellant
v.
RESIDENTS OF THE COUNTY OF
LANCASTER PENNSYLVANIA
Appellees
No. 1561 MDA 2015
Appeal from the Order Entered September 1, 2015

In the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County
Civil Division at No(s): CI-15-06985
BEFORE: LAZARUS, J., STABILE, J., and DUBOW, J.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 1st day of March, 2016, the appellants Motion for
Extension of Time (Request for Continuance) is hereby GRANTED.
The
Prothonotary is directed to reschedule oral argument on the next available

panel.
PER CURIAM

Superior Court of Pennsylvania Case No. 1915 MDA 2015 ORDER Denying Motion To Quash by Lancaster County District Attorney Until Time of Disposition April 1, 2016

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Titolo originale

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Superior Court of Pennsylvania Case No. 1915 MDA 2015 ORDER Denying Motion To Quash by Lancaster County District Attorney Until Time of Disposition April 1, 2016

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Filed 04/01/2016

Stanley J. Caterbone, et al.

Lancaster City Police

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

(C.P. Lancaster County

No. 1915 MDA 2015

Disposition of appellees motion to quash this appeal, is hereby

By Directive Of: __________________________________________

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq.